Content deleted Content added
Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Draft:EliveLinux. |
→Userbox suggestion: new section |
||
Line 129:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Draft:EliveLinux|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Draft%3AEliveLinux|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request [[WP:RFUD|here]]. <!-- Template:Db-reason-notice --> [[User:Dawnbails|Dawnbails]] ([[User talk:Dawnbails|talk]]) 16:24, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
== Userbox suggestion ==
{{bcc|Triantares|Thanatermesis|TheTechRobo3641}}{{u|Triantares}}, Regarding your user page statements on [[WP:COI]]: A person once wrote, <blockquote>"<font color="green">Be carefull about going around and adding [deleted] all over the place. Although it might feel like "as it should be", it will send WP moderators in a flurry if they get the impression you're abusing WP for PR (which in fact you are :shocked: ).</font>"</blockquote>
If one finds oneself thinking or saying similar things, or planning and coordinating efforts to make a project look better at Wikipedia or Distrowatch, or other places, then one certainly has a [[WP:COI]] on the topic, and should expect unconnected editors to observe the COI and resulting bias in articles. "<font color="green">Someone having a conflict of interest is a description of a situation, not a judgment about that person's opinions, integrity, or good faith. COI editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. <b>It undermines public confidence</b>...</font>" Indeed, no one should have much confidence in most WP articles, partly because this type of biased editing behavior is widespread at WP. Anyway, why not simply use the [[Template:UserboxCOI |<nowiki>{{UserboxCOI}}</nowiki>]] template for any projects, such as [[Elive]], where you have a <i>close</i> connection? -- [[User:Yae4|Yae4]] ([[User talk:Yae4|talk]]) 01:04, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
|