General Hindsight

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

General Hindsight (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is not a sock account, and I have no other account registered on Wikipedia. I have also not abused anything, which can be seen through my history of contributions. I use proxy to circumvent censorship filters in my country, and I would like to continue making productive contributions. Thank you. General Hindsight (talk) 14:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your first edit was to your usertalk and your second was this edit to your userpage, adding a well-known Wikipedia meme. This is obviously not your first account. Combine that with the checkuser result and the quick return to reverting edits of RashersTierney [1] [2], and we've got strong evidence of sockpuppetry.Chaser (talk) 15:34, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

General Hindsight (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been participating on Wikipedia a few years back with no registered account, which has nothing to do with this case of falsely accused sockpuppetry. I have no other accounts, and I use proxy to circumvent censorship filters in my country. I did not file a complaint about the accused sockpuppetry before because it is not true, and I mistakenly thought it would not be taken seriously. While using this account I have reverted many editors, and I reverted two of RashersTierney's edits based on my judgement that those revisions were unconstructive. I have never harassed any user, my care is for constructive contributions only. General Hindsight (talk) 16:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have been participating on Wikipedia a few years back with no registered account, which has nothing to do with this case of falsely accused sockpuppetry. I have no other accounts, and I use proxy to circumvent censorship filters in my country. I did not file a complaint about the accused sockpuppetry before because it is not true, and I mistakenly thought it would not be taken seriously. While using this account I have reverted many editors, and I reverted two of RashersTierney's edits based on my judgement that those revisions were unconstructive. I have never harassed any user, my care is for constructive contributions only. [[User:General Hindsight|General Hindsight]] ([[User talk:General Hindsight#top|talk]]) 16:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been participating on Wikipedia a few years back with no registered account, which has nothing to do with this case of falsely accused sockpuppetry. I have no other accounts, and I use proxy to circumvent censorship filters in my country. I did not file a complaint about the accused sockpuppetry before because it is not true, and I mistakenly thought it would not be taken seriously. While using this account I have reverted many editors, and I reverted two of RashersTierney's edits based on my judgement that those revisions were unconstructive. I have never harassed any user, my care is for constructive contributions only. [[User:General Hindsight|General Hindsight]] ([[User talk:General Hindsight#top|talk]]) 16:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been participating on Wikipedia a few years back with no registered account, which has nothing to do with this case of falsely accused sockpuppetry. I have no other accounts, and I use proxy to circumvent censorship filters in my country. I did not file a complaint about the accused sockpuppetry before because it is not true, and I mistakenly thought it would not be taken seriously. While using this account I have reverted many editors, and I reverted two of RashersTierney's edits based on my judgement that those revisions were unconstructive. I have never harassed any user, my care is for constructive contributions only. [[User:General Hindsight|General Hindsight]] ([[User talk:General Hindsight#top|talk]]) 16:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}