This article needs additional citations for verification. (May 2014) |
The Socialist Workers Party (SWP) is a communist party in the United States. The SWP began as a group which, because it supported Leon Trotsky over Soviet leader Joseph Stalin, was expelled from the Communist Party USA. Since the 1930s, it has published The Militant as a weekly newspaper. It also maintains Pathfinder Press.
Socialist Workers Party | |
---|---|
National Secretary | Jack Barnes |
Founded | January 1938 |
Split from | Socialist Party of America |
Preceded by | Workers Party of the United States |
Headquarters | 306 W. 37th Street, 13th floor New York City, New York 10018 |
Newspaper | The Militant |
Ideology | Socialism Castroism (since 1959)[1][2] Historical: Trotskyism (until 1980s) |
International affiliation | Fourth International (1938–1953) International Committee of the Fourth International (1953–1963) United Secretariat of the Fourth International (1963–1990) Pathfinder tendency (from 1990) |
Colors | Maroon |
Members in elected offices | 0 |
Website | |
themilitant | |
Until the collapse of the Soviet Union, the SWP was the largest Trotskyist organization in the United States.[citation needed] During the 1960s and 1970s, the SWP and its youth wing, the Young Socialist Alliance, were the third-largest socialist organizations, after the Communist Party USA and Students for a Democratic Society. The SWP suffered many splits and its membership declined. The modern SWP is smaller than its progeny, such as the Trotskyist Socialist Alternative and the Marxist-Leninist Party for Socialism and Liberation.
The SWP places a priority on "solidarity work" to aid strikes and is strongly supportive of Cuba. During the 2020s, the SWP has defended "Israel's right to exist" and "right to defend itself", especially during the Israel–Hamas war. This contrasts with other U.S. socialist organizations, which take an anti-Zionist position and defend Palestinian nationalism.[4]
History
editCommunist League of America
editThe SWP traces its origins back to the former Communist League of America (CLA), founded in 1928 by members of the CPUSA expelled for supporting Russian communist leader Leon Trotsky against Joseph Stalin. Concentrated almost exclusively in New York City and Minneapolis, the CLA did not have more than 100 adherents in 1929.[5] After five years of propaganda work, the CLA remained a tiny organization, with a membership of about 200 and very little influence.[6]
The rise of fascism in Nazi Germany and the failure of the communist and social democratic left to stop its rise created a situation where radical parties throughout the world reexamined their priorities and sought mechanisms for building united action. As early as December 1933, a Trotskyist splinter group called the Communist League of Struggle (CLS), headed by former Socialist Party youth section leader Albert Weisbord and his wife Vera Buch, approached Norman Thomas of the Socialist Party of America seeking a united front hunger march of the two organizations followed by a general strike.[7] This suggestion was dismissed as "poppycock" by SP Executive Secretary Clarence Senior, but the seed of the idea of joint action had been planted.[8]
Entryism
editEarly in 1934, some French Trotskyists of the Communist League conceived of the idea of entering the French Socialist Party (the Section Française de l'Internationale Ouvrière or SFIO) in order to recruit members for the Trotskyists, or so some critics have charged. The group retained its identity as a factional organization inside the SFIO and built a base among the party's youth section, continuing their activity until popular front action between the SFIO and the mainline Communist Party of France made their position untenable. This tactic of "entering" the larger social democratic parties of each country, endorsed by Trotsky himself, became known as the "French Turn" and was replicated by various Trotskyist parties around the world. In 1934, the Communist League of America merged with the American Workers Party led by A. J. Muste, forming the Workers Party of the United States.[9]: 775–778
Throughout 1935, the Workers Party was deeply divided over the "entryism" tactic called for by the "French Turn" and a bitter debate swept the organization. Ultimately, the majority faction of Jim Cannon, Max Shachtman and James Burnham won the day and the Workers Party determined to enter the Socialist Party of America. A minority faction headed by Hugo Oehler refused to accept this result and split from the organization into the Revolutionary Workers League.[9]: 779–783
The Socialist Party was itself beset with factional disagreements. The party's left-wing Militant faction sought to expand the organization into an "all-inclusive party"—inviting in members of the Lovestone and Trotskyist movements as well as radical individuals as the first step towards making the Socialist Party a mass party.[10] Although there were no mass entries at this time, several radical oppositionists did make their way into the party, including former Communist Party leader Benjamin Gitlow, youth leader and ex-Jay Lovestone supporter Herbert Zam and attorney and American Workers Party activist Albert Goldman.[8] Goldman at this time also joined with YPSL leader Ernest Erber to establish a newspaper in Chicago with a Trotskyist orientation, The Socialist Appeal, later to serve as the organ of the Trotskyists inside the Socialist Party.[11]
In January 1936, just as the National Executive Committee of the Socialist Party was expelling the Old Guard for their factional organization and alleged "violation of party discipline", James Cannon and his faction won their internal battle in the Workers Party to join the Socialist Party, when a national branch referendum voted unanimously for entry.[11] Negotiations commenced with the Socialist Party leadership, with the admissions ultimately made on the basis of individual applications for membership rather than admission of the Workers Party and its approximately 2,000 members as a group.[12] On June 6, 1936, the Workers Party's weekly newspaper, The New Militant, published its last issue and announced "Workers Party Calls All Revolutionary Workers to Join Socialist Party".[13]
They fear, in a word, that Soviet America will become the counterpart of what they have been told Soviet Russia looks like. Actually American soviets will be as different from the Russian soviets as the United States of President Roosevelt differs from the Russian Empire of Czar Nicholas II. Yet communism can come in America only through revolution, just as independence and democracy came in America.
At its inception, the entryist tactic was likely made in good faith. Historian Constance Myers writes that "initial prognoses for the union of Trotskyists and Socialists were favorable", but "constant and protracted contact caused differences to surface" later.[15] Party leader Jim Cannon later hinted that the entry of the Trotskyists into the Socialist Party had been a contrived tactic aimed at stealing "confused young Left Socialists" for his own organization.[16] The Trotskyists retained a common orientation with the radicalized Socialist Party in their opposition to the European war, their preference for industrial unionism and the Congress of Industrial Organizations over the trade unionism of the American Federation of Labor, a commitment to trade union activism, and the defense of the Soviet Union as the first workers' state, while at the same time maintaining antipathy toward Stalin's government.[17]
Cannon went to Tujunga, California, a suburb of Los Angeles, to establish another new newspaper, Labor Action, targeted to trade unionists and Socialist Party members and aimed at winning them over to Trotskyist views while Shachtman and Burnham handled the bulk of the faction's activities in New York. Norman Thomas attracted nearly 188,000 votes in his 1936 Socialist Party run for President, but performed poorly in historic strongholds of the party. Moreover, the party's membership had begun to decline.[18] The organization was deeply factionalized, with the Militant faction split into right ("Altmanite"), center ("Clarity") and left ("Appeal") factions, in addition to the radical pacifists led by Thomas. A special convention was planned for the last week of March 1937 to set the party's future policy, initially intended as an unprecedented "secret" gathering.[19]
Split from the Socialist Party of America
editPrior to the March convention, the Trotskyist Socialist Appeal faction held an organizational gathering of their own in Chicago, with 93 delegates gathering on February 20–22, 1937.[19] The meeting organized the faction on a permanent basis, electing a National Action Committee of five to "coordinate branch work" and "formulate Appeal policies".[20] Two delegates from the Clarity caucus were in attendance. James Burnham vigorously attacked the Labour and Socialist International, the international organization of left-wing parties to which the Socialist Party belonged and tension rose along these lines among the Trotskyists. United action between the Clarity and Appeal groups was not forthcoming and an emergency meeting of Vincent Dunne and Cannon was held in New York with leaders of the various factions including Thomas, Jack Altman and Gus Tyler of Clarity. At this meeting, Thomas pledged that the upcoming convention would make no effort to terminate the newspapers of the various factions.[21]
There was no action to expel the Trotskyist Appeal faction, but pressure continued to build along these lines, egged on by the Communist Party's increasingly vehement denunciations of Trotsky and his followers as wreckers and agents of international fascism. The convention passed a ban on future branch resolutions on controversial matters, an effort to rein in the activities of the factions at the local level. It also banned factional newspapers, establishing a national organ instead.[citation needed]
Constance Myers indicates that three factors led to the Trotskyists' expulsion from the Socialist Party in 1937: the divergence between the official Socialists and the Trotskyist faction on the issues, the determination of Altman's wing of the Militants to oust the Trotskyists, and Trotsky's own decision to move toward a break with the party.[22] Recognizing that the Clarity faction had chosen to stand with the Altmanites and the Thomas group, Trotsky recommended that the Appeal group focus on disagreements over Spain to provoke a split. At the same time, Thomas, freshly returned from Spain, had concluded that the Trotskyists had joined the Socialist Party not to make it stronger, but to capture it for their own purposes.[23]
On June 24–25, 1937, a meeting of the Appeal faction's National Action Committee voted to ratchet up the rhetoric against the American Labor Party and Republican nominee for mayor of New York Fiorello LaGuardia (a favorite son of many in Socialist ranks) and to reestablish their newspaper, The Socialist Appeal.[24] This was met with expulsions from the party beginning August 9 with a rump meeting of the Central Committee of Local New York, which expelled 52 New York Trotskyists by a vote of 48 to 2 (with 18 abstentions) and ordering 70 more to be brought up on charges.[24] Wholesale expulsions followed, with a major section of the Young People's Socialist League (YPSL) leaving the party with the Trotskyists.[citation needed]
The 1,000 or so Trotskyists who entered the Socialist Party in 1936 exited in the summer of 1937 with their ranks swelled by another 1,000.[25] On December 31, 1937, representatives of this faction gathered in Chicago to establish a new political organization—the Socialist Workers Party.[citation needed]
Formation of the Socialist Workers Party
editThe October 2, 1937 issue of the Socialist Appeal included a convention call from the so-called "Left Wing" to "All Locals and Branches of the Socialist Party", accusing the NEC of the party of having "betrayed the principles of socialism" by withdrawing the party's candidate for mayor of New York in favor of LaGuardia and for having ordered "the bureaucratic expulsion of all the revolutionary members of the party who oppose and obstruct this sell-out policy".[26] A convention was called by four Socialist Party State Committees, the NEC of the YPSL and the organized Left Wing organizations of Chicago and New York, originally slated for Thanksgiving weekend, November 25–28, in Chicago, but it was soon postponed until December 31 "in order to provide adequate time for discussion by the membership" of important questions.[27]
In December 1937, an agenda was published by the Convention Organizing Committee naming Cannon as the primary reporter on the Trade Union question, Shachtman on the Russian Resolution, Goldman on the Spanish Resolution, Canadian Maurice Spector on the International Resolution, Burnham on the Declaration of Principles of the new organization and Abern on Party Organization and Constitution.[28] The gathering was to conclude with the election of a new National Committee.
On December 31, over 100 regular and fraternal delegates gathered in Chicago, where they were greeted by a speech of welcome delivered by Chicago leader Albert Goldman, a labor attorney. As editor of the Trotskyist movement's ongoing theoretical magazine, The New International, Shachtman delivered the first official report to the gathering, dealing with the political situation in the United States. He declared:[29]
It is entirely inconceivable that American imperialism can succeed in resisting the inexorable tendencies that are pulling it into the vortex of the coming world war.
If the working class is unable to prevent the outbreak of war, and the United States enters directly into it, our party stands pledged to the traditional position of revolutionary Marxism.
It will utilize the crisis of capitalist rule engendered by the war to prosecute the class struggle with the utmost intransigence, to strengthen the independent labor and revolutionary movements, and to bring the war to a close by the revolutionary overthrow of capitalism and the establishment of proletarian rule in the form of the workers state.
The convention devoted a full day to discussion of the labor movement's problems and the role of the new organization in the unions, with Cannon delivering the primary report. While criticizing the "reactionary role which the AFL leadership has played", Cannon declared that "our party...takes a clear-cut position in favor of the earliest and completest possible unification of the AFL and the CIO, and also the hitherto unaffiliated Railroad Brotherhoods".[30]
1940 split
editThe 1940 split in the SWP followed an internal factional debate over the party's internal government, the class nature of the Russian state and Marxist philosophy and other questions. The SWP experienced many other factional conflicts and splits in its history, but this was the largest and foreshadowed many features of those to come.[citation needed]
The majority faction, led by Cannon, supported Trotsky's position that the Soviet Union remained a "workers' state" and should be supported in any war with capitalist states, despite their opposition to Stalin's government. The minority faction, led by Shachtman, held that the Soviet Union should not be supported in its war with Finland. One of its leaders, James Burnham, held in addition that the Soviet Union had degenerated so far that it deserved no defense whatsoever. Like this debate, most later factional disputes within the SWP centered on different attitudes toward revolutions in other countries.[9]: 793–810
The opposition faction alleged that Cannon's leadership of the SWP was "bureaucratic conservative" and demanded the right to its own publications to express its views outside the party. The majority faction said this was contrary to Lenin's concept of democratic centralism and that disagreements within the SWP should be debated only internally. Similar disagreements over the SWP's internal government have surfaced in most later faction fights, with most later opposition factions raising similar demands and accusations. Despite this, most of these later factions claimed political descent from Cannon and the SWP majority, not from earlier opposition factions and splinter parties.[9]: 793–810
The minority faction led by Shachtman eventually split away almost 40% of the party's membership and 80% of its youth organization, the Young People's Socialist League, forming the Workers Party.[31][9]: 793–810
World War II
editA number of members were imprisoned under the Smith Act of 1941, under Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration, including Cannon (see Smith Act Trials).[32] Those imprisoned included the main national leaders of the SWP and those members most prominent in the Midwest Teamsters. With Roosevelt's decision to increase the power of the FBI during this time, the arrests were made swiftly.[33]
The party put into practice the so-called Proletarian Military Policy of opposing the war politically while attempting to transform what they saw as an imperialist war into a civil war. The party lost a number of its members while sailing in extremely perilous convoys to Murmansk. Problems caused by some experienced leaders' imprisonment and many others' enlistment in the armed forces meant that the editorship of The Militant passed through a number of hands during the war.[citation needed]
The SWP was active in supporting labor strikes that occurred despite the wartime "no-strike pledge" and protests against racist discrimination during the war, such as A. Philip Randolph's March on Washington Movement.[9]: 824–825 The SWP maintained that the Fair Employment Practice Committee was insufficient to address racist discrimination.[9]: 824–825 The Post Office refused to mail some issues of The Militant and threatened to cancel its third-class mailing permit, citing objections to its articles calling for violent overthrow of the government. The SWP said it was being persecuted for opposing racist discrimination.[citation needed]
Postwar years
editAfter the war, the SWP and the Fourth International both expected that there would be a wave of revolutionary struggles like those that accompanied the end of the previous war. Indeed, revolutions did occur in Yugoslavia, Albania, Korea and China, to name only those that resulted in the overthrow of capitalism, but contrary to Trotskyist expectations they were headed by Moscow-oriented "Stalinist" parties.[citation needed]
The largest strike wave in United States history, involving over five million workers, occurred with the end of the war and the wartime pledge made by many union leaders not to strike for the duration, but this did not mean there were not many strikes during wartime as there were many wildcat strikes during this period as well as strikes officially called by the United Mine Workers of America. There were also protests by GIs demanding rapid demobilization after the end of the war, sometimes called the going-home movement. The SWP participation in this upsurge led to a brief period of rapid growth for the SWP immediately after the war.[9]: 825
The end of the war also saw the reorganization of the Fourth International in which the SWP played a major role. As part of this process, moves were made to heal the breach with Shachtman's supporters in the Workers Party (WP) and for the two groups to fuse. This eventually came to nothing, but some SWP members who supported the views of Felix Morrow and Albert Goldman grew dissatisfied with what they saw as the SWP's ultra-leftist attitude towards revolutionary policies. Eventually, they left the SWP in a state of demoralization and some joined the WP.[citation needed]
Meanwhile, a faction within the WP called the Johnson-Forest Tendency, named for C. L. R. James (known as Johnson) and Raya Dunayevskaya (Forest), was impatient with the WP's caution and felt the situation could rapidly become pre-revolutionary. This led them to leave the WP and rejoin the SWP in 1947. This tendency had moved further away from the "orthodox Trotskyism" of the SWP, producing tension. For example, they continued to hold the position that the Soviet Union was a "state capitalist" society. By 1951, their presence in the SWP was ever more anomalous and most left to form the Correspondence Publishing Committee. Dunayevskaya and her supporters eventually formed the News and Letters Committees in 1955 after splitting with James, who was deported from the United States to Britain, where he continued to advise the Correspondence Publishing Committee, which split again in 1962, with those loyal to James taking the name Facing Reality.[citation needed]
Cold War period
editThe brief postwar wave of labor unrest gave way to the conservatism of the 1950s, the reform of previously radical labor unions and McCarthyism. The SWP's attempt at entryism into the growing civil rights movement, which continued uninterrupted out of World War II, could not fully offset these trends and the SWP experienced a period of decline and isolation.[citation needed]
The party also had a number of splits over these years. One saw the departure of the faction of Bert Cochran and Clarke, who formed the American Socialist Union, which lasted until 1959. That 1953 opposition supported some of the positions of Michel Pablo, the Secretary of the Fourth International, although Pablo disagreed with their wish to dissolve the Fourth International.[citation needed]
The next, smaller split was that of Sam Marcy's Global Class War faction, which called within the SWP for support of Henry Wallace's Progressive Party presidential run in 1948 and regarded Mao Zedong as a revolutionary leader. This faction ended up leaving the SWP in 1958 after supporting the suppression of the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, a position contrary to that of the SWP and other Trotskyist tendencies. It went on to form the Workers World Party.[citation needed]
Meanwhile, throughout the 1950s and into the 1960s the remaining members of the SWP clung to its firmly held beliefs and grew older. Consequently, the party membership shrank over these years from a postwar high in 1948 until the tide began to turn in the early 1960s. The Cuban Revolution signaled a change in the SWP's political direction as it embarked on pro-Castro "solidarity work" through the Fair Play for Cuba Committee. The result was a small accretion of youth to the party's ranks. In the same period, longtime SWP leader Murry Weiss won another group of youth from the Shachtmanites as they joined the Socialist Party of America. Many of the new recruits were drawn from the student movement, unlike those who had led the party since the 1930s; as a result, the party's internal culture began to change.[citation needed]
1960s
editDespite such growing signs of an end to the isolation the group endured during the McCarthyite period, it experienced a new split in the early 1960s. A number of small oppositional groups developed within the party.[citation needed]
One of the key issues was the Cuban Revolution and the SWP's response to it. Cannon and other SWP leaders such as Joseph Hansen saw Cuba as qualitatively different from the Stalinist states of Eastern Europe. Their analysis brought them closer to the International Secretariat of the Fourth International (ISFI), from which the SWP had split in 1953.[9]: 334–335
The SWP successfully negotiated a reunification of the ISFI and the International Committee of the Fourth International, leading to the creation in 1963 of the reunified Fourth International. Two sections of the ICFI, including Gerry Healy's Socialist Labour League, rejected the merger and turned against the SWP leadership, working with opponents within the party.[citation needed]
The most important faction opposing the SWP leadership's new line was the Revolutionary Tendency (RT), led by James Robertson and Tim Wohlforth, which rejected the SWP's "capitulation" to Pabloism and opposed joining the USFI. It was critical of the Castro government, arguing that Cuba remained a "deformed workers' state". But a split developed within this faction between groups headed by the two men. Nonetheless, both the RT and the Reorganized Minority Tendency split to form the Spartacist (see Spartacist League) and the American Committee for the Fourth International, respectively, with the latter becoming aligned with Healy's SLL.[9]: 923–929
In the aftermath, the Seattle branch also left to found the Freedom Socialist Party after protesting the alleged suppression of internal democracy, as did Murray and Myra Tanner Weiss.[9]: 937–938 These groups later attempted to create the Committee for a Revolutionary Socialist Party.[citation needed]
The SWP supported both the civil rights movement and the black nationalist movement that grew during the 1960s. It particularly praised the militancy of black nationalist leader Malcolm X, who in turn spoke at the SWP's public forums and gave an interview to Young Socialist magazine. After his assassination, the SWP had limited success in forming alliances with his followers and other black nationalists. But these movements were part of the radicalization that aided the SWP's growth.[9]: 856–858
The SWP provided a political ideology for African Americans seeking equality in the early 20th century. Black nationalists were in favor of socialist policy and ideas. During the 1960s, the SWP had begun nominating African American candidates for president. The SWP hoped to change American values and ensure each citizen had equal rights under the law. "Many black nationalists turned to the Socialist Workers Party because the SWP proposed that its black members collaborate with other militant African Americans", according to a group of historians studying the public service of African Americans.[34] The SWP expanded the ideas of nationalism to African Americans and arguably expanded black nationalism for generations.[35]
Like many other left-wing groups, the SWP grew during the 1960s and experienced particularly brisk growth in early 1970s. Much of this was due to its involvement in many of the campaigns and demonstrations against the war in Vietnam. The SWP advocated that the antiwar movement call for the immediate withdrawal of all American troops and focus on organizing large, legal demonstrations for this demand. It was recognized by friend and foe alike as a major factor influencing the direction of the antiwar movement along these lines. One of the leaders of the antiwar movement at this time, along with Dave Dellinger and many others, was Fred Halstead, a World War II veteran and former leader of the garment workers union in New York City. Halstead was the SWP's 1968 presidential nominee and visited Vietnam in that capacity.[citation needed]
The SWP was also increasingly outspoken in its defense of Castro's government and its identification with that government. A new leadership led by Jack Barnes (who became national secretary in 1972) made identification with Cuba an ever-greater part of the SWP's politics throughout the 1970s.[9]: 853
The party also published many of Trotsky's works in these years through its publishing house, Pathfinder Press. Not only were the better-known writings reprinted, many for the first time since the 1930s, but other more obscure articles and letters were collected and printed for a wider audience than they had when first distributed. The expansion of the press also allowed the SWP to host Intercontinental Press, the FI magazine that moved from Paris to New York in 1969, which later merged with Inprecor.[citation needed]
1970s and new leadership
editThe growth of labor militancy in the early 1970s affected the SWP and currents developed within it urging a reorientation of the party toward this militancy. One such current was the Proletarian Orientation Tendency, which included Larry Trainor, and eventually dissolved.[9]: 875–876
The international tensions developed further when the SWP and its co-thinkers established the Leninist Trotskyist Tendency in 1973 in order to contribute to the debate for the Tenth World Congress. It argued for a reversal of the Latin American guerrilla war orientation adopted at the Ninth World Congress. This period was the peak of the SWP's growth and influence. The party continued its involvement in the movement against the war in Vietnam, which peaked in 1970–1971. The SWP also supported Chicano nationalism, including the Raza Unida Party. It helped organize protests demanding legal abortion through the Women's National Abortion Action Coalition. With the mid-to-late 1970s decline of these movements and the end of the 1960s–1970s youth radicalization, SWP membership and influence went into decline.[9]: 867–868
In 1974, the Internationalist Tendency (IT) developed. The IT posed a greater challenge to the SWP leadership's relationship with the Fourth International, as the IT agreed with the Fourth International's advocacy of guerrilla warfare as a "tactic on a continental scale" in Latin America. But despite tensions between the SWP and the International, when the SWP expelled the IT, the International refused to side with the IT. In 1974, the SWP expelled 115 members of the IT, the largest split since 1953.[36] The IT disintegrated over the next few months, some of its supporters finding their way back into the SWP.[9]: 875–876
In 1978, the SWP leadership decided that the key task was for party members to make a turn to industry. This turn entailed party members getting jobs in blue-collar industries in preparation for, the SWP leadership projected, increasing mass struggles. The 1977–1978 coal miners' strike and developments like Steelworkers Fight Back were among the events pointed to in arguing for this change in policy. Party members sought to get jobs in the same workplaces in order to work as organized "fractions", doing "communist political work" as well as union activity.[citation needed]
As a result, many members were asked to move and change jobs, often out of established careers and into low-paying jobs in small towns. Many of the older members with experience in trade unions resisted this "colonization program", which upset their established routine in the unions, as did some of the younger members.[citation needed]
1980s and after
editInternal affairs
editOpposition to the "turn to industry" developed within the SWP. This opposition was not homogeneous and was itself beset by differences among different factions.
A further factor in the growing divisions within the SWP was the move by Jack Barnes, Mary-Alice Waters and others in the leadership away from the Trotskyist label. In 1982, Barnes gave a speech, later published as Their Trotsky and Ours: Communist Continuity Today, in which he rejected Trotsky's theory of permanent revolution, arguing that it failed to sufficiently distinguish between the democratic and socialist tasks of a workers' revolution. Barnes argued that anticapitalist revolutions typically began with a "workers' and farmers' government" that initially concentrated on bourgeois-democratic measures and only later moved on to the abolition of capitalism.[citation needed]
Barnes also argued that the Trotskyist label unnecessarily distinguished leftists in that tradition from leftists of other origins, such as the Cuban Communist Party or the Sandinista National Liberation Front. He argued that the SWP had more in common with these organizations than with many groups calling themselves Trotskyist. The SWP has continued to publish numerous books by Trotsky and advocate a number of ideas commonly associated with Trotskyism, including Trotsky's analysis of Stalinism.[citation needed]
The opposition factions continued to support the theory of permanent revolution and the Trotskyist label: they anticipated that the SWP leadership was reassessing its place in the Fourth International. While declaring their support for the Cuban and the leftist Nicaraguan governments, they were more critical of the Castroist and Sandinista leadership. They also continued to oppose the "turn to industry".[citation needed]
One opposition group rallied around the Weinsteins on the West Coast (with supporters elsewhere too), while another rallied around George Breitman and Frank Lovell. Together they formed an opposition bloc on the SWP's National Committee, but in 1983 both groups were expelled. The opposition factions, having split from the SWP, formed new organizations. The Weinstein group formed the San Francisco-based Socialist Action. The Breitman-Lovell group after a time formed the Fourth Internationalist Tendency. Both groups called themselves "public factions" of the SWP and set the task of recapturing the SWP to their understanding of Trotskyism. Another group, mainly in Los Angeles, had been close to Breitman, belonged briefly to Socialist Action, and left to join the "regroupment" organization Solidarity.[9]: 886–895
This was the most recent split or major faction fight in the SWP.[citation needed]
Activities
editThe SWP's most high-profile and controversial campaign in the late 1980s and early 1990s was its Mark Curtis Defense Committee, established after Curtis, an SWP activist and trade union organizer, was charged and convicted on burglary and rape charges in 1988. The party claimed that Curtis had been framed by police for his role in defending immigrant workers. Curtis was eventually paroled, but he was later arrested in Chicago on prostitution-related charges and then expelled from the SWP.[citation needed]
The SWP now focuses much of its energy on raising awareness about socialist ideas by running political candidates for office, holding weekly Militant Labor Forums and distributing The Militant, a socialist weekly, as well as Pathfinder books, many of which feature Barnes's speeches and writings. SWP members are present in a handful of trade unions and take part in such activities as promoting Cuban solidarity, joining striking workers' picket lines, actions against racism and police brutality, opposing US imperialist wars, defending the Bundy family, speaking out against attacks on democratic rights, and promoting the creation of a broad-based labor party.[citation needed]
On November 5, 2022, during the California abortion proposition debate, Betsey Stone announced the SWP's opposition to the constitutional amendment in The Militant, arguing that "we need to fight to make abortion rarer by changing the social conditions that have led to its widespread use".[37]
1990s and after: Internal peace and decline
editThe SWP has experienced an unusually long period of internal peace since, although it has declined steadily in both membership and political influence on the American left. Numerous recent expulsions—sometimes of long-standing SWP veterans—have contributed to the membership decline.[citation needed] In 2003, the party sold its major headquarters building in New York City for $20 million and moved to another location in Manhattan. Party leaders Barnes and Mary-Alice Waters subsequently sold their West Village condominium for $1.87 million.[38]
COINTELPRO and FBI infiltration
editAccording to the Church Committee report of 1976, the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had investigated the SWP since 1940 and, in 1961, initiated a COINTELPRO program against it. The FBI said it had targeted the SWP because of its support for "such causes as Castro's Cuba and integration problems arising in the South". Under the COINTELPRO operation the FBI collected information about SWP members' political views, conducted up to 92 break-ins of the SWP's offices, and interfered in elections to damage SWP candidates' campaigns. FBI officials testified to the Church Committee that the SWP has "not been responsible for any violent acts nor has it urged actions constituting an indictable incitement to violence".[39]
Between 1960 and 1976, the FBI used 1,300 informants against the SWP and YSA, including 300 SWP/YSA members. The FBI's highest-placed member was Ed Heisler, who was a member of the SWP National Committee from 1977 to 1979.[9]: 836–837 In 1986, the party won a lawsuit against the FBI as a result of years of spying and disruption.[40] It was also found that Herbert Hill of the NAACP, a former SWP member, was an informant on the party after he left in the 1940s.[41]
International affiliation
editDue to legal constraints, the SWP ended its formal affiliation with the Fourth International in the 1940s. It remained in close political solidarity with the Fourth International.[citation needed]
The SWP broke formally with the Fourth International in 1990, though it had been increasingly inactive in the Trotskyist movement since Barnes's 1982 speech "Their Trotsky and Ours", which some view as signaling a break with Trotskyism. The SWP action followed the 1985 World Congress and the SWP closed Intercontinental Press in 1986.[citation needed] The SWP's international formation is sometimes called the Pathfinder tendency because they each operate a Pathfinder Bookstore that sells the publications of the SWP's publishing arm, Pathfinder Press.[citation needed]
Election results
editNo SWP candidate has yet won a major contested, partisan election.
Presidential elections
editThe SWP has run candidates for President since 1948. It received its greatest number of votes in 1976, when its candidate Peter Camejo received 90,310 votes.
Notable members
editNational Secretaries
edit- James P. Cannon (1938–1953)
- Farrell Dobbs (1953–1972)
- Jack Barnes (since 1972)
Prominent current and former members
edit- Martin Abern
- Harry Braverman
- George Breitman
- Alice Brock
- James Burnham
- Peter Camejo
- Grace Carlson
- Joseph Carter
- Bert Cochran
- Jake Cooper
- Stephanie Coontz
- Clifton DeBerry
- Farrell Dobbs
- Hal Draper
- Raya Dunayevskaya
- James T. Farrell
- Eric Flint
- Clara Fraser
- Richard Fraser
- Albert Goldman
- Joseph Hansen
- Sidney Hook
- C. L. R. James
- Martin Koppel
- Lyndon LaRouche
- Frank Lovell
- Sam Marcy
- Kathleen Mickells
- Paul Montauk
- Felix Morrow
- George Novack
- Evelyn Reed
- Harry Ring
- James Robertson
- Olga Rodriguez
- Max Shachtman
- Ed Shaw
- Carl Skoglund
- Morris Starsky
- Arne Swabeck
- Larry Trainor
- Mary-Alice Waters
- Eduard Limonov
- David Loeb Weiss
- Myra Tanner Weiss
- George Lavan Weissman
- Constance Weissman
- Herbert Hill
See also
editNotes
edit- ^ In 2008, as in 2004, Róger Calero was constitutionally unqualified for the presidency because Calero is not an American citizen, so James Harris ran as an alternate in some states.
- ^ 5,151 votes for Calero-Kennedy, 2,424 for Harris-Kennedy.
- ^ In 2004, as in 1972, both Róger Calero Arrin Hawkins were constitutionally unqualified for the presidency because Calero is not an American citizen and Hawkins was 29 years old, with the minimum age being 35. James Harris and Margaret Trowe, the SWP's ticket from 2000, stood in on the ballot in some states where Calero and Hawkins could not be listed.
- ^ 3,677 votes for Calero-Hawkins, 7,411 for Harris-Trowe.
- ^ Because DeBerry did not qualify for ballot access in some states, Andrew Pulley ran as an alternate in California, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, New Jersey, New Mexico and South Dakota, and Richard Congress in Ohio.
- ^ 38,738 for DeBerry-Zimmerman, 6,264 for Pulley-Zimmerman, 4,029 for Congress-Zimmerman.
- ^ In 1972, Jenness was constitutionally unqualified for the presidency (under Article II, section 1) because Jenness was 31 years old. As a result, Evelyn Reed and Clifton DeBerry ran as alternates in Indiana, New York and Wisconsin.
- ^ 83,380 for Jenness-Pulley, of which 30,579 votes in Arizona due to ballot malfunction, yielding 52,801; and 13,878 for Reed-DeBerry.
Footnotes
edit- ^ "Balance Sheet on the Socialist Workers Party (U.S.A.)". September 2, 1990. Retrieved January 5, 2022.
- ^ "About Us". Retrieved June 27, 2023.
- ^ "The fight against Jew-hatred and pogroms in the imperialist epoch". April 29, 2024. Retrieved November 23, 2024.
- ^ "Fight against Jew-hatred! Defend Israel's right to exist, defend itself". February 5, 2024.
- ^ George Breitman, "Answers to Questions," in The Founding of the Socialist Workers Party: Minutes and Resolutions, 1938-39. New York: Monad Press, 1982; pg. 19.
- ^ George Breitman, "Answers to Questions," pg. 21.
- ^ Constance Ashton Myers, The Prophet's Army: Trotskyists in America, 1928-1941. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1977; pg. 112.
- ^ a b Myers, The Prophet's Army, pg. 112.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Robert, Alexander (1991). International Trotskyism: A Documented Analysis of the World Movement. Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0822309758.
- ^ Constance Myers attributes this idea to Militant leader Paul Porter and dates it to 1934.
- ^ a b Myers, The Prophet's Army, pg. 113.
- ^ Myers, The Prophet's Army, pp. 113-114.
- ^ Myers, The Prophet's Army, pg. 115.
- ^ "Leon Trotsky: If America Should Go Communist (1934)". www.marxists.org.
- ^ Myers, The Prophet's Army, pg. 123.
- ^ Cannon, James P. (1944). The History of American Trotskyism. New York: Pioneer Press. pp. 195–196. ISBN 978-0873489546.
If we had stood aside, the Stalinists would have gobbled up the Socialist Left Wing and it would have been used as another club against us, as in Spain.
- ^ Myers, The Prophet's Army, pg. 124.
- ^ Myers, The Prophet's Army, pp. 126-127.
- ^ a b Myers, The Prophet's Army, pg. 127.
- ^ The committee included Vincent Dunne, Albert Goldman, Max Shachtman, and Richard Babb Whitten. Myers, The Prophet's Army, pp. 128-129.
- ^ Myers, The Prophet's Army, pg. 131.
- ^ Myers, The Prophet's Army, pg. 133.
- ^ Myers, The Prophet's Army, pg. 138.
- ^ a b Myers, The Prophet's Army, pg. 139.
- ^ Myers, The Prophet's Army, pg. 140.
- ^ "Left Wing Issues Convention Call: NY and Chicago Join Four State Committees in National Appeal, Socialist Appeal, v. 1, no. 8 (Oct. 2, 1937), pg. 1.
- ^ "Convention Postponed for Wider Discussions," Socialist Appeal, v. 1, no. 12 (Oct. 30, 1937), pg. 1.
- ^ "Convention Date Near, Locals Elect Delegates," Socialist Appeal, v. 1, no. 19 (Dec. 18, 1937), pg. 3.
- ^ "Left Wing Delegates Found Socialist Workers Party at Convention in Chicago," Socialist Appeal, v. II, no. 2 (Jan. 8, 1938), pg. 1.
- ^ "Left Wing Delegates Found Socialist Workers Party at Convention in Chicago," pg. 2.
- ^ Myers, Constance (August 13, 1977). "American Trotskyists: The First Years". Studies in Comparative Communism. 10 (1/2 (Spring/Summer 1977)): 133–151. doi:10.1016/S0039-3592(77)80080-X. JSTOR 45367167.
Shachtman took out with him 40 percent of the membership, but this included 80 percent of the Trotskyist youth and left the party the minuscule sect it had been in Communist League of America years before 1934.34
- ^ Lipset, Seymour Martin. (2000). It didn't happen here : why socialism failed in the United States. Marks, Gary, 1952- (1st ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Co. ISBN 0-393-04098-4. OCLC 43403442.
- ^ Haverty-Stacke, Donna T. (June 1, 2013). ""Punishment of Mere Political Advocacy": The FBI, Teamsters Local 544, and the Origins of the 1941 Smith Act Case". Journal of American History. 100 (1): 68–93. doi:10.1093/jahist/jat083. ISSN 0021-8723.
- ^ Glasrud, Bruce A.; Wintz, Cary D. (2009). African Americans and the Presidency: The Road to the White House. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 77–92.
- ^ Scott, Daryl Michael (2012). "How Black Nationalism Became Sui Generis". Fire!!!. 1 (2): 6–63. doi:10.5323/fire.1.2.0006. ISSN 2156-4078. JSTOR 10.5323/fire.1.2.0006.
- ^ "The SWP—A Strangled Party". Spartacist. Summer 1986. Archived from the original on December 9, 2008.
- ^ Stone, Betsey (November 5, 2022). "California referendum is blow to women's emancipation". The Militant. Oakland. Archived from the original on November 6, 2022. Retrieved November 6, 2022.
- ^ Abelson, Max (July 10, 2007). "Communists Capitalize on Village Sale—Get $1.87 M. for Loft". New York Observer. Archived from the original on October 2, 2008.
- ^ "Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans – Church Committee final report" (PDF). II. United States Senate. April 26, 1976. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 18, 2014. Retrieved May 25, 2022.
- ^ Dan Jakopovich, The FBI Against the US SWP Archived 2008-12-27 at the Wayback Machine, Socialist Outlook, Spring 2008
- ^ Phelps, Christopher (November 1, 2012). "Herbert Hill and the Federal Bureau of Investigation". Labor History. 53 (4): 561–570. doi:10.1080/0023656x.2012.732757. ISSN 0023-656X. S2CID 144415103 – via Academic Search Ultimate.
- ^ "Federal Elections 2020" (PDF). Federal Election Commission. October 2022. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 4, 2022.
- ^ "Federal Elections 2016" (PDF). Federal Election Commission. December 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 2, 2019.
- ^ "Federal Elections 2012" (PDF). Federal Election Commission. July 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 2, 2019.
- ^ "Federal Elections 2008" (PDF). Federal Election Commission. July 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 2, 2019.
- ^ Berg-Andersson, Richard; Roza, Tony (December 1, 2009). "The Green Papers: 2008 General Election". Archived from the original on September 18, 2008.
- ^ "Federal Elections 2004" (PDF). Federal Election Commission. July 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 2, 2019.
- ^ "Federal Elections 00" (PDF). Federal Election Commission. July 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 2, 2019.
- ^ "Federal Elections 96" (PDF). Federal Election Commission. July 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 2, 2019.
- ^ "Federal Elections 92" (PDF). Federal Election Commission. July 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 2, 2019.
- ^ "Federal Elections 88" (PDF). Federal Election Commission. July 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 2, 2019.
- ^ "Federal Elections 84" (PDF). Federal Election Commission. July 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 2, 2019.
- ^ "Statistics of the Presidential and Congressional Election of 1980" (PDF). Clerk of the United States House of Representatives. April 1981. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 28, 2008.
- ^ "Statistics of the Presidential and Congressional Election of 1976" (PDF). Clerk of the United States House of Representatives. April 1977. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 28, 2008.
- ^ "Statistics of the Presidential and Congressional Election of 1972" (PDF). Clerk of the United States House of Representatives. April 1973. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 28, 2008.
- ^ "Statistics of the Presidential and Congressional Election of 1968" (PDF). Clerk of the United States House of Representatives. April 1969. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 28, 2008.
- ^ "Statistics of the Presidential and Congressional Election of 1964" (PDF). Clerk of the United States House of Representatives. April 1965. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 28, 2008.
- ^ "Statistics of the Presidential and Congressional Election of 1960" (PDF). Clerk of the United States House of Representatives. April 1961. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 28, 2008.
- ^ "Statistics of the Presidential and Congressional Election of 1956" (PDF). Clerk of the United States House of Representatives. April 1957. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 28, 2008.
- ^ "Statistics of the Presidential and Congressional Election of 1952" (PDF). Clerk of the United States House of Representatives. April 1953. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 28, 2008.
- ^ "Statistics of the Presidential and Congressional Election of 1948" (PDF). Clerk of the United States House of Representatives. April 1949. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 28, 2008.
Further reading
editBooks
edit- Breitman, George (ed.) Founding of the Socialist Workers Party: Minutes and Resolutions, 1938-39. New York: Monad Press, 1982.
- Cannon, James P., The History of American Trotskyism: Report of a Participant. New York: Pioneer Press, 1944.
- Fields, A. Belden, Trotskyism and Maoism: Theory and Practice in France and the United States. Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia, 1988. ISBN 0-936756-29-2.
- Halstead, Fred, Out Now!: A Participant's Account of the Movement in the United States Against the Vietnam War. New York: Monad Press, 1978.
- Jayko, Margaret (ed.), FBI on Trial: The Victory in the Socialist Workers Party Suit Against Government Spying. New York: Pathfinder Press, 1988.
- LeBlanc, Paul; Bryan Palmer, and Thomas Bias (eds.), US Trotskyism, 1928-1965. In Three Volumes. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2019.
- McDonald, Larry, Trotskyism and Terror: The Strategy of Revolution. Washington, D.C.: ACU Education and Research Institute, 1977.
- Myers, Constance Ashton, The Prophet's Army: Trotskyists in America, 1928-1941. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1977.
- Sheppard, Barry, The Party: The Socialist Workers Party, 1960-1988. A Political Memoir. Volume 1: The Sixties. Chippendale, Australia: Resistance Books, 2005.
- Sheppard, Barry, The Party: The Socialist Workers Party, 1960-1988. A Political Memoir. Volume 2: Interregnum, Decline, and Collapse, 1973-1988. Chippendale, Australia: Resistance Books, 2012. ISBN 978-0-902869-59-2.
- Wohlforth, Tim, The Prophet's Children: Travels on the American Left. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanity Press, 1994.
Archival material
edit- George Breitman Papers. Tamiment Library and Robert F. Wagner Archives at New York University, New York. Finding Aid.
- James P. Cannon Papers. Wisconsin Historical Society, Madison. Also available on microfilm.
- Frank Lovell Papers. Tamiment Library and Robert F. Wagner Archives, New York University. Finding Aid.
- Max Shachtman Papers. Tamiment Library and Robert F. Wagner Archives, New York University. Finding Aid.
- David Loeb Weiss Papers. Tamiment Library and Robert F. Wagner Archives, New York University.
- Myra Tanner Weiss Papers. Tamiment Library and Robert F. Wagner Archives, New York University.
- Socialist Workers Party records 1928-1990. Hoover Institution for War and Peace, Stanford, California. Finding aid.
- Melba Windoffer Papers. Labor Archives of Washington, University of Washington. Finding Aid.
- George E. Rennar Papers. Labor Archives of Washington, University of Washington. Finding Aid.
External links
edit- The Militant homepage
- Pathfinder Press homepage
- James P. Cannon Internet Archive. Marxists Internet Archive.
- University of Washington Libraries Digital Collections - Vietnam War Era Ephemera. Includes ephemera produced by the SWP.
- Catalogue of the SWP publications within Tony Whelan's papers. Held at the Modern Records Centre, University of Warwick.