Talk:ABBA: You Can Dance/GA1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:35, 31 January 2024

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: A412 (talk · contribs) 22:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this one. ~ A412 ^talk! 22:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-prose stuff done. ~ A412 ^talk! 22:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

References

As of this revision

Spot checks

[2] - Checks out.
[6] - Can you run IABot? Link is down. Checks out via IA.
[11] - Checks out.
[16] - I couldn't validate this. GWR website gives Michael Jackson: The Experience for the listed record, and no information on this game. Is there a specific GWR publication that's being cited, and if so, can we be more specific?

RS

[3] - Is Club Nintendo an independent source that can be cited for reception?

Everything else looks fine.

OR

Looks fine, no uncited statements.

CV

Earwig is clean besides quotes from interview. The development quotes feel slightly unnecessary given that the entire paragraph is already from one source, but that's more of a content than a copying problem.

Images

Infobox image: Looks fine.
Reception image: NFCC looks fine. Could you update the caption to describe the image?

Coverage

Broad: I don't love that almost the entirety of development is sourced to one interview, but my quick search didn't find much else. Are there other potential sources out there?
Focused: Is there secondary coverage of the list of songs?

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 I'll do this one. ~ [[User:A412|<span style="color: #CC5500;">A412</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:A412|talk!]]</sup> 22:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
+: Non-prose stuff done. ~ [[User:A412|<span style="color: #CC5500;">A412</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:A412|talk!]]</sup> 22:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; width:50em"
@@ Line 15: / Line 16: @@
 #:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|{{{1a}}}}}<br/> b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|word choice]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{1b}}}}}
 #It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''.
-#:a ''(references)'': {{GAList/check|{{{2a}}}}} <br/>b ''(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{2b}}}}} <br/>c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{2c}}}}} <br/>d ''([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{2d}}}}}
+#:a ''(references)'': {{GAList/check|?}} <br/>b ''(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|?}} <br/>c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} <br/>d ''([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])'': {{GAList/check|y}}
 #It is '''broad in its coverage'''.
-#:a ''(major aspects)'': {{GAList/check|{{{3a}}}}} <br/>b ''(focused)'': {{GAList/check|{{{3b}}}}}
+#:a ''(major aspects)'': {{GAList/check|?}} <br/>b ''(focused)'': {{GAList/check|?}}
 #It follows the '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy'''.
-#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|{{{4}}}}}
+#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|y}}
 #It is '''stable'''.
-#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|{{{5}}}}}
+#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|y}}
 #It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''', where possible and appropriate.
-#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Non-free_use_rationale_guideline|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{6a}}}}} <br/>b ''(appropriate use with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{6b}}}}}
+#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Non-free_use_rationale_guideline|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} <br/>b ''(appropriate use with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|?}}
 |-
 | style="text-align:center;" |
@@ Line 33: / Line 34: @@
 |-
 |}
+=== References ===
+As of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ABBA:_You_Can_Dance&oldid=1199373859 this revision]
+==== Spot checks ====
+* [2] - Checks out.
+* [6] - Can you run IABot? Link is down. Checks out via IA.
+* [11] - Checks out.
+* [16] - I couldn't validate this. [https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/116011-best-selling-game-affiliated-to-a-music-artist GWR website] gives [[Michael Jackson: The Experience]] for the listed record, and no information on this game. Is there a specific GWR publication that's being cited, and if so, can we be more specific?
+==== RS ====
+* [3] - Is [[Club Nintendo]] an independent source that can be cited for reception?
+Everything else looks fine.
+==== OR ====
+Looks fine, no uncited statements.
+==== CV ====
+Earwig is clean besides quotes from interview. The development quotes feel slightly unnecessary given that the entire paragraph is already from one source, but that's more of a content than a copying problem.
+=== Images ===
+* Infobox image: Looks fine.
+* Reception image: NFCC looks fine. Could you update the caption to describe the image?
+=== Coverage ===
+* Broad: I don't love that almost the entirety of development is sourced to one interview, but my quick search didn't find much else. Are there other potential sources out there?
+* Focused: Is there secondary coverage of the list of songs?