User talk:Nouniquenames: Difference between revisions
NickPenguin (talk | contribs) TAFI nom process |
m Reverting editing by Tbf69 while evading a block |
||
| (44 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|box-advert=yes |
|box-advert=yes |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Not around}} |
|||
{{User:Nouniquenames/navtpl}} |
|||
{{User:X!/RfX Report}} |
|||
{{WP:TPS/banner|100}} |
|||
= Messages, etc = |
= Messages, etc = |
||
(Please add messages below under a new level-2 heading). |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Ames True Temper]] == |
|||
== AfC - Viralheat == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[:Ames True Temper]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
Hi Noun. Call me selfish and needy, but I have an AfC in the queue [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Viralheat for Viralheat] with non-free images for the logo[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Viralheat_logo.png] and screenshot[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Viralheat_screenshot.png] that are going to expire in a couple days and I was wondering if you could review the article before the files get deleted. User:VernoWhitney keeps (quite rightfully) hand-slapping me for putting non-free images in draft space, but it makes it quite a juggling act while following the [[WP:BRIGHTLINE]]. Piotrus already reviewed the article and just made one suggestion, which is identified in the edit history. [[User:CorporateM|CorporateM]] ([[User_talk:CorporateM|Talk]]) 00:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
<blockquote>No evidence of passing [[WP:GNG]]/[[WP:NCOMPANY]].</blockquote> |
|||
:Nevermind, someone else got it. [[User:CorporateM|CorporateM]] ([[User_talk:CorporateM|Talk]]) 22:19, 29 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
==Please comment on [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Clerks#rfc_1D05DD5|Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Clerks]]== |
|||
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the [[Wikipedia:Request for comment|request for comment]] on '''[[Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Clerks#rfc_1D05DD5|Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Clerks]]'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding|suggestions for responding]]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from [[Wikipedia:Feedback request service]].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— [[User:RFC bot|RFC bot]] ([[User talk:RFC bot|talk]]) 02:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Ames True Temper|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
==Revising the nominations process at [[Wikipedia:Today's article for improvement]]== |
|||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 08:35, 31 December 2019 (UTC) |
|||
I'm seeking [[Wikipedia_talk:Today%27s_article_for_improvement#Nominations_and_the_problems_of_scale|wider input]] on a proposed redesign of the [[Wikipedia:Today%27s_article_for_improvement/Nominated_articles|nomination process]] over at TAFI. The current method could benefit from some streamlining and usability tweaks. If you feel so inclined, I'd like to hear your opinion on the matter. --[[User:NickPenguin|<font color="darkgreen">Nick</font>]][[User talk:NickPenguin|<font color="darkblue">Penguin</font>]]<sub>([[Special:Contributions/NickPenguin|<font color="blue">'''contribs'''</font>]])</sub> 23:01, 31 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Nomination of [[:Ames True Temper]] for deletion == |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Ames True Temper]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ames True Temper]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 22:29, 5 January 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 14:19, 13 April 2023
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Nouniquenames has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Messages, etc
[edit]
The article Ames True Temper has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of passing WP:GNG/WP:NCOMPANY.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:35, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Ames True Temper for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ames True Temper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ames True Temper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 22:29, 5 January 2020 (UTC)