Jump to content

Talk:History of Belarus: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 4 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Belarus}}, {{WikiProject Russia}}, {{WikiProject History}}, {{Eurohist}}.
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{talkheader}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Belarus|class=c|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Belarus|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Russia|class=c|importance=High|hist=yes}}
{{WikiProject Russia|importance=High|hist=yes}}
{{WikiProject History|class=c|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject History|importance=mid}}
{{eurohist|class=c|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject European history|importance=mid}}
{{Vital article|class=C|topic=History|level=5}}
}}
}}


Line 39: Line 38:
*"...radical right wingers use to call Belarus "the last dictatorship in Europe", a propaganda cliche used against left wing governments by private owned enterprises lobbying for its appropiation of public owned state controlled resources." (the reference for this claim is a news forum btw, which doesn't meet our [[WP:EL|external link]] guidelines.
*"...radical right wingers use to call Belarus "the last dictatorship in Europe", a propaganda cliche used against left wing governments by private owned enterprises lobbying for its appropiation of public owned state controlled resources." (the reference for this claim is a news forum btw, which doesn't meet our [[WP:EL|external link]] guidelines.
*"...representative of frustrated capitalist interests in privatization of public enterprises. Under Lukashenko Belarus has seen economical prosperity with continuity of state control of the economy ("communism"). Eighty percent of the economy of Belarus remains under state control, just as it was in the Soviet Socialist Republic of Belarus. This is irritating to right-wingers, such as many in "the West" who fear that the example of Belarus demonstrates viability of communism in comparison to Russia´s experience with privatization and subsequent corruption and stealing of public resources."
*"...representative of frustrated capitalist interests in privatization of public enterprises. Under Lukashenko Belarus has seen economical prosperity with continuity of state control of the economy ("communism"). Eighty percent of the economy of Belarus remains under state control, just as it was in the Soviet Socialist Republic of Belarus. This is irritating to right-wingers, such as many in "the West" who fear that the example of Belarus demonstrates viability of communism in comparison to Russia´s experience with privatization and subsequent corruption and stealing of public resources."
[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aecis|<font color="blue">A</font>]][[User:Aecis|<font color="green">ecis</font>]] <sup>No running, shouting or [[Special:Contributions/Aecis|piddling]] in [[User talk:Aecis|the shallow end]]</sup> 18:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aecis|<span style="color:blue;">A</span>]][[User:Aecis|<span style="color:green;">ecis</span>]] <sup>No running, shouting or [[Special:Contributions/Aecis|piddling]] in [[User talk:Aecis|the shallow end]]</sup> 18:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


== Expanding this? ==
== Expanding this? ==
Line 115: Line 114:
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 14:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 14:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)


== "independent feudal consolidation" ==
== Why this page so heavy censored to fit Kremlin view on history ? ==


I have no idea what this means. Or is supposed to mean. [[User:Srnec|Srnec]] ([[User talk:Srnec|talk]]) 00:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Subject. Constant removing of the sources which contradict russian occupation of Lithuania-"Belarus" that's what I see.

I suspect users [[Sabbatino]] in [[Ke an]] payed by Moscow ideologists activity.

Administrator [[Jayjg]] have done nothing to analyse situation and keep sourced/linked info on this page.

If there will no answer around assessment of for deleting information reasons - interested society probably have right to appeal it the competent US/EU authorities and the media.
'''Wikipedia is not a place for one side propohanda!'''

Thank you.
:This rant just shows that you [[WP:NOTHERE|do not belong here]]. Your master account has already been banned for some time but you keep coming back by using different IPs and/or creating new accounts, which are already banned. All these accusations just show that you still fail to understand on why you were banned in the first place. – [[User:Sabbatino|Sabbatino]] ([[User talk:Sabbatino|talk]]) 08:25, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
::[[User:Sabbatino|Sabbatino]]. Can you argument your actions or you are going to bla-bla to hide you true motivation?
It's never was POV that was deleted. POV is what you going to save here in articles - just one side of thing which prevalent in Soviet/Kremlin imperial historiography.

Latest revision as of 23:10, 8 January 2024

Few more questions

[edit]

First:


into the multi-ethnic Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Ruthenia and Samogitia, with its capital initially in Horodno, later in Navahradak (now in western Belarus) and finally in Vilnia.


When did Grand Duchy of Lithuania became only Ruthenia and Samogitia? Did not missed - Lithuania?


Horodno as a capital Grand Duchy of Lithuania? When? If you writing capitals of Grand Duchy of Lithuania write all of them – Trakai Kernavė Voruta ; not only which you like!


Second:

Initially mostly Ruthenian and Orthodox, with time most of them became polonized. This was especially true for major magnate families (Sapieha and Radziwiłł clans being the most notable)


Do you really think that Radziwiłł family represents Orthodox? Family started from Trakai (Lithuania) and later developed into 3 branches – BiržaiDubingiai (Protestant branch), Olyka and Nieswiez (catholic branch); and a branch which died out very soon - Goniadz–Medele (catholic branch)

M.K.


Pov removed

[edit]

I've removed two highly pov sections from the paragraph "Republic of Belarus. Communist economy in a political democracy." Most of the section read like a paranoid crusade to dismiss certain views on Belarus, and like a massive defense of Lukashenko. The phrases I've removed are:

  • "...radical right wingers use to call Belarus "the last dictatorship in Europe", a propaganda cliche used against left wing governments by private owned enterprises lobbying for its appropiation of public owned state controlled resources." (the reference for this claim is a news forum btw, which doesn't meet our external link guidelines.
  • "...representative of frustrated capitalist interests in privatization of public enterprises. Under Lukashenko Belarus has seen economical prosperity with continuity of state control of the economy ("communism"). Eighty percent of the economy of Belarus remains under state control, just as it was in the Soviet Socialist Republic of Belarus. This is irritating to right-wingers, such as many in "the West" who fear that the example of Belarus demonstrates viability of communism in comparison to Russia´s experience with privatization and subsequent corruption and stealing of public resources."

Aecis No running, shouting or piddling in the shallow end 18:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expanding this?

[edit]

Hi folks. This article looks in dire need of re-writing and expanding, to me. What are the current hotspots here? Yury Tarasievich 11:59, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Belarusian Soviet Republic and West Belarus

[edit]

The same number of lines described language limitations in Poland and mass extermination in Soviet Belarus. POV.Xx236 08:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

including practically all its intellectual elite

[edit]

So the intelectual elite murdered in 1937 died for the second time? Xx236 08:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Polish population often collaborated with German occupation administration.

[edit]

The same "Belarus population often collaborated with German occupation administration". Xx236 08:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In total, Belarus lost a quarter of its pre-war population in the Second World War

[edit]

False, Belarus had more population after the war than before it.Xx236 08:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC). If 'after the war' means 40 years after -- this makes sense... the whole article on belarus seems to be written by non-natives, and has lots of false statements...[reply]

Ethnos

[edit]

The word 'ethnos' is pretentious use of Greek, needless, and is not good English. Is the phrase 'ethnic group' not politically correct enough already? And what is wrong with 'the Belarussian people'? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.185.167.243 (talk) 13:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1812

[edit]

Szlachta (gentry) joined Napoleon's army - not mentioned here . (be-tarsk) Беларуская шляхта ў часе вайны 1812 году падтрымала Напалеона,Xx236 (talk) 14:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References, please. It is a known fact that Polish nobility hoped for liberation from Russia by Napoleon. There is no such thing as "Belarusian szlachta". Nobility is national concept, not ethnic. Nationalistic be-tarsk is poor source for historical facts, since it is skewed into exaggeration of Belarusian glory. - üser:Altenmann >t 16:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nobility is national concept, not ethnic. - any sources? What about Konstanty Kalinowski? Members of gentry joined nationalistic anti-Polish movements, see Romer family, Andrey Sheptytsky. Four brothers were Lithuanian, Polish and Belarus (two Iwanowski-s, Tadas Ivanauskas, Ivanoŭski). The main division in Belarus was religious (Roman Catholic against Orthodox) rather than national.Xx236 (talk) 08:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The usage of Belarusian language

[edit]

Which Belarusian language 1920-1939? There existed at least two dialects, not mentioning West Polesian microlanguage. In another words - the Polish government didn't support unification of Belarusian language, was it oblidged to do it? Does Lithuanian government support unification of Polish language in Lithuania today, in the EU?Xx236 (talk) 08:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Piasecki ?

[edit]

The page is about History of Belarus. The Piasecki paragraph should be rewritten or removed.Xx236 (talk) 10:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the Nazis attempted to establish

[edit]

But they established in 1943.Xx236 (talk) 10:40, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

POV

[edit]

This article presents Belarus POV. History of minorities (Poles, Jews) should be described.Xx236 (talk) 08:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC) The article lacks references since 2012.Xx236 (talk) 08:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Belarus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Belarus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"independent feudal consolidation"

[edit]

I have no idea what this means. Or is supposed to mean. Srnec (talk) 00:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]