Jump to content

FEAL: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Other usages: Not relevant to this page
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5) (Whoop whoop pull up - 15814
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Block cipher}}
{{More footnotes|date=September 2015}}
{{Infobox block cipher
{{Infobox block cipher
| name = FEAL
| name = FEAL
Line 4: Line 6:
| caption = The FEAL Feistel function
| caption = The FEAL Feistel function
| designers = Akihiro Shimizu and Shoji Miyaguchi (NTT)
| designers = Akihiro Shimizu and Shoji Miyaguchi (NTT)
| publish date = FEAL-4 in [[1987]]; FEAL-N/NX in [[1990]]
| publish date = FEAL-4 in 1987; FEAL-N/NX in 1990
| derived from =
| derived from =
| derived to =
| derived to =
Line 14: Line 16:
}}
}}


In [[cryptography]], '''FEAL''' (the '''Fast Data Encipherment Algorithm''') is a [[block cipher]] proposed as an alternative to the [[Data Encryption Standard]] (DES), and designed to be much faster in software. The [[Feistel cipher|Feistel]] based algorithm was first published in [[1987]] by Akihiro Shimizu and Shoji Miyaguchi from [[Nippon Telegraph and Telephone|NTT]]. The cipher is susceptible to various forms of [[cryptanalysis]], and has acted as a catalyst in the discovery of [[differential cryptanalysis|differential]] and [[linear cryptanalysis]].
In [[cryptography]], '''FEAL''' (the '''Fast data Encipherment Algorithm''') is a [[block cipher]] proposed as an alternative to the [[Data Encryption Standard]] (DES), and designed to be much faster in software. The [[Feistel cipher|Feistel]] based algorithm was first published in 1987 by [[Akihiro Shimizu]] and [[Shoji Miyaguchi]] from [[Nippon Telegraph and Telephone|NTT]]. The cipher is susceptible to various forms of [[cryptanalysis]], and has acted as a catalyst in the discovery of [[differential cryptanalysis|differential]] and [[linear cryptanalysis]].


There have been several different revisions of FEAL, though all are [[Feistel cipher]]s, and make use of the same basic round function and operate on a [[block size (cryptography)|64-bit block]]. One of the earliest designs is now termed '''FEAL-4''', which has four rounds and a [[key (cryptography)|64-bit key]].
There have been several different revisions of FEAL, though all are [[Feistel cipher]]s, and make use of the same basic round function and operate on a [[block size (cryptography)|64-bit block]]. One of the earliest designs is now termed '''FEAL-4''', which has four rounds and a [[key (cryptography)|64-bit key]].
<!-- den Boer refers to an earlier FEAL-1 and FEAL-2, and Gutmann also mentions pre-FEAL-4 versions, but info on these is hard to find, and they aren't significant, really -->
<!-- den Boer refers to an earlier FEAL-1 and FEAL-2, and Gutmann also mentions pre-FEAL-4 versions, but info on these is hard to find, and they aren't significant, really -->


Unfortunately, problems were found with FEAL-4 from the start: Bert den Boer related a weakness in an unpublished rump session at the same conference where the cipher was first presented. A later paper (den Boer, 1988) describes an attack requiring 100&ndash;10000 [[chosen plaintext]]s, and Sean Murphy (1990) found an improvement that needs only 20 chosen plaintexts. Murphy and den Boer's methods contain elements similar to those used in [[differential cryptanalysis]].
Problems were found with FEAL-4 from the start: Bert den Boer related a weakness in an unpublished rump session at the same conference where the cipher was first presented. A later paper (den Boer, 1988) describes an attack requiring 100&ndash;10000 [[chosen plaintext]]s, and Sean Murphy (1990) found an improvement that needs only 20 chosen plaintexts. Murphy and den Boer's methods contain elements similar to those used in [[differential cryptanalysis]].


The designers countered by doubling the number of rounds, '''FEAL-8''' (Shimizu and Miyaguchi, 1988). However, eight rounds also proved to be insufficient &mdash; in [[1989]], at the Securicom conference, [[Eli Biham]] and [[Adi Shamir]] described a differential attack on the cipher, mentioned in (Miyaguchi, 1989). Gilbert and Chassé (1990) subsequently published a statistical attack similar to differential cryptanalysis which requires 10000 pairs of chosen plaintexts.
The designers countered by doubling the number of rounds, '''FEAL-8''' (Shimizu and Miyaguchi, 1988). However, eight rounds also proved to be insufficient &mdash; in 1989, at the Securicom conference, [[Eli Biham]] and [[Adi Shamir]] described a differential attack on the cipher, mentioned in (Miyaguchi, 1989). Gilbert and Chassé (1990) subsequently published a statistical attack similar to differential cryptanalysis which requires 10000 pairs of chosen plaintexts.


In response, the designers introduced a variable-round cipher, '''FEAL-N''' (Miyaguchi, 1990), where "N" was chosen by the user, together with '''FEAL-NX''', which had a larger 128-bit key. Biham and Shamir's differential cryptanalysis (1991) showed that both FEAL-N and FEAL-NX could be broken faster than exhaustive search for N ≤ 31. Later attacks, precursors to linear cryptanalysis, could break versions under the [[known plaintext]] assumption, first (Tardy-Corfdir and Gilbert, 1991) and then (Matsui and Yamagishi, 1992), the latter breaking FEAL-4 with 5 known plaintexts, FEAL-6 with 100, and FEAL-8 with 2<sup>15</sup>.
In response, the designers introduced a variable-round cipher, '''FEAL-N''' (Miyaguchi, 1990), where "N" was chosen by the user, together with '''FEAL-NX''', which had a larger 128-bit key. Biham and Shamir's differential cryptanalysis (1991) showed that both FEAL-N and FEAL-NX could be broken faster than exhaustive search for N ≤ 31. Later attacks, precursors to linear cryptanalysis, could break versions under the [[known plaintext]] assumption, first (Tardy-Corfdir and Gilbert, 1991) and then (Matsui and Yamagishi, 1992), the latter breaking FEAL-4 with 5 known plaintexts, FEAL-6 with 100, and FEAL-8 with 2<sup>15</sup>.

In 1994, Ohta and Aoki presented a linear cryptanalytic attack against FEAL-8 that required 2<sup>12</sup> known plaintexts.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://x5.net/faqs/crypto/q79.html |title=Q79: What is FEAL? |publisher=X5.net |access-date=2013-02-19}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
* [[N-Hash]]
* [[N-Hash]]


==Notes==

{{reflist}}


==References==
==References==
Line 42: Line 47:


==External links==
==External links==
* [http://info.isl.ntt.co.jp/feal-nx/ The FEAL home page]
* [http://info.isl.ntt.co.jp/crypt/eng/archive/index.html#feal The FEAL home page]
* [http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=54gq4q%242d7%40scream.auckland.ac.nz A sci.crypt article by Peter Gutmann describing FEAL]
* [https://groups.google.com/groups?selm=54gq4q%242d7%40scream.auckland.ac.nz A sci.crypt article by Peter Gutmann describing FEAL]
*[http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?TERM1=4850019&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&r=0&l=50&f=S&d=PALL US patent 4850019]
*[http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?TERM1=4850019&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&r=0&l=50&f=S&d=PALL US patent 4850019] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160409112249/http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?TERM1=4850019&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&r=0&l=50&f=S&d=PALL |date=2016-04-09 }}


{{Crypto navbox | block}}


{{Cryptography navbox | block}}
[[Category:Block ciphers]]


[[Category:Broken block ciphers]]
[[de:FEAL]]
[[Category:Feistel ciphers]]
[[fr:FEAL]]
[[ja:FEAL]]
[[pl:FEAL]]

Latest revision as of 01:40, 17 October 2023

FEAL
The FEAL Feistel function
General
DesignersAkihiro Shimizu and Shoji Miyaguchi (NTT)
First publishedFEAL-4 in 1987; FEAL-N/NX in 1990
Cipher detail
Key sizes64 bits (FEAL), 128 bits (FEAL-NX)
Block sizes64 bits
StructureFeistel network
RoundsOriginally 4, then 8, then variable (recommended 32)
Best public cryptanalysis
Linear cryptanalysis can break FEAL-4 with 5 known plaintexts (Matsui and Yamagishi, 1992). A differential attack breaks FEAL-N/NX with fewer than 31 rounds (Biham and Shamir, 1991).

In cryptography, FEAL (the Fast data Encipherment Algorithm) is a block cipher proposed as an alternative to the Data Encryption Standard (DES), and designed to be much faster in software. The Feistel based algorithm was first published in 1987 by Akihiro Shimizu and Shoji Miyaguchi from NTT. The cipher is susceptible to various forms of cryptanalysis, and has acted as a catalyst in the discovery of differential and linear cryptanalysis.

There have been several different revisions of FEAL, though all are Feistel ciphers, and make use of the same basic round function and operate on a 64-bit block. One of the earliest designs is now termed FEAL-4, which has four rounds and a 64-bit key.

Problems were found with FEAL-4 from the start: Bert den Boer related a weakness in an unpublished rump session at the same conference where the cipher was first presented. A later paper (den Boer, 1988) describes an attack requiring 100–10000 chosen plaintexts, and Sean Murphy (1990) found an improvement that needs only 20 chosen plaintexts. Murphy and den Boer's methods contain elements similar to those used in differential cryptanalysis.

The designers countered by doubling the number of rounds, FEAL-8 (Shimizu and Miyaguchi, 1988). However, eight rounds also proved to be insufficient — in 1989, at the Securicom conference, Eli Biham and Adi Shamir described a differential attack on the cipher, mentioned in (Miyaguchi, 1989). Gilbert and Chassé (1990) subsequently published a statistical attack similar to differential cryptanalysis which requires 10000 pairs of chosen plaintexts.

In response, the designers introduced a variable-round cipher, FEAL-N (Miyaguchi, 1990), where "N" was chosen by the user, together with FEAL-NX, which had a larger 128-bit key. Biham and Shamir's differential cryptanalysis (1991) showed that both FEAL-N and FEAL-NX could be broken faster than exhaustive search for N ≤ 31. Later attacks, precursors to linear cryptanalysis, could break versions under the known plaintext assumption, first (Tardy-Corfdir and Gilbert, 1991) and then (Matsui and Yamagishi, 1992), the latter breaking FEAL-4 with 5 known plaintexts, FEAL-6 with 100, and FEAL-8 with 215.

In 1994, Ohta and Aoki presented a linear cryptanalytic attack against FEAL-8 that required 212 known plaintexts.[1]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ "Q79: What is FEAL?". X5.net. Retrieved 2013-02-19.

References

[edit]
  • Eli Biham, Adi Shamir: Differential Cryptanalysis of Feal and N-Hash. EUROCRYPT 1991: 1–16
  • Bert den Boer, Cryptanalysis of F.E.A.L., EUROCRYPT 1988: 293–299
  • Henri Gilbert, Guy Chassé: A Statistical Attack of the FEAL-8 Cryptosystem. CRYPTO 1990: 22–33.
  • Shoji Miyaguchi: The FEAL Cipher Family. CRYPTO 1990: 627–638
  • Shoji Miyaguchi: The FEAL-8 Cryptosystem and a Call for Attack. CRYPTO 1989: 624–627
  • Mitsuru Matsui, Atsuhiro Yamagishi: A New Method for Known Plaintext Attack of FEAL Cipher. EUROCRYPT 1992: 81–91
  • Sean Murphy, The Cryptanalysis of FEAL-4 with 20 Chosen Plaintexts. J. Cryptology 2(3): 145–154 (1990)
  • A. Shimizu and S. Miyaguchi, Fast data encipherment algorithm FEAL, Advances in Cryptology — Eurocrypt '87, Springer-Verlag (1988), 267–280.
  • Anne Tardy-Corfdir, Henri Gilbert: A Known Plaintext Attack of FEAL-4 and FEAL-6. CRYPTO 1991: 172–181
[edit]