Spiff666

Welcome (a bit late)

Welcome!

Hello, Spiff666, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  MastCell ^Talk 16:01, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

E-mail on userpage

Spiff, might I suggest putting your e-mail, in preferences, in the e-mail field? This will make it so your e-mail won't be a target to spammers (it hides it). --AnonGuy 21:12, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:NMDP_logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NMDP_logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 17:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:NMDP.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:NMDP.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 17:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:NMDP name blue square small.jpg

What, exactly, did you say in your first email? Could you please copy that to the image page as well, so we can verify the licensing info? J Milburn (talk) 14:02, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi J Milburn. I'll do that right away. I am an employee of the NMDP, so if you need any more documentation, that's very quick and easy for me to get. --Spiff666 (talk) 14:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

UPDATE: I've re-uploaded this image, changing the "Licensing" category to "Logo" as I feel this is a more accurate description. I've added more complete comments, too. --Spiff666 (talk) 15:28, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Misstatement on acute myeloid leukemia

Hi - I reverted this edit on acute myeloid leukemia. Stem cell transplantation is not the only known cure for AML. A subset of patients can be cured with chemotherapy alone, particularly younger patients and those with favorable cytogenetics (see, for example, the large CALGB study, PMID 8078551, which found a 44% 4-year survival in patients consolidated with high-dose cytarabine in patients <60 years old). Stem cell transplantation is definitely an appropriate consideration for high-risk patients, and also for many standard-risk patients, but it's not the "only known cure". MastCell ^Talk 20:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Saskatoon John G. Diefenbaker International Airport

There are now photos of the Saskatoon John G. Diefenbaker International Airport at wikimedia commons that depict winter in Saskatoon so there are now spring May ones and winter January ones.SriMesh | talk 20:47, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

USS Midway collison with the cactus in march 1980

here is the info or some of it. my boyfriend can tell u more about it since the 2 men who died waqs his best friends and he is the one who covered daniel up and cut chris lose. his name is kevin and his email is allstar027@yahoo.com u can contact him

The Cactus Incident

By Bruce Lonardo

When I first arrived in Yokosuka, the Midway was out on Gonzo Station, so I was placed in transit until I was sent to Cubi Point. From there, the USS Dixie ferried me out to Diego Garcia where I caught a ride on the USS San Jose, which took me out to the Midway. I still remember the day the helo brought me aboard. It was December of 1979 and I was 17. My God, where did the time go? It seems like it all happened just yesterday!

One of the most amazing experiences I remember is one I marvel at to this day. I only wish that I had my camera with me at the time. One day, when we were in the Indian Ocean, it was gray and overcast and the planes were not flying that day. It was sometime in the afternoon when the skipper announced over the 1MC that all hands who were able to, should come topside (on the flight deck) and see an amazing sight. At the time, I was assigned TAD, 90 days on the mess decks and so at that moment, I was able to go topside to see what the skipper was talking about. Man, do I wish that I had brought my camera with me that day. For as far as the eye could see, from the eastern horizon on our port side, to the western horizon on our starboard side (I believe we were sailing south or south easterly heading), were thousands upon thousands of tuna or similar type fish, migrating in one direction for the span of probably a hundred yards wide, from horizon to horizon, for as far as the eye could see. I recall that the entire scene was so incredibly surreal, like an image right out of a sailor's ballad. I have never in my life, before or since, ever witnessed anything so incredible! To this day, whenever I hear the John Denver song, Calypso, I sing along, deliberately replacing the name "Calypso" with the name "Midway". The words of that song make me think of that day: ".....my oh Midway the places you've been too, the things that you show us - the stories you tell - my oh Midway I sing to your spirit, the men who have served you so long and so well......"

Another day I vividly remember was clearly the darkest day I can remember aboard the Midway - July 29, 1980. What a terrible night! Earlier that day, we had left Subic Bay and were on our way to the I.O. to relieve one of the carriers out on Gonzo Station. I don't remember which carrier it was - either the Nimitz or the Kitty Hawk. Well, anyway, by late evening, around 2200, we were proceeding through the Malaccan strait and we were at darkened ship. The scuttlebutt I heard in the aftermath was that the ship's radar was also off. I remember I was down in the crew's lounge in the VA-115 lower berthing compartment and I was writing a letter to my folks back home. The ironic thing is that I was kind of grappling with writer's block because I couldn't think of anything to write.

It was about 2300, or maybe a little bit after, when a trembling sensation ran throughout the ship as if there were an earthquake occurring right under the hull. Suddenly, the ship's collision alarm blurted out its pulsating scream, followed by the general alarm and the routine instructions that always followed the general alarm, but this time with one difference: "GENERAL QUARTERS! GENERAL QUARTERS! ALL HANDS MAN YOUR BATTLE STATIONS! - THIS IS NO DRILL!" Everybody just bolted up to the hanger deck, enroute to their battle stations and I remember as soon as I got up to the hangar deck, I could hear an ear-screeching sound of metal scraping against metal. I looked in the direction of where the sound was coming from, which was the port side aft area near aircraft elevator three, and I actually saw another ship scraping past us - ramming us for lack of any better description.

My G.Q. muster station was with the First Lieutenant Division in the VA-115 upper berthing, which was located directly under the flight deck in the forward part of the ship. As soon as I and a couple of other guys from my division get there, our leading petty officer told us to go back down to the hanger deck and muster with the entire ship's company. He also said that possible 'abandon ship' orders were pending.

On the way back down to the hangar deck, we were passing through a huge open ladder space, which leads several decks down from the flight deck to the hanger deck on the port side in the forward part of the ship. As we arrived at the hangar deck level, I saw a horrible sight which froze me in my tracks. It was one of the two men who were killed that night, lying dead in a stokes stretcher and he was covered with a gray navy blanket. What terrified me and the horrible image that remained imbedded in my brain was how the blanket appeared. Where a blanket would normally have made the obvious shape of a man's head, it appeared to have sloped down upon the deck. In other words, it looked like, and to this day I'm not exactly sure if this was the case, but it looked liked this poor soul had been decapitated and I heard rumors to that effect in the aftermath scuttlebutt. As I stood there frozen in my tracks for a second, I remember a buddy of mine who was behind me, shoving me forward and crying out "LONARDO, DON'T LOOK AT THAT! KEEP MOVING!"

When we arrived on the hangar deck, every one was donning kapok life vests and the Captain's launch was being readied. Through the open aircraft elevator doors, we could see our escort ships were surrounding us on all sides and flooding the Midway with illumination from their massive spotlights. We also tragically learned that another of our shipmates was dead. The damage the Midway had sustained was extensive. We had been accidentally rammed by a Panamanian freighter, the Cactus, which was traveling in the same direction as the Midway. The Cactus had hit the Midway's port side aft area knocking aircraft elevator three completely off its track. The giant elevator was literally hanging by its cables. The Cactus' hull had sliced into the Midway's hull causing a fifty foot gash in the port side below the waterline. The freighter's bow had also obliterated the port side catwalk, the LSO platform, and the port side landing lights. Several Corsairs and Phantoms (nearly all the aircraft in VF-161) were totally destroyed. As you know, on a carrier the aircraft are parked on the flight deck in a TOW manner (Tail Over Water) with the main landing gear put nearest to the edge of the flight deck. This maximizes maneuvering space for other aircraft, enabling them to be moved or repositioned on the flight deck. The result of positioning aircraft in this manner is that their entire tail section, along with a good part of their fuselage area, is then poised beyond the edge of the flight deck, over the water. As the freighter rammed into this area of the ship, these aircraft, numbering about fifteen total, were demolished. Some of them, simply disappeared - pulled completely and entirely right off the flight deck into the sea.

As bad as all this damage was, it was not the worst damage the Midway had sustained that night. By far the worst damage occurred in the port side hanger deck almost at amidships. The Midway's 5000 gallon liquid oxygen (LOX) plant had been seriously ruptured and was badly leaking. Moreover, the Midway's diesel fuel lines, which ran fore to aft on the port side of the ship, had also been severed and they were badly leaking. LOX is a very volatile and combustible agent whenever it comes in contact with heat, other chemicals, or any other petroleum agents such as diesel fuel. Both of these agents were leaking heavily in direct vicinity of each other, creating an impending catastrophe. Fortunately, the damage control teams were able to keep the two agents separated from each other by placing a barrier of light foam (ordinarily used for structural fires) between the two agents long enough to repair the LOX plant, the diesel fuel lines, and also decontaminate those areas in imminent danger. Thank God! Had the worst possible scenario occurred and given the vulnerable location where this occurred (amidships, near the expansion joint), 5000 gallons of exploding liquid oxygen would easily have caused enough devastation to do irreparable damage to the Midway's hull by making watertight integrity impossible. It could have even literally broken the Midway into two sections, which of course, would have resulted in the loss of her. Again, thank God for the Midway's damage control teams. They literally saved a legend and probably all of us aboard her, that night!

The entire crew, ship's company and squadron personnel, remained at GQ until about 7:00 am, at which time the ship secured from general quarters and the assigned on-duty working parties continued to monitor the extensive damage. At that time, the skipper made an announcement over the 1MC that the ship had been seriously damaged and that our escorts (which were still surrounding us) would be taking us in tow. We would be returning to Subic Bay and entering the Naval Ship Repair Facility for at least a one month working in port period. When a cheer erupted throughout the ship, it appeared no one was looking forward to three monotonous months out on Gonzo Station.

The skipper also made condolences about our two shipmates who had been tragically killed. They were Machinist Mate Second Class Daniel Francis Macey and Machinist Mate Third Class Christian John Belgum, both from A Division. Of the first man, the rumor I heard other men saying was that he had been decapitated. From what I myself witnessed, seeing how his corpse appeared in the stretcher, I fear the rumor may have been true, although I hope not. As for the fate of the second, I only hope the rumor I heard from other shipmates was untrue. The news going around the ship was that he was directly near the liquid oxygen tank when it ruptured. Rumor had it that he was drenched by liquid oxygen, which has a temperature of 300 degrees below zero, in which case, he would have been instantly crystallized.

After the ship secured from general quarters, many of the crew went topside to see the damage that had been done to the ship. What I saw looked like the aftermath scene right out of a war movie. The portside catwalk was no longer there. The landing lights which extend from the portside of the angle deck were gone, along with the LSO station. Aircraft elevator three was lowered at hanger deck level and was attached to the ship only by its giant greasy lifting cables. At least ten F-4 Phantoms were totally destroyed, their tails and aft fuselages ripped completely off. There were some A-7 Corsairs damaged in the same way and a few other aircraft were gone - just plain vanished! In addition, far more serious damage was evident with the LOX plant, the hangar deck fuel lines, and the 50 foot gash on the portside hull below the waterline. Cameras were strictly forbidden on the flight deck and hangar deck. In fact, anyone who even attempted to photograph the damage faced the penalty of having their camera confiscated by the Master-at-Arms and this was strictly enforced.

I remember for the next few days until we returned to Subic Bay, there was a quiet, pensiveness lingering about the ship. It was hard to believe that this had actually happened to the Midway. To say that there was a surreal connotation to this event would be an understatement. It was as though the entire crew and the Midway herself were in a state of shock. What probably contributed at least in part to such a haziness of disbelief on board may have been the wild rumors circulating throughout the ship. The commonly discussed scuttlebutt among the crew for several weeks prior to this tragic incident was that the nationally famous psychic, Jean Dixon, had made a prediction that within the year of 1980, a U.S. Naval warship bearing the number 41 would have a tragic accident at sea and founder. The USS Midway's side number was, of course, 41 and given the reality of our current situation, it was hard for anyone to dismiss her prediction or at least the unbelievable coincidence. At the time, it had seemed more like a prophesy. However, the part about the ship foundering never happened, thank God! After a few days, we arrived back at Subic Bay for an intense working in port period at the ship repair facility. About five weeks later, the ship was fully repaired, all the destroyed aircraft had been replaced, and we were once again underway for the fair seas of WESTPAC and a long three month period out on Gonzo Station. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikkimarie44 (talk • contribs) 09:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Non Free Images in your User Space

Hey there Spiff666, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Spiff666/new article name here. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of images removed today here

• Shut off the bot here

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 21:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Tea Party

Hello Spiff666,

I reverted your edits on the Tea Party movement page. I hope your edits were an honest mistake, as there is no evidence that the Tea Partiers referred to themselves as "teabaggers" before the term was applied to them pejoratively by the media. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 16:25, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Actually, there is. What I don't see is evidence that it has been used "pejoratively" by the media. "Mockingly", absolutely, but the term is no more "pejorative" than French kiss or Doggy style. Xenophrenic (talk) 09:19, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Overdrive Shonen Knife.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Overdrive Shonen Knife.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:20, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Spiff666. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Spiff666. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Spiff666. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)