User talk:Artemis Andromeda

Welcome to my talk page

Hi, how is your day going?

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1774 establishments in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealt

A tag has been placed on Category:1774 establishments in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealt indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sergiusz Żymełka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TVP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Names

The point you made w.r.t. Bismarck Sea has been shifted to a note and made more neutral. You can do more research as to when various languages changed the name if you wish to improve the note. I have a CoI as relatives Polish so might not have made changes neutral enough to please some. ChaseKiwi (talk) 17:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Stefan Żeromski Park (Szczecin)

On 2 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stefan Żeromski Park (Szczecin), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Żeromski Park, the second-largest park in Szczecin, Poland, used to be a cemetery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stefan Żeromski Park (Szczecin). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Stefan Żeromski Park (Szczecin)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work! Feel free to put up your articles on Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge‎!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld Hii :) Thank you very much, I will gladly join in <3 I will also try to add all applicable articles I wrote so far later this week <3 Artemis Andromeda (talk) 18:15, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 23:20, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warsaw areas

Hi, I just wanted to express my thanks for your contributions to Warsaw-related matters and its areas/districts/suburbs. Keep up the good work, especially with the creation of new pages. :) Merangs (talk) 22:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Merangs Thank you very much <3 Trying to do my best to contribute as I can. It's nice to be noticed for my work :) Artemis Andromeda (talk) 22:33, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Merangs also, if you want, I could always use help in writing more articles about Warsaw :) Becouse I will be honest, it's a huge city and I'm sadly only one person Artemis Andromeda (talk) 22:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beatles

Thanks for creating The Beatles Statue (Liverpool), but please go back to it and fix the typos. Thanks. PamD 20:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD I saw that quick fix ;) Artemis Andromeda (talk) 20:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD ok, I did fix the typos, I hope I cought all of them this time Artemis Andromeda (talk) 20:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so I fix my own typos even on talk pages! But I'm on my phone, and there just seemed too many to fix in that article of yours. PamD 20:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict! PamD 20:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

4 typos left in "Characteristics", I reckon. PamD 20:53, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For creating so many great articles (I saw your reddit post). Keep up the good work. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 13:56, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Blaze Wolf, thank you very much. That's very nice from you <3 Artemis Andromeda (talk) 21:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UPA article

Would you be able to look at one issue in the UPA article, I wrote about this on the talk page there, but no long-term editor removed it, and since you edited the Wołyń Massacre article you are probably familiar with the topic. There is a section called Commemoration in Ukraine and in it there is a picture of Ukrainian minority in Przemyśl with UPA flags. This should be removed because Przemyśl is not in Ukraine. I don't understand why no one responded and fixed it because this is really obvious inacuracy. 94.172.109.57 (talk) 10:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I just noticed that on Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia someone changed the intro to the article, which contains made up terms: "The Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia (Polish: rzeź wołyńska), also known as the Volhynian tragedy (Ukrainian: Воли́нська траге́дія, romanized: Volynsʹka trahediya), the Volhynian–Galician slaughter (Polish: rzeź wołyńsko-galicyjska)". In Polish the name is "Volhynian slaughter" not "Volhynian–Galician slaughter". Also, this should be moved up, not sure why you have "(Polish: rzeź wołyńska)" right after Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia with out what happened to lit. 'Volhynian slaughter' in bold letters. --94.172.109.57 (talk) 13:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yeah, I agree that the name should be "Volhynian massacre" not "Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia". Also, Volhynian–Galician massacre is also used in Polish, it's just less popular (but is for example used by IPN and some historians), and in English, term "rzeź" is translated to "massacre" and not to more direct "slaughter". And going back to the first message. I think you are right that a picture from Ukraine would be more appropriate. I guess the picture of Przemysl was simply used becouse it shows the point author tried to make (shows Ukrainian demonstrators celebrating UPA). And, I think Przemysl had this kind of celebrations is becouse while it's in Poland, it is right on Ukrainian border, and has quite sizable Ukrainian minority. And, also, I should point out that I'm probably not the best person to ask, as I'm not really an expert on Volhynian massacre or WW2 history in general. I only have passing knowledge of it. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 13:58, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for looking into the above listed issues, as for the UPA article, I'm a bit concerned that there are some undertones to that image from Przemyśl, as some far-right Ukrainian nationalist groups claim that Przemyśl should be part of Ukraine, that is why I think this image should be taken out. The section only talks about "Commemoration in Ukraine" and the actual text only covers that aspect, and not in other places where Ukrainians are found like Poland, Canada or even the US. I would call the inclusion of that image rather controversial. --94.172.109.57 (talk) 14:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to close my comment, I think Wikipedia should avoid such inaccuracies, at the most basic level the image is not directly referenced in the text and is out of place, that's all. So, this is just a editorial fix. --94.172.109.57 (talk) 14:28, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Jerzy Waszyngton" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Jerzy Waszyngton has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 16 § Jerzy Waszyngton until a consensus is reached. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 03:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]