Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vonabell Sherman
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. asilvering (talk) 22:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vonabell Sherman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP of a television personality, not properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for television personalities. The claim here is that she's been an "on-air guest" on a shopping channel, which is not "inherently" notable without WP:GNG-worthy coverage and analysis about her work -- but the article is completely unreferenced, and has been tagged as unreferenced since 2011 without ever having any sources added in the 13 years since. Bearcat (talk) 20:28, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 20:28, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Advertising. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:46, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. A WP:BEFORE search found someone else with the same name (who also isn't notable anyway), and her blog. That's it. Procyon117 (talk) 12:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: A quick Google search reveals that there are no reliable sources (WP:RS) available about the subject. In fact, there is absolutely zero significant coverage on the topic. Baqi:) (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:BASIC.4meter4 (talk) 04:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.