User talk:Gurch: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:55, 13 January 2007

Click here to leave me a message

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26

Talk:Main Page archiving

etc etc etc

Anyway, do you think it was okay that i moved the WP:RM manually and also created archive 88? Did i do the right thing to get Werdnabot to go to the new archive, by changing the code?

Its weird. Even though stats say that <1% are Admins, i still think half i know are admins. Simply south

Sysop

Please do not ask to be desysoped. You are one of the best sysops we have. Have a nice week and god bless. --Sir James Paul, La gloria è a dio 00:36, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

deleted article

Hello, A brief article I wrote was deleted by you as "Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content". It was about a mostly forgotten old hardcore group (Damage), but in the context of a list containing many much more obscure bands that haven't been deleted, that categorization seems odd. What sort of information needs to added to indicate that the band in question wasn't "unremarkable"? potanka 19:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oi! Barnstar!

		The Minor Barnstar
		This Barnstar is given to Gurch for lending a helping hand in protecting all those templates. Миша 13 22:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recurrent vandalism by 204.38.101.7

Hi! User 204.38.101.7, blocked by Gurch on 20th December for repeated vandalism, seems to be at it again on the "French wine" page. Please accept my humble apologies if I've gone about reporting this the wrong way, I'm a complete newbie. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Philip Trueman (talk • contribs) 17:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Template protections

Hello Gurch, I hope you are doing well. I noticed that you perm-protected Template talk:WikiProject Texas and some other templates today. If you don't mind, I would like to inquire as to your reasoning. That particular template has existing for a long time without any trouble. Did something specific prompt the protections? Do you have a certain criteria you are using to decide which ones to protect? Thanks very much for satisfying our curiosity. Johntex\^talk 07:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like Semi-protection would be better suited with problem templates getting full protection. Morphh ^(talk) 19:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protection on images

Please don't assume I ignored your warning; I uploaded two images yesterday, Image:Stop.png and Image:Stop X.png. Because Stop.png and Information.png were already protected, I forgot that Stop X.png wasn't. -- Renesis (talk) 20:56, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard#What is the status on this namechange?

I seemed to have sparked some criticism of your actions, and to fair I agreed with it, in the above thread and thought it only proper that you should be made aware of it. Since I cannot see that anyone has brought it up with you on your talk page, here is a heads-up.--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 22:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:66.173.152.158

This user has continued the act of vandalism, most recently at Dependent variable, even after your last warning.--æn↓þæµß¶-ŧ-¢ 16:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are not an administrator and I will seek that you be banned for deleting Nysted.

Lee Nysted, Owner; Managing Partner NystedMusic, LLC.

www.NystedMusic.com

Lee@NystedMusic.com

www.MySpace.com/LeeNysted

www.isound.com/lee_nysted

Legal Counsel:

Frank W. Pirruccello, Esq. www.Musiclaw1.com

Counsel has been notified.

Lee Nysted

My page has been the subject of vandals.

Please re-submit the following on Lee Nysted and ban the user that keeps changing my stats.

I have been in the music business for 30 years, playing for 40.

The obvious links to the name Lee Nysted can be traced back to Google or even Wikipedia.

Whoever has "protected" the page should be verified. If it is Chris_73, then that person should be aware that my company will pursue this issue until resolved.