Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley J. Bondi: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:04, 27 August 2024

Bradley J. Bondi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the references in this article about a lawyer show significant secondary coverage in reliable sources. I have carried out WP:BEFORE and not found references to add; I have removed two existing references which did not mention him. Article has been tagged as orphan for six years, notability and advert for two years, and was recently tagged with possible CoI. It was also recently cut down by another editor from a longer version with no sources, but the quality of those sources is not better than the existing ones. I don't think he meets WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Tacyarg (talk) 14:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and United States of America. Tacyarg (talk) 14:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment When I looked at this I thought it would be a straightforward senior-lawyer vanity page. I tend to agree that on his career alone, he gets nowhere towards WP:GNG despite having been prominent. There are a few borderline articles like this and this talking about him taking on clients and a court judgment relating to conflict of interest. But nothing that profiles him in the way this article does that doesn't seem to be relying on a press release and CV. Note that the article doesn't mention he's Pam Bondi's brother but that's not inherited. He also got coverage for endowing a scholarship.
Where there is substantial coverage about him is this WSJ article about his 330 acre property and graveyard (someone else's family, also interviewed). The story is also here credited to WSJ.
Cumulatively does this get him across the line? I'm doubtful but would be interested to see further views. Oblivy (talk) 02:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 None of the references in this article about a lawyer show significant secondary coverage in reliable sources. I have carried out [[WP:BEFORE]] and not found references to add; I have removed two existing references which did not mention him. Article has been tagged as orphan for six years, notability and advert for two years, and was recently tagged with possible CoI. It was also recently cut down by another editor from a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bradley_J._Bondi&oldid=1184783200 longer version with no sources], but the quality of those sources is not better than the existing ones. I don't think he meets [[WP:GNG]] or [[WP:ANYBIO]]. [[User:Tacyarg|Tacyarg]] ([[User talk:Tacyarg|talk]]) 14:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|People]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Law|Law]],  and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|United States of America]]. [[User:Tacyarg|Tacyarg]] ([[User talk:Tacyarg|talk]]) 14:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)</small>
+*:'''Comment''' When I looked at this I thought it would be a straightforward senior-lawyer vanity page.  I tend to agree that on his career alone, he gets nowhere towards WP:GNG despite having been prominent.  There are a few borderline articles like [https://www.ttnews.com/articles/trevor-milton-hires-lawyers-who-defended-elon-musk this] and [https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/coca-cola-loses-bid-disqualify-law-firm-paul-hastings-trade-secret-fight-2023-07-18/ this] talking about him taking on clients and a court judgment relating to conflict of interest. But nothing that profiles him in the way this article does that doesn't seem to be relying on a press release and CV.  Note that the article doesn't mention he's Pam Bondi's brother but that's not inherited. He also got coverage for endowing a scholarship.{{pb}}Where there is substantial coverage about him is [https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-family-mans-estatecemetery-includedin-virginia-1479309174 this WSJ article] about his 330 acre property and graveyard (someone else's family, also interviewed). The story is also [https://www.mansionglobal.com/articles/a-family-man-s-estate-cemetery-included-in-virginia-46163 here] credited to WSJ.  {{pb}}Cumulatively does this get him across the line? I'm doubtful but would be interested to see further views. [[User:Oblivy|Oblivy]] ([[User talk:Oblivy|talk]]) 02:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)