Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hezbollah/1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1247207773 by It is a wonderful world (talk). Self reverting, will leave open for one week per GAR guidance |
close GAR Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hezbollah/1 as delist (GANReviewTool) |
||
Line 1:
===[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hezbollah/1|Hezbollah]]===
{{atopr}}
: {{al|Hezbollah|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Hezbollah/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]</span> • GAN review not found
: <span>{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Hezbollah/1|[[Category:GAR/79]]}} '''Result''': Delisting because consensus has been reached to delist, and discussion has subsided.</span> [[User:It is a wonderful world|It is a wonderful world]] ([[User talk:It is a wonderful world|talk]]) 18:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)<br/>
This article has several citation needed type tags, violating [[WP:V]]. It last went through GAR in 2008, thus making it very likely it is unduly weighted toward that time period. Also were the standards for GA in 2008 lower?
Line 11:
: Not a GA article imo. [[User:Selfstudier|Selfstudier]] ([[User talk:Selfstudier|talk]]) 16:22, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
::Word count according to prosesize (web tool version) is now: 11,513. That puts it at the probably should be split size; still a little short of the definitely split size on word count according to the article size guideline. BUT the prosesize word count does not include tables and lists, which this article has, and may not include long quotations since these are not highlighted as part of the "prosesize" count and the article has several long block quotes. The random increases in the size of the article and its overall size alone would seem to be enough to change the assessment to B class from GA. [[User:Donner60|Donner60]] ([[User talk:Donner60|talk]]) 07:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
{{abot}}
| |||