User talk:FreeRangeFrog

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:28, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Hope you are OK

Hi Frog. It's been a long time since anyone here has heard from you and you are missed. The very abrupt nature of your apparent departure has some people worried. Could you drop a line here, or even a private email to someone on Wikipedia just to let us know you are OK? Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi from me too. Yes, what happened to you? I hope you are okay. We miss you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:46, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Four years now, miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:24, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

... and five and same --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:08, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:36, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

"Complete List of My Name is Rachel Corrie Performances" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Complete List of My Name is Rachel Corrie Performances. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24#Complete List of My Name is Rachel Corrie Performances until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 12:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of AGSB University for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AGSB University is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AGSB University until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sandstein 10:36, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Maine College Of Art Logo 2013.jpg

The file File:Maine College Of Art Logo 2013.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Maine College of Art Logo.png.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:07, 6 August 2022 (UTC)