User talk:Kayau

Splitting Computer Programming/Hello world

I was just wondering why you thought Computer Programming/Hello world should be split, or how. Ubigcow (discuss • contribs) 03:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply. I think it shuld be split alphabetically into Computer Programming/Hello world (A-H, Computer Programming/Hello world (I-N), and so on. The page is very long and may take a long time to load on slower computers and browsers. [[::User:Kayau|Kayau]] ([[::User talk:Kayau|discuss]] · [[::Special:Emailuser/Kayau|email]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Kayau|contribs]] · logs · count) 10:05, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

You know what kayau you are right Wikivuyo (discuss • contribs) 19:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Page Tag

Please remember to tag the pages when opening a discussion for deletion (transwiki included). Done that for you now in relation to Living With a Narcissist. I have also informed the most relevant editor to the work. --Panic (discuss • contribs) 03:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Sorry panic. I haven't been here for a long time so I kind of forgot. [[::User:Kayau|Kayau]] ([[::User talk:Kayau|discuss]] · [[::Special:Emailuser/Kayau|email]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Kayau|contribs]] · logs · count) 04:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

FLT

Please note that [1] is a pseudomathematical garbage which is certainly not "a proof" of Fermat's Last Theorem. I would advise you deleting this link. 92.23.202.71 (discuss) 18:07, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me. I've reverted the edit for now. Since I'm clueless about this advanced maths stuff, though, I'll ask thenub to make sure. Kayau (talk · contribs) 22:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi

How do what I know each textbook is open content and which one is not?Trongphu (discuss • contribs) 17:18, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Do you mean textbooks on Wikibooks? All books on WB are licensed under CC-BY-SA, which means they are open content. ;) Kayau (talk · contribs) 08:40, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Wow that is great Wikivuyo (discuss • contribs) 19:47, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Replied.

Sorry I have been away for a bit, but I have replied at my talk page. Thenub314 (talk) 21:04, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Sure Wikivuyo (discuss • contribs) 19:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Nudge, nudge...

Just to pass to you the necessity to not refer to book-pages as articles as to clearly differentiate our project from others...
I know it was only a edit comment and has no "real" significance, this is just a reminder that by educating contributors (about the distinction) we can empower Wikibooks. No need to reply. --Panic (discuss • contribs) 09:52, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Ah, sorry. I do know the importance of the distinction; it just escaped me at that moment. I'll be more cautious. Kayau (talk · contribs) 06:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

What do you mean by that 🤨🤨🤨🤨???? Wikivuyo (discuss • contribs) 19:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Governent and binding theory?

Several years ago, somebody put a big section on government and binding theory into the Conlang wikibook; it was far too big, and written in a style altogether wrong for a book on conlanging — taking the attitude that this is how language is, whereas conlanging is in no small part about thinking outside the box on what language might be (and having fun in the process). We've been wondering what we could do with that material so it doesn't go to waste. Of interest? --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 20:52, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I have actually looked at the section before. I was discouraged from using its contents after I saw the second chapter because there was a major error in it: It mixed phrase structure grammar into GB theory. In GB theory, the last two rewrite rules, the X-bar rules, are the only phrase structure rules needed (see Government and Binding_Theory/X-bar Theory#Phrase structure rules get the boot). (The reason is that post-standard theory Chomskyian grammar aims to generalise a set of rules for all phrases, rather than having individual phrase-specific rules.) I found it very problematic that they put in rules for AP, CP, TP, etc! This grave error was reflected in later trees, which did not follow X-bar theory at all, and they're JPEGs and not SVGs, so I can't reuse most of the contents, unfortunately. With that said, a lot of the content in Conlang/Advanced/Grammar/Government/Structural relationships can be reused, and perhaps Conlang/Advanced/Grammar/Government/Binding theory as well, though I'll have to redraw all the diagrams. Thanks for the heads up :) Kayau (talk · contribs) 01:37, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Kayau

I want to know more about kayau he/she is very interesting. Wikivuyo (discuss • contribs) 19:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)