Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afrin Sultana Laboni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:44, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Afrin Sultana Laboni

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think that the person is not notable enough to pass WP:N, as the person only got coverage due to playing in some films. Ahmetlii (talk) 08:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ahmetlii (talk) 08:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Ahmetlii (talk) 08:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There's enough coverage about the actress in online websites to pass WP:NACTOR. Not only routine coverage, there is in depth coverage about the individual in multiple articles. Not just about participation in films, there's also coverage about her interview, marriage and qualifying to Miss Bangladesh final as per sources. Reaching at this position is not easy, she might have notably contributed indeed. I think the sources are reliable, as they are one of the oldest and most reputable news portals in Bangladesh. — A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 13:30, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Draftify, I am agree with nom. Most of sources are either interview (primary source) or passing mention. No secondary significant coverage. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What? They are using wikipedia as a career boosting/ promotional site. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the facts given in the article do not support notability. The Miss Bangladesh auxiliary award is not one which would confer notability on its own, and of the two films she is said to have acted in, one does not appear to exist, and the other was filmed in 1980, 14 years before she was born (unless there was a more recent remake which I have not found). Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 17:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although she was a Top 10 Miss Bangladesh finalist, I do not think that is significant enough to meet WP:ENT.Peter303x (talk) 03:01, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no significant coverage. Delete as per rule. Trakinwiki (talk) 16:27, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trakinwiki, you joined three days ago and have contributed to only deletion directly. It takes you 2-3 minutes to decide whether the article should be kept or not. What are you? The best Wikipedian ever? Most of your comments are copied/pasted and very reliable on previous comments. Do you even bother to check about the subject in-depth before commenting? Or you have some other things in mind? And apparently, I am a day old and this being my first suggested article, I am learning about the rules, and you KNOW ALL THE RULES as you comment clearly in 2-3 minutes (that also using mobile~)? I am posting this on other comments of yours as well. HeyitsmeFellen (talk) 19:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There's WP:REFBOMB all over but no significant coverage. Also based on messages left at User talk:A.A Prinon, definitely WP:PAID and WP:COI. Clog Wolf _Howl 03:48, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant media coverage, no major roles in any major films. Could be a case of paid editing and COI. Tame (talk) 11:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.