This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I'm curious about two things that aren't covered here. Why was there such a long time span between launch and commissioning? And how did she get a battle star if she never went into battle? Kendall-K1 (talk) 17:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Interesting Catch. OK - I jump around several other Wikipedia sites. William Cramp shipbuilding built several "pairs" of submarines - laid down dates the same. "In 1940, the Navy spent $22 million to reopen the yard as Cramp Shipbuilding to build cruisers and submarines. Cramp used the long slipways to construct two submarines at a time, with the intention of launching them simultaneously. However, the shipyard's submarine construction program was not especially successful, as poor management hindered the delivery of the boats.[3] The first delivery was made two years after keel laying, and fitting out was then done by Portsmouth Navy Yard. The best construction time for a submarine was 644 days.[4]" Then fitting out was accomplished at another shipyard. That movement and the proximity to the end of the war might be a reason the Navy dragged their feet on commissisoning her. Wfoj3 (talk) 17:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
I have photographs that I took at the site that I would like to donate. In addition, I have scanned in an engineering diagram of the submarine that they give out at the site that I would like to upload. Any pointers as to how I can do so? Please contact me at kenneth.d.ng@gmail.com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdn1480 (talk • contribs) 08:15, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It seems to me the last paragraph of the "Site" section, regarding the bridge, is completely irrelevant to the article and a tad annoying as one wastes time attempting to map it's relevance to the submarine.... Or anything else in the article.
It's an interesting bit of information, on its own, but really should be removed.
.jpg)
