Talk:Phrase

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 142.179.117.165 (talk) at 21:39, 25 January 2015 (Theory). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 12 years ago by 190.58.210.129 in topic Constituents
WikiProject iconLinguistics: Theoretical Linguistics Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Theoretical Linguistics Task Force.

==Edits== Edited "are" to "is" in the Construction section for grammatical accuracy. Grammar is cool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gedaechtnis (talkcontribs) 01:54, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 'Italic text'Italic text'Italic text'Italic text'Italic text'''''Reply

==Edits== Edited "are" to "is" in the Construction section for grammatical accuracy. Grammar is cool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gedaechtnis (talkcontribs) 01:54, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Constituents

Add constituent! --Suspekt-- 13:41, 10 July 2005 (UTC) how are you so stupid WIKI! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.58.210.129 (talk) 12:27, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Should it not be more clear that it isn't a sentence?

title —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.132.71.55 (talk) 13:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

sentences tree structure

Is there anybody here an expert on sentence structure? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.84.44.215 (talk) 17:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC)Reply