Revision as of 01:29, 18 October 2024 edit Z1720 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators 28,675 edits Nominating for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:17, 5 November 2024 edit undo AirshipJungleman29 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 41,459 edits close GAR Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Berghuis v. Thompkins/1 as delist (GANReviewTool) Next edit →
Line 1: ~~{{GAR/link\|01:29, 18 October 2024 (UTC)\|page=2\|GARpage=1\|status= \|shortdesc=}}~~ {{ArticleHistory \|action1=GAN Line 16 ⟶ 15: \|dykentry=... that in '''''[[Berghuis v. Thompkins]]''''' the [[United States Supreme Court]] ruled that failing to claim the [[right to silence]] means police can use any voluntary statements regardless of length of interrogation? \|topic=Law \|currentstatus=GA▼ \|action3 = GAR \|action3date = 17:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC) \|action3link = Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Berghuis v. Thompkins/1 \|action3result = delisted \|action3oldid = 1254018290 ▲\|currentstatus =GA DGA }} {{WikiProject banner shell\|class=GA\| {{WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases\|importance=mid }} {{WikiProject Law\|importance=mid }}

Talk:Berghuis v. Thompkins: Difference between revisions