Talk:Omegle: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 08:40, 2 February 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Omegle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 90 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

Websites: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Reasons for shutdown

Hello, based on the official statement of the author, which can be read at the website itself, the reasons for shutdown appear to be the attack and criticism against the platform itself, rather than mainly child exploitation or management of crime. On the contrary, the author said he was trying to preserve the site in spite of the many people maligning it, but in the end it seems the "ornery" people of the modern day caused him too much grief, which was the main factor that broke the camel's back - on top of the already-existing problems of criminal exploitation and maintenance expenses. Should we change the focus of the article's description of the shutdown to these aforementioned points?

Thanks, Kiril kovachev (talk) 00:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, this article has much more concrete reasons for the shutdown - BBC - Fuzheado | Talk 15:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That article isn't particularly accurate on several counts, and very one sided. For one, no legal precedent is set when a case gets settled out of court, for another the product liability claim is also likely flawed. A similar argument could me bade for guns and cigarettes, but those are still allowed, and exist. You can't blame the creator of a tool for a person abusing and misusing it. Many, in fact most people used Omegle for it's intended purpose, which was to converse with people you had no way of connecting with otherwise. Nabeel_co (talk) 05:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Popularity, especially during the pandemic.

I'm surprised the popularity of Omegle wasn't discussed, and I think it should be. Many people used it as an outlet for social interaction and communication, in general, but especially during the 2020 lockdowns. There also were a lot of YouTube and TikTok creators who used it as a medium to create content by entertaining the person the matched with, with comedy, music, skills, magic, jokes, etc. Nabeel_co (talk) 05:44, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}}
-{{WikiProject Websites |class=start |importance=mid}}
+{{Talk page banner}}
-{{WikiProject Internet culture |importance=Low |class=Start}}
+{{Controversial}}
+{{Censor}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
+{{WikiProject Websites |importance=mid}}
+{{WikiProject Internet culture |importance=Low }}
+}}
 {{Archives|bot=ClueBot III}}{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
 | age=2160
@@ Line 11: / Line 17: @@
 | format= %%i
 }}
+== Reasons for shutdown ==
+Hello, based on the official statement of the author, which can be read at the website itself, the reasons for shutdown appear to be the attack and criticism against the platform itself, rather than mainly child exploitation or management of crime. On the contrary, the author said he was trying to preserve the site in spite of the many people maligning it, but in the end it seems the "ornery" people of the modern day caused him too much grief, which was the main factor that broke the camel's back - on top of the already-existing problems of criminal exploitation and maintenance expenses. Should we change the focus of the article's description of the shutdown to these aforementioned points?
+Thanks, [[User:Kiril kovachev|Kiril kovachev]] ([[User talk:Kiril kovachev|talk]]) 00:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
+:FYI, this article has much more concrete reasons for the shutdown - [https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-67485561 BBC] - [[User:Fuzheado|Fuzheado]] &#124; [[User talk:Fuzheado|Talk]] 15:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
+::That article isn't particularly accurate on several counts, and very one sided. For one, no legal precedent is set when a case gets settled out of court, for another the product liability claim is also likely flawed. A similar argument could me bade for guns and cigarettes, but those are still allowed, and exist. You can't blame the creator of a tool for a person abusing and misusing it. Many, in fact most people used Omegle for it's intended purpose, which was to converse with people you had no way of connecting with otherwise. [[User:Nabeel co|Nabeel_co]] ([[User talk:Nabeel co|talk]]) 05:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
+== Popularity, especially during the pandemic. ==
+I'm surprised the popularity of Omegle wasn't discussed, and I think it should be. Many people used it as an outlet for social interaction and communication, in general, but especially during the 2020 lockdowns. There also were a lot of YouTube and TikTok creators who used it as a medium to create content by entertaining the person the matched with, with comedy, music, skills, magic, jokes, etc. [[User:Nabeel co|Nabeel_co]] ([[User talk:Nabeel co|talk]]) 05:44, 29 January 2024 (UTC)