Template:Conservatism US: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 01:4101:41, 10 November 2024 Pizza2771 talk contribs 25,864 bytes +37 Adding John Taylor of Caroline due to his influence on the ideas of states' rights, republicanism, and blends of libertarianism and conservatism. Also had similar ideals as John Randolph of Roanoke, who is also on this page.
curprev 01:1901:19, 10 November 2024 Pizza2771 talk contribs 25,827 bytes +32 Making the decision to add William McKinley due to the fact that he is decently influential to the history of American conservatism, ushering in the Fourth Party System and being an early promoter of interventionism and big business. Recently, he is also influential to some of Trump’s ideas for his second term, specifically with tariffs and protectionism.

curprev 22:3222:32, 9 November 2024 Trakking talk contribs m 25,795 bytes −20 removal of awkward use of parenthesis in a parenthesis
curprev 21:2421:24, 9 November 2024 The Banner talk contribs 25,815 bytes +99 lf
curprev 13:4413:44, 9 November 2024 Trakking talk contribs m 25,716 bytes 0 chronological order; additional terms might have to be moved around in the History section
curprev 01:0801:08, 9 November 2024 Biohistorian15 talk contribs 25,716 bytes −69 Standardize style with the other templates in the category

curprev 16:0916:09, 7 November 2024 Trakking talk contribs m 25,292 bytes +26 Undid revision 1255977763 by Duke of New Gwynedd (talk) - a coat of arms is a more permanent symbol of conservatism than a party logo
curprev 15:5615:56, 7 November 2024 Duke of New Gwynedd talk contribs 25,266 bytes −27 No edit summary

curprev 17:5117:51, 3 November 2024 GreenLoeb talk contribs m 25,266 bytes −33 Good additions, Biohistorian; however, I would not include LaRouche. His conspiratorial movement defies easy categorization, but it is decidedly fringe and originated on the political left. It is a kind of crackpotism that really is beyond left/right, and not especially relevant to the history of the conservative movement in the US.
curprev 13:0113:01, 3 November 2024 Biohistorian15 talk contribs 25,299 bytes +347 Misc. additions... tried getting "concerns" to be more representative in particular

curprev 14:2714:27, 1 November 2024 Chipperdude15 talk contribs 24,952 bytes 0 I would say America First is more better in the Related section than in Principles. It's more of a policy and it's not shared by all conservatives.

curprev 15:3515:35, 31 October 2024 Biohistorian15 talk contribs 24,952 bytes +300 Rm deprecated Hinchcliffe + standardize style parameter with other templates in cat + misc. additions elsewhere
curprev 06:3106:31, 31 October 2024 Biohistorian15 talk contribs 24,652 bytes +287 Miscellaneous additions to various sections

curprev 23:5923:59, 23 October 2024 GreenLoeb talk contribs 24,365 bytes +40 Partial reversion; I'm fine excluding MDE, but Red Scare is not a dirtbag left podcast. Its hosts began their careers on the left, but they are both now solidly on the right, they are influential on RW discourse, and they are friends with Tucker. This is not Chapo Trap House.
curprev 06:2806:28, 23 October 2024 VintageVernacular talk contribs 24,325 bytes −73 A "dirtbag left" podcast, and a neo-Nazi troll troupe. How does this even get here?

curprev 11:5411:54, 20 October 2024 AFEG64 talk contribs 24,398 bytes −25 Undid revision 1251444734 by Trakking (talk) the Dark Enlightenment is very much reactionary, but its reasons for being so are *not* conservative at all. it can be considered reactionary, but it *cannot* be considered 'ultraconservative' because it is not conservative in the slightest. Tag: Undo

curprev 04:5904:59, 16 October 2024 Trakking talk contribs 24,423 bytes +25 Undid revision 1251432094 by AFEG64 (talk) - Dark Enlightenment is a combination of reactionary conservatism and ultraconservatism; it belongs in the list, although it lies outside mainstream conservatism Tags: Undo Reverted
curprev 02:5302:53, 16 October 2024 AFEG64 talk contribs 24,398 bytes −25 removed 'Dark Enlightenment' from the 'Movements' section. it is right-wing, but certainly not conservative, and neither are its major authors. Tag: Reverted

curprev 06:0106:01, 10 October 2024 Partofthemachine talk contribs 24,423 bytes −225 Trim unrelated or loosely related content

curprev 17:2917:29, 4 October 2024 Biohistorian15 talk contribs 24,648 bytes −65 Rm for now after all
curprev 14:2814:28, 4 October 2024 Biohistorian15 talk contribs 24,713 bytes +111 Two standard additions (*mind the invis. comment please)

curprev 08:3008:30, 28 September 2024 Biohistorian15 talk contribs 24,602 bytes +59 Rm two section-links because they screw up the template when transcluded into the respective articles + add perennial piece to "Literature" section + one well-known activist (*and rm now lesser-known one instead)

curprev 18:5218:52, 23 September 2024 Biohistorian15 talk contribs 24,543 bytes +96 Various standard additions (primarily to commentators)... + rm of media org the article of which is now solely about a controversy
curprev 18:4518:45, 23 September 2024 Biohistorian15 talk contribs 24,447 bytes +294 Manual rv. Restore two surely standard concerns of current conservatism

curprev 01:5701:57, 22 September 2024 Partofthemachine talk contribs 24,153 bytes −440 Remove entries that are only very loosely (if at all) related to conservatism

curprev 14:2814:28, 20 September 2024 Chipperdude15 talk contribs 24,593 bytes +1 I think nativism is more of a demographic concern to the more harder right but Paleoconservatives do comment on it a lot. I would keep it in the concerns area.

curprev 17:5617:56, 19 September 2024 Biohistorian15 talk contribs 24,592 bytes −26 Arguably not their main focus hence problematic notability here