User contributions for N-HH

20 January 2019

• 17:5817:58, 20 January 2019 diff hist +28 m Dash →top: Consistent/better grammar & slightly clearer
• 09:2109:21, 20 January 2019 diff hist −141 Dash →top: Restore recently changed wording in lead. Either dash can be used here. Source not needed either, and misleading anyway as only relates to emdash. Better sourcing already there in main body

1 September 2018

• 22:2322:23, 1 September 2018 diff hist +939 User talk:N-HH →Nomination of Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta for deletion: Absolute moron
• 14:1314:13, 1 September 2018 diff hist +457 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta →Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta: +
• 13:3813:38, 1 September 2018 diff hist +13 m Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta →top: sort link
• 13:3713:37, 1 September 2018 diff hist +881 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta →Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta
• 13:2713:27, 1 September 2018 diff hist +1,306 Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta Expand a bit and improve references Tag: ProveIt edit
• 10:5310:53, 1 September 2018 diff hist +1,301 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta →Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta: K

5 June 2018

• 09:3609:36, 5 June 2018 diff hist +1,136 Talk:Seumas Milne →USSR/Bullough

4 June 2018

• 09:2709:27, 4 June 2018 diff hist +1,901 Talk:Seumas Milne →USSR/Bullough

2 June 2018

• 16:4016:40, 2 June 2018 diff hist +762 Talk:Seumas Milne →USSR/Bullough: new section
• 16:3116:31, 2 June 2018 diff hist −1,595 Seumas Milne Is he an expert on Seumas Milne though, the actual topic of the page? Also your blanket revert reversed other changes for no apparent reason. As noted, please read and use the talk page. Thanks Tag: Undo
• 10:0610:06, 2 June 2018 diff hist −121 Seumas Milne →On Putin and Russia: Not sure Pilger and Murray need to be mentioned here (and again, not sure this para of polemical criticism is relevant at all)
• 10:0510:05, 2 June 2018 diff hist 0 Seumas Milne →On Putin and Russia: Not sure this para needs to be here at all, but it certainly shouldn't head up this subsection
• 10:0310:03, 2 June 2018 diff hist −565 Seumas Milne →On Putin and Russia: Rm commentary re the break-up of the USSR. Nothing to do with Milne per se
• 09:5809:58, 2 June 2018 diff hist +45 m Talk:Seumas Milne →Milne's articles following Kremlin's line: + re "emails"
• 09:3609:36, 2 June 2018 diff hist −909 Seumas Milne Undid revision 843944771 See talk, where most people seem to accept that, yes, we do not stuff BLPs with every obscure piece of random, speculative, politically motivated criticism Tag: Undo
• 09:3409:34, 2 June 2018 diff hist +863 Talk:Seumas Milne →Milne's articles following Kremlin's line

26 May 2018

• 10:0810:08, 26 May 2018 diff hist −909 Seumas Milne Perhaps to a debate about Russia, if you're going to cite partisan mud-slinging as part of it, but not to a factual biography of Milne. There's a talk page section about this Tag: Undo

25 May 2018

• 08:1108:11, 25 May 2018 diff hist +656 Talk:Seumas Milne →Commentary and bias again
• 08:0708:07, 25 May 2018 diff hist +144 Seumas Milne →Journalism

24 May 2018

• 21:3721:37, 24 May 2018 diff hist −963 Seumas Milne Rvt to pre-PC changes. A lot more of the commentary here needs to be removed to stop this being a pointless attack page rather than a bio actually explaining who Milne is and what he thinks
• 21:3421:34, 24 May 2018 diff hist +1,428 Talk:Seumas Milne →Commentary and bias again: new section

8 April 2018

• 13:2213:22, 8 April 2018 diff hist −50 Matt Taibbi →The eXile: Belatedly removing this clear piece of OR interpretation/comment. It's now 3 v 1 pointing out that this goes beyond what is explicitly in source. No consensus to keep
• 11:4111:41, 8 April 2018 diff hist +542 Talk:Fascism →Incorrect placement on left-right spectrum

2 April 2018

• 17:5017:50, 2 April 2018 diff hist +2 m Sannhet Update maths

18 February 2018

• 15:5115:51, 18 February 2018 diff hist +1,647 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style →Discussion on ENGVAR template proposal

15 February 2018

• 22:0822:08, 15 February 2018 diff hist +819 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style →Survey on ENGVAR template proposal: S

11 February 2018

• 19:0519:05, 11 February 2018 diff hist −35 Cornwall →top: Rm tag added without any explanation of what the problem is
• 19:0419:04, 11 February 2018 diff hist −492 Cornwall →Prehistory, Roman and post-Roman periods: Rm recent addition that seems a bit of a confused leap from the cited source

2 January 2018

• 17:1917:19, 2 January 2018 diff hist +1,014 Talk:Matt Taibbi →Exile, again
• 13:0413:04, 2 January 2018 diff hist +234 m Talk:Matt Taibbi →Exile, again: tweak/add
• 12:4812:48, 2 January 2018 diff hist +608 Talk:Max Boot →Conservative in lead
• 12:4412:44, 2 January 2018 diff hist +964 Talk:Matt Taibbi →Exile, again

1 January 2018

• 14:4514:45, 1 January 2018 diff hist +832 Talk:Max Boot →Conservative in lead: new section
• 14:3814:38, 1 January 2018 diff hist −46 Matt Taibbi →The eXile: That is not "playing it straight", but interpretation added in WP's voice. The article says nothing about "other harassment" or Taibbi not apologising for its

29 December 2017

• 14:1714:17, 29 December 2017 diff hist +15 Max Boot The "neoconservative" label, by contrast, is not uncontroversial. And even if he is one, he is also a conservative, so let's stick with that broader and more widely acknowledged one
• 14:1514:15, 29 December 2017 diff hist +875 Talk:Matt Taibbi →Exile, again

28 December 2017

• 22:1022:10, 28 December 2017 diff hist +726 Talk:Matt Taibbi →Exile, again: new section
• 22:0422:04, 28 December 2017 diff hist −312 Matt Taibbi Disagree on both counts: simply saying "describe[s]" suggests veracity; quote is totally undue and marginal, and controversy re Taibbi himself is perfectly well explained without it. Talk page to carry this on thanks
• 22:0122:01, 28 December 2017 diff hist +51 Max Boot The fact that he is a conservative is both uncontroversial and useful information
• 10:3710:37, 28 December 2017 diff hist −98 Max Boot Although on reflection not sure this one-off quote, originally buried in random op-ed, needs to be highlighted as second point in lead
• 10:3310:33, 28 December 2017 diff hist +35 Max Boot →top: "conservative" is probably worth stating from outset. Also trying to repair WSJ link
• 10:2310:23, 28 December 2017 diff hist −66 Max Boot →top: Rm "American values" from lead. Literally do not know what that means, and if it means anything, it presumably is covered by what the next sentence says anyway re "ideals"
• 10:2210:22, 28 December 2017 diff hist +25 Matt Taibbi →The eXile: +
• 10:2010:20, 28 December 2017 diff hist +27 Matt Taibbi →The eXile: clarify that Taibbi did not even write the bits in qu
• 10:1910:19, 28 December 2017 diff hist −404 Matt Taibbi Sorry, but that edit reverted some copyediting and removal of duplication. Not clear that quote is needed or adds much either

24 December 2017

• 23:2323:23, 24 December 2017 diff hist −89 United States recognition of Jerusalem as capital of Israel Reality ffs
• 23:1923:19, 24 December 2017 diff hist +852 Talk:United States recognition of Jerusalem as capital of Israel →Lead bias: new section

23 December 2017

• 12:4712:47, 23 December 2017 diff hist +6 m Matt Taibbi →United States