Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Graphical content problem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Graphical content problem

My first Mfd, so I may be applying wrong rules. I'm nominating this article since this encyclopedia in not censored, and that's what this project's purpose seems to be. And plus there are a ton of ridiculous examples of images that "apply" for this project (including a simple photo of woman, for example) and images of great encyclopedic value like this one. Also, this project is virtually inactive and pointless, since any changes to how images are used in an article would have to be still discussed in the articles, talk page. Do U(knome)? ^yes...|_{or no} · 20:31, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tag as historical, as proposed to me by User:White Cat on my talk page. I withdraw this nomination Thanks Do U(knome)? ^yes...|_{or no} · 06:33, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not censored, and just as there shouldn't be spoiler warnings in book- and film-related articles, there shouldn't be warnings and disclaimers in articles with disturbing images. Additionally, the WikiProject is rather inactive. --Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 22:57, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Userify or put a clearer rejected label at the top. Legitimate opinion, though I think it's wrong. Perfectly in order for someone to advocate it. DGG (talk) 01:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Historical/inactive/userify Take your pick. -- Ned Scott 04:08, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: When I created this page in question it felt like a good idea. Now I do not feel it is as good an idea. I think deleting the page will be problematic since keeping it as a rejected idea would prevent it from resurfacing. Therefore I suggest keeping it as a historic idea. -- Cat ^chi? 11:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Tag as historical. It is a record of a past discussion about Wikipedia being uncensored. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:32, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.