Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pesarattu (2015)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep; nicely improved as well. Mojo Hand (talk) 18:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pesarattu (2015)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:FILM, apart from a review, no other coverage. Esquivalience ^t 15:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete: this is nothing but an OR-filled run-on sentence about a barely-known film. Could have probably been speedily deleted. Quis separabit? 17:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Quis separabit?... the easily addressable issue of article format is not a deletion rationale, and please... we generally DO NOT speedy sourcable articles on released films because they may be poorly written by a new contributor. And please, WP:UNKNOWNHERE does not mean it is not known elsewhere.Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 03:10, 29 April 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INDAFD: Pesarattu Mahesh Kathi

Keep and allow continued improvements through MOS:FILM and regular editing. After quickly finding a review in Times of India to support that offered by the nominator, I feel we have a meeting of WP:NF and it would be better to keep this suitable stub and improve it, than to toss and forget. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 04:42, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A simple search yielded these: [1] [2] [3] [4]. It passes WP:MOVIE. — Yash! ^(Y) 21:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per MichaelQSchmidt and Yash.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.