Jump to content

Talk:Christian nationalism: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
POV Info: Reply
POV Info: that's naive
Line 41: Line 41:
::::::Christian nationalism doesn't only exist in the United States now does it? Plus the article you linked literally says "Christian nationalism is a growing force in Ghana" [[User:Wiiformii|Wiiformii]] ([[User talk:Wiiformii|talk]]) 20:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
::::::Christian nationalism doesn't only exist in the United States now does it? Plus the article you linked literally says "Christian nationalism is a growing force in Ghana" [[User:Wiiformii|Wiiformii]] ([[User talk:Wiiformii|talk]]) 20:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::That's correct. So if there is a country in which white supremacy and Christian nationalism are tied together, that needs to be made explicit. The black majority of Christian nationalists in Ghana are obviously not white supremacists. [[User:Desmay|desmay]] ([[User talk:Desmay|talk]]) 20:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::That's correct. So if there is a country in which white supremacy and Christian nationalism are tied together, that needs to be made explicit. The black majority of Christian nationalists in Ghana are obviously not white supremacists. [[User:Desmay|desmay]] ([[User talk:Desmay|talk]]) 20:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Actually, that's a naive assumption. See [https://circumspecte.com/2009/01/ghana-strain-of-racism-ethnocentrism/ this article]: "the general rule is 'lighter is better'." Even in Ghana. [[User:Skyerise|Skyerise]] ([[User talk:Skyerise|talk]]) 20:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Fair enough, although I do not have many strong opinions, I feel as @[[User:Skyerise|Skyerise]] knows more, I just saw this edit on the recent edits page but in all honesty I do not know much, but I hope you guys find consensus. [[User:Wiiformii|Wiiformii]] ([[User talk:Wiiformii|talk]]) 20:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Fair enough, although I do not have many strong opinions, I feel as @[[User:Skyerise|Skyerise]] knows more, I just saw this edit on the recent edits page but in all honesty I do not know much, but I hope you guys find consensus. [[User:Wiiformii|Wiiformii]] ([[User talk:Wiiformii|talk]]) 20:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:18, 25 June 2024

Add Lebanon in the "By Country" Section

Can we start a section on Lebanon? I feel like Lebanon has a lot to go off of as far as Christian nationalism is concerned. I think important groups to mention would be the Kataeb Party, Lebanese Front, Lebanese Forces (Christian militia), Lebanese Forces (political party), and the Free Patriotic Movement. 140.141.4.65 (talk) 21:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add material that is not cited by reliable, secondary sources. See our guidelines on no original research and reliable sources (also, secondary sources). ButlerBlog (talk) 02:08, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Case for Christian Nationalism

An IP editor has repeatedly reinserted material regarding the book The Case for Christian Nationalism, which is not a book for an academic or academically-respected press. It is a book that defines and recommends a very specific, xenophobic version of Christian nationalism that cannot be assumed to be the general view of American Christian nationalists. The insertions have lacked third-party sources showing that the quotes being used of are import. It should not be reinserted. -- Nat Gertler (talk) Nat Gertler (talk) 06:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"xenophobic version of Christian nationalism that cannot be assumed to be the general view of American Christian nationalists" So, you think that Christian nationalists are not xenophobic? Based on which source? Dimadick (talk) 08:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not saying that American Christian nationalism is not generally or frequently xenophobic; I'm saying that because an advocacy book with Christian Nationalism in the title calls for xenophobic action, that does not make it a proper source for such statements. Cannot be assumed is meant differently than isn't. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 15:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the situation has changed just in the last few days with the publication of Owen Strachan's "One “Holy Nation” in Christ: Christian Nationalism in Historical and Theological Perspective" in GDJT. He notes (p. 83) that Wolfe's book is "the longest text written in recent days to support CN". The most interesting quote is on p. 59: "In general, the New Testament is — by and large — missing from Wolfe's Thomistic project of political philosophy." StAnselm (talk) 18:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that says much for inclusion here, but may fit nicely into the book's own article. Nat Gertler (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It’s looks to be a fine source for the book and the wider phenomenon of Christian Nationalism in the context of this page. 3Kingdoms (talk) 16:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am uncertain of the reliability of the GDJT. It is a fairly new entry to the journal field, published by a ministry rather than by an academic press. However, I am unused to evaluating journals. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 18:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Armaly et. al.

This source appears to contradict itself. It says Christian nationalism is strongly related to support for specific and abstract political violence on its own. But it also says At low levels of white identity, perceived victimhood, and QAnon support, Christian nationalism was not a particularly infuential predictor of support for violence. These are just directly in contradiction with each other. Am I missing something? If CN is only a predictor of support for violence only in conjunction wtih these other views (e.g. QAnon support), as the second quote says, then it would seem CN isn't strongly related to support for violence on its own (i.e., in isolation from other views, such as QAnon support), as the first quote says. So both quotes can't be true. Shinealittlelight (talk) 17:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's a bit of nuance needed to understand the source. Firstly, the source makes it explicitly clear that CN itself is associated with political violence. As stated, Christian nationalism in the United States is associated with increased support for political violence like that seen at the U.S. Capitol in January 2021. The study goes into studying whether or not white identity, perceived victomhood, and support for QAnon influences the likelihood of violence by followers of CN, in which it finds support for violence appears to be most potent when combined with other individual characteristics. However, CN itself is still strongly related to support for specific and abstract political violence on its own, however, when compared at low levels of support with the previously mentioned influences, it was not a particularly influential predictor of support for violence. However, the source makes clear that the conditional nature of these effects should not be misunderstood to minimize the extent of the risks associated with Christian nationalism, as Christian nationalism, perceived victimhood, and white identity are all positively correlated, this toxic blend strikes us as an empirical reality rather than a hypothetical. Thus, CN itself is associated with violence, and these three influences increase the likelihood of violence. However, saying that without these three influences CN is not associated with violence is false, as the source makes it clear CN is still associated with violence on its own, its just that these cues inflame it. BootsED (talk) 01:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you affirm (with the source) that CN is both strongly related to support for political violence but also that CN is not a particularly influential predictor of support for violence? If so, can you please explain how something can be strongly related to support for violence but not a predictor of support for violence? Shinealittlelight (talk) 03:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

POV Info

I deleted a recently-added paragraph that clearly violated WP:NPOV and WP:ATTACKPAGE and is not representative globally. For content as inflammatory as this, much stronger WP:RS sourcing (rather than one citation per claim) should be found before reconsidering its addition. --1990'sguy (talk) 02:29, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - adding a new book discussing South Africa isn't justifiable. You can't say that Christian nationalists are white supremacists from a global perspective. Christian nationalism is a form of religious nationalism, not ethnic nationalism. Would a Christian nationalist in Nigeria be a white supremacist? I suggest that if there is country-specific material, it be added to those sections. desmay (talk) 13:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. The literature supports that white missionaries historically assumed themselves at the top of a hierarchy and acted accordingly. I can provide a dozen more citations. Skyerise (talk) 19:27, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. Read WP:BRD. Your edits haven't been accepted by two editors and the onus is on your to get consensus for the material you're adding. It's not appropriate for you to keep shoving material that does not have consensus in the article. The article is not about white missionaries is it? It's about a religious Christian nationalism. You need to explicitly discuss exactly what it is that you want to add here. desmay (talk) 20:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to criticize the sources then. WP:BRD is an essay and it is not binding. Skyerise (talk) 20:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I feel as it was properly cited, the South African portion maybe not but it is true Christian nationalism may attract white supremacy, obviously not all believe in this but some do that also believe in Christian nationalism. Wiiformii (talk) 20:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Wiiformii:, if that's added it needs to be made clear. Obviously, white supremacy wouldn't have anything to do with Christian nationalism in Ghana, would it? desmay (talk) 20:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Christian nationalism doesn't only exist in the United States now does it? Plus the article you linked literally says "Christian nationalism is a growing force in Ghana" Wiiformii (talk) 20:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's correct. So if there is a country in which white supremacy and Christian nationalism are tied together, that needs to be made explicit. The black majority of Christian nationalists in Ghana are obviously not white supremacists. desmay (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, that's a naive assumption. See this article: "the general rule is 'lighter is better'." Even in Ghana. Skyerise (talk) 20:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, although I do not have many strong opinions, I feel as @Skyerise knows more, I just saw this edit on the recent edits page but in all honesty I do not know much, but I hope you guys find consensus. Wiiformii (talk) 20:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]