Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→What is the record for most admins lost in a month?: most don't care about administration problems |
|||
Line 409:
:::That is one of the dumbest things I have heard all day, and that is saying something. There is no need to "make room", Wikipedia doesn't have a fixed number of admin. And just because an admin resigns his bit doesn't mean he has retired or will not participate in an RFA. And his vote counts exactly the same with or without the bit. I handed in my bit, I'm still here, and I'm not alone. You seem to be taking joy in the fact that around two dozen admin have resigned as a show of principle against encroachment by the WMF. Something is seriously wrong with you if you truly find joy in all this carnage. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<b>2¢</b>]] 00:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
:::::You seem to think that overall the community cares about what ever your talking about....they don't. But iI could clear the air for many.--<span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User_talk:Moxy|Moxy]]</span> <span style="color:red">🍁</span> 01:01, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
::::::I think it would be more difficult than usual for an RFA to succeed right now. At least some would vote against to keep faith with those who have given up their tools, though they might not say so.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 02:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
| |||