Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Blown for Good/1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
PARAKANYAA (talk | contribs) close GAR Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Blown for Good/1 as keep (GANReviewTool) |
|||
Line 1:
===[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Blown for Good/1|Blown for Good]]===
{{atopg}}
: {{al|Blown for Good|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Blown_for_Good/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]</span> • [[Talk:Blown for Good/GA1|Most recent review]]
: <span>{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Blown for Good/1|[[Category:GAR/78]]}} '''Result''': Problems solved.</span> [[User:PARAKANYAA|PARAKANYAA]] ([[User talk:PARAKANYAA|talk]]) 18:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC)<br/>
This article bears little resemblance to the form it was when it was nominated 14 years ago, though at the time it had its own issues. For context, the article was created and largely written by someone who was 1) banned from this topic area for BLP and source misrepresentation, among other issues 2) later indefinitely banned. Afterwards the article had a chunk taken out of it, perhaps justifiably, but what is left does not meet the GA standards, and may still face the problems with POV that existed before.
Line 26:
::::@[[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] @[[User:Grorp|Grorp]] FWIW my problems with it have been solved. [[User:PARAKANYAA|PARAKANYAA]] ([[User talk:PARAKANYAA|talk]]) 18:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
::::: Oh good. Then you can simply withdraw, i.e. close the GAR now as KEEP. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 18:37, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
{{abot}}
| |||