Talk:Brazil women's national football team

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2021 and 7 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ZMuis.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:12, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

status of women's soccer in Brazil?

I lack an discussion starting out with the fact that this team has posed in Playboy, and its implications for taking the team seriously as a sports team. Nothing of the sort is even hinted at here. It's not as if somebody is pretending it isn't happening, I hope 85.227.226.168 08:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

It was not the Brazilian women's national team that has posed in Playboy. It was only several models wearing (or, in some pictures not wearing) the Brazilian football home kit. --Carioca 19:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Rivalry with Argentina

The rise of Argentina as a rival??? Whose opinion is it? Why is it here? Argentina won one game against Brazil, in Mar del Plata!, went on to receive the greatest defeat in world cup history (11-0 to Germany) and once again leave the tournament as dead last... (0W, 3Losses, 1GF, 18GA, -17 GD!) But yet it is the only team mentioned in Brazil's page as its rival! "as the men's"??!! Argentina is Brazil's rival??? Not Germany, not USA, Sweden, Denmark or Norway? But Argentina! Of all the finals Brazil played, won and lost, this is The only one being mentioned?! How come? Remove the word Argentina from this page!

"Brazilians have not been entirely supportive of the program"? What program? How is it that Brazilians haven't been supportive? Compared to USA, for example, Brazil's women's soccer is a fairly new affair. And it competes for mass audiance not only with men's soccer, but also with volley and basketball(men's and women's, indoor and beach). The new league is taking its first steps and the old Taça Brasil and Campeonato Brasileiro strugled(for many reasons). So it's one thing to say that state football federations, CBF and COB haven't been able to promote and sustain sucssesful championships, cups and leagues, but to say that only "after 2007 world cup the country has begun to notice the women's side" is inacurate at best. This two paragraphs are among the worst I've ever seen on Wikipedia. Please review, or I will. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.218.254.166 (talk) 14:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Marta's age mix up

Marta cannot have been 22 at the 2008 Olympics and 23 at the 2007 World Cup. I don't know how old she is, but I know this is wrong —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.219.115.20 (talk) 10:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks for letting us know. --Carioca (talk) 18:19, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

5-Star Logo

The women's team has not even won a world cup. It is not fitting for this team to have the 5-star logo. KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 08:45, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

See this picture (zoom it and check the player without the ball). The women's team use the same logo, but without the five stars. Probably someone should upload a logo without the stars. Hope that helps. --Carioca (talk) 19:44, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Brazil women's national football team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160804001808/https://smsprio2016-a.akamaihd.net/_odf-documents/F/B/FBW400E02_MatchReport_2016_08_03.pdf to https://smsprio2016-a.akamaihd.net/_odf-documents/F/B/FBW400E02_MatchReport_2016_08_03.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160807202631/https://smsprio2016-a.akamaihd.net/_odf-documents/F/B/FBW400E04_MatchReport_2016_08_06.pdf to https://smsprio2016-a.akamaihd.net/_odf-documents/F/B/FBW400E04_MatchReport_2016_08_06.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160810041519/https://smsprio2016-a.akamaihd.net/_odf-documents/F/B/FBW400E05_MatchReport_2016_08_10_7fa1fe08_aa24_4f31_abcf_4378267627d9.pdf to https://smsprio2016-a.akamaihd.net/_odf-documents/F/B/FBW400E05_MatchReport_2016_08_10_7fa1fe08_aa24_4f31_abcf_4378267627d9.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160816223319/https://smsprio2016-a.akamaihd.net/_odf-documents/F/B/FBW400201_MatchReport_2016_08_16_ded7da3b_0b2b_41e1_a94d_26233c0ac20e.pdf to https://smsprio2016-a.akamaihd.net/_odf-documents/F/B/FBW400201_MatchReport_2016_08_16_ded7da3b_0b2b_41e1_a94d_26233c0ac20e.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC)