Jewish diaspora: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 11:5211:52, 2 April 2017 Debresser talk contribs 91,622 bytes −9 This article doesn't use AD. In any case, I think the year is not necessary here. If restored, must be in CE format, per WP:ERA.
curprev 07:1707:17, 2 April 2017 Sangdeboeuf talk contribs 91,631 bytes +73 →Roman destruction of Judea: copy editing, adding link to Nahum Goldmann Museum of the Jewish People
curprev 07:1007:10, 2 April 2017 Sangdeboeuf talk contribs 91,558 bytes +43 →Roman destruction of Judea: Adding WP:ALT text, link cleanup per MOS:NOPIPE, copy editing for WP:IMPARTIAL tone, other misc.

curprev 21:1721:17, 28 March 2017 ClueBot NG talk contribs m 91,515 bytes −25 Reverting possible vandalism by 209.63.206.28 to version by Davide King. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (2988827) (Bot)
curprev 21:1721:17, 28 March 2017 209.63.206.28 talk 91,540 bytes +25 No edit summary

curprev 19:5119:51, 13 March 2017 Debresser talk contribs 91,520 bytes −325 Undid revision 770160194 by Dailycare (talk) Revert to stable version as I understand it.
curprev 19:5019:50, 13 March 2017 Dailycare talk contribs 91,845 bytes +325 Undid revision 770008039 by Debresser (talk) Restore stable version pending outcome of discussion. Debresser, you need consensus for making a change, as you yourself correctly emphasize

curprev 22:1222:12, 12 March 2017 Debresser talk contribs 91,520 bytes −325 Undid revision 769952170 by Dailycare (talk) Revert to previous version. See talkpage for additional explanation why this version is in accordance with Wikipedia policies and guidelines.
curprev 15:5215:52, 12 March 2017 Dailycare talk contribs 91,845 bytes +325 Undid revision 769782272 by Debresser (talk) See talkpage concerning the stable version and why the proposed changes don't make sense. The rules apply to you as well.

curprev 16:3616:36, 11 March 2017 Debresser talk contribs 91,520 bytes −326 Undid revision 769732269 by Dailycare (talk) Again, even if you believe you are right: discuss.
curprev 09:1709:17, 11 March 2017 Dailycare talk contribs 91,846 bytes +326 Undid revision 769462440 by Debresser (talk) This is the longstanding version since at least 2015, and probably earlier. I've left the lead edit out, although it's hardly objectionable.

curprev 18:2518:25, 9 March 2017 Debresser talk contribs 91,520 bytes −513 The stable version was this one, as a matter of fact. Please discuss and establish consensus before you make any further edits.
curprev 18:2218:22, 9 March 2017 Debresser talk contribs 92,033 bytes +6 Was this a quote?
curprev 17:5417:54, 9 March 2017 Dailycare talk contribs 92,027 bytes +506 Undid revision 769130042 by Debresser (talk) Here are three sources for what the expert view is, not just one. Restoring stable version. If you want changes, we can of course discuss them.

curprev 19:0619:06, 7 March 2017 Debresser talk contribs 91,527 bytes −199 Undid revision 769128095 by Dailycare (talk) 1. That is just one source. 2. Per [WP:BRD]] please discuss. 3. I wasn't edit warring till you started one, I just made one revert.
curprev 18:5218:52, 7 March 2017 Dailycare talk contribs 91,726 bytes +199 Undid revision 768576795 by Debresser (talk) the source says "the accounts of historians", not one historian. please quit edit-warring this carefully sourced content

curprev 17:0117:01, 4 March 2017 Debresser talk contribs 91,527 bytes −199 That os one historian who claims so.
curprev 09:4009:40, 4 March 2017 Dailycare talk contribs 91,726 bytes +188 the "no basis" claim is untrue, since basis was provided in the preceding edit summary with reference to WP:LEAD
curprev 09:3809:38, 4 March 2017 Dailycare talk contribs 91,538 bytes +11 →Dispersion of the Jews in the Roman Empire: read the source this is not a "handful" of scholars but consensus scholarly opinion, which must be presented as such

curprev 21:2621:26, 18 February 2017 Debresser talk contribs 91,941 bytes +3 Undid revision 766200990 by 216.19.191.9 (talk) Most definitely not a fix, rather a highly POV edit.
curprev 20:5520:55, 18 February 2017 216.19.191.9 talk 91,938 bytes −3 →Post-Roman period Jewish populations: Fixed link Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 09:3409:34, 18 February 2017 Jennica talk contribs m 91,941 bytes +2 fmt using AWB

curprev 04:0004:00, 17 February 2017 186.136.245.45 talk 91,939 bytes −37 Undid revision 765863555 by 2601:84:4502:61EA:8557:D983:241F:39DF (talk) redundant category, including in category:Jewish diaspora

curprev 12:3912:39, 5 February 2017 2601:84:4502:61ea:90a8:180d:6009:e38c talk 91,939 bytes +28 →Dispersion of the Jews in the Roman Empire
curprev 12:2812:28, 5 February 2017 2601:84:4502:61ea:90a8:180d:6009:e38c talk 91,911 bytes −27 Undid revision 763806195 by Dailycare (talk) 1. No, it doesn't. 2. Even if it did, we're still not supposed to treat the argument of a handful of scholars as fact.
curprev 12:2612:26, 5 February 2017 2601:84:4502:61ea:90a8:180d:6009:e38c talk 91,938 bytes −202 Undid revision 763806869 by Dailycare (talk) No basis for this change
curprev 09:3609:36, 5 February 2017 Dailycare talk contribs 92,140 bytes +202 Add mention of this tension between popular belief and professional opinion to the lead. WP:LEAD "The lead should (...) explain (...) any prominent controversies"