Jump to content

Non-human: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Removing 'and gypsies' listed after 'any entity.' Racist language.
 
(26 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:

{{refimprove|date=May 2013}}
'''Non-human''' (also spelled '''nonhuman''') is any entity displaying some,{{cn|date=August 2016}} but not enough, human characteristics to be considered a [[human]]. The term has been used in a variety of contexts and may be used to refer to objects that have been developed with human intelligence, such as robots or vehicles.
'''Non-human''' (also spelled '''nonhuman''') is any entity displaying some,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.dictionary.com/browse/nonhuman|title=the definition of nonhuman|website=Dictionary.com|access-date=5 February 2019}}</ref> but not enough, [[human]] characteristics to be considered a human. The term has been used in a variety of contexts and may refer to objects that have been developed with [[human intelligence]], such as robots or vehicles.


==Animal rights and personhood==
==Animal rights and personhood==
{{Further information|Personhood#Non-human animals}}
{{Further information|Personhood#Non-human animals}}
In the [[animal rights]] movement, it is common to distinguish between "human animals" and "non-human animals". Participants in the animal rights movement generally recognize that non-human animals have some similar characteristics to those of human [[personhood|person]]s. For example, various non-human animals have been shown to register pain, compassion, memory, and some [[Animal cognition|cognitive]] function. Some animal rights activists argue that the similarities between human and non-human animals justify giving non-human animals rights that human society has afforded to humans, such as the right to self-preservation, and some even wish for all non-human animals or at least those that bear a fully thinking and conscious mind, such as [[vertebrate]]s and some [[invertebrate]]s such as [[cephalopod]]s, to be given a full right of personhood.
In the [[animal rights]] movement, it is common to distinguish between "[[Personhood#Humans|human animal]]s" and "[[non-human animal]]s". Participants in the animal rights movement generally recognize that non-human animals have some similar characteristics to those of human [[personhood|person]]s. For example, various non-human animals have been shown to register pain, compassion, memory, and some [[Animal cognition|cognitive]] function. Some animal rights activists argue that the similarities between human and non-human animals justify giving non-human animals rights that human society has afforded to humans, such as the right to self-preservation, and some even wish for all non-human animals or at least those that bear a fully thinking and conscious mind, such as [[vertebrate]]s and some [[invertebrate]]s such as [[cephalopod]]s, to be given a full right of personhood.


==The non-human in philosophy==
==The non-human in philosophy==
{{Clarify section|date=January 2022}}
Contemporary philosophers have drawn on the work of [[Henri Bergson]], [[Gilles Deleuze]], [[Félix Guattari]], and [[Claude Lévi-Strauss]] (among others) to suggest that the non-human poses [[epistemological]] and [[ontological]] problems for humanist and post-humanist ethics,<ref>{{Citation | title= Becoming-Animal Is A Trap For Humans: Deleuze and Guattari in Madagascar | first= Timothy | last= Laurie | journal=Deleuze and the Non-Human | year=2015 | url= https://www.academia.edu/10912960}} eds. Hannah Stark and Jon Roffe.</ref> and have linked the study of non-humans to materialist and [[ethological]] approaches to the study of society and culture.<ref>Whatmore, Sarah (2006), 'Materialist Returns: Practising Cultural Geography In and For a More-Than-Human World', ''Cultural Geographies'', 13, pp. 600-09.</ref>
Contemporary philosophers have drawn on the work of [[Henri Bergson]], [[Gilles Deleuze]], [[Félix Guattari]], and [[Claude Lévi-Strauss]] (among others) to suggest that the non-human poses [[epistemological]] and [[ontological]] problems for humanist and post-humanist ethics,<ref>{{Citation | title= Becoming-Animal Is A Trap For Humans: Deleuze and Guattari in Madagascar | first= Timothy | last= Laurie | journal=Deleuze and the Non-Human | year=2015 | url= https://www.academia.edu/10912960}} eds. Hannah Stark and Jon Roffe.</ref> and have linked the study of non-humans to materialist and [[ethological]] approaches to the study of society and culture.<ref>Whatmore, Sarah (2006), 'Materialist Returns: Practising Cultural Geography In and For a More-Than-Human World', ''Cultural Geographies'', 13, pp. 600-09.</ref>


==Artificial intelligence==
==Artificial intelligence==
The term non-human has been used to describe computer programs and robot-like devices that display some human-like characteristics. In both [[science fiction]] and in the real world, [[artificial intelligence|computer programs]] and [[robots]] have been built to perform tasks that require human-computer interactions in a manner that suggests [[sentience]] and compassion. There is increasing interest in the use of robots in nursing homes and to provide elder care.<ref>{{citation |author=Nick Bilton| newspaper=The New York Times |date=May 19, 2013 |title=Disruptions: Helper Robots Are Steered, Tentatively, to Care for the Aging |url=http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/19/disruptions-helper-robots-are-steered-tentatively-to-elder-care/?ref=technology |accessdate=2013-05-24}}</ref> Computer programs have been used for years in schools to provide one-on-one education with children. The [[Tamagotchi]] toy required children to provide care, attention, and nourishment to keep it "alive".
The term non-human has been used to describe computer programs and robot-like devices that display some human-like characteristics. In both [[science fiction]] and in the real world, [[artificial intelligence|computer programs]] and [[robots]] have been built to perform tasks that require human-computer interactions in a manner that suggests [[sentience]] and compassion. There is increasing interest in the use of robots in nursing homes and to provide elder care.<ref>{{citation |author=Nick Bilton| newspaper=The New York Times |date=May 19, 2013 |title=Disruptions: Helper Robots Are Steered, Tentatively, to Care for the Aging |url=http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/19/disruptions-helper-robots-are-steered-tentatively-to-elder-care/?ref=technology |access-date=2013-05-24}}</ref> Computer programs have been used for years in schools to provide one-on-one education with children. The [[Tamagotchi]] toy required children to provide care, attention, and nourishment to keep it "alive".


==See also==
==See also==
* [[Animal]]
* [[Animal]]
*[[Animal rights by country or territory]]
* [[Artificial intelligence]]
* [[Artificial intelligence]]
* [[Dehumanization]]
* [[Person]]
* [[Person]]


Line 22: Line 25:
== External links ==
== External links ==
{{refbegin}}
{{refbegin}}
*Johnson, Jim. [http://www.psf.wur.nl/en/workshops/Latour;%20Sociology%20of%20a%20Door.pdf "Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer"].
*Johnson, Jim. [http://www.psf.wur.nl/en/workshops/Latour;%20Sociology%20of%20a%20Door.pdf "Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer"]{{Dead link|date=April 2020 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}.
*Latour, Bruno. [http://www.bruno-latour.fr/articles/article/113-MYERS-ECOTHEO.pdf "Will Non-humans be Saved? An Argument in Ecotheology"].
*Latour, Bruno. [https://web.archive.org/web/20110429072506/http://www.bruno-latour.fr/articles/article/113-MYERS-ECOTHEO.pdf "Will Non-humans be Saved? An Argument in Ecotheology"].
{{refend}}
{{refend}}
[[Category:Articles created via the Article Wizard]]
[[Category:Animals]]
[[Category:Personhood]]
[[Category:Personhood]]
[[Category:Artificial intelligence]]
[[Category:Artificial intelligence]]
[[Category:Critical theory]]
[[Category:Critical theory]]


{{critical-theory-stub}}
{{ai-stub}}

Latest revision as of 13:01, 15 July 2024

Non-human (also spelled nonhuman) is any entity displaying some,[1] but not enough, human characteristics to be considered a human. The term has been used in a variety of contexts and may refer to objects that have been developed with human intelligence, such as robots or vehicles.

Animal rights and personhood

[edit]

In the animal rights movement, it is common to distinguish between "human animals" and "non-human animals". Participants in the animal rights movement generally recognize that non-human animals have some similar characteristics to those of human persons. For example, various non-human animals have been shown to register pain, compassion, memory, and some cognitive function. Some animal rights activists argue that the similarities between human and non-human animals justify giving non-human animals rights that human society has afforded to humans, such as the right to self-preservation, and some even wish for all non-human animals or at least those that bear a fully thinking and conscious mind, such as vertebrates and some invertebrates such as cephalopods, to be given a full right of personhood.

The non-human in philosophy

[edit]

Contemporary philosophers have drawn on the work of Henri Bergson, Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari, and Claude Lévi-Strauss (among others) to suggest that the non-human poses epistemological and ontological problems for humanist and post-humanist ethics,[2] and have linked the study of non-humans to materialist and ethological approaches to the study of society and culture.[3]

Artificial intelligence

[edit]

The term non-human has been used to describe computer programs and robot-like devices that display some human-like characteristics. In both science fiction and in the real world, computer programs and robots have been built to perform tasks that require human-computer interactions in a manner that suggests sentience and compassion. There is increasing interest in the use of robots in nursing homes and to provide elder care.[4] Computer programs have been used for years in schools to provide one-on-one education with children. The Tamagotchi toy required children to provide care, attention, and nourishment to keep it "alive".

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "the definition of nonhuman". Dictionary.com. Retrieved 5 February 2019.
  2. ^ Laurie, Timothy (2015), "Becoming-Animal Is A Trap For Humans: Deleuze and Guattari in Madagascar", Deleuze and the Non-Human eds. Hannah Stark and Jon Roffe.
  3. ^ Whatmore, Sarah (2006), 'Materialist Returns: Practising Cultural Geography In and For a More-Than-Human World', Cultural Geographies, 13, pp. 600-09.
  4. ^ Nick Bilton (May 19, 2013), "Disruptions: Helper Robots Are Steered, Tentatively, to Care for the Aging", The New York Times, retrieved 2013-05-24
[edit]