User talk:Zhomron: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 22:32, 29 December 2022

Archives

Archive 1

October 2022

Your change of Khasekhemwy's name from Khasekhem to Khasekhemwy, is incorrect as khasekhemwy was called Khasekhem prior to his reunification of Egypt after the political instability of the 2nd dynasty. Mrgengar81 (talk) 2:25, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Temple in Jerusalem, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:45, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CITELEAD allows for such a lack of citations in the opening paragraphs of an article provided that the content in question is thoroughly cited in the body of the article. The Hebrew name of the structure is cited in the very first paragraph of the very first section of the article – next time, try scrolling down. Zhomron (talk) 20:47, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Temple in Jerusalem. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 20:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1978 Iranian politics. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Elizium23 (talk) 05:06, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The ancient Near East

Hello there, I see we share a common interest. It is nice to establish rapport, so if there is any topic we can work on together, let me know. el.ziade (talkallam) 09:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mary, mother of Jesus has an RFC

Mary, mother of Jesus has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 17:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Judekkan (talk) 03:40, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Be civil

I noticed the edit summary of this revert of yours, and I get that you have history with this editor, but this is unacceptable. Please becivil in the future, or simple refrain from editing. Thank you. Debresser (talk) 23:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Debresser: I invite you, then, to intercede on the proceeding matter, as my patience with this editor was exhausted several months ago. Zhomron (talk) 23:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shabbat. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 23:37, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zhomron -- RoySmith (talk) 18:58, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 23:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert: Eastern Europe

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Elizium23 (talk) 17:22, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Samaritan Torah

See Talk page for a possible solution to the reference to this in the Torah article.Pngeditor (talk) 20:22, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Negev. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 20:47, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's Noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:54, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revision of my edit on the Phoenician Language

Good evening, would you clarify as to how the addition of northern Palestine as an area in which Phoenician was spoken was inaccurate? If there is aomething wrong with the source, please let me know, since i am still getting better at wikipedia edits. Cheers Haditaha.z (talk) 00:09, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zhomron. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 00:44, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Translation error on Maimonides

Hey, I noticed that you translated "Abu Imran" as "Father of Amram" here, when it should be "whose father was Amram". This is an odd sort of nickname/kunya which references the Biblical Moses' father Amram, very commonly applied to people named Moses with no regard to the actual names of their fathers or sons. GordonGlottal (talk) 04:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't doubt your accuracy but, do you have any source to back that up? Abu literally means "Father of", there's no translation of the term which can be read "whose father is", and I'm unfamiliar with any trend of the Arabic name Moses being prefaced like that. The only other one I can find on Wikipedia is Abu Imran al-Fasi, but I have no idea who that is or what his children were named. Like I said, I'm sure you're correct, but I just wanna be able to back that up with a source. Zhomron (talk) 22:32, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]