View source for Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry

{{policy|[[WP:SOCK]]}}
{{Policy in a nutshell|With few exceptions, users should make all their contributions from a single account.}}

<br>

A '''sock puppet''' is an additional username used by a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]] who edits under more than one name. The Wikipedian who uses a [[Internet sock puppet|sock puppet]] may be called a '''sock puppeteer'''. Use of sock puppets is discouraged in most cases; [[user:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] has said, ''"It's generally considered uncool unless you have a good reason."''

The reason for discouraging sock puppets is to prevent abuses such as a person voting more than once in a poll, or using multiple accounts to circumvent [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|Wikipedia policies]]. Some people feel that second accounts should not be used at all; others feel it is harmless if the accounts are all behaving acceptably.

Also see [[MeatBall:SockPuppet|this page]] for information on how this affects other online communities.

Multiple accounts have legitimate uses. But you must refrain from using them in any way prohibited to sock puppets and from using one account to support the position of another, the standard definition of sock puppetry. If someone uses multiple accounts, it is recommended that he or she provides links between the accounts, so it is easy to determine that they are shared by one individual.

== Prohibited uses of sock puppets ==
=== Voting ===
Wikipedia uses a "one person, one vote" principle for all votes and similar discussions where individual preferences are counted in any fashion. Accordingly, sock puppets are not permitted to vote in any Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:Elections|election]], nor are they allowed to participate in any similar procedure, such as [[Wikipedia:Current surveys|polls and surveys]] or the discussions at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]] and [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship]]. Proven sock puppets may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|permanently blocked]] if used to cast double votes.

=== Deception and impersonation ===
In addition to double-voting, sock puppets should not be used for purposes of deception, or to create the illusion of broader support for a position. This kind of behavior is disruptive and unnecessary for any potentially legitimate use of sock puppets. In particular, accounts that are used to maliciously impersonate another Wikipedian should be blocked permanently.

===Circumventing policy===
Policies apply per person, not per account. Policies such as [[WP:3RR|3RR]] are for each person's edits. Similarly, using a second account for policy violations will cause any penalties to also be applied to your main account.

Users who are [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banned]] from editing or temporarily subject to a legitimate block may not use sock puppets to circumvent this. Evading a ban in this manner causes the timer on the ban to restart.

== Characteristics of sock puppets ==
Not surprisingly, sock puppet accounts usually show much greater familiarity with Wikipedia and its editing process than most [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers!|newcomers]]. They are more likely to use [[Wikipedia:Edit summary|edit summaries]], immediately join in [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit wars]], or participate vocally in procedures like [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for deletion]] or [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship|Requests for adminship]] as part of their first few edits.

One type of sock puppet is sometimes referred to as a "straw man sock puppet."  They are created by users with one point of view, but act as though they have an opposing point of view, in order to make that point of view look bad, or to act as an online [[agent provocateur]].  They will often make poor arguments which their "opponents" can then easily refute.  This can allow them to essentially make [[straw man argument]]s.  Such sock puppets thus become a personification of the straw man argument which their creators argue against.  They often act unintelligent or uninformed, and may behave in an overtly [[bigoted]] manner.  The effect is often to obfuscate the debate and prevent a serious discussion of the arguments from each side.  Suspicion of such sock puppets is often harder to verify though, as there are often people who naturally behave in such a manner with the same effects. 

=== When questions arise ===
In some cases it may not be completely clear whether an account is a sock puppet, as the purpose is usually to avoid detection. Similarities in interests and editing style can be noted, but not everyone may be familiar enough with the user to understand the evidence.

If it appears that sock puppets are being used as part of an edit war or to distort the outcome of a vote or survey, one possible rule of thumb is the ''100-edit guideline''. This suggests that any account with more than 100 edits is presumed not to be a sock puppet. If there are unusually many accounts with few edits participating, you may want to check if they are sockpuppets, by looking at IP addresses or times that edits were made. However, simply having made few edits is ''not'' evidence of sockpuppetry on its own, and if you call a new user a sockpuppet without justification, they will probably be insulted and get a negative impression of Wikipedia.

Keep in mind there can be multiple users who are driven to start participating in Wikipedia for the same reason, particularly in controversial areas such as articles about the conflict in the Middle East, cult figures, or [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]]. Some have suggested applying the 100-edit guideline more strongly in such cases, assuming that all accounts with fewer than 100 edits are sock puppets. Generally, such beliefs have been shown not to be well founded.

If there is doubt, a [[m:Developers|developer]] or [[m:Help:CheckUser|checkuser user]] can check to see whether accounts are related. Experience has shown that on article talk pages, including polls, the linkage is usually not supported by the information available to developers, so self-restraint in making such accusations is usually the right course.

If ''you'' have been accused incorrectly of being a sock puppet, don't take it too personally.  New users are unknown quantities.  Stay around a while and make good edits, and your record will speak for itself.

==Tagging ''identified'' sock puppets==
If an account has been shown to be a sock puppet used for policy violations, then it should be identified as such, by adding [[Template:SockpuppetProven]] to the user page of the sock puppet account. The syntax is (replacing instances of "SOCKPUPPETEER" with the name of the sock puppeteer and "EVIDENCE" with something such as "<code>Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SOCKPUPPETEER/Evidence</code>"):

<code><nowiki>{{SockpuppetProven|1=SOCKPUPPETEER|evidence=EVIDENCE}}</nowiki></code>

which will render as:

{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="width: auto;"
|-
| [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|50px]]
| '''This user is a [[Wikipedia:Sock puppet|sock puppet]] of [[User:SOCKPUPPETEER|SOCKPUPPETEER]]''', as established by [[EVIDENCE]],<br>and has been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked indefinitely]].  <small>See [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{PAGENAMEE}}}} block log].</small>
|}

Note that this should only be done if the account has been shown beyond reasonable doubt to be a sock puppet of the user by one of the following:
* the user's own admission;
* matching of IP addresses or similar strong technical evidence;
* a ruling on [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration]].

The above template should ''not'' be added in the cases of accusations of sockpuppetry which have not been proven. Instead, add [[Template:Sockpuppet]] to the page:

<code><nowiki>{{Sockpuppet|1=SOCKPUPPETEER|evidence=[[EVIDENCE]]}}</nowiki></code>

{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="width: auto;"
|-
| [[Image:Nuvola apps kdmconfig.png|50px| ]]
| '''It is suspected that this user may be a [[Wikipedia:Sock puppet|sock puppet]] or impersonator of [[User:SOCKPUPPETEER|SOCKPUPPETEER]]'''.<br>Please refer to [[EVIDENCE]] for evidence. <small>See [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{PAGENAMEE}}}} block log]</small>
|}

== Legitimate uses for Multiple accounts ==
Multiple accounts have legitimate uses.  For example, prominent users might create a new account in order to experience how the community functions for new users.  In particular, some have suggested that [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo]] should get, and edit from, a sock puppet account.  Perhaps he does.

Other users employ multiple accounts to segregate their contributions for various reasons. A user making substantial contributions to an area of interest in Wikipedia might register another account to be used solely in connection with developing that area.

Some users use alternate accounts for security reasons. Because public computers often have password-stealing trojans installed, users put themselves at risk if they log in on public computers using their main accounts.

Others might use different accounts in talk pages to avoid extending conflicts about a particular area of interest into conflicts based upon  user identity. A person participating in a discussion of an article about abortion, for example, might not want to allow other participants an opportunity to extend that discussion or engage them in unrelated or philosophically motivated debate outside the context of that article.

Multiple accounts also serve to protect identity. Someone who is known to the public or within a particular circle may be identifiable based on their interests and contributions; dividing these up between different accounts might help preserve the person's anonymity. Users with a recognized expertise in one field, for example, might not wish to associate their contributions to that field with contributions to articles about less weighty subjects. A person editing an article which is highly controversial within their social circle may wish to use a sock puppet so that readers unfamiliar with [[WP:NPOV]] policy will not assume their information edits are statements of personal belief.

[[m:Role account|Role account]]s have been used on the French Wikipedia without any opposition, but their use is not officially sanctioned at this time.

''Note'': Wikipedians who operate [[Wikipedia:Bots|bots]] are encouraged to create separate accounts so the automated edits can be filtered out of [[special:recentchanges|recent changes]].

=== Tagging legitimate sockpuppet accounts ===
Contributors who use multiple accounts may tag the "secondary" ones with '''{{tlp|User Sock Puppet|SOCKPUPPETEER}}''' which produces:

{{User Sock Puppet|SOCKPUPPETEER}}{{clear}}

The "main" accounts can similarly be marked with '''{{tl|User Puppet Master}}''', which gives:

{{User Puppet Master}}{{clear}}

<span id="Meatpuppets" /><!-- old title for the following section, to keep section links working -->

== Accounts created by new users for a specific purpose ==

A related issue occurs when non-Wikipedians create new accounts specifically to influence a particular vote or discussion.  This is especially common in [[WP:AFD|deletion discussions]].  These newly created accounts (or anonymous edits) may be friends of a Wikipedian, or may be related in some way to the subject of an article under discussion. 

These accounts are not actually sockpuppets, but they are difficult to distinguish from real sockpuppets and are treated similarly.  Neither a sockpuppet nor a brand-new, single-purpose account holder is a member of the Wikipedia community.  The reason behind this is that, for instance, an article about an online community should not be kept merely because all members of that community show up to vote for it. The [[WP:RFAr|Arbitration Committee]] has ruled that, for the purpose of dispute resolution, when there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sockpuppets or several users with similar editing habits they may be treated as one user with sockpuppets.

Such accounts have sometimes been called "meatpuppets" (this name perhaps inspired by the band [[Meat Puppets|of the same name]]).  Use of this term is not advised, since it can be perceived as highly [[WP:CIVIL|incivil]].  Calling someone a "meatpuppet" to their face may be perceived as a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]], and is certainly likely to [[WP:BITE|discourage a new user]] from participating further.

== See also ==
*[[Internet sock puppet]]

[[ar:ويكيبيديا:دمى الجورب]]
[[bg:Уикипедия:Марионетка]]
[[de:Sock puppet]]
[[fr:Wikipédia:Faux-nez]]
[[he:ויקיפדיה:בובת קש]]
[[hu:Wikipédia:Zoknibáb]]
[[ja:Wikipedia:&#22810;&#37325;&#12450;&#12459;&#12454;&#12531;&#12488;]]
[[ko:&#50948;&#53412;&#48177;&#44284;:&#45796;&#51473; &#44228;&#51221;]]
[[sv:Wikipedia:Marionetter]]
[[pl:Wikipedia:Figurant]]
[[pt:Wikipedia:Sock puppet]]
[[ru:Википедия:Виртуалы]]
[[zh:Wikipedia:傀儡]]