Talk:Health 2.0

Might

Might Potts HWW (2006). "Is e-health progressing faster than e-health researchers?" Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(3), e24[1] be of value to this article? Bondegezou (talk) 18:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Addition: CareFlash.com

CareFlash.com is in my opinion one of the best medical social networking sites... it provides a free service for caregivers to create an online comunity around a loved-one that is sick. I think it'd be an improvement to this article to add it to the Community Driven Social Network area. What do you think? Thanks, Klostermankl (talk) 03:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

I think CareFlash.com is very interested. What's needed is reliable sources discussing CareFlash.com or, indeed, any of the other services currently listed. Bondegezou (talk) 16:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

If CareFlash had it's own wiki page, would that be notable enough? I know that ther are articls out there from businesswire.com, the Houston Chronicle and another. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Klostermankl (talk • contribs) 00:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

If there are such articles, then they would probably be reason enough to mention it here. I'm not certain what the notability criteria are for articles about websites: try WP:WEB. Bondegezou (talk) 15:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

If you'd like to take a look at the article you can at User:Klostermankl/CareFlash at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Klostermankl/CareFlash. It's in my sand box. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Klostermankl (talk • contribs) 22:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

New reference(s)

I think we definitely need to include this new paper by Hughes et al. on Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0. Bondegezou (talk) 14:04, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I've added some material citing Hughes et al., but as a major review article, there's more of value there. Bondegezou (talk) 16:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Another article of possible use: [2] Bondegezou (talk) 10:32, 2 April 2009 (UTC)