Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 September 25
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Oxymoron83 first orphaned this pic from 2 articles, second he vandalized the fair use rationale (see [1]) and third this admin from Germany locked the disc of User:MutterErde. Later Oxymoron83 was invited to a meeting in Berlin, but didn't come. Btw: He seems to be unknown there - not only to me. Please undelete the vandalized pic, because it was deleted by another admin without proving the image's history 78.51.238.122 (talk) 21:53, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Movie Reels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD) Has importance as a filmmaker forum website Indy424242 (talk) 21:50, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Fábio Pereira da Silva (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD) Procedural nom after the request for unsalting came to my talk. What the article draft asserts and what the source provided to me says differ, and I'm not entirely comfortable with WP:ATHLETE to make the call on my own. Will be notifying all parties in a moment, as this is a procedural nom, I have no !vote. TravellingCari 21:15, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
WTFPL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD) (AfD 2) (copied from Talk:WTFPL) I believe the second AfD was conducted in bad faith. Of the four keeps, the first was WP:GOOGLEHITS and failed to establish WP:N as pointed out by User:Thumperward; the second WP:PERNOM; the third suggested using WP:N was WP:GAME while failing to establish notability; and the fourth was a WP:VAGUEWAVE. None of these keeps went so far as to point to a reliable secondary source to establish notability. I understand that the editors in favor of keeping the article intend to establish notability, and I encourage them to do so as quickly as possible, but if this notability cannot be established soon then the article should be deleted beacuse articles should not be written based on speculation that the topic may receive additional coverage in the future. WP:NOTAGAIN suggests an article can be renominated for deletion as many times as necessary, given that we allow enough time for editors to improve the quality of the article after the first AfD. However, this article was first nominated for deletion over 20 months ago. In that time, the editors have not improved the quality of the article to sufficiently establish notability. Beefyt (talk) 18:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
John Pemberton (anthropologist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD) Pemberton is a renowned anthropologist and scholar whose page was seemingly deleted without any process and very little time for discussion. This seems more like a situation that calls for careful consideration of his notability as an academic rather than speedy deletion in a matter of hours. Shakeer (talk) 16:17, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Vortex (iPod game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD) I'd like to see if anything in the article is salvageable. Justice America (talk) 04:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |