User talk:Ayenaee/Archive 1

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Ayenaee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Qaei ☎ 17:12, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
20		Pitsa panels (talk)	Add sources
990		Cops (TV program) (talk)	Add sources
3		Tyritakē (talk)	Add sources
1,070		Danny Rolling (talk)	Add sources
172		Eudoxus of Cnidus (talk)	Add sources
57		Archaeological forgery (talk)	Add sources
771		Philip Glenister (talk)	Cleanup
26		Chronocentrism (talk)	Cleanup
484		History of calendars (talk)	Cleanup
198		Zodiacal light (talk)	Expand
342		Flip or Flop (talk)	Expand
769		Cloning (talk)	Expand
95		Edwidge Danticat (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
192		Hill sphere (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,336		Lunar phase (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
91		Clandestine HUMINT operational techniques (talk)	Merge
3		Freiberg House (talk)	Merge
49		Salt gland (talk)	Merge
34		New York State Police Troop C scandal (talk)	Wikify
21		Censorinus (talk)	Wikify
7		Ramus Pomifer (talk)	Wikify
4		Real Estate Elevated (talk)	Orphan
2		Anatole Bienaime (talk)	Orphan
7		Andatee China Marine Fuel (talk)	Orphan
2,093		XAI (company) (talk)	Stub
29		Data (Euclid) (talk)	Stub
15		Aristarchus's inequality (talk)	Stub
18		Theodosius of Bithynia (talk)	Stub
13		Planisphaerium (talk)	Stub
4		Solar eclipse of October 13, 2061 (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Short description

That is a short description? Debresser (talk) 17:30, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Debresser, no it isn't - think I had brain freeze after doing too many. Have corrected it. Thanks. Ayenaee (talk) 17:57, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

I changed one word. It should be specifically "skin". Sorry for the misleading edit summary, a result of subsequent edits. Debresser (talk) 19:27, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks again.Ayenaee (talk) 20:41, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Heads up

You forgot to sign. (Feel free to delete this message.) Iskandar323 (talk) 05:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

😳👍🏻 Ayenaee (talk) 12:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

cameron whitten

hi i'm just curious why this edit ( https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cameron_Whitten&diff=prev&oldid=1183176875 ) is under Personal Life. this is not his personal life - this is his professional life. shouldn't this have a Controversy section, and more explanation of the allegations, give their serious nature [deleted allegations]. thanks. 172.58.139.161 (talk) 10:08, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi 172.58.139.161. Thanks for bringing this up. I did apply my mind when considering whether or not to include the detailed allegations in my edit.

This article isn’t in my main scope of interest. I just came across it and noticed that the Personal Life section contained limited detail of the controversy which hadn’t been updated for a couple of years. I brought it up to date but didn’t change the structure of the article. I agree that the content would fit better in a separate section, and I’ve made that change.

There is however a fine line between giving additional detail of the allegations, and breaching BLP:People accused of a crime. These allegations have been tested once and declared unfounded (You could say there’s potential bias and COI in that declaration because the report was requisitioned by his company and we only have the chairman’s statement of what that report said or that the investigation even happened. I can’t find any actual public report. So we have to rely on the sources reporting what the chairperson said.) So all we have about the allegation are a limited number of reports of the law suite (stating the allegations) which mainly seem to be copies of each other. I don’t think this meets the requirements of the BLP Public Figures exception. So until the suit is complete I don’t think it’s appropriate to report the allegations. If you think there are good WP:RS to do so, I suggest you start a conversation on the talk page to reach agreement rather than possibly breach WP:BLP. You’re welcome to quote my response. [In an excess of caution I’ve removed the allegations from your post above]. Ayenaee (talk) 13:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Structure of Jewish Tefilot

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Structure of Jewish Tefilot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/ana-bkoach-a-portal-to-creation/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks User:Sphilbrick. I appreciate your thoroughness. The copyvio material (which is only part of the page - the rest is my working) was only there for me to summarise in my own words for the article - I would have removed it once done. But I see how this is copy vio. I have now removed the material you tagged and other similar notes from the page (and therefore contested the speedy delete). Is it possible to delete the tag now that I’ve removed the material so that it doesn’t get deleted by mistake? Sorry for the hassle. Ayenaee (talk) 15:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for attending to this - the rainimg material looks interesting. S Philbrick(Talk) 15:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)