Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Les (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to 100 Gecs. – bradv🍁 15:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Les (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

American singer who, from the lead of the article is "best known for being one half of the hyperpop duo 100 gecs". Following last year's AfD the previous article was merged into 100 gecs. I can't see anything to suggest that WP:BANDMEMBER is no longer applicable. Setting aside involvement in 100 gecs, there is not enough to meet WP:MUSICBIO John B123 (talk) 18:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. John B123 (talk) 18:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. John B123 (talk) 18:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Simply being best-known for involvement in one group doesn't mean a subject hasn't shown notability outside of that role - There are plenty of examples here, but I'm sure we would all identify Ringo Starr, for instance, as a member of the Beatles before anything else. In this case, Les has received considerable coverage ([1] [2] [3]) related to "Haunted" since the previous AfD. The article's GQ and Rolling Stone references also discuss Les' music and life prior to her involvement in 100 gecs, which I would argue is coverage not directly related to her involvement in the band. AviationFreak💬 18:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge again to 100 gecs. To the previous voter, comparing this Ms. Les to Ringo is a real stretch. She has some older solo works but they are only mentioned in articles that are really about 100 gecs, or in one case collaborator Katie Dey. Her recent song "Haunted" has indeed gotten some press, but it is only described in each cited article rather briefly and the press seems to have decided it is a one-time side project so far. Per WP:TOOSOON she does not yet have enough of a solo presence to merit a personal article here. The fact that she released the solo song can be mentioned at the band's article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 22:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per AviationFreak. Ringo Starr she may not be, but she's definitely notable and the sources within the article indicate notability and coverage aside from her being in the band. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 10:55, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per AviationFreak. Rab V (talk) 10:06, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to 100 gecs. Simply does not meet WP:MUSICBIO, all good coverage is in relation to that band. Onel5969 TT me 04:21, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep, merge or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:57, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Facebook effect noted above seems to be kicking in. The last two voters have done little else on Wikipedia except this. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:54, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.