Platt Report 1964: Difference between revisions
Create article |
m Reverted edit by 46.18.177.138 (talk) to last version by Zeromonk |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|1964 report on nurse education in England}} |
|||
{{Distinguish|Platt Report 1959|text= the [[Platt Report 1959]] on the welfare of sick children in hospital}} |
|||
The '''Platt Report''' (1964) or the '''Platt Report(s) on the Reform of Nursing Education''' was the report of [[Harry Platt]] upon the investigations of a committee established by the [[Royal College of Nursing]] (RCN). It made recommendations about how [[Nursing|nurses]] should be educated and what prior qualifications should be required in order to begin [[Nurse education|nurse training]] in England. |
The '''Platt Report''' (1964) or the '''Platt Report(s) on the Reform of Nursing Education''' was the report of [[Harry Platt]] upon the investigations of a committee established by the [[Royal College of Nursing]] (RCN). It made recommendations about how [[Nursing|nurses]] should be educated and what prior qualifications should be required in order to begin [[Nurse education|nurse training]] in England. |
||
== Context == |
== Context == |
||
By the 1960s, problems with recruitment of nurses to the [[National Health Service]] had been identified by studies, questionnaires, and job analyses.<ref name="Rivett">{{cite book |last1=Rivett |first1=Geoffrey |title=The history of the NHS |publisher=Nuffield Trust |url=https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/chapter/1958-1967-the-renaissance-of-general-practice-and-the-hospitals |access-date=3 January 2024 |language=en |chapter=1958–1967: The renaissance of general practice and the hospitals}}</ref> As many as 10,000 students failed to complete training and wastage rates were as high as 50 percent.<ref name=": |
By the 1960s, problems with recruitment of nurses to the [[National Health Service]] had been identified by studies, questionnaires, and job analyses.<ref name="Rivett">{{cite book |last1=Rivett |first1=Geoffrey |title=The history of the NHS |publisher=Nuffield Trust |url=https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/chapter/1958-1967-the-renaissance-of-general-practice-and-the-hospitals |access-date=3 January 2024 |language=en |chapter=1958–1967: The renaissance of general practice and the hospitals}}</ref> As many as 10,000 students failed to complete training and wastage rates were as high as 50 percent.<ref name=":1" /> |
||
The RCN established a committee chaired by Platt to look at nursing education and suggest ways to reduce loss of staff during training or soon afterwards. |
The RCN established a committee chaired by Platt to look at nursing education and suggest ways to reduce loss of staff during training or soon afterwards. Committee members included [[Annie Altschul]], [[Barbara Fawkes]], [[Catherine Hall (nurse)|Catherine Hall]], [[John Greene (nurse)|John Greene]] and [[Winifred Hector]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=1964 |title=A reform of nursing education first report of a special committee |url=https://rcn.access.preservica.com/uncategorized/IO_636f6543-6fe0-408d-a603-a6fa33a86bd5/ |website=RCN Digital Archive}}</ref> |
||
== Recommendations == |
== Recommendations == |
||
The Platt Report was published in 1964.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Platt |first=Harry |url=https://rcn.access.preservica.com/uncategorized/IO_636f6543-6fe0-408d-a603-a6fa33a86bd5/ |title=A Reform of Nursing Education: First Report of a Special Committee on Nurse Education |date=April 1964 |publisher=[[Royal College of Nursing]]}}</ref> |
The Platt Report was published in 1964.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Platt |first=Harry |url=https://rcn.access.preservica.com/uncategorized/IO_636f6543-6fe0-408d-a603-a6fa33a86bd5/ |title=A Reform of Nursing Education: First Report of a Special Committee on Nurse Education |date=April 1964 |publisher=[[Royal College of Nursing]]}}</ref> |
||
=== Entry requirements === |
=== Entry requirements === |
||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
The Platt Report stated that trainee nurses should receive two years of academic study and monitored clinical experience, followed by an exam, then another year of work in a hospital under supervision.<ref name=":1" /> |
The Platt Report stated that trainee nurses should receive two years of academic study and monitored clinical experience, followed by an exam, then another year of work in a hospital under supervision.<ref name=":1" /> |
||
Nurse training had to cover general medicine and surgery, gynaecology, paediatrics, ear nose and throat medicine, |
Nurse training had to cover general medicine and surgery, gynaecology, paediatrics, ear nose and throat medicine, ophthalmology and dermatology.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |title=100 Years of Nursing: 1960s |url=https://cdn.ps.emap.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2021/10/NT-Vol-101-No-19-1960s.pdf |journal=Nursing Times |volume=101 |issue=19 |pages=36–38}}</ref> |
||
All nurse training schools were to have access to hospitals or groups of hospitals with 300 beds or more.<ref name=":0" /> |
All nurse training schools were to have access to hospitals or groups of hospitals with 300 beds or more.<ref name=":0" /> |
||
The Platt Report recommended that student nurses remained employees funded by Regional Health Authorities and paid a grant.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |last=Ousey |first=Karen |date=2011 |title=The changing face of student nurse education and training programmes |url=http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/10084/1/ouseycontent_9838.pdf |journal=Wounds UK |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages= |
The Platt Report recommended that student nurses remained employees funded by Regional Health Authorities and paid a grant.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |last=Ousey |first=Karen |date=2011 |title=The changing face of student nurse education and training programmes |url=http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/10084/1/ouseycontent_9838.pdf |journal=Wounds UK |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=70–76}}</ref> It recommended different courses for state registered nurses (SRN) and state enrolled nurses (SEN), with a SEN required to complete two years' training and have their name on a roll and an SRN a three-year training programme and have their name on a professional register. Both would receive training grants.<ref name=":2" /> |
||
== Impact == |
== Impact == |
||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
The General Nursing Council questioned the Report's "move away from a vocational ethos of nursing."<ref name=":2" /> |
The General Nursing Council questioned the Report's "move away from a vocational ethos of nursing."<ref name=":2" /> |
||
In 1969, the Welsh School of Medicine created a course that provided the first route to a degree in nursing.<ref name=":2" /> |
|||
== See also == |
|||
* [[Cumberlege Report 1986]] |
|||
* [[Briggs Report|Briggs Report 1972]] |
|||
* [[Salmon Report|Salmon Report 1966]] |
|||
== References == |
== References == |
||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
[[Category:Health care reports of the United Kingdom government]] |
|||
[[Category:Nursing in the United Kingdom]] |
|||
[[Category:1964 documents]] |
|||
[[Category:1964 in the United Kingdom]] |
|||
[[Category:Nursing education in the United Kingdom]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 23:18, 2 September 2024
The Platt Report (1964) or the Platt Report(s) on the Reform of Nursing Education was the report of Harry Platt upon the investigations of a committee established by the Royal College of Nursing (RCN). It made recommendations about how nurses should be educated and what prior qualifications should be required in order to begin nurse training in England.
Context
[edit]By the 1960s, problems with recruitment of nurses to the National Health Service had been identified by studies, questionnaires, and job analyses.[1] As many as 10,000 students failed to complete training and wastage rates were as high as 50 percent.[2]
The RCN established a committee chaired by Platt to look at nursing education and suggest ways to reduce loss of staff during training or soon afterwards. Committee members included Annie Altschul, Barbara Fawkes, Catherine Hall, John Greene and Winifred Hector.[3]
Recommendations
[edit]The Platt Report was published in 1964.[4]
Entry requirements
[edit]The Platt Report proposed that to be accepted onto nurse training, people should have a minimum of five O-Levels.[2]
Training requirements
[edit]The Platt Report stated that trainee nurses should receive two years of academic study and monitored clinical experience, followed by an exam, then another year of work in a hospital under supervision.[2]
Nurse training had to cover general medicine and surgery, gynaecology, paediatrics, ear nose and throat medicine, ophthalmology and dermatology.[5]
All nurse training schools were to have access to hospitals or groups of hospitals with 300 beds or more.[5]
The Platt Report recommended that student nurses remained employees funded by Regional Health Authorities and paid a grant.[6] It recommended different courses for state registered nurses (SRN) and state enrolled nurses (SEN), with a SEN required to complete two years' training and have their name on a roll and an SRN a three-year training programme and have their name on a professional register. Both would receive training grants.[6]
Impact
[edit]As Health Minister, Kenneth Robinson rejected suggestions from the Platt Report.[5]
The General Nursing Council questioned the Report's "move away from a vocational ethos of nursing."[6]
In 1969, the Welsh School of Medicine created a course that provided the first route to a degree in nursing.[6]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Rivett, Geoffrey. "1958–1967: The renaissance of general practice and the hospitals". The history of the NHS. Nuffield Trust. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
- ^ a b c O'Dowd, Adrian (2021-10-11). "A history of nursing in Britain: the 1960s". Nursing Times. Retrieved 2024-01-03.
- ^ "A reform of nursing education first report of a special committee". RCN Digital Archive. 1964.
- ^ Platt, Harry (April 1964). A Reform of Nursing Education: First Report of a Special Committee on Nurse Education. Royal College of Nursing.
- ^ a b c "100 Years of Nursing: 1960s" (PDF). Nursing Times. 101 (19): 36–38.
- ^ a b c d Ousey, Karen (2011). "The changing face of student nurse education and training programmes" (PDF). Wounds UK. 7 (1): 70–76.