Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Capitol Limited (B&O train)/1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Epicgenius (talk | contribs) |
close GAR Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Capitol Limited (B&O train)/1 as delist (GANReviewTool) |
||
Line 1:
===[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Capitol Limited (B&O train)/1|Capitol Limited (B&O train)]]===
{{atopr}}
: {{al|Capitol Limited (B&O train)|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Capitol_Limited_(B%26O_train)/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]</span> • GAN review not found
: <span>{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Capitol Limited (B&O train)/1|[[Category:GAR/77]]}} '''Result''': Delisted.</span> [[User:AirshipJungleman29|~~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 13:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)<br/>
This 2007 promotion has a number of uncited passages, severe [[MOS:SANDWICH|sandwiching]] throughout the article, and a lead of insufficient length to summarize the body of the article. I also question the relevance of the schedule table which seems like excessive and inappropriate detail to me. One might also expect some basic detail on Amtrak's version of the train; the current article says almost nothing about it. [[User:Trainsandotherthings|Trainsandotherthings]] ([[User talk:Trainsandotherthings|talk]]) 00:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
:I've axed the schedule table. I have no comment on the other points raised, which do seem valid. [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 23:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
{{abot}}
| |||