Jump to content

Reaction calorimeter: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Added bibcode. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Wikipedia introduction cleanup from July 2024 | #UCB_Category 36/230
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Apparatus for measuring reaction energy}}
{{Short description|Apparatus for measuring reaction energy}}{{Multiple issues|{{No inline citations|date=April 2024}}
{{Lead too short|date=July 2024}}}}[[Image:Rc1 calorimeter.jpg|thumb|Original RC1 Calorimeter]]A '''reaction calorimeter''' is a [[calorimeter]] that measures the amount of [[energy]] released (in [[exothermic]] reactions) or absorbed (in [[endothermic]] reactions) by a [[chemical reaction]]. It does this by measuring the total change in [[temperature]] of an exact amount of water in a vessel.
{{Multiple issues|{{No inline citations|date=April 2024}}
{{Tone|date=May 2024}}}}
[[Image:Rc1 calorimeter.jpg|thumb|Original RC1 Calorimeter]]A '''reaction calorimeter''' is a [[calorimeter]] that measures the amount of [[energy]] released (in [[exothermic]] reactions) or absorbed (in [[endothermic]] reactions) by a [[chemical reaction]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Calorimeter - CHEMISTRY COMMUNITY |url=https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=124034 |access-date=2024-05-06 |website=lavelle.chem.ucla.edu}}</ref>


== Methods ==
== Methods ==


=== Heat flow calorimetry ===
=== Heat flow calorimetry ===
Heat flow calorimetry measures the heat flowing across the reactor wall and quantifies this in relation to the other energy flows within the reactor.
Heat flow [[calorimetry]] measures the heat flowing across the reactor wall and quantifies this in relation to other energy flows within the reactor.


:<math> Q = U A (T_r-T_j)</math>
:<math> Q = U A (T_r-T_j)</math>


where
where:


:<math>Q</math> = process heating (or cooling) power (W)
:<math>Q</math> process heating (or cooling) power (W)
:<math>U</math> = overall heat transfer coefficient (W/(m<sup>2</sup>K))
:<math>U</math> overall [[heat transfer coefficient]] (W/(m<sup>2</sup>K))
:<math>A</math> = heat transfer area (m<sup>2</sup>)
:<math>A</math> heat transfer area (m<sup>2</sup>)
:<math>T_r</math> = process temperature (K)
:<math>T_r</math> process temperature (K)
:<math>T_j</math> = jacket temperature (K)
:<math>T_j</math> jacket temperature (K)


Heat flow calorimetry allows the user to measure heat whilst the process temperature remains under control. While the driving force {{math|''T<sub>r</sub> − T<sub>j</sub>''}} is measured with a relatively high resolution, the overall heat transfer coefficient {{math|''U''}} or the calibration factor {{math|''UA''}} is determined by means of calibration before and after the reaction takes place. The calibration factor {{math|''UA''}} (or the overall heat transfer coefficient {{math|''U''}}) are affected by the product composition, process temperature, agitation rate, viscosity, and the liquid level. Using reaction calorimeters to a high degree of accuracy requires understanding their limitations and having significant experience with the process.<ref>{{Cite web |last=reserved |first=Mettler-Toledo International Inc all rights |title=Reaction Calorimeters |url=https://www.mt.com/us/en/home/products/L1_AutochemProducts/reaction-calorimeters.html |access-date=2024-05-06 |website=www.mt.com |language=en-US}}</ref>
Heat flow [[calorimetry]] allows the user to measure heat while the process temperature remains under control. While the driving force {{math|''T<sub>r</sub> − T<sub>j</sub>''}} is measured with a relatively high resolution, the overall heat transfer coefficient {{math|''U''}} or the calibration factor {{math|''UA''}} is determined by calibration before and after the reaction takes place. These factors are affected by the product composition, process temperature, agitation rate, [[viscosity]], and liquid level.<ref>{{Cite web |last=reserved |first=Mettler-Toledo International Inc all rights |title=Reaction Calorimeters |url=https://www.mt.com/us/en/home/products/L1_AutochemProducts/reaction-calorimeters.html |access-date=2024-05-06 |website=www.mt.com |language=en-US}}</ref>


=== Heat balance calorimetry ===
=== Heat balance calorimetry ===
In heat balance calorimetry, the cooling/heaing jacket controls the temperature of the process. Heat is measured by monitoring the heat gained or lost by the heat transfer fluid.
In heat balance calorimetry, the cooling/heating jacket controls the temperature of the process. Heat is measured by monitoring the heat gained or lost by the heat transfer fluid.
:<math>Q = m_s C_{ps}(T_i - T_o)</math>
:<math>Q = m_s C_{ps}(T_i - T_o)</math>


where
where:


:<math>Q</math> = process heating (or cooling) power (W)
:<math>Q</math> → is the process heating (or cooling) power (W)
:<math>m_s</math> = mass flow of heat transfer fluid (kg/s)
:<math>m_s</math> → is the mass flow of [[Heat-transfer fluid|heat transfer fluid]] (kg/s)
:<math>C_{ps}</math> = specific heat of heat transfer fluid (J/(kg K))
:<math>C_{ps}</math> is the [[Specific heat capacity|specific heat]] of heat transfer fluid (J/(kg K))
:<math>T_i</math> = inlet temperature of heat transfer fluid (K)
:<math>T_i</math> → is the inlet temperature of heat transfer fluid (K)
:<math>T_o</math> = outlet temperature of heat transfer fluid (K)
:<math>T_o</math> → is the outlet temperature of heat transfer fluid (K)


Heat balance calorimetry is, in principle, the ideal method of measuring heat since the heat entering and leaving the system through the heating/cooling jacket is measured from the heat transfer fluid (which has known properties).
Heat balance calorimetry is considered an effective method for measuring heat, as it involves quantifying the heat entering and leaving the system through the heating/cooling jacket using the heat transfer fluid, whose properties are well known.


In heat balance calorimetry, the heat entering and leaving the system through the heating/cooling jacket is measured from the heat transfer fluid (which has known properties) - making the method a very effective way of measuring heat loss or gain. Most calibration problems encountered by heat flow and power compensation calorimetry therefore do not apply to heat balance calorimetry. However, the method does not work well in traditional batch vessels since the process heat signal is obscured by large heat shifts in the cooling/heating jacket.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Kossoy |first=Arcady |date=September 2023 |title=Reaction calorimetry: Main types, simple theory, and application for kinetic study—A review |url=https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/prs.12452 |journal=Process Safety Progress |language=en |volume=42 |issue=3 |pages=417–429 |doi=10.1002/prs.12452 |issn=1066-8527}}</ref>
This method effectively measures heat loss or gain, circumventing many calibration issues associated with heat flow and power compensation calorimetry. However, it is less effective in traditional batch vessels, where significant heat shifts in the cooling/heating jacket can obscure the process's heat signal.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Kossoy |first=Arcady |date=September 2023 |title=Reaction calorimetry: Main types, simple theory, and application for kinetic study—A review |url=https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/prs.12452 |journal=Process Safety Progress |language=en |volume=42 |issue=3 |pages=417–429 |doi=10.1002/prs.12452 |issn=1066-8527}}</ref>


=== Power compensation calorimetry ===
=== Power compensation calorimetry ===
A variation of the 'heat flow' technique is called 'power compensation' calorimetry. This method uses a cooling jacket operating at constant flow and temperature. The process temperature is regulated by adjusting the power of the electrical heater. When the experiment is started, the electrical heat and the cooling power (of the cooling jacket) are in balance. As the process heat load changes, the electrical power is varied in order to maintain the desired process temperature.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Toubes-Rodrigo |first=Mario |date=March 13, 2024 |title=Calorimetry: Heat flow versus power compensations methods |url=https://helgroup.com/application-notes/calorimetry-heat-flow-versus-power-compensations/ |website=H.E.L. Group}}</ref> The heat liberated or absorbed by the process is determined from the difference between the initial electrical power and the demand for electrical power at the time of measurement. Power compensation calorimetry requires less preparation than heat flow calorimetry, however, it still experiences similar limitations, due to any change in product composition, liquid level, process temperature, agitation or viscosity will impact the instrument's calibration. The presence of an electrical [[heating element]] is also suboptimal for process operations. A further limitation of the method is that the largest heat it can measure is equal to the initial electrical power applied to the heater.{{Citation needed|date=April 2024}}
Power compensation calorimetry is a variation of the heat flow technique. This method utilizes a cooling jacket operating at constant flow and temperature. The process temperature is regulated by adjusting the power of an electrical heater. At the start of the experiment, the electrical heat and cooling power are balanced. As the process's heat load changes, the electrical power is adjusted to maintain the desired process temperature.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Toubes-Rodrigo |first=Mario |date=March 13, 2024 |title=Calorimetry: Heat flow versus power compensations methods |url=https://helgroup.com/application-notes/calorimetry-heat-flow-versus-power-compensations/ |website=H.E.L. Group}}</ref> The heat liberated or absorbed by the process is determined from the difference between the initial electrical power and the electrical power required at the time of measurement. While power compensation calorimetry requires less preparation than heat flow calorimetry, it faces similar limitations. Changes in product composition, liquid level, process temperature, agitation, or viscosity can impact the instrument's calibration. Additionally, the presence of an electrical [[heating element]] is not optimal for process operations. Another limitation of this method is that the maximum heat it can measure is equal to the initial electrical power applied to the heater.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cooksley |first=Katherine |title=Calorimetry: heat flow versus power compensations methods |url=https://helgroup.com/application-notes/calorimetry-heat-flow-versus-power-compensations/ |access-date=2024-06-02 |website=H.E.L Group |language=en-GB}}</ref>


:<math>Q = IV\,\,\,\,\,\mathrm {or}\,\,\,\,\,\,(I - I_0)V</math>
:<math>Q = IV\,\,\,\,\,\mathrm {or}\,\,\,\,\,\,(I - I_0)V</math>
where
where:
:<math>I</math> = current supplied to heater
:<math>I</math> is the [[Electric current|current]] supplied to the heater
:<math>V</math> = voltage supplied to heater
:<math>V</math> is the [[voltage]] supplied to the heater
:<math>I_0</math> = current supplied to heater at equilibrium (assuming constant voltage / resistance)
:<math>I_0</math> is the current supplied to the heater at [[Equilibrium chemistry|equilibrium]] (assuming constant voltage / resistance)


=== Constant flux calorimetry ===
=== Constant flux calorimetry ===
[[Image:Coflux1.png|thumb|Diagram of COFLUX system]]
[[Image:Coflux1.png|thumb|Diagram of COFLUX system]]
Constant flux heating and cooling jackets use variable geometry cooling jackets and can operate with cooling jackets at substantially constant temperature. These reaction calorimeters tend to be much simpler to use and are much more tolerant of changes in the process conditions (which would affect calibration in heat flow or power compensation calorimeters).{{Citation needed|date=April 2024}}[[Image:Lara Coflux.jpg|right|150px|thumb|An example of a Co-Flux Calorimeter]]
Constant flux heating and cooling jackets use variable geometry cooling jackets and can operate with cooling jackets at a substantially constant temperature. These reaction calorimeters are simpler to use and are much more tolerant of changes in the process conditions.<ref>{{Citation |title=Handbook of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry |date=2008 |work=Recent Advances, Techniques and Applications |volume=5 |pages=ii |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1573-4374(13)60004-7 |access-date=2024-05-28 |publisher=Elsevier|doi=10.1016/s1573-4374(13)60004-7 |isbn=978-0-444-53123-0 }}</ref>[[Image:Lara Coflux.jpg|right|150px|thumb|An example of a Co-Flux [[Calorimeter]]]]
In essence, constant flux calorimetry is a highly developed temperature control mechanism which can be used to generate highly accurate calorimetry. It works by controlling the jacket area of a controlled lab reactor while keeping the inlet temperature of the thermal fluid constant. This allows the temperature to be precisely controlled even under strongly exothermic or endothermic events as additional cooling is always available by simply increasing the area over which the heat is being exchanged.
Constant flux calorimetry is an advanced temperature control mechanism used to generate accurate calorimetry. It operates by controlling the jacket area of a laboratory reactor while maintaining a constant inlet temperature of the [[Thermal fluids|thermal fluid]]. This method allows for precise temperature control, even during strongly exothermic or endothermic events, as additional cooling can be achieved by increasing the area over which heat is exchanged.


This system is generally more accurate than heat balance calorimetry (on which it is based), as changes in the delta temperature (T<sub>out</sub> - T<sub>in</sub>) are magnified by keeping the fluid flow as low as possible.
This system is generally more accurate than heat balance calorimetry, as changes in the delta temperature (T<sub>out</sub> - T<sub>in</sub>) are magnified by keeping the [[Fluid dynamics|fluid flow]] as low as possible.


One of the main advantages of constant flux calorimetry is the ability to dynamically measure heat transfer coefficient (U). We know from the heat balance equation that:
One of the main advantages of constant flux calorimetry is the ability to dynamically measure heat transfer coefficient (U). According to the heat balance equation:


:<math>Q=m_f\;C_p\;(T_{in}-T_{out})</math>
:<math>Q=m_f\;C_p\;(T_{in}-T_{out})</math>


We also know that from the heat flow equation that
From the heat flow equation that


:<math>Q=U\;A\;LMTD</math>
:<math>Q=U\;A\;LMTD</math>


These equations can be rearranged to:
We can therefore rearrange this such that


:<math>U=\frac{m_f\;C_p\;(T_{in}-T_{out})}{A\;LMTD}</math>
:<math>U=\frac{m_f\;C_p\;(T_{in}-T_{out})}{A\;LMTD}</math>


This will allow us therefore to monitor U as a function of time.
This allows for the monitoring of U as a function of time.


==Instrumentation==
==Instrumentation==
{{Expand section|date=May 2024}}[[Image:Reaktionskalorimeter 3 Generation.png|thumb|A continuous reaction calorimeter]]In traditional heat flow calorimeters, one reactant is added continuously in small amounts, similar to a semi-batch process, in order to obtain a complete conversion of the reaction. In contrast to the tubular reactor, this leads to longer residence times, different substance concentrations and flatter temperature profiles. Thus, the selectivity of less well-defined reactions can be affected. This can lead to the formation of by-products or consecutive products which alter the measured heat of reaction, since other bonds are formed. The amount of by-product or secondary product can be found by calculating the yield of the desired product. A continuous reaction calorimeter is a similar type of instrument used to obtain thermodynamic information on continuous processes in tubular reactors. An axial temperature profile along the tube reactor can be recorded and the specific heat of reaction can be determined by means of heat balances and segmental dynamic parameters. The system must consist of a tubular reactor, dosing systems, preheaters, temperature sensors and flow meters.
{{Unreferenced section|date=July 2024}}[[Image:Reaktionskalorimeter 3 Generation.png|thumb|A continuous reaction [[calorimeter]]]]In traditional heat flow calorimeters, one reactant is added continuously in small amounts, similar to a semi-batch process, to achieve complete conversion of the reaction. Unlike in a tubular reactor, this approach results in longer residence times, different substance concentrations, and flatter temperature profiles. Consequently, the selectivity of less well-defined reactions can be affected, potentially leading to the formation of by-products or secondary products. These by-products can alter the measured heat of reaction as different chemical bonds are formed. The amount of by-product or secondary product can be determined by calculating the yield of the desired product.


A continuous reaction calorimeter is a similar instrument used to obtain [[Thermodynamics|thermodynamic]] information on continuous processes in tubular reactors. It can record an axial temperature profile along the tubular reactor, allowing the determination of the specific heat of reaction through heat balances and segmental dynamic parameters. The system typically includes a tubular reactor, dosing systems, preheaters, temperature [[Sensor|sensors]], and [[Flow measurement|flow meters]].
If the heat of reaction measured in the HFC (Heat flow calorimetry) and PFR calorimeter differ, most probably some side reactions have occurred. They could for example be caused by different temperatures and residence times. The totally measured Qr is composed of partially overlapped reaction enthalpies (ΔHr) of main and side reactions, depending on their degrees of conversion (U).

If the heat of reaction measured in the heat flow calorimeter (HFC) differs from that measured in a plug flow reactor (PFR) calorimeter, it is likely that side reactions have occurred. These discrepancies may arise due to differences in temperatures and residence times. The total measured heat (Qr) comprises partially overlapped reaction enthalpies (ΔHr) of both main and side reactions, depending on their degrees of conversion (U).

Continuous reaction calorimeters offer significant advantages in the study of continuous processes, particularly in industrial applications where consistent and reproducible reaction conditions are critical. These instruments can provide detailed insights into the thermodynamics and kinetics of reactions under steady-state conditions. The use of precise dosing systems ensures accurate control over reactant flow rates, while preheaters can stabilize the temperature of incoming reactants, minimizing temperature fluctuations that could affect the reaction rate and selectivity.

Moreover, advanced temperature sensors and flow meters enable real-time monitoring and control of the process parameters, facilitating the optimization of reaction conditions. By recording axial temperature profiles, researchers can identify temperature gradients within the reactor, which can inform adjustments to improve heat transfer efficiency and reaction uniformity. This capability is particularly important in scaling up reactions from laboratory to industrial scale, where maintaining consistent product quality and yield is essential.

Continuous reaction calorimeters also allow for the study of reaction mechanisms and the identification of intermediate species. By analyzing the heat flow data in conjunction with other analytical techniques, such as spectroscopy or chromatography, researchers can gain a comprehensive understanding of the reaction pathways and the factors influencing selectivity and yield. This information is invaluable for developing efficient and sustainable chemical processes, reducing waste, and minimizing energy consumption.


== See also ==
== See also ==
Line 78: Line 84:
== References ==
== References ==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Moser |first=Marlies |last2=Georg |first2=Alain G. |last3=Steinemann |first3=Finn L. |last4=Rütti |first4=David P. |last5=Meier |first5=Daniel M. |date=September 2021 |title=Continuous milli-scale reaction calorimeter for direct scale-up of flow chemistry |url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41981-021-00204-y |journal=Journal of Flow Chemistry |language=en |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=691–699 |doi=10.1007/s41981-021-00204-y |issn=2062-249X|hdl=11475/23441 |hdl-access=free }}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Moser |first1=Marlies |last2=Georg |first2=Alain G. |last3=Steinemann |first3=Finn L. |last4=Rütti |first4=David P. |last5=Meier |first5=Daniel M. |date=September 2021 |title=Continuous milli-scale reaction calorimeter for direct scale-up of flow chemistry |url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41981-021-00204-y |journal=Journal of Flow Chemistry |language=en |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=691–699 |doi=10.1007/s41981-021-00204-y |bibcode=2021JFlCh..11..691M |issn=2062-249X|hdl=11475/23441 |hdl-access=free }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Mortzfeld |first=Frederik |last2=Polenk |first2=Jutta |last3=Guelat |first3=Bertrand |last4=Venturoni |first4=Francesco |last5=Schenkel |first5=Berthold |last6=Filipponi |first6=Paolo |date=2020-10-16 |title=Reaction Calorimetry in Continuous Flow Mode: A New Approach for the Thermal Characterization of High Energetic and Fast Reactions |url=https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00117 |journal=Organic Process Research & Development |language=en |volume=24 |issue=10 |pages=2004–2016 |doi=10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00117 |issn=1083-6160}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Mortzfeld |first1=Frederik |last2=Polenk |first2=Jutta |last3=Guelat |first3=Bertrand |last4=Venturoni |first4=Francesco |last5=Schenkel |first5=Berthold |last6=Filipponi |first6=Paolo |date=2020-10-16 |title=Reaction Calorimetry in Continuous Flow Mode: A New Approach for the Thermal Characterization of High Energetic and Fast Reactions |url=https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00117 |journal=Organic Process Research & Development |language=en |volume=24 |issue=10 |pages=2004–2016 |doi=10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00117 |issn=1083-6160}}


[[Category:Calorimetry]]
[[Category:Calorimetry]]

Latest revision as of 09:02, 9 August 2024

Original RC1 Calorimeter

A reaction calorimeter is a calorimeter that measures the amount of energy released (in exothermic reactions) or absorbed (in endothermic reactions) by a chemical reaction. It does this by measuring the total change in temperature of an exact amount of water in a vessel.

Methods

[edit]

Heat flow calorimetry

[edit]

Heat flow calorimetry measures the heat flowing across the reactor wall and quantifies this in relation to other energy flows within the reactor.

where:

→ process heating (or cooling) power (W)
→ overall heat transfer coefficient (W/(m2K))
→ heat transfer area (m2)
→ process temperature (K)
→ jacket temperature (K)

Heat flow calorimetry allows the user to measure heat while the process temperature remains under control. While the driving force Tr − Tj is measured with a relatively high resolution, the overall heat transfer coefficient U or the calibration factor UA is determined by calibration before and after the reaction takes place. These factors are affected by the product composition, process temperature, agitation rate, viscosity, and liquid level.[1]

Heat balance calorimetry

[edit]

In heat balance calorimetry, the cooling/heating jacket controls the temperature of the process. Heat is measured by monitoring the heat gained or lost by the heat transfer fluid.

where:

→ is the process heating (or cooling) power (W)
→ is the mass flow of heat transfer fluid (kg/s)
→ is the specific heat of heat transfer fluid (J/(kg K))
→ is the inlet temperature of heat transfer fluid (K)
→ is the outlet temperature of heat transfer fluid (K)

Heat balance calorimetry is considered an effective method for measuring heat, as it involves quantifying the heat entering and leaving the system through the heating/cooling jacket using the heat transfer fluid, whose properties are well known.

This method effectively measures heat loss or gain, circumventing many calibration issues associated with heat flow and power compensation calorimetry. However, it is less effective in traditional batch vessels, where significant heat shifts in the cooling/heating jacket can obscure the process's heat signal.[2]

Power compensation calorimetry

[edit]

Power compensation calorimetry is a variation of the heat flow technique. This method utilizes a cooling jacket operating at constant flow and temperature. The process temperature is regulated by adjusting the power of an electrical heater. At the start of the experiment, the electrical heat and cooling power are balanced. As the process's heat load changes, the electrical power is adjusted to maintain the desired process temperature.[3] The heat liberated or absorbed by the process is determined from the difference between the initial electrical power and the electrical power required at the time of measurement. While power compensation calorimetry requires less preparation than heat flow calorimetry, it faces similar limitations. Changes in product composition, liquid level, process temperature, agitation, or viscosity can impact the instrument's calibration. Additionally, the presence of an electrical heating element is not optimal for process operations. Another limitation of this method is that the maximum heat it can measure is equal to the initial electrical power applied to the heater.[4]

where:

is the current supplied to the heater
is the voltage supplied to the heater
is the current supplied to the heater at equilibrium (assuming constant voltage / resistance)

Constant flux calorimetry

[edit]
Diagram of COFLUX system

Constant flux heating and cooling jackets use variable geometry cooling jackets and can operate with cooling jackets at a substantially constant temperature. These reaction calorimeters are simpler to use and are much more tolerant of changes in the process conditions.[5]

An example of a Co-Flux Calorimeter

Constant flux calorimetry is an advanced temperature control mechanism used to generate accurate calorimetry. It operates by controlling the jacket area of a laboratory reactor while maintaining a constant inlet temperature of the thermal fluid. This method allows for precise temperature control, even during strongly exothermic or endothermic events, as additional cooling can be achieved by increasing the area over which heat is exchanged.

This system is generally more accurate than heat balance calorimetry, as changes in the delta temperature (Tout - Tin) are magnified by keeping the fluid flow as low as possible.

One of the main advantages of constant flux calorimetry is the ability to dynamically measure heat transfer coefficient (U). According to the heat balance equation:

From the heat flow equation that

These equations can be rearranged to:

This allows for the monitoring of U as a function of time.

Instrumentation

[edit]
A continuous reaction calorimeter

In traditional heat flow calorimeters, one reactant is added continuously in small amounts, similar to a semi-batch process, to achieve complete conversion of the reaction. Unlike in a tubular reactor, this approach results in longer residence times, different substance concentrations, and flatter temperature profiles. Consequently, the selectivity of less well-defined reactions can be affected, potentially leading to the formation of by-products or secondary products. These by-products can alter the measured heat of reaction as different chemical bonds are formed. The amount of by-product or secondary product can be determined by calculating the yield of the desired product.

A continuous reaction calorimeter is a similar instrument used to obtain thermodynamic information on continuous processes in tubular reactors. It can record an axial temperature profile along the tubular reactor, allowing the determination of the specific heat of reaction through heat balances and segmental dynamic parameters. The system typically includes a tubular reactor, dosing systems, preheaters, temperature sensors, and flow meters.

If the heat of reaction measured in the heat flow calorimeter (HFC) differs from that measured in a plug flow reactor (PFR) calorimeter, it is likely that side reactions have occurred. These discrepancies may arise due to differences in temperatures and residence times. The total measured heat (Qr) comprises partially overlapped reaction enthalpies (ΔHr) of both main and side reactions, depending on their degrees of conversion (U).

Continuous reaction calorimeters offer significant advantages in the study of continuous processes, particularly in industrial applications where consistent and reproducible reaction conditions are critical. These instruments can provide detailed insights into the thermodynamics and kinetics of reactions under steady-state conditions. The use of precise dosing systems ensures accurate control over reactant flow rates, while preheaters can stabilize the temperature of incoming reactants, minimizing temperature fluctuations that could affect the reaction rate and selectivity.

Moreover, advanced temperature sensors and flow meters enable real-time monitoring and control of the process parameters, facilitating the optimization of reaction conditions. By recording axial temperature profiles, researchers can identify temperature gradients within the reactor, which can inform adjustments to improve heat transfer efficiency and reaction uniformity. This capability is particularly important in scaling up reactions from laboratory to industrial scale, where maintaining consistent product quality and yield is essential.

Continuous reaction calorimeters also allow for the study of reaction mechanisms and the identification of intermediate species. By analyzing the heat flow data in conjunction with other analytical techniques, such as spectroscopy or chromatography, researchers can gain a comprehensive understanding of the reaction pathways and the factors influencing selectivity and yield. This information is invaluable for developing efficient and sustainable chemical processes, reducing waste, and minimizing energy consumption.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ reserved, Mettler-Toledo International Inc all rights. "Reaction Calorimeters". www.mt.com. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  2. ^ Kossoy, Arcady (September 2023). "Reaction calorimetry: Main types, simple theory, and application for kinetic study—A review". Process Safety Progress. 42 (3): 417–429. doi:10.1002/prs.12452. ISSN 1066-8527.
  3. ^ Toubes-Rodrigo, Mario (March 13, 2024). "Calorimetry: Heat flow versus power compensations methods". H.E.L. Group.
  4. ^ Cooksley, Katherine. "Calorimetry: heat flow versus power compensations methods". H.E.L Group. Retrieved 2024-06-02.
  5. ^ "Handbook of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry", Recent Advances, Techniques and Applications, vol. 5, Elsevier, pp. ii, 2008, doi:10.1016/s1573-4374(13)60004-7, ISBN 978-0-444-53123-0, retrieved 2024-05-28