Jump to content

Talk:Rotax 915 iS: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Proposed merger with Rotax 916 iS
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WPAVIATION}}. Keep 1 different rating in {{WikiProject Austria}}.
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{American English}}
{{American English}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{WikiProject Aviation| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> =y
{{WPAVIATION|class=B
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> =y
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> =n
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> =n
| b3 <!--Structure --> =y
| b3 <!--Structure --> =y
Line 14: Line 13:


==Proposed merger with [[Rotax 916 iS]]==
==Proposed merger with [[Rotax 916 iS]]==
{{Archive top|result=Consensus to not merge|status=Closed}}
*'''Oppose''' - while it is a derivative of the 915, which itself is a derivative of the [[Rotax 912]], the [[Rotax 916 iS]] is a distinctive type, with sufficient notability for a stand-alone article, as already shown by the refs cited, for its own article. The 160 hp power output positions it for a whole new class of aircraft applications, where it will be replacing engines like the [[Lycoming O-320]], as illustrated by its installation in the [[Carbon Cub UL]], so it is expected to see wide uptake. - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 12:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' - while it is a derivative of the 915, which itself is a derivative of the [[Rotax 912]], the [[Rotax 916 iS]] is a distinctive type, with sufficient notability for a stand-alone article, as already shown by the refs cited. See [[WP:GNG]]. The 160 hp power output positions it for a whole new class of aircraft applications, where it will be replacing engines like the [[Lycoming O-320]], as illustrated by its installation in the [[Carbon Cub UL]], so it is expected to see wide uptake. - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 12:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' - Per Ahunt. [[User:BilCat|BilCat]] ([[User talk:BilCat|talk]]) 19:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
: Okay then! I saw the 916 as an uprated 915, only with a little more turbocharger boost.--[[User:Marc Lacoste|Marc Lacoste]] ([[User talk:Marc Lacoste|talk]]) 19:55, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
{{Archive bottom}}

Latest revision as of 03:31, 25 February 2024


Proposed merger with Rotax 916 iS

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Okay then! I saw the 916 as an uprated 915, only with a little more turbocharger boost.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 19:55, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.