User talk:Rich Smith/Archive17
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Rich Smith. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:30, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 December 2012
- News and notes: Wobbly start to ArbCom election, but turnout beats last year's
- Featured content: Wikipedia goes to Hell
- Technology report: The new Visual Editor gets a bit more visual
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Human Rights
Test
Testing editing at work, I'll revert this later - Do Not Revert... - Rich - 212.8.163.213 (talk) 17:49, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Alan Fletcher
Hello Rich
I'm just wondering if this addition to Alan Fletcher should have been picked up by ClueBot? It's obvious vandalism to me--5 albert square (talk) 01:51, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 December 2012
- News and notes: Arbitrator election: stewards release the results
- WikiProject report: WikiProjekt Computerspiel: Covering Computer Games in Germany
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; section headings for navboxes
- Op-ed: Finding truth in Sandy Hook
- Featured content: Wikipedia's cute ass
- Technology report: MediaWiki groups and why you might want to start snuggling newbie editors
ClueBot NG must go!!!
Listen up git, I heard you run ClueBot NG eh? Well I have bone to pick with this so called 'bot'. This automated piece of rubbish is ruining Wikipedia by blocking legitimate edits. I am currently leading the petitions to get rid of ClueBot NG for which, by the way, support is mounting fast. I love helping Wikipedia out by sharing my wealth of knowledge on the lower leagues of British football (or 'soccer' to you yanks), however I am now absolutely fuming at the way in which I have treated by this ridiculously strict 'bot', which will block any (and I mean any) perfectly legitimate information I so kindly donate to Wikipedia. I have a wealth of knowledge on the field of lower league footballers and lesser known teams, information which, if allowed to share, would significantly improve the current appalling state of Wikipedia's pages on lower league English football. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boomage (talk • contribs) 22:36, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
- Well it seems you are unable to sign your own post, want to hide your identity? I would love to see said petitions which you seem to have not linked which makes me think they don't exist... and calling me a git? You are sad... - Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 22:39, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Hypocrite
You seem to have a policy by which you always remain civil to others on Wikipedia, Well, in the way you just replied to me that's clearly not the case - calling me 'sad', not very civil is it. You are the one who sent me a message saying remain civil to people on Wikipedia, it seems you have already broken that trust. You're obviously rubbish with computers because you're one of the makers of ClueBot NG which is (as i said) an automated piece of rubbish which wrongly blocks legitimate edits on Wikipedia. You are letting down Wikipedia with your rude reply to users. I can tell you're one of these cocky arrogant gits because of your username. Unbelievable you are, the downfall of Wikipedia.
- "Cocky arrogant gits"... really... - Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 23:24, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Are you a 10 year old?
Are you a 10 year old? I know it sounds ridiculous but the way you're speaking and the language you are using in your replies is very slang and unprofessional. When I talk to other Wikipedia moderators they speak in a more civilized manner and are more polite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boomage (talk • contribs) 23:49, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
- 1. I'm not a Wikipedia admin or mod or whatever, please don't presume I am.
2. I do not see any slang, show me an example of where I have used slang.
3. You are asking me to be polite? I don't think calling me an arrogant git is really going to help...
4. This is the final time I will respond, if any one else like to chip in to this they are more then welcome too - Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 00:13, 25 December 2012 (UTC)- It would be interesting to see the ClueBot reversions which are being complained about.TheLongTone (talk) 12:23, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2012
- WikiProject report: A Song of Ice and Fire
- Featured content: Battlecruiser operational
- Technology report: Efforts to "normalise" Toolserver relations stepped up
Messages on CBNG's talk page
Hello!
There's messages on ClueBot NG's talk page that you may be interested in.
User talk:ClueBot NG#Feeding ClueBot false-positives into ClueBot NG, someone is wondering if it's possible to combine User:ClueBot and CBNG's false positive databases? I'm not sure that is possible, firstly because they are two separate bots, secondly because ClueBot has been out of action for so long and I'm fairly certain ClueNet has updated a lot since then and a merge wouldn't work for technical reasons. Thirdly I'd imagine combining the databases would make them massive as ClueBot had close to 1.6 million edits when he retired!
The same editor also edited User:ClueBot/FalsePositives and put ClueBot's wikibreak template on there. They said that they did that because they were reporting a false positive that the original ClueBot made, they found an old false positive reporting page for ClueBot and they said that it took them ages to work out that ClueBot was no longer in action. I've removed the wikibreak template and tidied things up a bit by putting a small notice on the old reporting page explaining old ClueBot is on a Wikibreak and giving the link for ClueBot NG's false positive reporting page at ClueNet. I hope that's ok.--5 albert square (talk) 22:24, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- That's fine, thanks :) - Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 23:29, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:51, 30 May 2016 (UTC)