Talk:Webley Self-Loading Pistol
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Webley Self-Loading Pistol article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Webley Self-Loading Pistol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090704095414/http://www.webley.co.uk:80/webley_scott/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=103&Itemid=243 to http://www.webley.co.uk/webley_scott/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=103&Itemid=243
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Infobox/lead image
edit@Rama: I'm trying to figure out why there seems to be a preference for what seems like a worse image for the lead/infobox image.
-
Slightly lower resolution, but more detail, natural colour, crisp.
-
Slightly higher resolution but less detail, colour issues, poor cropping from background, blurry.