View source for Visa Waiver Program

{{Short description|Program allowing 90-day visa-free travel to the United States for nationals of some countries}}
{{Use American English|date = March 2019}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=August 2019}}
{{Politics of the United States |expanded= Foreign}}

The '''Visa Waiver Program''' ('''VWP''') is a program of the [[Federal government of the United States|United States federal government]] that allows nationals of specific countries to travel to the United States for tourism, business, or while in transit for up to 90 days without having to obtain a [[Visa (document)|visa]]. It applies to all fifty [[U.S. state]]s, the [[District of Columbia]], [[Puerto Rico]], and the [[U.S. Virgin Islands]], as well as to [[Guam]] and the [[Northern Mariana Islands]], which also have an additional program with waivers for more nationalities; [[American Samoa]] has a similar but separate program.

The majority of the countries selected for the VWP by the U.S. government are  generally regarded as [[developed country|developed countries]], with [[High income economy|high-income economies]] and a very high [[Human Development Index]].

Other visa waivers exist for citizens of certain jurisdictions.

==Eligible countries==
[[File:Visa policy of the USA.svg|thumb|none|800px|
{{legend|#ED1C24|The United States and [[Territories of the United States|its territories]]}}
{{legend|#1191E5|[[Compact of Free Association|Freely associated states]] (freedom of movement)}}
{{legend|#008000|Visa-free (6 months)}}
{{legend|#22B14C|Visa Waiver Program (90 days)}}
{{legend|#FFD000|Visa-free with police certificate (6 months)}}
{{legend|#C0C0C0|Visa required to enter the United States}}]]

To be eligible for a visa waiver under the VWP, the traveler seeking admission to the United States must be a national of a country that has been designated by the [[U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security]], in consultation with the [[U.S. Secretary of State|Secretary of State]], as a "program country". [[Permanent residency|Permanent residents]] of designated countries who are not their nationals do not qualify for a visa waiver. The criteria for designation as program countries are specified in Section 217(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ({{UnitedStatesCode|8|1187}}). The criteria stress passport security, a nonimmigrant visa refusal rate below 3%, and a reciprocal visa waiver for U.S. nationals, among other requirements.

As of 2024, nationals of 42 countries are eligible for entry into the United States without a visa under the VWP:<ref name=vwp>{{cite web | url=https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/tourism-visit/visa-waiver-program.html | title=Visa Waiver Program | publisher=U.S. Department of State | location=Washington}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.dhs.gov/visa-waiver-program-requirements | title=Visa Waiver Program Requirements | publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security | location=Washington | accessdate=January 9, 2024}}</ref>

{|style=" border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); background-color: white; border: 1px solid white; padding: 5px;"
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
|colspan=3|
*{{flag|European Union}} [[Member state of the European Union|member states]] {{small|(except [[Bulgaria]], [[Cyprus]] and [[Romania]])}}{{efn|ESTA is not available for nationals of [[Hungary]] born outside Hungary.<ref name=hu>{{cite web | url=https://hu.usembassy.gov/visas/visa-waiver-program/ | title=Visa Waiver Program|publisher=U.S. Department of State | location=Budapest}}</ref>}}
|-
|
*{{flag|Andorra}}
*{{flag|Australia}}
*{{flag|Brunei}}
*{{flag|Chile}}
*{{flag|Iceland}}
*{{flag|Israel}}
|valign="top"|
*{{flag|Japan}}
*{{flag|Liechtenstein}}
*{{flag|Monaco}}
*{{flag|New Zealand}}
*{{flag|Norway}}
*{{flag|Qatar}} {{small|(from 1 December 2024)}}<ref name=qa/>
|valign="top"|
*{{flag|San Marino}}
*{{flag|Singapore}}
*{{flag|South Korea}}
*{{flag|Switzerland}}
*{{flag|Taiwan}}{{efn|Only holders of passports with a [[National Identification Card (Taiwan)|national identification number]].}}
*{{flag|United Kingdom}}{{efn|name=gb|Only [[British nationality law|British citizens]] are eligible for the visa waiver.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://uk.usembassy.gov/visas/visa-waiver-program/machine-readable-biometric-passports/ | title=Machine Readable Biometric Passports|publisher=U.S. Department of State | location=London}}</ref>}}
|}

==Requirements==
===Passport===
All visitors from VWP countries must hold a [[biometric passport]].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/158/text|title=Text – H.R.158 – 114th Congress (2015–2016): Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015 | last=Miller | first=Candice | date=December 9, 2015 | access-date=February 6, 2017}}</ref>

All travelers must have individual passports. It is not acceptable (for the VWP) for children to be included on a parent's passport.<ref name=":0">{{cite web | url=http://canberra.usembassy.gov/visa_waiver_prog.html | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302015254/http://canberra.usembassy.gov/visa_waiver_prog.html|archive-date=March 2, 2012 | title=Visa Waiver Program {{!}} Embassy of the United States Canberra, Australia | date=2012-03-02 | access-date=2020-02-22}}</ref>

In principle, the passport must be valid for six months beyond the expected date of departure from the United States. However, the United States has agreements with a large number of countries to waive this requirement, including all VWP countries except Brunei.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://fam.state.gov/FAM/09FAM/09FAM040309.html#M403_9_3_B_2|title=9 FAM 101.1 INTRODUCTION TO 9 FAM | website=fam.state.gov | access-date=February 6, 2017}}</ref><ref name=":0" />

===Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA)===
[[File:ESTA record.png|thumb|Record of ESTA approval]]
{{main|Electronic System for Travel Authorization}}
All incoming passengers who intend to take advantage of the Visa Waiver Program are required to apply for a travel authorization through the [[Electronic System for Travel Authorization]] (ESTA) online before departure to the United States, preferably at least 72 hours (3 days) in advance. This requirement was announced on June 3, 2008 and is intended to bolster U.S. security by pre-screening participating VWP passengers against terrorist or no-fly lists and databases.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/2067319/US-to-demand-72hrs-notice-for-British-tourists.html | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080606000754/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/2067319/US-to-demand-72hrs-notice-for-British-tourists.html | archive-date=June 6, 2008 | work=The Daily Telegraph | location=London | title=US to demand 72hrs notice for British tourists | first=Andy | last=Bloxham | date=June 3, 2008 | access-date=May 27, 2010}}</ref> It is similar to Australia's [[Electronic Travel Authority (Australia)|Electronic Travel Authority]] system. The authorization is mandatory for participating VWP nationals before traveling to the United States, but as with formal visas this does not guarantee admission into the United States since final admission eligibility is determined at U.S. ports of entry by [[U.S. Customs and Border Protection|CBP]] officers.

ESTA has an application fee of 4 [[United States dollar|USD]], and if approved, an additional fee of 17 USD is charged, for a total of 21 USD. An approved ESTA is valid for up to two years or until the traveler's passport expires, whichever comes first, and is valid for multiple entries into the United States.{{efn|For nationals of Brunei applying from July 6, 2023, ESTA is valid for one year. For nationals of Hungary applying from August 1, 2023, ESTA is valid for one year and for a single entry to the United States.<ref name=estafaq/>}}<ref name=estafaq>[https://esta.cbp.dhs.gov/faq?lang=en Frequently asked questions], Electronic System for Travel Authorization, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.</ref>

When traveling to the United States by air or sea under the VWP with ESTA, the person must be traveling on a participating commercial carrier and hold a valid return or onward ticket, dated within 90 days.<ref name=":0" /> The VWP does not apply at all (i.e. a visa is required) if a passenger arrives via air or sea on an unapproved carrier. ESTA is also required for travel by land.<ref>[https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/cbp-expands-esta-requirements-visa-waiver-program-travelers CBP Expands ESTA Requirements for Visa Waiver Program Travelers], U.S. Customs and Border Protection, April 7, 2022.</ref>

===Prior travel or dual nationality in certain countries===
Since 2016, those who have previously been in [[Iran]], [[Iraq]], [[Libya]], [[North Korea]], [[Somalia]], [[Sudan]], [[Syria]] or [[Yemen]] on or after March 1, 2011, or in [[Cuba]] on or after January 12, 2021, or who are [[multiple citizenship|dual nationals]] of Cuba, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Sudan or Syria, are not eligible to travel under the VWP.<ref name="vwp"/> However, those who traveled to such countries as diplomats, military, journalists, humanitarian workers or legitimate businessmen may have this ineligibility waived by the Secretary of Homeland Security.<ref>[https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/01/21/united-states-begins-implementation-changes-visa-waiver-program United States Begins Implementation of Changes to the Visa Waiver Program], U.S. Department of Homeland Security, January 21, 2016.</ref>

===Other requirements===
Applicants for admission under the Visa Waiver Program:<ref name=":0"/>
* Must have complied with the conditions of all previous admissions to the United States and have not been found ineligible for a U.S. visa.
* Must never have been convicted of, or arrested for, an offense or crime involving [[moral turpitude]]{{efn|There is an exemption in some cases for a single offense committed before age 18 and the crime was committed (and the person released from any confinement to a prison or correctional institution imposed for the crime) more than five years before the date of application for a visa, and also for a single instance if the maximum possible sentence in the United States is one year or less in jail, and less than six months was served. However, these exceptions cannot be applied by the individual as the question on ESTA is specific.}} or a controlled substance, or two or more crimes with a maximum aggregate sentence of five years' imprisonment or more, no matter how long ago. National regulations which normally expunge criminal records after a certain length of time (e.g. the [[Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974]] in the UK) do not apply.
* Must not be otherwise inadmissible to the United States, such as on health or national security grounds.
* Must be intending to visit the United States for a purpose of tourism, business or transit.

Applicants should display social and economic ties which bind them to their country of origin or may be refused entry.<ref>[https://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/denials/denials_1361.html Visa denials] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131222133227/http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/denials/denials_1361.html |date=December 22, 2013 }} retrieved April 19, 2012</ref>

Having been arrested or convicted does not in itself make a person ineligible to use the Visa Waiver Program. However, some U.S. embassies advise such persons to apply for a tourist visa even though there is no legal obligation to do so.<ref name=":0"/>

Those who do not meet the requirements for the Visa Waiver Program must obtain a U.S. visitor visa from a U.S. embassy or consulate.<ref name=":0"/>

===Restrictions===
Visitors under the VWP may stay for up to 90 days in the United States and cannot request an extension of the original allowed period of stay<ref name=":0"/> (this practice is allowed to those holding regular visas).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uscis.gov/working-united-states/temporary-visitors-business/b-1-temporary-business-visitor|title=B-1 Temporary Business Visitor|date=2015-07-14|website=USCIS|language=en|access-date=2020-02-03}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://immigration.com/visa/b-visa/b-visa-overview|title=B Visa Overview|date=2009-02-06|website=US Immigration Lawyer, Law Offices of Rajiv S. Khanna, PC, Rajiv S. Khanna|access-date=2020-02-03}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uscis.gov/visit-united-states/extend-your-stay|title=Do you want or need to extend your stay in the U.S.?|date=2019-05-22|website=USCIS|language=en|access-date=2020-02-03}}</ref> However, VWP visitors may seek to adjust status on the basis of either marriage to a U.S. citizen or an application for asylum.<ref>{{cite web |title=8 USC §§ 1187, 1255(c)(4); Freeman v Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2006) |url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2006/04/20/0435797.pdf |publisher=Ca9.uscourts.gov }}</ref>

[[U.S. Customs and Border Protection]] (CBP) officers determine admissibility upon the traveler's arrival. If one seeks to enter the United States under the VWP and is denied entry by a CBP officer at a port of entry, there is no path to appeal or review of the denial of entry.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Smith|first=Lamar|date=2000-10-30|title=H.R.3767 - 106th Congress (1999-2000): Visa Waiver Permanent Program Act|url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-bill/3767|access-date=2020-07-01|website=www.congress.gov}}</ref>

Travelers can leave to neighboring jurisdictions ([[Canada]], [[Mexico]] and the [[Caribbean]]), but will not be granted another 90 days after reentry in the United States; instead they are readmitted to the United States for the remaining days granted on their initial entry.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://amsterdam.usconsulate.gov/visa_waiver_program2.html |publisher=The American Embassy in The Hague |title=Visa Waiver Program |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110619194258/http://amsterdam.usconsulate.gov/visa_waiver_program2.html |archive-date=June 19, 2011  }}</ref> Transit through the United States is generally permitted, if the total time in the United States, Canada, Mexico and adjacent islands is less than 90 days. However, if for example the traveler is transiting the United States on the way to a 6-month stay in Canada, the VWP cannot be used, as the total time in the United States, Canada, Mexico and adjacent islands will be over 90 days. In this case the traveler should apply for a [[B visa|B-1/B-2 visa]], or a [[C-1 visa|transit visa]].<ref name=":0"/>

There are restrictions on the type of employment-related activities allowed. Meetings and conferences in relation to the travelers' profession, line of business or employer in their home country are generally acceptable, but most forms of "gainful employment" are not. There are however poorly-classifiable exceptions such as persons performing professional services in the United States for a non-U.S. employer, and persons installing, servicing and repairing commercial or industrial equipment or machinery pursuant to a contract of sale.<ref>{{cite web |title=Working (Legally) on a Visitor's Visa or Visa Waiver Entry |url= http://www.usvisalawyers.co.uk/article15.htm |publisher=Usvisalawyers.co.uk }}</ref> Performers (such as actors and musicians) who plan on performing live or taping scenes for productions in their country of origin, as well as athletes participating in an athletic event, are likewise not allowed to use the VWP for their respective engagements and are instead required to have an [[O1 visa|O]] or [[P visa]] prior to arrival. Foreign media representatives and journalists on assignment are required to have a nonimmigrant media (I) visa.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1990.html |title=U.S. Department of State: Visa Waiver Program (VWP) |publisher=State.gov |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131102061718/http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1990.html#travelertype |archive-date=November 2, 2013}}</ref>

==History==
[[United States Congress|Congress]] passed legislation in 1986 to create the Visa Waiver Program with the aim of facilitating tourism and short-term business visits to the United States, and allowing the [[United States Department of State]] to focus consular resources on addressing higher risks.<ref name=":3" /> The United Kingdom became the first country to participate in the Visa Waiver Program in July 1988, followed by Japan in December 1988.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/1988/10/30/travel/travel-advisory-accord-allows-trips-to-japan-without-a-visa.html | work=The New York Times | title=TRAVEL ADVISORY; Accord Allows Trips to Japan Without a Visa | date=October 30, 1988}}</ref> In July 1989, France, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland and West Germany were added to the VWP.<ref name=fr1997/>

In 1991, more European countries joined the Program – Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, Norway, San Marino and Spain – as well as New Zealand (the first country from Oceania).<ref name=fr1997/> In 1993, Brunei became the second Asian country to be admitted to the Program.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0338.pdf |title=United States General Accounting Office: Implications of Eliminating the Visa Waiver Program |access-date=July 12, 2012}}</ref>

On April 1, 1995, Ireland was added to the VWP.<ref name=ie/> In 1996, Australia and Argentina (the first Latin American country) joined,<ref name=fr1997/> although Argentina was later removed in 2002.<ref name=ar/> On September 30, 1997, Slovenia was added.<ref name=fr1997/> On August 9, 1999, Portugal, Singapore and Uruguay joined the program,<ref name=fr1999/> although Uruguay was subsequently removed in 2003.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.americanlaw.com/vwpp.html |title=Visa Waiver Program |publisher=Americanlaw.com |access-date=July 12, 2012}}</ref>

Following the [[September 11 terrorist attacks]], the [[George W. Bush administration]] decided to tighten entry requirements into the United States, as a result of which legislation was passed requiring foreign visitors entering under the Visa Waiver Program to present a [[machine-readable passport]] upon arrival starting from October 1, 2003, and a [[biometric passport]] from October 26, 2004. However, as a number of VWP countries still issued non-machine readable passports (for example, more than a third of [[French passport|French]] and [[Spanish passport|Spanish]] passport holders held a non-machine readable version), the implementation of this rule was postponed to October 26, 2004, with the exception of [[Belgian nationality law|Belgian nationals]], as there were concerns about the security and integrity of [[Belgian passport]]s.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/09/us/two-years-later-borders-new-passport-rules-fight-terrorism-are-put-off-for-year.html | work=The New York Times | first=Philip | last=Shenon | title=TWO YEARS LATER: THE BORDERS; New Passport Rules to Fight Terrorism Are Put Off for a Year | date=September 9, 2003}}</ref> Likewise, the biometric passport requirement was also postponed to October 26, 2005, only to be further postponed by another year to October 26, 2006 at the request of the [[European Union]], which raised concerns about the number of participating countries which would have been able to make the deadline.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6080384.stm |title=US imposes biometric entry demand |date=October 26, 2006 |work=[[BBC News]] |access-date=November 30, 2011}}</ref> When the new rule came into force on that day, three countries (Andorra, Brunei and Liechtenstein) had not yet started issuing biometric passports.<ref name=":3">{{cite web |url=http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/1006/102706j1.htm |title=Most countries meet e-passport deadline – Defense |publisher=GovExec.com |access-date=July 12, 2012 |archive-date=January 19, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120119145212/http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/1006/102706j1.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref>

In November 2006, the U.S. government announced that plans for an "Electronic Travel Authorization" program (officially named "[[Electronic System for Travel Authorization]]") would be developed so that VWP travelers can give advance information on their travels to the United States. In return, they will be given authorization electronically to travel to the United States, although it does not guarantee admission to the United States. This program is modeled on the [[Electronic Travel Authority (Australia)|Electronic Travel Authority]] scheme that has been used in Australia for many years.<ref>[https://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1164919987951.shtm Security Improvements to Visa Waiver Program] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070613080816/https://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1164919987951.shtm |date=June 13, 2007 }}</ref>

Argentina's participation in the VWP was terminated in 2002 in light of the [[Argentine economic crisis (1999–2002)|financial crisis]] taking place in that country and its potential effect on mass emigration and unlawful overstay of its nationals in the United States by way of the VWP. Uruguay's participation in the program was revoked in 2003 for similar reasons. While a country's political and economic standing does not directly determine its eligibility, it is widely believed that nationals of politically stable and economically developed nations would not have much incentive to illegally seek employment and violate their visa while in the United States, risks that consular officers seriously consider in approving or denying a visa.

===Road map===
After the [[2004 enlargement of the European Union]], both the newly admitted countries and EU agencies began intensive lobbying efforts to include those new countries in the VWP. The U.S. government initially responded to those efforts by developing bilateral strategies with 19 candidate countries known as the Visa Waiver road map process.<ref name=roadmap>{{cite book|url=http://www.ilw.com/immigrationdaily/news/2007,0314-crs1.pdf |author=Alison Siskin|title=Visa Waiver Program|publisher=Congressional Research Service|date=January 24, 2007|page=14}}. "Currently there are 19 'road map' countries. They are Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Israel, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Taiwan, Turkey, and Uruguay."</ref> The U.S. government began to accept the possibility of departing from the original country designation criteria – which had been contained within immigration law ''per se'' – and to expand them by adding political criteria, with the latter being able to override the former. This development began first with Bill S.2844<ref>[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:S.2844.PCS: Calendar No. 715 108th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 2844] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151019021140/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:S.2844.PCS: |date=October 19, 2015 }},</ref> which explicitly named Poland as the only country to be added to the VWP, and continued as an amendment to the [[S. 2611|Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 (S.2611)]], whose Sec. 413, Visa Waiver Program Expansion,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.2611.ES: |title=Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 S.2611 |publisher=Thomas.loc.gov |access-date=July 12, 2012 |archive-date=October 19, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151019021140/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.2611.ES:  }}</ref> defined broader criteria that would apply to any EU country that provided "material support" to the multinational forces in [[Multinational force in Iraq|Iraq]] and [[International Security Assistance Force|Afghanistan]]. However, the definition of that "material support" would be met again only by Poland and Romania, a fact that was not favorably received by the other EU candidate countries. Ironically, Poland remained the only Central European country that was not a participating nation in the VWP until 2019, due to a visa refusal rate above the critical threshold of 3%.

During his visit to Estonia in November 2006, [[George W. Bush|President Bush]] announced his intention "to work with our Congress and our international partners to modify our visa waiver program". In 2006, the Secure Travel and Counterterrorism Partnership Bill was introduced in the Senate but no action was taken and that bill, as well as a similar one introduced in the House the following year, died after two years of inactivity.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s109-4100 |title=Secure Travel and Counterterrorism Partnership Act |publisher=Govtrack.us |access-date=July 12, 2012}}</ref> The bill would have directed the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish a pilot program to expand the visa waiver program for up to five new countries that were cooperating with the United States on security and counterterrorism matters.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/senate-bill/4100 |title=S.4100 - Secure Travel and Counterterrorism Partnership Act |date=December 7, 2006 |publisher=Congress.gov |access-date=May 30, 2016}}</ref>

A June 2007 [[Hudson Institute]] Panel stressed the urgency of the inclusion of Central Europe in the VWP: "An inexplicable policy that is causing inestimable damage to the United States with its new Central and Eastern European NATO allies is the region's exclusion from the visa waiver program. As Helle Dale wrote in the spring issue of European Affairs: "Meanwhile, the problem is fueling anti-U.S. antagonisms and a perception of capricious discrimination by U.S. bureaucrats ---and damping the visits to the United States of people from countries with whom Washington would like to improve commercial and intellectual ties. Meanwhile, horror stories abound from friends and diplomats from Central and Eastern Europe about the problems besetting foreigners seeking to visit the United States. In fact bringing up the subject of visas with any resident of those countries is like waving a red flag before a bull." Visa waiver must be satisfactorily addressed and resolved at long last."<ref>Hudson Institute Panel:
Enduring Strains of Communism in Central and Eastern Europe [http://www.americanhungarianfederation.org/news_hudsoninstitute.htm]</ref>

The [[Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007]] allowed the inclusion of new countries in the VWP with a visa refusal rate up to 10% (up from the standard requirement of 3%) if they satisfied certain other conditions, from October 2008.<ref name=crs>[https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32221 Visa Waiver Program], Congressional Research Service, June 29, 2020.</ref> With the relaxed criteria, eight countries were added to the program: Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia and South Korea in November 2008,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/article/2008/10/20081017140208dmslahrellek0.8056452.html |title=Seven Nations to Join U.S. Visa Waiver Program |publisher=America.gov |access-date=June 10, 2016}}</ref> and Malta in December 2008.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aila.org/File/DownloadEmbeddedFile/51690 |title=DHS Designates Malta as a Visa Waiver Program Country  |publisher=Department of Homeland Security |date=December 22, 2008 |access-date=June 10, 2016}}</ref> [[Czech Prime Minister]] [[Mirek Topolánek]] called it "a removal of the last relict of Communism and the Cold War".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2008-10-17-visa-waiver_N.htm |title=Bush announces visa waiver for 7 countries|work=USA Today |date= October 19, 2008|access-date=June 22, 2011}}</ref> However, from July 2009, the authority to include countries with such higher visa refusal rate became conditioned on the implementation of a system capable of matching the entry and exit from the United States of travelers under the VWP using biometric identifiers.<ref name=crs/> As such system was not implemented, the visa refusal rate requirement returned to 3%.

Greece officially joined the program on April 5, 2010.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ynews/releases/pr_1268162593062.shtm |title=Secretary Napolitano Announces Greece's Designation as a Member of the Visa Waiver Program |date=March 9, 2010 |publisher=Dhs.gov |access-date=July 12, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://athens.usembassy.gov/pr-2010-12.html |title=Greeks Can Travel to U.S. under Visa Waiver Program Starting April 5 With an Easy Electronic Application |publisher=Athens.usembassy.gov |access-date=July 12, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110707044928/http://athens.usembassy.gov/pr-2010-12.html |archive-date=July 7, 2011   }}</ref>

On October 2, 2012, Secretary [[Janet Napolitano]] announced the inclusion of Taiwan into the program effectively as of November 1, 2012.<ref>[https://www.dhs.gov/news/2012/10/02/dhs-announces-taiwan%E2%80%99s-designation-visa-waiver-program ''DHS Announces Taiwan's Designation into the Visa Waiver Program''] from http://www.dhs.gov; October 2, 2012</ref> Only holders of passports with a [[National Identification Card (Taiwan)|national identification number]] can benefit from the visa waiver.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Visa Waiver Program|url=https://www.ait.org.tw/visas/visa-waiver-program/|access-date=2021-01-26|publisher=American Institute in Taiwan}}</ref>

In 2013 there was conflict over the [[United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2013]] whose Senate version specified that satisfaction of the requirements regarding reciprocal travel privileges for U.S. nationals would be subject to security concerns.<ref>[http://thomas.loc.gov/ THOMAS search of "United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2013", S. 462] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150830093514/http://thomas.loc.gov/ |date=August 30, 2015 }}.</ref> Many members of the House of Representatives opposed the security language because it seemed to validate Israel's tendency to turn away Arab Americans without giving any reason. None of the other 37 countries in the visa waiver program had such an exemption.<ref>Ron Kampeas, [http://azjewishpost.com/2013/in-u-s-fight-over-visa-waiver-exemption-for-israel-both-sides-cite-discrimination/ In U.S. fight over visa waiver exemption for Israel, both sides cite discrimination], [[Jewish Telegraphic Agency]], April 15, 2013.</ref>

[[Chief Executive of Hong Kong]] [[Donald Tsang]] raised the issue of allowing holders of [[Hong Kong Special Administrative Region passport]]s or [[British National (Overseas) passport]]s to participate in the VWP during his visit to the United States in 2011, but proposals to allow this have not been successful.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/1848106/return-moderate-mainstream-path-achieve-democracy-us-consul|title=Return to 'moderate mainstream' path to achieve democracy, US consul urges Hong Kong |work=[[South China Morning Post]] |date=August 20, 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2097340/what-united-states-visa-waiver-scheme-envoy-kurt-tong-wants|title= What is the United States visa waiver scheme that envoy Kurt Tong wants to be applied to Hong Kong?|work=[[South China Morning Post]] |date=June 7, 2017|author=Viola Zhou |author2=Joyce Ng }}</ref>

Hong Kong is the only jurisdiction with a higher [[Human Development Index]] than the United States whose citizens cannot enjoy the program. The visa refusal rate for Hong Kong dropped to 1.7% for [[HKSAR passport]] and 2.6% for [[British National (Overseas) passport]] in 2012.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/FY12.pdf |title=Adjusted Refusal Rate B-Visa only, by nationality, fiscal year 2012 |access-date=May 16, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130717174850/http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/FY12.pdf |archive-date=July 17, 2013   }}</ref> Hong Kong met all VWP criteria but did not qualify at the time because it was not legally a separate country, despite having its own passports and independent judicial system, monetary system and immigration control. The former [[Chief Executive of Hong Kong]], [[Donald Tsang]], raised the issue with then-Secretary of State [[Hillary Clinton]] during his visit to the United States in 2011 and was met with positive response.<ref name="scmp" /> On May 16, 2013, a bipartisan amendment bill was passed by the [[Senate Judiciary Committee]] but not ratified into law. On August 10, 2015, the [[Consulate General of the United States, Hong Kong and Macau|U.S. Consul General to Hong Kong and Macau]], [[Clifford Hart]], said during an interview with [[South China Morning Post]] that the visa waiver was "not happening anytime soon", as the Visa Waiver law required the participant to be a "sovereign state" and Hong Kong was not independent, thus ending the possibility of Hong Kong joining the program. He also denied that the failed lobbying effort of the [[HKSAR government]] on this issue was a result of the refusal of detaining [[Edward Snowden]] in 2013.<ref name="scmp">{{cite web|url=http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/1848106/return-moderate-mainstream-path-achieve-democracy-us-consul|title=Return to 'moderate mainstream' path to achieve democracy, US consul urges Hong Kong |work=[[South China Morning Post]] |date=August 20, 2015 |access-date=May 23, 2016}}</ref>

Chile joined the VWP on March 31, 2014.<ref name=cl/>

As of December 2018, ESTA is no longer approved in real-time to qualifying passengers and passengers are required to apply no later than 72 hours before departure.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.lonelyplanet.com/news/2018/12/20/estas-usa-new-changes|title=Travelling to the USA? The ESTA service has one important change|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181221230659/https://www.lonelyplanet.com/news/2018/12/20/estas-usa-new-changes|date=December 20, 2018|archive-date=December 21, 2018|author=Andrea Smith}}</ref>

In July 2019, U.S. Ambassador to Poland [[Georgette Mosbacher]] stated that "Poland would fully qualify for the Visa Waiver Program within 3 to 6 months after September 2019" depending on bureaucratic procedures.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://fakty.interia.pl/polska/news-georgette-mosbacher-potwierdza-wizy-dla-polakow-zostana-znie,nId,3120471 | title=To już przesądzone. Koniec wiz dla Polaków do USA }}</ref> On October 4, 2019, U.S. President [[Donald Trump]] confirmed that the Department of State had formally nominated Poland for entry into the Visa Waiver Program.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/statement-press-secretary-regarding-nomination-poland-entry-visa-waiver-program/|title = Statement from the Press Secretary Regarding the Nomination of Poland for Entry into the Visa Waiver Program – the White House}}</ref> On November 11, 2019 Poland officially joined the Program and became its 39th member.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/11/06/acting-secretary-mcaleenan-announces-designation-poland-visa-waiver-program |title=Acting Secretary McAleenan Announces Designation of Poland into the Visa Waiver Program |date=November 6, 2019 |access-date=November 6, 2019}}</ref>

On February 12, 2021, U.S. Embassy in Croatia's Chargé d'Affaires, a.i. Victoria J. Taylor, announced on Twitter that the refusal rate for business and tourist visas in Croatia in 2020 dropped to 2.69%, marking a step forward for Croatia to join the VWP "in the near future." On August 2, 2021, [[United States Secretary of State|Secretary of State]] [[Antony Blinken]] announced that Croatia had been formally nominated to join the VWP.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-02-18|title=Croatians Soon to Travel Visa-Free to US, After the Country Met Another Condition for Joining Visa Waiver Program|url=https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/news/croatians-soon-to-travel-visa-free-to-us-after-the-country-met-another-condition-for-joining-visa-waiver-program/|access-date=2021-02-19|website=SchengenVisaInfo.com|language=en}}</ref><ref>[https://hr.usembassy.gov/croatia-formally-nominated-to-join-the-u-s-visa-waiver-program/ Croatia formally nominated to join the U.S. Visa Waiver Program], U.S. Embassy in Croatia, 2 August 2021.</ref> On September 28, 2021, [[United States Secretary of Homeland Security|Secretary of Homeland Security]] [[Alejandro Mayorkas]] officially announced that Croatia would join the VWP before December 1, 2021.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-09-28|title=Secretary Mayorkas Announces Designation of Croatia as a New Participant in the Visa Waiver Program|url=https://www.dhs.gov/news/2021/09/28/secretary-mayorkas-announces-designation-croatia-new-participant-visa-waiver-program|access-date=2021-09-28|website=Department of Homeland Security|language=en}}</ref> Croatia joined the VWP on October 23, 2021.<ref name=hr/>

On July 6, 2023, the validity of new ESTA applications by nationals of Brunei was reduced to one year.<ref name=estafaq/>

On September 27, 2023, Israel was designated to join the VWP by November 30, 2023.<ref>[https://www.dhs.gov/news/2023/09/27/secretary-mayorkas-and-secretary-blinken-announce-designation-israel-visa-waiver Secretary Mayorkas and Secretary Blinken Announce Designation of Israel into the Visa Waiver Program], U.S. Department of Homeland Security, September 27, 2023.</ref> Israel joined the VWP on October 19, 2023.<ref name=il/>

On September 24, 2024, Qatar was designated to join the VWP by December 1, 2024.<ref name=qa>{{Cite web |title=Secretary Mayorkas and Secretary Blinken Announce Designation of the State of Qatar into the Visa Waiver Program |url=https://www.dhs.gov/news/2024/09/24/secretary-mayorkas-and-secretary-blinken-announce-designation-state-qatar-visa |date=2024-09-24 |publisher=United States Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>

{| class="wikitable collapsible" style="font-size:90%"
|-
!Date of addition to the Visa Waiver Program
|-
|
* July 1, 1988: United Kingdom<ref name="fr1997">[https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1997-09-30/html/97-25982.htm Adding Slovenia to the List of Countries Authorized To Participate in the Visa Waiver Pilot Program and Designating Ireland as a Permanent Participating Country (Formerly With Probationary Status)], Federal Register, September 30, 1997.</ref>
* December 15, 1988: Japan<ref name="fr1997" />
* July 1, 1989: France, Switzerland<ref name="fr1997" />
* July 15, 1989: (West) Germany, Sweden<ref name="fr1997" />
* July 29, 1989: Italy, Netherlands<ref name="fr1997" />
* October 1, 1991: Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, New Zealand, Norway, San Marino, Spain<ref name="fr1997" />
* July 29, 1993: Brunei<ref name="fr1997" />
* April 1, 1995: Ireland<ref name="ie">[https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1995-03-28/html/95-7450.htm Visa Waiver Pilot Program; Ireland], Federal Register, March 28, 1995.</ref>
* July 8, 1996: Argentina<ref name="fr1997" />
* July 29, 1996: Australia<ref name="fr1997" />
* September 30, 1997: Slovenia<ref name="fr1997" />
* August 9, 1999: Portugal, Singapore, Uruguay<ref name="fr1999">[https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1999-08-03/html/99-19836.htm Adding Portugal, Singapore and Uruguay to the List of Countries Authorized To Participate in the Visa Waiver Pilot Program], Federal Register, August 3, 1999.</ref>
* November 17, 2008: Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, South Korea<ref name="fr2008">[https://www.federalregister.gov/a/E8-27062 Additional Countries Designated for the Visa Waiver Program], Federal Register, November 17, 2008.</ref>
* December 30, 2008: Malta<ref name="mt">[https://www.federalregister.gov/a/E8-30818 Designation of Malta for the Visa Waiver Program], Federal Register, December 30, 2008.</ref>
* April 5, 2010: Greece<ref name="gr">[https://www.federalregister.gov/a/2010-7211 Designation of Greece for the Visa Waiver Program], Federal Register, March 31, 2010.</ref>
* November 1, 2012: Taiwan<ref name="tw">[https://www.federalregister.gov/a/2012-25986 Designation of Taiwan for the Visa Waiver Program], Federal Register, October 22, 2012.</ref>
* March 31, 2014: Chile<ref name="cl">[https://www.federalregister.gov/a/2014-07254 Designation of Chile for the Visa Waiver Program], Federal Register, March 31, 2014.</ref>
* November 11, 2019: Poland<ref name="pl">[https://www.federalregister.gov/a/2019-24328 Designation of Poland for the Visa Waiver Program], Federal Register, November 11, 2019.</ref>
* October 23, 2021: Croatia<ref name="hr">{{cite web|url=https://hr.usembassy.gov/faq-croatias-inclusion-in-the-visa-waiver-program/|title=FAQ: Croatia's Inclusion in the Visa Waiver Program|date=October 22, 2021 |publisher=U.S. Embassy in Croatia|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211025160650/https://hr.usembassy.gov/faq-croatias-inclusion-in-the-visa-waiver-program/|archive-date=October 25, 2021}}</ref>
* October 19, 2023: Israel<ref name="il">[https://www.dhs.gov/news/2023/10/19/dhs-announces-start-applications-visa-free-travel-us-eligible-israeli-citizens-and DHS Announces Start of Applications for Visa-Free Travel to U.S. for Eligible Israeli Citizens and Nationals], U.S. Department of Homeland Security, October 19, 2023.</ref>
* December 1, 2024: Qatar (planned)<ref name=qa/>

Cancelled:
* February 21, 2002: Argentina<ref name="ar">[https://www.federalregister.gov/a/02-4260 Termination of the Designation of Argentina as a Participant Under the Visa Waiver Program], Federal Register, February 21, 2002.</ref>
* April 15, 2003: Uruguay<ref name="uy">[https://www.federalregister.gov/a/03-5244 Attorney General's Evaluations of the Designations of Belgium, Italy, Portugal, and Uruguay as Participants Under the Visa Waiver Program], March 7, 2003.</ref>
|}

===Hungary's participation===
In October 2017, U.S. officials discovered a massive [[passport fraud]] scheme in Hungary, in which hundreds of non-Hungarians obtained genuine [[Hungarian passport]]s.<ref name=HudsonPethro>John Hudson & Andras Petho, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/massive-passport-fraud-in-hungary-allowed-dozens-of-people-to-enter-us-under-false-identities-officials-say/2018/05/09/b1ee48be-523a-11e8-b00a-17f9fda3859b_story.html Massive passport fraud in Hungary allowed dozens of people to enter U.S. under false identities, officials say], ''Washington Post'' (May 12, 2018).</ref><ref name=Morris>Loveday Morris, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/08/01/hungary-passport-fraud-us-travel-restrictions/ After massive Hungarian passport fraud, U.S. tightens travel restrictions], ''Washington Post'' (August 1, 2023).</ref> A [[U.S. Department of Homeland Security]] report (obtained by the ''Washington Post'' and reported in May 2018) showed that of approximately 700 non-Hungarians who had obtained the passports, 85 had attempted to travel to the United States under false identites, 65 had been admitted to the United States through the VWP, and (as of October 2017) approximately 30 remained in the United States despite the efforts of U.S. authorities to locate and deport them.<ref name=HudsonPethro/> The fraud was enabled by a policy implemented in 2011 by Hungarian Prime Minister [[Viktor Orbán]]; under the policy, the Hungarian government provided passports to [[Hungarian diaspora|ethnic Hungarians living outside Hungary]], who could prove that one of their ancestors was a Hungarian citizen, with the goal of expediting [[naturalization]].<ref name=HudsonPethro/><ref name=Szandelszky>Béla Szandelszky, [https://apnews.com/article/us-hungary-visa-free-travel-restrictions-8d3d2394ca48fefd815f9a95845a58dd US restricts visa-free travel for Hungarian passport holders because of security concerns], Associated Press (August 1, 2023).</ref> More than a million people obtained Hungarian citizenship through the program.<ref name=Morris/><ref name=HudsonPethro/> Because the program lacked stringent identity-verification procedures, it was abused by bad actors, including criminals and applicants who used forged documents to falsely claim Hungarian descent.<ref name=Szandelszky/><ref name=HudsonPethro/> Some who received Hungarian passports under the program were criminals without any connection to Hungary.<ref name=Szandelszky/>

U.S. officials were alarmed by the risks created by the program, including the risk that the passports might be used in drug smuggling, organized crime, illegal immigration, espionage, or terrorism.<ref name=HudsonPethro/> In October 2017, the U.S. government downgraded Hungary's status in the VWP to "provisional" and sought to develop a "cooperative action plan" within 45 days.<ref name=HudsonPethro/><ref name="thesundaily">{{cite web|url=https://www.thesundaily.my/archive/us-threatens-end-hungary-visa-waivers-after-passport-fraud-report-GUARCH546813|title=US threatens end to Hungary visa waivers after passport 'fraud': Report|work=The Sun Daily|date=May 11, 2018|access-date=May 11, 2018}}</ref> U.S. and Hungarian officials engaged in a dialogue for several years on resolving the security risks, but Hungarian authorities failed to resolve the issues to the U.S. government's satisfaction.<ref name=Szandelszky/> As a result, beginning in 2020 and 2021, the U.S. government barred Hungarian passport-holders who were not born in Hungary from obtaining ESTA pre-travel authorizations.<ref>Lili Bayer, [https://www.politico.eu/article/us-america-visa-waiver-program-esta-visa-waiver-hungary-tourism-viktor-orban/  US limits visa waiver for Hungarians], ''Politico'' (August 1, 2023).</ref><ref>[https://www.imidaily.com/europe/us-drops-visa-waivers-for-hungarian-citizens-born-outside-the-country-cites-fraud-concerns/ US Drops Visa-Waivers for Hungarian Citizens Born Outside the Country, Cites Fraud Concerns], ''Investment Migration Insider'' (April 22, 2022).</ref> In August 2023, the U.S. government imposed additional restrictions on Hungary's participation in the VWP: the ESTA validity period for Hungarian passport-holders was reduced from two years to one year, and each ESTA on a Hungarian passport would be valid for only one entry to the United States.<ref name=Szandelszky/><ref name=Morris/>

===Aspiring countries===
Of the 19 road map countries listed in 2007,<ref name=roadmap/> 12 have been admitted to the VWP. As of 2024, the U.S. government cited six countries aspiring to join the VWP:<ref>{{cite web |url=https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46300 |title=Adding Countries to the Visa Waiver Program: National Security and Tourism Considerations |publisher=Congressional Research Service |date=September 23, 2024}} This report does not cite [[Turkey]], the remaining road map country listed in 2007. Chile, Croatia and Qatar were not listed as road map countries in 2007 but were later admitted to the VWP.</ref>

{|style=" border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); background-color: white; border: 1px solid white; padding: 5px;"
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
|
*{{flag|Argentina}}{{efn|Included in the VWP from 1996 to 2002.<ref name=ar/>}}
*{{flag|Brazil}}
*{{flag|Bulgaria}}
|valign=top|
*{{flag|Cyprus}}
*{{flag|Romania}}
*{{flag|Uruguay}}{{efn|Included in the VWP from 1999 to 2003.<ref name=uy/>}}
|}

In 2014, the [[European Union]] pressured the United States to extend the Visa Waiver Program to its five member states that were not yet included in it (Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Poland and Romania).<ref>Gotev, Georgi. "[http://www.euractiv.com/justice/eu-gives-usa-deadline-reciprocat-news-533275 EU gives US six months to come clean on visa policy]". ''Euractiv''. February 5, 2014.</ref> In November 2014, the Bulgarian government announced that it would not ratify the [[Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership]] unless the United States lifted the visa requirement for its nationals.<ref>"[http://www.novinite.com/articles/165030/Bulgaria+Will+Not+Sign+TTIP+Unless+US+Lifts+Visa+Requirements+-+Minister Bulgaria Will Not Sign TTIP Unless US Lifts Visa Requirements – Minister]". ''Novinte''. November 26, 2014.</ref> Due to incomplete U.S. reciprocity, in March 2017 the [[European Parliament]] approved a non-binding resolution calling on the [[European Commission]] to suspend the visa exemption for U.S. nationals to travel the [[Schengen Area]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/europe-visa-free-travel-americans-european-parliament-vote-a7609406.html|title=European Parliament votes to end visa-free travel for Americans|last=Sharman|first=Jon|date=3 March 2016|work=[[The Independent]]|access-date=4 March 2017}}</ref> On May 2, 2017, the [[European Commission]] decided not act on the resolution and hoped to restart full visa reciprocity negotiations for the remaining EU member states with the [[First presidency of Donald Trump|new U.S. administration]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Press corner|url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/home/en|access-date=2021-02-19|website=European Commission - European Commission|language=en}}</ref> In 2019, as mentioned above, Poland, which had been the last Schengen Area country not yet included in the VWP, was admitted to the program. In October 2020, the European Parliament repeated its request for the European Commission to suspend the visa exemption for U.S. nationals, and in March 2021, it filed a judicial action against the European Commission for its failure to act on the subject.<ref name=eucourt>{{cite web |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62021CJ0137 |title=Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 September 2023, European Parliament v European Commission |publisher=EUR-Lex}}</ref> In 2021, Croatia was admitted to the VWP before joining the Schengen Area in 2023. On March 15, 2023, [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] [[United States Senate|senator]] [[Dick Durbin]] introduced a bill that would allow including Romania in the VWP regardless of the program requirements.<ref>{{cite web|title= S.814 - Romania Visa Waiver Act of 2023 [118th Congress (2023-2024)]|url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/814|access-date= July 8, 2023|website=[[Congress.gov]]|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Romanian citizens could travel to the United States without a visa for a maximum of 90 days|url=https://radiomoldova.md/p/8280/romanian-citizens-could-travel-to-the-united-states-without-a-visa-for-a-maximum-of-90-days|date=March 16, 2023|website=[[Radio Moldova]]|language=en}}</ref> In September 2023, the [[Court of Justice of the European Union]] dismissed the judicial action brought by the European Parliament, ruling that the European Commission was not obligated to suspend the visa exemption for U.S. nationals.<ref name=eucourt/> In December 2023, during a visit to the United States, [[Romanian Prime Minister]] [[Marcel Ciolacu]] said that Romania's entry into the U.S. visa-free program would be announced in 2024, ahead of the 2025 deadline discussed with the U.S. representatives.<ref>{{cite web|title=Romanians Could Soon Travel to the US Visa-Free|url=https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/news/romanians-could-soon-travel-to-the-us-visa-free/|date=December 7, 2023|website=SchengenVisaInfo|language=en}}</ref> 

As of 2024, three EU member states ([[Bulgaria]], [[Cyprus]] and [[Romania]]) are still not included in the VWP, and nationals of [[Hungary]] born outside Hungary are automatically denied ESTA due to a passport fraud scheme described above.<ref name=hu/>

==U.S. territories==
The Visa Waiver Program applies to all permanently inhabited [[U.S. territories]] except American Samoa.

===Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands===
Although the U.S. Visa Waiver Program also applies to the U.S. territories of [[Guam]] and the [[Northern Mariana Islands]], and therefore nationals of VWP countries may travel to these territories with an ESTA, both territories have additional visa waiver programs for certain nationalities. The Guam–CNMI Visa Waiver Program, first enacted in October 1988 and periodically amended, permits nationals from 12 countries in Asia, Europe and Oceania to enter Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands as tourists for up to 45 days without the need to obtain a U.S. visa or an ESTA.<ref name="8 CFR 212.1"/> A parole policy also allows nationals of China visa-free access to the Northern Mariana Islands for up to 14 days.<ref>{{cite web | title=Limit of parole of nationals of the People's Republic of China into Guam and/or Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands | url=https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/assets/documents/2019-Oct/PRC%20Guam%20and%20CNMI%20Parole%20Program.pdf}}</ref>

{|style=" border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); background-color: white; border: 1px solid white; padding: 5px;"
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
|
*{{flag|Australia}}
*{{flag|Brunei}}
*{{flag|China}}{{efn|Up to 14 days, for the Northern Mariana Islands only, under a separate parole policy.}}
*{{flag|Hong Kong}}{{efn|Holders of a [[British National (Overseas) passport]] or [[Hong Kong Special Administrative Region passport]], in conjunction with a [[Hong Kong identity card]]. On July 14, 2020, [[Executive Order 13936]] ended the treatment of Hong Kong separately from China under U.S. immigration law, thus removing Hong Kong from the visa waiver for Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.kanditnews.com/post/trump-ends-hong-kong-tourism-to-guam-cnmi-msn-saves-the-rest-from-cuts-casino-may-be-affected |title=Trump ends Hong Kong tourism to Guam & CNMI; MSN saves the rest from cuts; casino may be affected |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210122054218/https://www.kanditnews.com/post/trump-ends-hong-kong-tourism-to-guam-cnmi-msn-saves-the-rest-from-cuts-casino-may-be-affected |archive-date=January 22, 2021 |publisher=Kandit News Group |date=July 29, 2020}}</ref><ref>[https://www.mobilework.law/2020/07/president-trump-issues-executive-order-on-us-hong-kong-relations/ President Trump Issues Executive Order on US-Hong Kong Relations], Mayer Brown, July 27, 2020.</ref> On July 9, 2021, the governor of the Northern Mariana Islands announced that the federal government had approved his request to reinclude Hong Kong in the visa waiver for the Northern Mariana Islands.<ref>[https://governor.gov.mp/news/press-releases/biden-administration-approves-governor-torres-request-to-re-include-hong-kong-on-cnmi-visa-waiver-program/ Biden administration approves Governor Torres' request to re-include Hong Kong on CNMI visa waiver program], Governor of the Northern Mariana Islands, July 9, 2021.</ref> It is unclear whether Hong Kong was reincluded in the visa waiver on its own, for Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, for stays of up to 45 days, or under a parole policy as part of China, for the Northern Mariana Islands only, for stays of up to 14 days, or under some other arrangement.}}
*{{flag|Japan}}
|valign="top"|
*{{flag|Malaysia}}
*{{flag|Nauru}}
*{{flag|New Zealand}}
*{{flag|Papua New Guinea}}
*{{flag|Singapore}}
|valign="top"|
*{{flag|South Korea}}
*{{flag|Taiwan}}{{efn|Must travel on a [[nonstop flight]] from Taiwan and hold a valid [[Taiwanese passport]] and [[National Identification Card (Taiwan)|national identification card]].}}
*{{flag|United Kingdom}}{{efn|name=gb}}
|}

===American Samoa===
U.S. visa policy does not apply to [[American Samoa]], as it has its own entry requirements and maintains control of its own borders. Hence, neither a U.S. visa nor an ESTA can be used to enter American Samoa. If required, an entry permit or electronic authorization must be obtained from the Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.legalaffairs.as.gov/copy-of-immigration-office-1 | title=Immigration Office, Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa}}</ref>

Nationals of [[Canada]], [[Marshall Islands]], [[Federated States of Micronesia|Micronesia]], [[Palau]], and countries in the U.S. Visa Waiver Program (except Qatar) may visit American Samoa for up to 30 days without an entry permit. However, if arriving by air, they must apply online for an electronic authorization called "OK Board", at least 3 business days before travel, for a fee of 40 [[United States dollar|USD]].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.legalaffairs.as.gov/copy-of-entry-permit-waiver-program | title=Entry Permit Waiver Program}}, Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa.</ref> Nationals of [[Samoa]] may also apply for a similar electronic authorization to visit American Samoa for up to 7 days, for a fee of 10 USD.<ref>[https://www.legalaffairs.as.gov/permit-waiver-7 Entry Permit Waiver Program (PW7)], Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa.</ref>

Nationals of other countries need an entry permit, which must be requested by a local sponsor at the Immigration Office of the Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa.<ref>[https://www.legalaffairs.as.gov/30-day-permit-info 30-day permit], Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa.</ref>

==Statistics==
[[File:US visa refusal rate.png|600px|thumbnail|
{|
|colspan=3|U.S. [[B visa]] refusal rate in fiscal year 2023 (October 2022 to September 2023):
|-
|valign=top|{{legend|#00b900|<3%}} {{legend|#56eb15|3–5%}} {{legend|#a7eb15|5–10%}} {{legend|#ebde15|10–20%}}
|valign=top|{{legend|#e9b21d|20–30%}} {{legend|#c45327|30–40%}} {{legend|#c42727|40–50%}} {{legend|#910505|>50%}}
|valign=top|{{legend|#7816a5|United States}} {{legend|#1d236f|Visa-exempt countries}}
|}]]

===Admissions===
{| class="wikitable sortable collapsible collapsed" style="font-size:90%; line-height:1.2; text-align:right"
|+style=line-height:1.5 class=nowrap|Admissions into the United States under the VWP by country and [[Fiscal year#United States|fiscal year]]
! Country
! 2022<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ohss/topics/immigration/yearbook/2022|title=Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2022|publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>
! 2021<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ohss/topics/immigration/yearbook/2021|title=Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2021|publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>
! 2020<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ohss/topics/immigration/yearbook/2020|title=Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2020|publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>
! 2019<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ohss/topics/immigration/yearbook/2019/table28|title=Table 28. Nonimmigrant Admissions (I-94 Only) by Selected Category of Admission and Region and Country of Citizenship: Fiscal Year 2019|publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>
! 2018<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ohss/topics/immigration/yearbook/2018/table28|title=Table 28. Nonimmigrant Admissions (I-94 Only) by Selected Category of Admission and Region and Country of Citizenship: Fiscal Year 2018|publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>
! 2017<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ohss/topics/immigration/yearbook/2017/table28|title=Table 28. Nonimmigrant Admissions (I-94 Only) by Selected Category of Admission and Region and Country of Citizenship: Fiscal Year 2017|publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>
! 2016<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ohss/topics/immigration/yearbook/2016/table28|title=Table 28. Nonimmigrant Admissions (I-94 Only) by Selected Category of Admission and Region and Country of Citizenship: Fiscal Year 2016|publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>
|-
|{{left}}Andorra || 1,100 || 80 || 532 || 1,544 || 1,692 || 1,371 || 1,357
|-
|{{left}}Australia || 463,792 || 23,096 || 532,815 || 1,369,855 || 1,412,605 || 1,431,077 || 1,393,642
|-
|{{left}}Austria || 122,008 || 8,779 || 79,871 || 208,366 || 206,643 || 210,727 || 216,122
|-
|{{left}}Belgium || 187,804 || 10,472 || 108,442 || 297,934 || 303,669 || 295,607 || 291,235
|-
|{{left}}Brunei || 302 || 25 || 421 || 1,014 || 1,086 || 1,034 || 1,081
|-
|{{left}}Chile || 443,702 || 138,940 || 157,498 || 350,811 || 315,703 || 268,704 || 226,127
|-
|{{left}}Croatia || 14,474 || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}}
|-
|{{left}}Czech Republic || 74,961 || 4,352 || 50,279 || 128,856 || 122,434 || 116,097 || 102,061
|-
|{{left}}Denmark || 173,843 || 6,471 || 124,274 || 317,683 || 338,063 || 345,070 || 335,158
|-
|{{left}}Estonia || 13,900 || 965 || 12,594 || 25,730 || 23,878 || 24,208 || 22,682
|-
|{{left}}Finland || 64,116 || 2,533 || 70,664 || 150,040 || 150,440 || 157,079 || 161,474
|-
|{{left}}France || 1,343,142 || 73,159 || 864,581 || 2,121,625 || 2,022,153 || 1,891,564 || 1,871,506
|-
|{{left}}Germany || 1,251,241 || 84,444 || 829,996 || 2,084,664 || 2,130,453 || 2,160,492 || 2,138,056
|-
|{{left}}Greece || 56,255 || 3,311 || 41,027 || 87,520 || 82,453 || 73,240 || 66,999
|-
|{{left}}Hong Kong{{efn|name=gump|Visa waiver only for Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.}} || 27 || 3 || 123 || 2,415 || 2,983 || 5,979 || 2,736
|-
|{{left}}Hungary || 53,325 || 3,115 || 47,966 || 110,906 || 98,060 || 90,997 || 81,320
|-
|{{left}}Iceland || 33,741 || 771 || 25,299 || 63,569 || 68,724 || 62,782 || 54,571
|-
|{{left}}Ireland || 366,153 || 10,226 || 245,669 || 588,911 || 576,099 || 521,641 || 491,963
|-
|{{left}}Italy || 769,705 || 104,633 || 494,102 || 1,333,908 || 1,315,270 || 1,248,156 || 1,234,097
|-
|{{left}}Japan || 338,837 || 49,627 || 1,590,287 || 3,615,829 || 3,509,759 || 3,672,493 || 3,696,408
|-
|{{left}}Latvia || 14,272 || 1,279 || 10,581 || 22,887 || 21,544 || 21,459 || 19,107
|-
|{{left}}Liechtenstein || 1,004 || 60 || 670 || 1,820 || 1,890 || 1,919 || 2,053
|-
|{{left}}Lithuania || 28,201 || 2,312 || 18,490 || 41,297 || 37,734 || 24,383 || 30,287
|-
|{{left}}Luxembourg || 9,371 || 431 || 5,101 || 14,864 || 14,196 || 13,008 || 14,195
|-
|{{left}}Malaysia{{efn|name=gump}} || 54 || 7 || 152 || 488 || 416 || 609 || 255
|-
|{{left}}Malta || 4,900 || 451 || 3,117 || 8,157 || 6,999 || 6,252 || 6,000
|-
|{{left}}Monaco || 580 || 34 || 408 || 998 || 888 || 991 || 1,097
|-
|{{left}}Nauru{{efn|name=gump}} || ≤236 || 0 || ≤32 || 22 || 28 || 5 || 9
|-
|{{left}}Netherlands || 480,942 || 52,601 || 317,788 || 813,888 || 812,905 || 777,886 || 751,482
|-
|{{left}}New Zealand || 103,279 || 7,039 || 121,474 || 338,162 || 345,102 || 338,371 || 322,001
|-
|{{left}}Norway || 110,403 || 3,387 || 97,091 || 263,579 || 276,912 || 290,688 || 274,958
|-
|{{left}}Papua New Guinea{{efn|name=gump}} || 26 || 0 || ≤32 || 55 || 59 || 100 || 252
|-
|{{left}}Poland || 138,275 || 5,137 || 27,544 || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}}
|-
|{{left}}Portugal || 137,241 || 12,290 || 86,176 || 207,772 || 205,780 || 185,010 || 174,040
|-
|{{left}}San Marino || ≤236 || 30 || 286 || 711 || 746 || 692 || 693
|-
|{{left}}Singapore || 66,714 || 4,286 || 63,290 || 149,381 || 138,013 || 133,627 || 132,204
|-
|{{left}}Slovakia || 32,200 || 2,060 || 22,414 || 59,527 || 53,181 || 49,399 || 46,692
|-
|{{left}}Slovenia || 14,521 || 1,521 || 13,719 || 30,275 || 27,019 || 25,015 || 24,197
|-
|{{left}}South Korea || 643,164 || 87,520 || 999,347 || 2,111,855 || 2,290,705 || 2,223,813 || 1,862,434
|-
|{{left}}Spain || 784,673 || 135,197 || 441,802 || 1,122,063 || 1,080,300 || 1,015,528 || 991,483
|-
|{{left}}Sweden || 198,093 || 8,566 || 204,290 || 466,465 || 529,534 || 554,600 || 572,385
|-
|{{left}}Switzerland || 215,053 || 19,137 || 145,192 || 387,285 || 403,095 || 416,944 || 438,061
|-
|{{left}}Taiwan || 74,654 || 24,790 || 165,869 || 440,995 || 442,622 || 419,748 || 388,629
|-
|{{left}}United Kingdom || 2,795,703 || 115,057 || 1,918,654 || 4,758,514 || 4,635,480 || 4,558,681 || 4,691,708
|-class=sortbottom
!{{left}}Total || 11,625,987 || 1,008,194 || 9,939,927 || 24,102,240 || 24,007,315 || 23,637,046 || 23,132,817
|}

===Visa refusal rate===
To qualify for the Visa Waiver Program, a country must have had a visa refusal rate of less than 3% for the previous year.<ref name=crs/> This refusal rate is based on applications for [[B visa]]s, for tourism and business purposes. B visas are adjudicated based on applicant interviews, which generally last between 60 and 90 seconds.<ref>{{cite web|title=Shortcuts to Immigration|date=January 2003|url=http://www.cis.org/TemporaryVisaProgram-Broken|publisher=[[Center for Immigration Studies]]|access-date=October 10, 2013 |last1=Vaughan |first1=Jessica M. }}</ref>

{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed sortable nowrap" style="font-size:90%; line-height:1.2; text-align:right; width:1em"
|+style=line-height:1.5|Refusal rates for B visas by country and fiscal year{{efn|Refusal rates lower than the VWP requirement (10% for fiscal year 2008, or 3% for other years), for nationalities without visa waivers, are highlighted in green in the table. Refusal rates for nationalities with visa waivers are highlighted in yellow.}}
! Country
! 2023<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY23.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2023|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2022<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY22.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2022|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2021<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY21.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2021|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2020<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY20.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2020|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2019<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY19.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2019|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2018<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY%2018.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2018|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2017<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY%2017.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2017|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2016<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY16.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2016|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2015<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY15.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2015|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2014<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY14.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2014|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2013<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY13.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2013|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2012<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY12.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2012|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2011<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY11.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2011|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2010<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY10.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2010|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2009<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY09.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2009|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2008<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY08.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2008|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
|-
|{{left}}Afghanistan || 48.73% || 52.65% || 72.09% || 56.05% || 68.42% || 71.39% || 72.14% || 73.80% || 61.03% || 46.7% || 62.7% || 59.3% || 45.7% || 56.0% || 59.6% || 51.0%
|-
|{{left}}Albania || 31.10% || 27.55% || 10.78% || 40.06% || 41.45% || 41.92% || 40.45% || 35.95% || 36.82% || 39.8% || 40.4% || 40.5% || 42.3% || 37.7% || 39.6% || 38.7%
|-
|{{left}}Algeria || 35.19% || 18.10% || 38.40% || 49.69% || 44.22% || 39.26% || 43.96% || 36.00% || 25.92% || 23.1% || 28.3% || 24.2% || 29.2% || 21.9% || 20.5% || 20.3%
|-
|{{left}}Andorra || bgcolor=#FF8|22.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|50.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.50% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|28.57% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|60.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|50.0%
|-
|{{left}}Angola || 48.94% || 47.25% || 58.52% || 62.15% || 58.26% || 51.76% || 36.01% || 48.52% || 26.77% || 21.4% || 24.8% || 19.9% || 17.2% || 21.4% || 17.7% || 17.1%
|-
|{{left}}Antigua and Barbuda || 18.60% || 14.09% || 16.66% || 23.44% || 15.25% || 19.07% || 20.50% || 22.11% || 20.17% || 20.8% || 18.1% || 24.1% || 20.2% || 19.7% || 13.1% || 21.7%
|-
|{{left}}Argentina || 8.21% || 3.66% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.31% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.79% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.07% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.73% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.79% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.14% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.14% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.7% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.5% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.5% || 3.1% || 3.3% || bgcolor=#AFA|3.1%
|-
|{{left}}Armenia || 51.49% || 37.87% || 37.07% || 56.47% || 51.65% || 53.83% || 51.87% || 45.88% || 47.17% || 43.8% || 37.9% || 38.5% || 54.5% || 51.4% || 48.9% || 53.3%
|-
|{{left}}Australia || bgcolor=#FF8|16.75% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.55% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.27% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.74% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.18% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.99% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.18% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.38% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.24% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.5%
|-
|{{left}}Austria || bgcolor=#FF8|9.38% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.97% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.29% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.91% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.21% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.39% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.93% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.40% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.3%
|-
|{{left}}Azerbaijan || 35.99% || 23.54% || 12.27% || 26.41% || 25.43% || 28.45% || 27.63% || 14.83% || 12.93% || 13.5% || 9.4% || 11.4% || 12.9% || 13.5% || 11.5% || 14.0%
|-
|{{left}}Bahamas || bgcolor=#FF8|8.38% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.91% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.59% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.51% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.32% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.35% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.40% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.60% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.90% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.70% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.90%
|-
|{{left}}Bahrain || 11.11% || 28.41% || 22.48% || 9.04% || 13.55% || 6.96% || 9.53% || 6.26% || 3.81% || 4.7% || 4.1% || 7.7% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.4% || 4.1% || 6.7% || bgcolor=#AFA|6.6%
|-
|{{left}}Bangladesh || 43.66% || 30.30% || 29.91% || 40.34% || 39.78% || 40.05% || 60.88% || 62.82% || 59.96% || 50.8% || 43.5% || 26.0% || 42.4% || 36.4% || 34.1% || 48.2%
|-
|{{left}}Barbados || 9.63% || 6.55% || 12.93% || 10.79% || 6.76% || 7.07% || 8.72% || 11.24% || 9.54% || 9.8% || 9.9% || 12.4% || 10.7% || 10.2% || 7.8% || 10.1%
|-
|{{left}}Belarus || 32.80% || 26.05% || 16.81% || 27.01% || 21.93% || 23.26% || 21.69% || 14.87% || 12.53% || 14.0% || 20.7% || 19.5% || 19.4% || 19.7% || 15.5% || 21.1%
|-
|{{left}}Belgium || bgcolor=#FF8|8.76% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.73% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.57% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.47% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.96% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.77% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.96% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.85% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.4%
|-
|{{left}}Belize || 26.25% || 26.45% || 25.36% || 23.31% || 28.63% || 34.55% || 30.91% || 35.21% || 30.47% || 16.4% || 19.7% || 22.7% || 36.8% || 33.4% || 21.4% || 25.4%
|-
|{{left}}Benin || 49.11% || 40.57% || 32.05% || 45.27% || 48.48% || 47.74% || 42.10% || 38.01% || 35.74% || 31.4% || 34.6% || 33.0% || 48.2% || 39.7% || 37.0% || 39.1%
|-
|{{left}}Bhutan || 45.03% || 34.55% || 43.33% || 53.56% || 57.13% || 59.63% || 52.43% || 69.78% || 54.55% || 43.6% || 42.0% || 52.2% || 60.7% || 64.1% || 68.1% || 48.3%
|-
|{{left}}Bolivia || 22.15% || 17.15% || 11.30% || 20.36% || 24.17% || 22.19% || 18.08% || 14.36% || 13.56% || 13.6% || 15.4% || 16.3% || 24.0% || 23.8% || 17.4% || 23.6%
|-
|{{left}}Bosnia and Herzegovina || 18.49% || 19.91% || 21.84% || 16.01% || 25.27% || 23.50% || 16.37% || 19.70% || 20.38% || 16.1% || 26.5% || 14.4% || 10.1% || 9.7% || 13.9% || 21.3%
|-
|{{left}}Botswana || 23.81% || 11.19% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 19.26% || 17.54% || 18.67% || 17.94% || 18.97% || 16.67% || 16.9% || 17.3% || 12.5% || 11.0% || 13.9% || 16.8% || 15.6%
|-
|{{left}}Brazil || 11.94% || 14.48% || 14.25% || 23.16% || 18.48% || 12.73% || 12.34% || 16.70% || 5.36% || 3.2% || 3.5% || 3.2% || 3.8% || 5.2% || 7.0% || bgcolor=#AFA|5.5%
|-
|{{left}}Brunei || bgcolor=#FF8|10.71% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.76% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.35% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.70% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.51% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.3%
|-
|{{left}}Bulgaria || 11.61% || 10.00% || 18.40% || 12.52% || 9.75% || 11.32% || 14.97% || 16.86% || 17.26% || 15.2% || 19.9% || 18.0% || 15.7% || 17.2% || 17.8% || 13.3%
|-
|{{left}}Burkina Faso || 45.20% || 39.25% || 24.55% || 62.86% || 62.32% || 71.16% || 75.74% || 65.35% || 50.37% || 37.4% || 31.7% || 35.3% || 37.9% || 45.8% || 48.9% || 44.4%
|-
|{{left}}Burundi || 66.29% || 69.52% || 53.23% || 77.72% || 73.16% || 74.39% || 75.55% || 61.33% || 58.35% || 50.0% || 52.7% || 46.1% || 45.5% || 36.4% || 52.2% || 58.8%
|-
|{{left}}Cambodia || 25.95% || 24.50% || 35.62% || 26.50% || 33.65% || 32.63% || 41.05% || 35.62% || 48.41% || 39.9% || 28.9% || 33.9% || 44.0% || 42.9% || 47.2% || 44.3%
|-
|{{left}}Cameroon || 58.62% || 52.22% || 39.93% || 57.12% || 57.97% || 52.27% || 47.29% || 36.84% || 29.89% || 28.2% || 37.3% || 41.1% || 40.6% || 40.5% || 48.3% || 46.7%
|-
|{{left}}Canada || bgcolor=#FF8|52.04% || bgcolor=#FF8|58.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|51.81% || bgcolor=#FF8|52.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|43.76% || bgcolor=#FF8|38.98% || bgcolor=#FF8|41.14% || bgcolor=#FF8|47.93% || bgcolor=#FF8|49.13% || bgcolor=#FF8|48.70% || bgcolor=#FF8|43.10% || bgcolor=#FF8|44.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|52.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|57.10% || bgcolor=#FF8|52.80% || bgcolor=#FF8|39.00%
|-
|{{left}}Cape Verde || 41.55% || 33.68% || 25.32% || 42.74% || 52.66% || 54.22% || 50.70% || 45.89% || 36.05% || 28.7% || 36.4% || 36.6% || 38.3% || 46.3% || 45.3% || 42.7%
|-
|{{left}}Central African Republic || 56.67% || 36.70% || 36.36% || 48.67% || 37.45% || 36.03% || 44.24% || 35.12% || 32.43% || 46.6% || 46.4% || 32.2% || 47.4% || 48.3% || 45.0% || 39.6%
|-
|{{left}}Chad || 42.50% || 69.39% || 72.77% || 70.60% || 70.16% || 60.80% || 51.65% || 42.53% || 33.87% || 32.4% || 36.3% || 43.8% || 42.7% || 58.5% || 37.6% || 41.4%
|-
|{{left}}Chile || bgcolor=#FF8|16.12% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.75% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.42% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.54% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.32% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.34% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.87% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.43% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.66% || bgcolor=#FF8|2.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.6% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.8% || 3.4% || 5.0% || 5.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|8.9%
|-
|{{left}}China || 26.63% || 30.39% || 79.09% || 22.12% || 18.22% || 17.00% || 14.57% || 12.35% || 10.03% || 9.0% || 8.5% || 8.5% || 12.0% || 13.3% || 15.6% || 18.2%
|-
|{{left}}Colombia || 20.59% || 32.86% || 27.75% || 46.82% || 41.93% || 35.11% || 21.93% || 17.79% || 15.52% || 12.3% || 10.4% || 11.2% || 21.7% || 30.7% || 27.3% || 25.6%
|-
|{{left}}Comoros || 33.33% || 43.48% || 73.68% || 86.15% || 53.02% || 69.46% || 48.45% || 53.73% || 54.44% || 17.0% || 32.6% || 22.1% || 29.6% || 43.6% || 24.5% || 14.0%
|-
|{{left}}Congo || 49.65% || 37.19% || 63.82% || 59.34% || 60.49% || 52.23% || 48.47% || 46.55% || 40.77% || 35.4% || 27.5% || 30.7% || 25.2% || 34.4% || 33.0% || 33.2%
|-
|{{left}}Costa Rica || 16.09% || 12.71% || 7.97% || 24.77% || 18.66% || 9.91% || 6.49% || 8.39% || 9.83% || 11.4% || 13.7% || 11.3% || 13.7% || 17.7% || 16.6% || 21.2%
|-
|{{left}}Croatia || bgcolor=#FF8|9.32% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.56% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.65% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.69% || 4.02% || 5.92% || 5.10% || 6.78% || 5.29% || 6.1% || 5.9% || 4.4% || 6.3% || 5.3% || 5.3% || bgcolor=#AFA|5.1%
|-
|{{left}}Cuba || 49.96% || 56.51% || 52.69% || 60.15% || 53.40% || 50.97% || 77.17% || 81.85% || 76.03% || 66.2% || 61.1% || 38.7% || 33.0% || 20.5% || 31.3% || 45.2%
|-
|{{left}}Cyprus || 4.48% || 6.22% || 15.09% || 6.21% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.78% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.38% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.69% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.03% || 3.53% || 3.5% || 4.0% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.7% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.7%
|-
|{{left}}Czech Republic || bgcolor=#FF8|8.05% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.50% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.24% || bgcolor=#FF8|26.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.37% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.81% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|5.2%
|-
|{{left}}Democratic Republic of the Congo || 48.53% || 43.93% || 37.36% || 58.03% || 53.80% || 50.56% || 49.94% || 45.63% || 45.62% || 39.1% || 41.9% || 37.4% || 39.1% || 40.8% || 35.6% || 36.2%
|-
|{{left}}Denmark || bgcolor=#FF8|10.66% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.17% || bgcolor=#FF8|31.11% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.58% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.26% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.38% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.18% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.74% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.73% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.6%
|-
|{{left}}Djibouti || 68.37% || 74.44% || 88.34% || 69.79% || 85.35% || 82.96% || 74.80% || 47.09% || 52.00% || 50.1% || 62.6% || 64.5% || 58.0% || 60.2% || 42.1% || 42.5%
|-
|{{left}}Dominica || 29.10% || 25.00% || 22.85% || 30.38% || 26.83% || 37.13% || 28.74% || 31.63% || 33.33% || 29.0% || 30.2% || 31.7% || 29.2% || 27.5% || 20.3% || 29.5%
|-
|{{left}}Dominican Republic || 36.69% || 15.75% || 4.33% || 39.18% || 53.21% || 49.54% || 35.78% || 31.88% || 33.78% || 35.9% || 41.3% || 32.0% || 32.1% || 31.2% || 34.6% || 45.6%
|-
|{{left}}East Timor || 8.51% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 21.43% || 4.23% || 8.16% || 7.02% || 26.67% || 12.68% || 25.0% || 5.6% || 16.7% || 25.5% || 13.3% || 17.5% || 16.7%
|-
|{{left}}Ecuador || 26.67% || 17.51% || 15.68% || 33.44% || 34.05% || 31.38% || 27.95% || 29.18% || 31.34% || 20.8% || 16.9% || 18.5% || 23.0% || 27.1% || 36.0% || 40.0%
|-
|{{left}}Egypt || 26.11% || 23.11% || 23.81% || 35.16% || 31.83% || 32.15% || 34.24% || 28.61% || 33.57% || 34.0% || 39.5% || 32.4% || 24.0% || 31.3% || 29.7% || 35.3%
|-
|{{left}}El Salvador || 57.91% || 45.46% || 20.63% || 62.95% || 58.18% || 51.49% || 52.97% || 57.12% || 45.72% || 36.3% || 45.1% || 41.4% || 47.1% || 47.4% || 52.1% || 45.7%
|-
|{{left}}Equatorial Guinea || 40.35% || 48.32% || 74.13% || 59.18% || 27.79% || 21.29% || 18.21% || 17.75% || 19.30% || 17.8% || 16.2% || 10.0% || 6.6% || 12.2% || 8.2% || 11.1%
|-
|{{left}}Eritrea || 61.97% || 47.04% || 55.96% || 63.62% || 65.39% || 69.54% || 71.69% || 50.49% || 55.67% || 41.7% || 40.5% || 39.2% || 46.2% || 52.6% || 48.2% || 51.1%
|-
|{{left}}Estonia || bgcolor=#FF8|16.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.43% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.09% || bgcolor=#FF8|32.65% || bgcolor=#FF8|24.81% || bgcolor=#FF8|26.73% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.16% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.74% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.53% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|29.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.2% || bgcolor=#AFA|3.9%
|-
|{{left}}Eswatini || 7.84% || 9.30% || 8.89% || 5.52% || 5.73% || 8.49% || 12.59% || 8.03% || 12.95% || 10.0% || 4.5% || 4.9% || 10.4% || 9.0% || 10.4% || 13.0%
|-
|{{left}}Ethiopia || 41.20% || 25.32% || 7.52% || 39.73% || 45.46% || 41.74% || 50.30% || 38.13% || 48.32% || 44.9% || 35.6% || 39.7% || 41.7% || 49.1% || 50.6% || 46.7%
|-
|{{left}}Fiji || 41.88% || 45.36% || 56.64% || 44.44% || 38.96% || 41.74% || 26.59% || 20.23% || 14.92% || 14.0% || 27.2% || 26.9% || 31.4% || 33.8% || 40.0% || 38.0%
|-
|{{left}}Finland || bgcolor=#FF8|22.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.07% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.51% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.03% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.05% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.78% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.72% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.86% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.1%
|-
|{{left}}France || bgcolor=#FF8|10.11% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.55% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.21% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.58% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.11% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.43% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.28% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.7%
|-
|{{left}}Gabon || 29.62% || 21.65% || 31.25% || 37.61% || 45.41% || 40.00% || 26.10% || 21.29% || 15.74% || 13.5% || 20.3% || 24.1% || 30.3% || 27.3% || 23.8% || 23.0%
|-
|{{left}}Gambia || 60.40% || 50.64% || 40.30% || 66.84% || 72.30% || 64.22% || 70.27% || 69.87% || 75.64% || 69.3% || 74.5% || 73.5% || 67.2% || 56.2% || 51.9% || 55.7%
|-
|{{left}}Georgia || 49.23% || 42.01% || 63.04% || 66.91% || 63.85% || 62.35% || 61.09% || 62.82% || 50.58% || 48.2% || 38.3% || 31.8% || 40.2% || 43.6% || 49.7% || 46.6%
|-
|{{left}}Germany || bgcolor=#FF8|10.84% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|24.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.40% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.91% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.25% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.87% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.8%
|-
|{{left}}Ghana || 37.56% || 27.66% || 17.49% || 57.01% || 55.60% || 49.35% || 56.18% || 65.70% || 63.28% || 59.8% || 61.8% || 61.7% || 59.3% || 58.0% || 54.3% || 50.1%
|-
|{{left}}Greece || bgcolor=#FF8|15.57% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.95% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.86% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.58% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.99% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.93% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.14% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.37% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.89% || bgcolor=#FF8|27.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|26.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|26.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|2.6% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.0% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.5%
|-
|{{left}}Grenada || 20.37% || 16.58% || 19.63% || 24.76% || 19.49% || 26.44% || 26.94% || 35.71% || 32.00% || 29.5% || 25.8% || 32.5% || 26.6% || 29.6% || 19.5% || 29.9%
|-
|{{left}}Guatemala || 21.55% || 5.45% || 7.26% || 52.36% || 58.64% || 53.62% || 47.14% || 48.68% || 45.37% || 35.9% || 37.7% || 30.9% || 30.2% || 28.0% || 29.7% || 33.8%
|-
|{{left}}Guinea || 61.37% || 53.56% || 61.26% || 63.79% || 73.29% || 66.16% || 64.59% || 63.53% || 59.81% || 47.8% || 52.5% || 54.2% || 60.6% || 66.0% || 67.8% || 63.8%
|-
|{{left}}Guinea-Bissau || 48.15% || 60.91% || 62.50% || 66.36% || 65.33% || 76.09% || 71.61% || 71.88% || 65.18% || 56.5% || 43.6% || 50.0% || 55.0% || 46.6% || 61.9% || 63.4%
|-
|{{left}}Guyana || 39.22% || 28.42% || 36.76% || 62.20% || 62.96% || 70.62% || 37.92% || 25.76% || 37.28% || 40.2% || 52.7% || 46.5% || 51.5% || 63.5% || 55.9% || 56.6%
|-
|{{left}}Haiti || 47.94% || 47.12% || 45.87% || 50.16% || 60.81% || 67.59% || 71.44% || 64.52% || 60.45% || 58.2% || 47.1% || 54.0% || 58.2% || 49.0% || 61.4% || 54.4%
|-
|{{left}}Honduras || 33.79% || 30.47% || 12.38% || 52.10% || 61.71% || 60.32% || 40.35% || 42.76% || 39.73% || 36.8% || 37.0% || 29.8% || 27.6% || 29.2% || 29.2% || 33.6%
|-
|{{left}}Hong Kong ([[British National (Overseas) passport|BNO]]) || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || bgcolor=#AFA|2.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.6% || 3.6% || 5.0% || 5.0% || bgcolor=#AFA|3.3%
|-
|{{left}}Hong Kong ([[Hong Kong Special Administrative Region passport|SAR]]) || 5.49% || 4.88% || 5.28% || 4.50% || 3.23% || 4.25% || 3.45% || 4.61% || 4.36% || 3.1% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.7% || 3.9% || 5.4% || 6.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|4.4%
|-
|{{left}}Hungary || bgcolor=#FF8|7.29% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.44% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.36% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.85% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.53% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.04% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.48% || bgcolor=#FF8|31.31% || bgcolor=#FF8|35.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|31.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|31.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|34.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.1% || bgcolor=#AFA|7.8%
|-
|{{left}}Iceland || bgcolor=#FF8|4.54% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.24% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.98% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.44% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.14% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.46% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.11% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.1%
|-
|{{left}}India || 10.99% || 6.54% || 12.25% || 27.26% || 27.75% || 26.07% || 23.29% || 26.02% || 23.78% || 19.8% || 18.7% || 24.1% || 30.1% || 26.8% || 28.7% || 24.7%
|-
|{{left}}Indonesia || 10.95% || 12.23% || 5.83% || 12.19% || 12.46% || 12.81% || 10.99% || 11.19% || 8.71% || 8.3% || 8.0% || 12.1% || 14.2% || 16.4% || 25.0% || 37.0%
|-
|{{left}}Iran || 53.26% || 54.09% || 66.81% || 85.88% || 86.58% || 87.66% || 58.66% || 45.02% || 38.55% || 41.8% || 48.2% || 37.6% || 31.0% || 38.9% || 40.1% || 42.5%
|-
|{{left}}Iraq || 37.09% || 44.63% || 36.48% || 45.24% || 49.94% || 56.95% || 60.71% || 51.71% || 52.82% || 41.4% || 39.2% || 32.8% || 27.3% || 42.2% || 31.8% || 46.3%
|-
|{{left}}Ireland || bgcolor=#FF8|19.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.32% || bgcolor=#FF8|40.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|26.07% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.77% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.89% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.48% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.34% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|24.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.0%
|-
|{{left}}Israel || bgcolor=#FF8|3.30% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.27% || 4.92% || 6.52% || 5.33% || 5.10% || 4.88% || 4.09% || 3.85% || 8.2% || 8.6% || 5.4% || 6.9% || 6.4% || 5.1% || bgcolor=#AFA|3.0%
|-
|{{left}}Italy || bgcolor=#FF8|10.62% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.75% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.86% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.03% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.83% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.54% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.86% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.10% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.3%
|-
|{{left}}Ivory Coast || 24.85% || 23.08% || 25.33% || 40.66% || 35.73% || 33.81% || 33.72% || 37.38% || 28.59% || 29.8% || 30.3% || 27.7% || 39.6% || 47.0% || 36.5% || 40.9%
|-
|{{left}}Jamaica || 40.29% || 30.04% || 19.13% || 57.07% || 56.59% || 54.46% || 46.78% || 35.64% || 37.62% || 32.3% || 35.3% || 41.6% || 45.7% || 47.4% || 46.4% || 35.5%
|-
|{{left}}Japan || bgcolor=#FF8|6.05% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.79% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.43% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.48% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.76% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.47% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.12% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.8%
|-
|{{left}}Jordan || 28.51% || 27.90% || 38.09% || 44.44% || 45.26% || 42.62% || 40.06% || 40.34% || 37.59% || 26.9% || 32.6% || 30.8% || 34.5% || 40.1% || 31.4% || 43.2%
|-
|{{left}}Kazakhstan || 41.93% || 44.02% || 43.29% || 47.34% || 42.58% || 39.38% || 32.81% || 27.55% || 12.70% || 9.9% || 8.0% || 7.5% || 8.3% || 9.4% || 12.2% || 11.7%
|-
|{{left}}Kenya || 51.68% || 42.02% || 34.86% || 50.26% || 49.86% || 41.59% || 33.17% || 26.60% || 27.34% || 27.3% || 28.3% || 33.6% || 39.3% || 40.2% || 35.8% || 35.6%
|-
|{{left}}Kiribati || 20.55% || 30.43% || 50.00% || 55.56% || 11.69% || 25.33% || 5.13% || 5.81% || 16.05% || 15.4% || 27.3% || 22.9% || 20.7% || 20.9% || 10.2% || 26.2%
|-
|{{left}}Kosovo || 29.79% || 17.93% || 12.51% || 39.47% || 36.76% || 35.97% || 37.92% || 41.48% || 44.03% || 38.1% || 40.0% || 31.7% || 29.0% || 25.4% || 29.0% || 47.9%
|-
|{{left}}Kuwait || 3.96% || 16.04% || 18.18% || 5.01% || 3.27% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.71% || 8.32% || 4.56% || 5.73% || 5.7% || 10.3% || 4.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.8% || 3.6% || bgcolor=#AFA|-2.2% || bgcolor=#AFA|6.5%
|-
|{{left}}Kyrgyzstan || 41.54% || 37.85% || 44.00% || 65.60% || 67.75% || 58.90% || 55.58% || 51.68% || 55.75% || 43.2% || 24.9% || 26.4% || 18.0% || 17.5% || 32.8% || 32.1%
|-
|{{left}}Laos || 72.79% || 56.20% || 89.86% || 70.57% || 65.60% || 64.06% || 63.66% || 62.37% || 66.68% || 61.1% || 61.4% || 60.1% || 74.8% || 74.4% || 72.4% || 73.4%
|-
|{{left}}Latvia || bgcolor=#FF8|9.28% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.95% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.91% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.01% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.98% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.24% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.83% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.45% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.40% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|29.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|33.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.5% || bgcolor=#AFA|8.3%
|-
|{{left}}Lebanon || 38.78% || 39.40% || 52.21% || 28.44% || 23.85% || 25.22% || 31.75% || 25.41% || 27.10% || 16.1% || 15.1% || 18.1% || 20.9% || 22.4% || 18.6% || 27.9%
|-
|{{left}}Lesotho || 25.82% || 22.22% || 50.00% || 26.74% || 28.24% || 21.94% || 35.97% || 21.20% || 13.95% || 16.7% || 19.4% || 11.2% || 18.6% || 21.1% || 17.7% || 32.1%
|-
|{{left}}Liberia || 78.19% || 62.73% || 54.17% || 67.62% || 73.93% || 64.36% || 64.98% || 70.23% || 62.45% || 49.4% || 59.0% || 45.5% || 56.1% || 57.6% || 66.0% || 70.7%
|-
|{{left}}Libya || 19.41% || 22.78% || 24.26% || 80.90% || 89.05% || 73.73% || 45.50% || 40.58% || 43.02% || 33.9% || 33.8% || 38.9% || 30.8% || 14.3% || 19.2% || 27.1%
|-
|{{left}}Liechtenstein || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.50% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0%
|-
|{{left}}Lithuania || bgcolor=#FF8|13.40% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.81% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.91% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.96% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.29% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.54% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.36% || bgcolor=#FF8|33.49% || bgcolor=#FF8|37.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|33.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|34.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|34.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|31.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.6% || bgcolor=#AFA|9.0%
|-
|{{left}}Luxembourg || bgcolor=#FF8|4.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.84% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.19% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.74% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.88% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.8%
|-
|{{left}}Macau || 11.57% || 20.17% || 12.50% || 7.12% || 5.03% || 7.79% || 5.38% || 7.71% || 9.30% || {{n/a}} || 3.1% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.3% || 8.9% || 12.0% || 16.4% || 14.2%
|-
|{{left}}Madagascar || 12.07% || 13.24% || 21.82% || 14.36% || 7.69% || 11.77% || 11.00% || 12.12% || 11.01% || 11.6% || 9.3% || 17.5% || 15.0% || 15.7% || 18.2% || 11.9%
|-
|{{left}}Malawi || 39.25% || 38.54% || 12.12% || 42.67% || 37.05% || 28.20% || 26.49% || 14.52% || 10.23% || 12.3% || 13.8% || 16.5% || 26.9% || 26.9% || 27.1% || 28.9%
|-
|{{left}}Malaysia || 4.43% || 9.41% || 7.21% || 6.97% || 4.91% || 4.94% || 3.93% || 3.65% || 3.34% || 4.6% || 5.0% || 5.4% || 4.7% || 5.9% || 6.6% || bgcolor=#AFA|5.6%
|-
|{{left}}Maldives || 14.66% || 23.65% || 66.67% || 22.88% || 33.65% || 39.88% || 27.74% || 47.56% || 15.49% || 6.7% || 22.9% || 42.2% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.9% || 12.2% || 19.7% || bgcolor=#AFA|4.7%
|-
|{{left}}Mali || 60.16% || 64.08% || 62.96% || 55.99% || 55.89% || 50.60% || 59.43% || 57.58% || 52.77% || 54.0% || 47.7% || 54.7% || 51.0% || 55.7% || 52.8% || 48.1%
|-
|{{left}}Malta || bgcolor=#FF8|10.56% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.78% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|28.38% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.76% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.59% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.81% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.38% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.87% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.5%
|-
|{{left}}Marshall Islands || bgcolor=#FF8|31.58% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|45.45% || bgcolor=#FF8|30.77% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.39% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.88% || bgcolor=#FF8|29.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|26.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.80% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.70% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.60% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.40% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.00%
|-
|{{left}}Mauritania || 76.43% || 89.72% || 83.14% || 80.15% || 67.79% || 61.58% || 67.30% || 71.45% || 61.45% || 52.2% || 50.0% || 54.7% || 61.5% || 49.7% || 54.1% || 51.0%
|-
|{{left}}Mauritius || 6.90% || 7.77% || 9.92% || 6.22% || 6.59% || 6.49% || 8.29% || 5.53% || 5.71% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.2% || 4.7% || 5.0% || 7.5% || 6.0% || 7.2% || 11.6%
|-
|{{left}}Mexico || 10.57% || 5.91% || 4.23% || 23.16% || 26.66% || 24.93% || 22.50% || 23.49% || 20.17% || 15.6% || 12.1% || 10.6% || 12.8% || 11.1% || 10.9% || 11.4%
|-
|{{left}}Micronesia || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|85.71% || bgcolor=#FF8|80.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|50.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|33.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|50.00%
|-
|{{left}}Moldova || 42.42% || 43.57% || 66.37% || 51.00% || 58.03% || 61.10% || 49.12% || 36.35% || 41.83% || 40.1% || 33.6% || 31.0% || 34.7% || 38.5% || 41.3% || 36.7%
|-
|{{left}}Monaco || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|50.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.50% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|33.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|57.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.0%
|-
|{{left}}Mongolia || 37.34% || 38.32% || 39.57% || 45.47% || 54.60% || 56.51% || 53.62% || 43.63% || 34.76% || 27.9% || 30.6% || 37.0% || 44.5% || 37.1% || 34.9% || 53.6%
|-
|{{left}}Montenegro || 43.59% || 34.03% || 9.30% || 58.53% || 39.10% || 35.35% || 26.41% || 28.69% || 31.26% || 28.0% || 32.6% || 31.4% || 39.0% || 36.6% || 27.5% || 25.6%
|-
|{{left}}Morocco || 15.92% || 21.90% || 20.85% || 23.35% || 28.48% || 42.88% || 36.99% || 26.77% || 20.60% || 21.9% || 23.3% || 21.3% || 15.1% || 15.5% || 19.6% || 24.0%
|-
|{{left}}Mozambique || 22.23% || 20.48% || 32.75% || 18.64% || 14.24% || 10.22% || 26.18% || 10.29% || 4.03% || 4.0% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.2% || 3.2% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.6% || 6.7% || 11.4% || 13.8%
|-
|{{left}}Myanmar || 43.67% || 46.15% || 39.40% || 40.68% || 30.91% || 23.12% || 17.88% || 13.02% || 16.32% || 15.5% || 23.5% || 31.0% || 33.2% || 32.0% || 34.2% || 41.9%
|-
|{{left}}Namibia || 22.40% || 12.05% || 10.71% || 5.20% || 6.60% || 8.40% || 6.31% || 5.56% || 7.43% || 7.6% || 6.2% || 8.8% || 8.9% || 14.9% || 10.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|6.8%
|-
|{{left}}Nauru || 10.00% || 66.67% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 25.00% || 20.83% || 21.43% || 20.97% || 13.33% || 5.26% || 42.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.0% || 18.2% || 16.7% || 41.7% || 60.0% || 66.7%
|-
|{{left}}Nepal || 31.03% || 19.85% || 18.72% || 48.11% || 50.70% || 51.53% || 46.42% || 49.54% || 42.19% || 38.2% || 46.4% || 49.4% || 59.9% || 58.3% || 59.1% || 51.2%
|-
|{{left}}Netherlands || bgcolor=#FF8|16.81% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.97% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.28% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.89% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.56% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.65% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.62% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.01% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.7%
|-
|{{left}}New Zealand || bgcolor=#FF8|13.28% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.52% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.74% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.47% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.32% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.97% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.02% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.45% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.94% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.0%
|-
|{{left}}Nicaragua || 65.60% || 50.81% || 12.72% || 63.17% || 63.52% || 46.75% || 43.28% || 44.54% || 41.19% || 35.8% || 26.7% || 27.6% || 30.1% || 33.8% || 35.1% || 41.8%
|-
|{{left}}Niger || 30.76% || 43.67% || 61.39% || 53.50% || 42.76% || 43.33% || 30.65% || 31.14% || 31.10% || 36.4% || 27.5% || 35.9% || 41.3% || 41.3% || 44.1% || 55.7%
|-
|{{left}}Nigeria || 29.23% || 25.80% || 43.78% || 64.83% || 67.20% || 57.47% || 44.95% || 41.44% || 32.56% || 33.2% || 35.1% || 33.6% || 38.0% || 33.7% || 37.3% || 36.0%
|-
|{{left}}North Korea || 100.00% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 100.00% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 100.00% || 100.00% || 54.55% || 15.00% || 47.67% || 55.6% || 28.6% || 36.0% || 8.3% || 23.3% || 4.0% || 16.3%
|-
|{{left}}North Macedonia || 29.13% || 26.29% || 12.31% || 29.62% || 36.19% || 31.29% || 28.69% || 33.84% || 36.08% || 29.8% || 27.0% || 20.7% || 19.6% || 20.0% || 21.5% || 33.5%
|-
|{{left}}Norway || bgcolor=#FF8|17.96% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.53% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.65% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.07% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.35% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.40% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.36% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.96% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.12% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.9%
|-
|{{left}}Oman || 4.76% || 18.45% || 16.45% || 6.32% || 5.13% || 4.87% || 3.46% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.93% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.00% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.1% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.3% || 4.5% || 5.7% || 8.7% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.2%
|-
|{{left}}Pakistan || 40.82% || 31.43% || 32.53% || 45.62% || 48.26% || 47.89% || 49.40% || 46.43% || 40.40% || 38.0% || 38.5% || 37.3% || 40.0% || 41.6% || 40.7% || 46.3%
|-
|{{left}}Palau || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|66.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|40.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|71.43% || bgcolor=#FF8|83.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|53.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|96.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|84.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|29.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|35.70% || bgcolor=#FF8|57.10% || bgcolor=#FF8|54.50% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.00%
|-
|{{left}}Palestine || 34.77% || 33.96% || 50.80% || 58.27% || 52.92% || 53.87% || 50.98% || 40.64% || 42.68% || 36.7% || 37.6% || 38.9% || 34.2% || 36.2% || 45.2% || 55.6%
|-
|{{left}}Panama || 23.95% || 13.54% || 8.29% || 15.33% || 18.93% || 11.71% || 11.61% || 12.05% || 11.36% || 10.0% || 8.0% || 8.4% || 11.3% || 11.2% || 13.1% || 19.2%
|-
|{{left}}Papua New Guinea || 6.15% || 4.93% || 3.45% || 6.64% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.74% || 6.84% || 9.34% || 10.56% || 5.14% || 7.4% || 3.1% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.95% || 5.0% || 3.7% || 5.7% || bgcolor=#AFA|3.4%
|-
|{{left}}Paraguay || 16.00% || 17.95% || 13.33% || 16.80% || 12.41% || 8.02% || 6.83% || 7.47% || 6.15% || 6.1% || 4.4% || 4.6% || 7.6% || 9.3% || 9.8% || 14.4%
|-
|{{left}}Peru || 24.23% || 27.61% || 4.11% || 24.13% || 25.39% || 28.53% || 25.97% || 28.61% || 14.46% || 13.8% || 16.1% || 20.1% || 22.7% || 26.0% || 29.1% || 37.7%
|-
|{{left}}Philippines || 23.93% || 11.59% || 10.20% || 32.49% || 24.40% || 27.07% || 25.54% || 27.29% || 27.96% || 24.6% || 24.1% || 23.8% || 33.8% || 37.9% || 35.9% || 31.0%
|-
|{{left}}Poland || bgcolor=#FF8|16.47% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.74% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.48% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.91% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.76% || 3.99% || 5.92% || 5.37% || 6.37% || 6.4% || 10.8% || 9.3% || 10.2% || 9.8% || 13.5% || 13.8%
|-
|{{left}}Portugal || bgcolor=#FF8|10.52% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.86% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.75% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.52% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.28% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.06% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.97% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.7%
|-
|{{left}}Qatar || bgcolor=#AFA|2.53% || 12.86% || 11.69% || 8.28% || 10.33% || 8.34% || 7.48% || 3.50% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.97% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.1% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.2% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.6% || 3.2% || 3.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|4.9%
|-
|{{left}}Romania || 8.79% || 12.61% || 17.03% || 10.14% || 9.11% || 10.44% || 11.76% || 11.43% || 11.16% || 9.8% || 11.5% || 17.0% || 22.4% || 24.8% || 26.3% || 25.0%
|-
|{{left}}Russia || 39.49% || 26.18% || 29.42% || 17.79% || 15.19% || 14.89% || 11.61% || 9.29% || 10.24% || 7.8% || 10.2% || 9.6% || 10.3% || 10.1% || 4.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|7.5%
|-
|{{left}}Rwanda || 71.09% || 62.92% || 34.96% || 63.93% || 53.76% || 44.51% || 52.17% || 43.79% || 49.17% || 51.1% || 44.9% || 30.9% || 40.6% || 48.1% || 53.2% || 50.3%
|-
|{{left}}Saint Kitts and Nevis || 20.95% || 17.14% || 19.35% || 23.28% || 21.87% || 24.98% || 26.66% || 28.31% || 26.60% || 27.5% || 30.7% || 27.2% || 23.3% || 22.7% || 16.1% || 25.0%
|-
|{{left}}Saint Lucia || 16.60% || 16.72% || 17.47% || 23.31% || 16.75% || 21.90% || 22.34% || 27.16% || 26.90% || 27.6% || 22.5% || 28.2% || 25.4% || 23.8% || 17.2% || 26.6%
|-
|{{left}}Saint Vincent and the Grenadines || 16.99% || 14.12% || 15.08% || 21.10% || 14.55% || 19.77% || 20.38% || 27.46% || 27.15% || 24.1% || 22.5% || 27.2% || 25.8% || 27.2% || 17.1% || 26.4%
|-
|{{left}}Samoa || 34.37% || 29.52% || 32.58% || 36.87% || 27.02% || 26.26% || 40.32% || 28.44% || 29.99% || 27.2% || 22.1% || 29.5% || 41.7% || 37.0% || 22.4% || 32.4%
|-
|{{left}}San Marino || bgcolor=#FF8|33.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|50.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|50.0%
|-
|{{left}}São Tomé and Príncipe || 46.67% || 21.43% || 20.00% || 36.36% || 34.78% || 26.09% || 14.81% || 24.14% || 5.71% || 10.7% || 22.2% || 18.0% || 31.7% || 16.7% || 33.3% || 28.6%
|-
|{{left}}Saudi Arabia || 5.01% || 14.29% || 13.43% || 10.01% || 6.82% || 7.47% || 5.26% || 4.04% || 3.24% || 3.3% || 7.8% || 7.6% || 6.3% || 6.0% || 3.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|6.6%
|-
|{{left}}Senegal || 70.47% || 66.48% || 34.95% || 65.28% || 55.88% || 59.18% || 56.85% || 52.46% || 54.37% || 57.5% || 53.2% || 67.0% || 62.8% || 59.6% || 60.2% || 55.2%
|-
|{{left}}Serbia || 16.53% || 19.45% || 13.27% || 25.01% || 30.33% || 25.93% || 22.33% || 18.77% || 16.54% || 16.0% || 14.7% || 13.7% || 15.7% || 14.5% || 11.0% || 11.7%
|-
|{{left}}Serbia and Montenegro || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || 100.0% || 100.0% || 39.7% || 16.2% || 14.7% || 12.0% || 17.1%
|-
|{{left}}Seychelles || 4.55% || 10.26% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 6.38% || 10.60% || 11.64% || 13.14% || 9.66% || 7.26% || 6.8% || 4.3% || 4.8% || 15.9% || 8.5% || 21.3% || 18.0%
|-
|{{left}}Sierra Leone || 49.02% || 45.16% || 35.70% || 59.35% || 57.99% || 60.56% || 47.30% || 61.25% || 53.02% || 51.9% || 46.5% || 50.3% || 48.0% || 45.7% || 52.6% || 50.1%
|-
|{{left}}Singapore || bgcolor=#FF8|15.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.10% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.72% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.17% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.07% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.29% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.74% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.10% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|24.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.7%
|-
|{{left}}Slovakia || bgcolor=#FF8|11.49% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.86% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.87% || bgcolor=#FF8|28.08% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.99% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.21% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.28% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.14% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.3% || bgcolor=#AFA|5.3%
|-
|{{left}}Slovenia || bgcolor=#FF8|13.86% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.47% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.19% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.11% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.43% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.56% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|28.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.7%
|-
|{{left}}Solomon Islands || 4.35% || 7.69% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 9.09% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.20% || 3.57% || 16.79% || 4.28% || 7.26% || 5.4% || 12.7% || 5.4% || 13.1% || 10.7% || 17.0% || bgcolor=#AFA|6.5%
|-
|{{left}}Somalia || 69.89% || 73.97% || 66.67% || 71.76% || 80.77% || 90.16% || 75.50% || 63.89% || 64.60% || 52.0% || 65.8% || 61.7% || 66.8% || 69.6% || 73.4% || 54.0%
|-
|{{left}}South Africa || 11.27% || 9.68% || 17.67% || 7.80% || 6.92% || 7.31% || 6.44% || 6.83% || 5.08% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.6% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.6% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.9% || 4.6% || 4.1% || 3.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|4.6%
|-
|{{left}}South Korea || bgcolor=#FF8|14.44% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.38% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.03% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.46% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.96% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.05% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.65% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.21% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.5% || bgcolor=#AFA|3.8%
|-
|{{left}}South Sudan || 48.94% || 49.04% || 45.71% || 53.36% || 52.32% || 41.29% || 47.52% || 43.89% || 41.77% || 43.8% || 41.9% || 37.7% || 23.8% || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}}
|-
|{{left}}Spain || bgcolor=#FF8|15.66% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.75% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.29% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.17% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.53% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.04% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.26% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.09% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.76% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.9%
|-
|{{left}}Sri Lanka || 26.61% || 22.13% || 25.34% || 36.00% || 35.12% || 33.61% || 26.19% || 21.69% || 22.07% || 19.5% || 20.6% || 34.7% || 25.2% || 28.6% || 40.8% || 31.4%
|-
|{{left}}Sudan || 49.34% || 38.83% || 40.90% || 50.25% || 57.44% || 59.83% || 51.37% || 36.59% || 40.45% || 42.4% || 47.9% || 45.4% || 40.6% || 32.5% || 62.2% || 38.6%
|-
|{{left}}Suriname || 14.44% || 11.91% || 6.42% || 10.83% || 7.44% || 8.57% || 11.44% || 10.86% || 7.78% || 13.6% || 9.6% || 11.6% || 18.0% || 18.6% || 15.5% || bgcolor=#AFA|9.6%
|-
|{{left}}Sweden || bgcolor=#FF8|20.68% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.07% || bgcolor=#FF8|39.46% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.35% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.32% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.92% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.78% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.19% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.2%
|-
|{{left}}Switzerland || bgcolor=#FF8|5.36% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.05% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.92% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.92% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.50% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.89% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.62% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|2.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.4%
|-
|{{left}}Syria || 47.42% || 42.87% || 44.04% || 66.68% || 74.83% || 77.31% || 59.11% || 59.77% || 63.43% || 60.0% || 46.1% || 42.0% || 32.8% || 28.4% || 23.6% || 33.1%
|-
|{{left}}Taiwan || bgcolor=#FF8|4.92% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.56% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.65% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.02% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.62% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.80% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.42% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.36% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.81% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.2% || 4.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|5.9%
|-
|{{left}}Tajikistan || 54.96% || 57.93% || 57.24% || 59.55% || 60.97% || 53.39% || 51.84% || 55.24% || 44.44% || 49.0% || 53.7% || 42.6% || 30.3% || 31.4% || 23.8% || 32.4%
|-
|{{left}}Tanzania || 34.13% || 29.37% || 7.27% || 31.04% || 23.90% || 19.87% || 18.36% || 23.05% || 12.02% || 21.3% || 25.7% || 15.8% || 27.5% || 24.2% || 28.3% || 26.2%
|-
|{{left}}Thailand || 24.34% || 24.36% || 31.82% || 24.44% || 23.41% || 22.17% || 20.15% || 17.82% || 12.35% || 10.2% || 11.1% || 10.2% || 11.4% || 13.5% || 16.4% || 19.8%
|-
|{{left}}Togo || 55.13% || 43.87% || 16.98% || 62.32% || 59.78% || 59.61% || 59.88% || 54.39% || 43.42% || 35.6% || 44.0% || 37.7% || 35.8% || 42.1% || 42.6% || 51.7%
|-
|{{left}}Tonga || 50.61% || 51.27% || 46.67% || 48.15% || 45.85% || 51.33% || 32.85% || 31.58% || 28.09% || 25.4% || 42.1% || 41.5% || 46.5% || 42.8% || 47.8% || 48.7%
|-
|{{left}}Trinidad and Tobago || 16.62% || 13.64% || 7.05% || 14.10% || 13.05% || 19.28% || 22.46% || 22.70% || 25.16% || 21.2% || 20.6% || 18.7% || 19.3% || 32.0% || 33.1% || 23.8%
|-
|{{left}}Tunisia || 26.14% || 21.06% || 24.92% || 19.11% || 24.17% || 27.67% || 19.53% || 15.92% || 19.69% || 17.5% || 17.0% || 16.8% || 17.2% || 15.6% || 18.5% || 23.9%
|-
|{{left}}Turkey || 20.59% || 19.96% || 13.70% || 17.46% || 19.19% || 17.49% || 17.86% || 13.62% || 13.88% || 7.1% || 10.3% || 8.1% || 7.0% || 9.1% || 9.0% || 11.2%
|-
|{{left}}Turkmenistan || 51.10% || 35.69% || 32.00% || 58.55% || 56.26% || 52.93% || 40.60% || 32.95% || 25.41% || 18.6% || 16.3% || 17.7% || 24.3% || 20.6% || 19.8% || 45.4%
|-
|{{left}}Tuvalu || 22.22% || 27.27% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 33.33% || 25.81% || 34.78% || 15.38% || 20.00% || 21.05% || 27.3% || 71.4% || 21.4% || 32.0% || 38.1% || 28.6% || 17.6%
|-
|{{left}}Uganda || 47.13% || 42.15% || 38.70% || 49.82% || 51.65% || 42.29% || 42.38% || 41.53% || 30.63% || 37.2% || 32.7% || 33.2% || 37.3% || 36.3% || 38.8% || 34.4%
|-
|{{left}}Ukraine || 34.29% || 41.27% || 15.15% || 43.14% || 45.06% || 40.97% || 34.54% || 40.83% || 34.03% || 27.7% || 26.7% || 26.9% || 29.0% || 31.8% || 36.8% || 30.9%
|-
|{{left}}United Arab Emirates || 4.18% || 10.06% || 8.93% || 8.44% || 5.56% || 3.75% || 5.80% || 4.02% || 7.10% || 4.8% || 8.0% || 9.0% || 5.7% || 9.7% || 9.6% || 10.4%
|-
|{{left}}United Kingdom || bgcolor=#FF8|14.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.55% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.97% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.58% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.05% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.29% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.15% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.42% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|27.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|27.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.5%
|-
|{{left}}Uruguay || 3.21% || 5.70% || 8.82% || 9.77% || 5.91% || 4.11% || 3.19% || 3.14% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.70% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.7% || 3.8% || 5.6% || 5.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|9.5%
|-
|{{left}}Uzbekistan || 59.56% || 47.04% || 45.98% || 74.14% || 68.06% || 61.76% || 50.29% || 57.09% || 49.59% || 52.1% || 44.3% || 40.4% || 50.2% || 46.8% || 41.1% || 61.1%
|-
|{{left}}Vanuatu || 38.84% || 36.09% || 33.33% || 46.34% || 41.05% || 38.30% || 13.51% || 16.67% || 10.53% || 20.0% || 14.9% || 12.5% || 15.0% || 13.3% || 20.0% || 16.7%
|-
|{{left}}Vatican City || 14.29% || 14.29% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 8.33% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 36.36% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 25.00% || 7.7% || 33.3% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.0% || 11.8% || 14.3% || 7.1% || 16.7%
|-
|{{left}}Venezuela || 34.88% || 34.01% || 27.22% || 52.30% || 59.53% || 74.28% || 42.87% || 40.25% || 15.57% || 15.2% || 13.8% || 12.0% || 16.1% || 17.6% || 18.3% || 25.4%
|-
|{{left}}Vietnam || 25.78% || 14.98% || 11.32% || 18.78% || 23.70% || 26.20% || 24.06% || 29.49% || 23.43% || 14.3% || 20.3% || 22.2% || 33.5% || 36.1% || 42.3% || 38.8%
|-
|{{left}}Western Sahara || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 100.00% || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}}
|-
|{{left}}Yemen || 57.16% || 56.14% || 54.30% || 76.66% || 78.45% || 82.50% || 60.76% || 48.85% || 54.01% || 44.2% || 44.0% || 47.8% || 48.4% || 54.3% || 47.3% || 54.7%
|-
|{{left}}Zambia || 32.36% || 33.22% || 16.54% || 44.78% || 40.64% || 22.45% || 21.72% || 22.26% || 20.98% || 22.2% || 26.2% || 22.9% || 22.1% || 23.1% || 38.9% || 53.3%
|-
|{{left}}Zimbabwe || 34.55% || 26.76% || 9.31% || 29.41% || 26.92% || 26.60% || 26.32% || 22.88% || 21.03% || 13.2% || 19.7% || 19.2% || 21.8% || 28.1% || 31.3% || 30.3%
|-
|{{left}}Unknown or stateless || 43.95% || 45.44% || 49.74% || 46.06% || 43.16% || 40.27% || 35.61% || 28.92% || 32.62% || 32.3% || 27.0% || 31.6% || 39.2% || 42.4% || 50.2% || 51.6%
|}

===Overstay rate===
The table below shows the overstay rate, which is the portion of visitors arriving under the Visa Waiver Program who remained in the United States longer than the maximum allowed stay of 90 days. Some of these visitors later left the United States or legalized their immigration status.<ref name=overstay>{{cite web |title=Entry/Exit Overstay Report |url=https://www.dhs.gov/publication/entryexit-overstay-report |publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>

{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed sortable" style="font-size:90%; line-height:1.2; text-align:right"
|+style=line-height:1.5 class=nowrap|Overstay rate by country and fiscal year<ref name=overstay/>
|-
! Country !! 2020 !! 2019 !! 2018 !! 2017 !! 2016 !! 2015
|-
|{{left}}Andorra || 0.43% || 0.63% || 0.19% || 0.44% || 0.69% || 0.41%
|-
|{{left}}Australia || 0.48% || 0.37% || 0.28% || 0.39% || 0.56% || 0.37%
|-
|{{left}}Austria || 0.70% || 0.38% || 0.34% || 0.41% || 1.37% || 1.33%
|-
|{{left}}Belgium || 0.53% || 0.36% || 0.31% || 0.55% || 0.54% || 0.56%
|-
|{{left}}Brunei || 2.14% || 0.99% || 0.78% || 1.29% || 0.98% || 0.96%
|-
|{{left}}Chile || 1.76% || 1.34% || 1.49% || 1.33% || 1.71% || 2.33%
|-
|{{left}}Czech Republic || 0.77% || 0.51% || 0.63% || 0.80% || 1.11% || 1.65%
|-
|{{left}}Denmark || 0.43% || 0.29% || 0.23% || 0.40% || 0.50% || 0.60%
|-
|{{left}}Estonia || 0.67% || 0.61% || 0.47% || 0.72% || 0.84% || 1.16%
|-
|{{left}}Finland || 0.53% || 0.35% || 0.23% || 0.45% || 0.46% || 0.55%
|-
|{{left}}France || 0.79% || 0.55% || 0.60% || 0.91% || 0.68% || 0.76%
|-
|{{left}}Germany || 0.47% || 0.39% || 0.32% || 0.51% || 0.98% || 1.07%
|-
|{{left}}Greece || 1.71% || 1.27% || 1.26% || 1.71% || 2.19% || 2.31%
|-
|{{left}}Hungary || 1.24% || 1.03% || 1.26% || 2.04% || 2.75% || 2.92%
|-
|{{left}}Iceland || 0.33% || 0.28% || 0.21% || 0.33% || 0.33% || 0.46%
|-
|{{left}}Ireland || 0.42% || 0.29% || 0.31% || 0.50% || 0.53% || 0.47%
|-
|{{left}}Italy || 0.86% || 0.63% || 0.54% || 0.83% || 1.36% || 1.60%
|-
|{{left}}Japan || 0.27% || 0.15% || 0.16% || 0.22% || 0.16% || 0.20%
|-
|{{left}}Latvia || 1.28% || 0.96% || 1.03% || 1.34% || 1.75% || 1.92%
|-
|{{left}}Liechtenstein || 0.44% || 0.96% || 0.21% || 0.60% || 0.82% || 0.68%
|-
|{{left}}Lithuania || 1.44% || 1.18% || 1.32% || 1.44% || 1.99% || 2.20%
|-
|{{left}}Luxembourg || 0.50% || 0.38% || 0.35% || 0.51% || 0.78% || 0.57%
|-
|{{left}}Malta || 0.59% || 0.48% || 0.35% || 0.59% || 1.01% || 0.85%
|-
|{{left}}Monaco || 0.45% || 0.32% || 0.40% || 0.19% || 0.55% || 0.44%
|-
|{{left}}Netherlands || 0.51% || 0.34% || 0.40% || 0.53% || 0.64% || 1.15%
|-
|{{left}}New Zealand || 0.53% || 0.36% || 0.32% || 0.52% || 0.58% || 0.49%
|-
|{{left}}Norway || 0.39% || 0.25% || 0.23% || 0.31% || 0.41% || 0.46%
|-
|{{left}}Poland || 0.95% || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}}
|-
|{{left}}Portugal || 2.19% || 1.80% || 1.80% || 2.08% || 2.42% || 2.31%
|-
|{{left}}San Marino || 0.74% || 0.14% || 0.41% || 0.42% || 2.01% || 2.28%
|-
|{{left}}Singapore || 0.28% || 0.29% || 0.22% || 0.29% || 0.49% || 0.38%
|-
|{{left}}Slovakia || 1.17% || 0.70% || 0.93% || 1.07% || 1.85% || 2.36%
|-
|{{left}}Slovenia || 0.59% || 0.41% || 0.39% || 0.59% || 1.03% || 1.17%
|-
|{{left}}South Korea || 0.35% || 0.27% || 0.29% || 0.37% || 0.46% || 0.76%
|-
|{{left}}Spain || 1.68% || 1.31% || 1.12% || 1.38% || 1.46% || 1.40%
|-
|{{left}}Sweden || 0.43% || 0.29% || 0.26% || 0.44% || 0.53% || 0.48%
|-
|{{left}}Switzerland || 0.51% || 0.45% || 0.30% || 0.39% || 0.59% || 0.55%
|-
|{{left}}Taiwan || 0.60% || 0.52% || 0.41% || 0.59% || 0.57% || 0.53%
|-
|{{left}}United Kingdom || 0.64% || 0.33% || 0.30% || 0.54% || 0.50% || 0.43%
|-class=sortbottom
!{{left}}Total || 0.64% || 0.44% || 0.41% || 0.58% || 0.68% || 0.73%
|}

==Other visa waivers==
===Nationals of neighboring jurisdictions===
Separate from the Visa Waiver Program, {{USCSub|8|1182|d|4|B}} permits the Attorney General and the Secretary of State (acting jointly) to waive visa requirements for admission to the United States in nonimmigrant status for nationals of foreign contiguous territories or adjacent islands or for residents of those territories or islands who have a common nationality with those nationals. The regulations relating to such admissions can be found at {{USCFR|8|212|1}}.<ref name="68FR5190">{{cite journal | url=https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2003/01/31/03-2164/removal-of-visa-and-passport-waiver-for-certain-permanent-residents-of-canada-and-bermuda | title=Removal of Visa and Passport Waiver for Certain Permanent Residents of Canada and Bermuda | journal=Federal Register | volume=68 | page=5190 | date=January 31, 2003 | access-date=October 28, 2013}}</ref>

Under this provision, nationals of the following jurisdictions may travel to the United States without a visa:
*{{flag|Bahamas}}{{snd}}Nationals of the Bahamas do not need a visa to travel to the United States if they apply for admission at a [[United States border preclearance|U.S. preclearance facility]] located in the Bahamas. Applicants 14 years of age or older must present a certificate issued by the [[Royal Bahamas Police Force]] indicating no criminal record.<ref name="8 CFR 212.1">[http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?node=se8.1.212_11 8 CFR 212.1 Documentary requirements for nonimmigrants], [[United States Government Publishing Office]], January 21, 2021.</ref><ref>[https://help.cbp.gov/s/article/Article-1250?language=en_US Bahamian citizen document requirements], U.S. Customs and Border Protection, December 10, 2019.</ref>
*{{flag|Bermuda}}{{snd}}[[British Overseas Territories citizen]]s of Bermuda do not need a visa to visit the United States under most circumstances for up to 180 days.<ref name=cabm/>
*{{flag|British Virgin Islands}}{{snd}}British Overseas Territories citizens of the British Virgin Islands may travel without a visa to the [[U.S. Virgin Islands]]. They may also continue travel to other parts of the United States if they present a certificate issued by the [[Royal Virgin Islands Police Force]] indicating no criminal record.<ref name="8 CFR 212.1"/>
*{{flag|Canada}}{{snd}}Nationals of Canada do not need a visa to visit the United States under most circumstances.<ref name=cabm>{{cite web | url=https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/tourism-visit/citizens-of-canada-and-bermuda.html | title=Citizens of Canada and Bermuda | access-date=January 24, 2021 | publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref> In addition, under the [[USMCA]] (and earlier [[NAFTA]]), they may work under a [[TN status|simplified procedure]].
*{{flag|Cayman Islands}}{{snd}}British Overseas Territories citizens of the Cayman Islands do not need a visa if they travel directly from the territory to the United States and present a certificate issued by the [[Royal Cayman Islands Police Service]] indicating no criminal record.<ref name="8 CFR 212.1"/>
*{{flag|Mexico}}{{snd}}Some nationals of Mexico do not need a visa to travel to the United States: government officials not permanently assigned to the United States and their accompanying family members, holding diplomatic or official passports, for stays of up to six months; members of the [[Kickapoo people|Kickapoo]] tribes of Texas or Oklahoma, holding Form I-872, American Indian Card; and crew members of [[List of airlines of Mexico|Mexican airlines]] operating in the United States.<ref name="8 CFR 212.1"/> Other nationals of Mexico may travel to the United States with a [[Border Crossing Card]], which functions as a visa and has similar requirements.<ref>[https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/tourism-visit/border-crossing-card.html Border Crossing Card], U.S. Department of State.</ref> Under the [[USMCA]] (and earlier [[NAFTA]]), they may also work under a [[TN status|simplified procedure]].
*{{flag|Turks and Caicos Islands}}{{snd}}British Overseas Territories citizens of the Turks and Caicos Islands do not need a visa if they travel directly from the territory to the United States and present a certificate issued by the [[Royal Turks and Caicos Islands Police Force]] indicating no criminal record.<ref name="8 CFR 212.1"/>

Restrictions on the use of the Visa Waiver Program do not affect this class of travelers unless separately provided for by statute or regulation. For example, a Canadian citizen who has briefly overstayed a previous visit to the United States (by less than 180 days) will still not require a visa for future visits, while a VWP national who overstays will become ineligible for the VWP for life and will need a visa for future visits. ESTA is not required from British Overseas Territories citizens using one of the above waivers with the respective territory's passport, but it is required if they use the VWP with a British citizen passport.

Until 2003, this visa waiver was granted not only to nationals of those countries and territories, but also to permanent residents of Bermuda and Canada who were nationals of countries in the [[Commonwealth of Nations]] or [[Republic of Ireland|Ireland]].<ref name="68FR5190"/>

===Citizens of freely associated states===
Under [[Compact of Free Association|Compacts of Free Association]], citizens of the following countries may enter, reside, study and work in the United States indefinitely without a visa. These benefits are granted to citizens from birth or [[Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands|independence]], and to [[naturalization|naturalized citizens]] who have resided in the respective country for at least five years, excluding those who acquired citizenship by investment.<ref>[https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/fact-sheets/FactSheet-Status_of_Citizens_of_Micronesia_Marshalls_Islands.pdf Status of Citizens of the Freely Associated States of the Federated States of Micronesia and the Republic of the Marshall Islands], U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, October 29, 2019.</ref><ref>[https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/fact-sheets/FactSheet-Status_of_Citizens_of_Palau.pdf Status of Citizens of the Republic of Palau], U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, October 29, 2019.</ref>
{|
|
*{{flag|Marshall Islands}}
*{{flag|Micronesia}}
*{{flag|Palau}}
|}

==See also==
{{Portal|United States}}
* [[Electronic System for Travel Authorization]] (ESTA)
* [[Visa policy of the United States]]
* [[United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology|US-VISIT]]
* [[Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative]]

==Notes==
{{notelist|colwidth=30em}}

==References==
{{reflist|colwidth=30em}}

==External links==
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20150905101452/http://travel.state.gov/content/visas/english/visit/visa-waiver-program.html  Visa Waiver Program], Bureau of Consular Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
* [http://www.cbp.gov/travel/international-visitors/visa-waiver-program Visa Waiver Program], U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
* [https://esta.cbp.dhs.gov Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA)]
* [https://www.dhs.gov/visa-waiver-program-passport-requirements-timeline Visa Waiver Program: Passport Requirements Timeline], Department of Homeland Security.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20161120084837/https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/assets/documents/2016-Jun/Signatory%20VWP%20Carriers%28June%202016%292.pdf VWP Signatory Carriers list as of 1 June 2016], US Customs & Border Protections. 
* [https://fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/RL32221.pdf Visa Waiver Program], [[Congressional Research Service]].

{{Visa policy by country}}
{{Visa Requirements}}
{{Immigration to the United States}}
{{authority control}}

[[Category:Visa policy of the United States]]
[[Category:United States Department of Homeland Security]]