Hear the Silence: Difference between revisions
Philip Cross (talk | contribs) →Synopsis: ce |
Ernsanchez00 (talk | contribs) Changed the category |
||
(35 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|British television drama}} |
|||
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2016}} |
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2016}} |
||
{{Use British English|date=June 2016}} |
{{Use British English|date=June 2016}} |
||
{{Infobox television |
{{Infobox television |
||
| |
| image = |
||
| image = |
|||
| image_size = |
| image_size = |
||
| image_alt = |
| image_alt = |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| story = |
| story = |
||
| director = [[Tim Fywell]] |
| director = [[Tim Fywell]] |
||
| starring = [[Hugh Bonneville]]<br>[[Juliet Stevenson]] |
| starring = [[Hugh Bonneville]]<br />[[Juliet Stevenson]] |
||
| narrated = |
| narrated = |
||
| theme_music_composer = |
| theme_music_composer = |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| cinematography = Ivan Strasburg |
| cinematography = Ivan Strasburg |
||
| runtime = 90 minutes |
| runtime = 90 minutes |
||
| company = |
| company = |
||
| distributor = |
|||
| budget = £1 million |
| budget = £1 million |
||
| network = [[Channel 5 (UK)|Five]] |
| network = [[Channel 5 (UK)|Five]] |
||
| first_aired = {{Start date|2003|12|15|df=y}} |
| first_aired = {{Start date|2003|12|15|df=y}} |
||
| last_aired = |
| last_aired = |
||
| preceded_by = |
|||
| followed_by = |
|||
| website = |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
'''''Hear the Silence''''' is a 2003 semi-fictional TV drama based |
'''''Hear the Silence''''' is a 2003 semi-fictional TV drama based around the discredited idea of a potential link between the [[MMR vaccine and autism]].<ref name="Times20200904">{{cite news|last=Aaronovitch|first=David|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-doctor-who-fooled-the-world-by-brian-deer-review-andrew-wakefield-67xs9njgh#|title=The Doctor Who Fooled the World by Brian Deer review — the father of anti-vaxxer lies|work=The Times|date=4 September 2020|access-date=13 September 2020}} {{subscription required}}</ref> By then, a contentious issue, the supposed connection originated in a paper by [[Andrew Wakefield]] published in 1998.<ref name="Gdn20031211">{{cite news|last=Goldacre|first=Ben|url=https://www.theguardian.com/education/2003/dec/11/science.highereducation | title=Never mind the facts | work=The Guardian | date=11 December 2003 | access-date=6 September 2020}}</ref> The film debuted on 15 December 2003 at 9 pm on the [[United Kingdom|British]] network [[Channel 5 (UK)|Five]]. Produced on a budget of £1 million, it stars [[Hugh Bonneville]] as Wakefield and [[Juliet Stevenson]] as Christine Shields, a fictional mother who discovers the possible MMR-autism link when her son is diagnosed as autistic.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/may/23/channel5.broadcasting | title=Five plans autism drama | work=[[The Guardian]] | date=23 May 2003 | accessdate=30 April 2014 | author=Wells, Matt}}</ref> |
||
==Synopsis== |
==Synopsis== |
||
Christine Shields (Stevenson), who works in a senior capacity for a bank, begins informing a series of doctors that her son appeared to develop autism soon after he received the MMR vaccine, but she receives no sympathy from them, her boss, or even her husband. However, this all changes when she meets |
Christine Shields (Stevenson), who works in a senior capacity for a bank, begins informing a series of doctors that her son appeared to develop autism soon after he received the MMR vaccine, but she receives no sympathy from them, her boss, or even her husband. However, this all changes when she meets Wakefield (Bonneville), who shares her opinion of the MMR vaccine causing her son's autism. Shields is highly relieved at finding someone who believes her.<ref name="Times20031213">{{cite news|last=Ahuja|first=Anjana|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/suffer-little-children-fslbmqfct0g|title=Suffer little children?|work=The Times|date=13 December 2003|access-date=6 September 2020}} {{subscription required}}</ref><ref name="BMJ">{{cite journal | pmc=293044 | title=Hear the Silence |last=Elliman|first=David | journal=BMJ | volume=327 | pages=1411 | date=December 2003 | issue=7428 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.327.7428.1411-a }}</ref> |
||
At the press conference at which Wakefield announces his research findings, mysterious figures are shown already plotting.<ref name="Times20031213" /> Fictional government officials want to achieve Wakefield's "demise", which they intend to bring about by portraying his research as flawed. Although never demonstrated as being based on fact, the film depicts Wakefield being targeted by the government: his phone is tapped and his files are stolen.<ref name="Travesty">{{cite news| url=https://www.theguardian.com/society/2003/dec/14/broadcasting.science | title=A travesty of truth|<!-- Did not appear in The Guardian: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/saturday-review/the-doctor-who-fooled-the-world-by-brian-deer-review-andrew-wakefield-67xs9njgh -->work=The Observer | date=14 December 2003|access-date=1 May 2014|last=Aaronovitch|first=David}}</ref> |
At the press conference at which Wakefield announces his research findings, mysterious figures are shown already plotting.<ref name="Times20031213" /> Fictional government officials want to achieve Wakefield's "demise", which they intend to bring about by portraying his research as flawed. Although never demonstrated as being based on fact, the film depicts Wakefield being targeted by the government: his phone is tapped and his files are stolen.<ref name="Travesty">{{cite news| url=https://www.theguardian.com/society/2003/dec/14/broadcasting.science | title=A travesty of truth|<!-- Did not appear in The Guardian: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/saturday-review/the-doctor-who-fooled-the-world-by-brian-deer-review-andrew-wakefield-67xs9njgh -->work=The Observer | date=14 December 2003|access-date=1 May 2014|last=Aaronovitch|first=David}}</ref> |
||
==Cast== |
|||
(in credits order) |
|||
{{Div col|colwidth=25em}} |
|||
* [[Juliet Stevenson]] as Christine Shields |
|||
* Jamie Martin as Nicky Shields |
|||
* Stefan Mervyn as Max Shields (1 year old) |
|||
* Luke Mervyn as Max Shields (1 year old) |
|||
* Andrew Woodall as Martin Shields |
|||
* [[Hugh Bonneville]] as [[Andrew Wakefield]] |
|||
* [[Adie Allen]] as Dr. Carmel Wakefield |
|||
* Emma Pike as Emma |
|||
* Helen Kirkpatrick as Christine's secretary |
|||
* [[Todd Boyce]] as Simonson |
|||
* [[Emma Handy]] as Ann |
|||
* [[Felicity Montagu]] as Mary Watt |
|||
* Louis Doré as Philip Watt |
|||
* David Mallinson as Dr. Philip Ash |
|||
* Kish Sharma as ENT doctor |
|||
* Adrian Rawlins as Dr. Tony Danielson |
|||
* Paul Curran as Paediatrician |
|||
* [[Rosalind Bailey]] as Paediatric psychiatrist |
|||
* Simon Markey as Educational psychologist |
|||
* Diana Marchment as Woman shopper |
|||
* [[Harvey Virdi]] as Dr. Ash's receptionist |
|||
* [[Jan Harvey]] as Dr. Mead |
|||
* Richard Durden as Dr. Austen Parker |
|||
* Thomas Hunt as Max Shields (2 years old) |
|||
* Oliver Hunt as Max Shields (2 years old) |
|||
* Maurice Gleeson as Dr. Collier |
|||
* Rebecca Charles as Mother #1 |
|||
* [[Caroline O'Neill]] as Anna Hoskins |
|||
* [[Denise Black]] as Valerie Park |
|||
* Denise Stephenson as Red-Headed woman |
|||
* Victoria Williams as Tessa Jowell |
|||
* [[Peter Halliday]] as Sir Kenneth Calman |
|||
* Gabrielle Jourdan as Sarah |
|||
* Emma Cleasby as Lisa - ABA |
|||
* Jack Le Breton as Jamie Park |
|||
* David Blair as Clean cut young man |
|||
* Hugh Walters as Dean Dr. Richard Stein |
|||
* Finlay Robertson as Journalist |
|||
* Fred Pearson as Dr. Terence Roberts |
|||
* Belle Mary Hithersay as Mother #2 |
|||
* Paul Antony-Barber as Trust director |
|||
* Olivia Darnley as Wakefield's babysitter |
|||
* Simon Wilson as Worried father |
|||
* [[Sarah Woodward]] as Headmistress |
|||
* Jason Morell as Dr. Lyndon Gardner |
|||
* Cate Fowler as Headteacher |
|||
{{div col end}} |
|||
==Reception== |
==Reception== |
||
''Hear the Silence'', according to unofficial figures, attracted 1.2 million viewers on its first screening with a 6 |
''Hear the Silence'', according to unofficial overnight figures, attracted 1.2 million viewers on its first screening with a 6 per cent audience share; Channel Five's films debuting at 9 pm often gained audiences of more than 2 million viewers at the time.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/dec/16/overnights | title=MMR row fails to stir audiences | work=The Guardian | date=16 December 2003 | access-date=7 May 2014|last=Deans|first=Jason}}</ref> [[Mark Lawson]] in ''The Guardian'' wrote that [[Tim Fywell]]'s direction "ensures that the piece, from its shivery beginnings onwards, has a flu-like hold on the viewer" and is "a fine piece of drama".<ref name="Gdn20031208">{{cite news|last=Lawson|first=Mark|author-link=Mark Lawson|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/dec/08/tvandradio.columnists|title=Saint Mum, Saint Doctor and the evil MMR|work=The Guardian|date=8 December 2003|access-date=6 September 2020}}</ref> ''[[The Times]]'' science writer [[Anjana Ahuja]] believed there were reasons to praise the drama as it contained a "powerful portrayal of autism, parental frustration and marital strains", despite its serious flaws.<ref name="Times20031213" /> It was "deceitful, unbalanced and irresponsible", according to Mark Henderson in ''The Times'', but also "slick, gripping and professional" and [[Juliet Stevenson]] gave an "outstanding" performance.<ref name="Times20031220">{{cite news|last=Henderson|first=Mark|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/junk-medicine-tv-coverage-of-mmr-jg70q6885pw|title=Junk medicine: TV coverage of MMR|work=The Times|date=20 December 2003|access-date=6 September 2020}} {{subscription required}}</ref> |
||
Otherwise the film was received negatively, with critics arguing that it portrayed the purported MMR-autism link in a mistakenly sympathetic light as scientific evidence supporting the connection was lacking. It was said to idealize Wakefield and vilify the physicians who dismissed the vaccine-autism link by depicting them as "blatant caricatures" (''[[British Medical Journal]]'').<ref name=BMJ /><ref name="Gdn20031208" /> Jon Joseph in ''[[The Times]]'' wrote "there are definitely no shades of grey" with Wakefield's assertions treated as if they are "a law of nature, like gravity".<ref>{{cite news|last=Joseph|first=Jon|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/tv-review-mhvv8gh78qm|title=TV Review|work=The Times|date=16 December 2003|access-date=6 September 2020}} {{subscription required}}</ref> Of the supposed plot presumed to originate with the drug companies as a means to discredit Wakefield,<!-- Lawson: "without any explanation of whether it's the drug companies or the NHS or the CIA that is being fingered for intimidation". --> [[Ben Goldacre]] wrote in ''[[The Guardian]]'' of its |
Otherwise the film was received negatively, with critics arguing that it portrayed the purported MMR-autism link in a mistakenly sympathetic light as scientific evidence supporting the connection was lacking. It was said to idealize Wakefield and vilify the physicians who dismissed the vaccine-autism link by depicting them as "blatant caricatures" (''[[British Medical Journal]]'').<ref name=BMJ /><ref name="Gdn20031208" /> Jon Joseph in ''[[The Times]]'' wrote "there are definitely no shades of grey" with Wakefield's assertions treated as if they are "a law of nature, like gravity".<ref>{{cite news|last=Joseph|first=Jon|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/tv-review-mhvv8gh78qm|title=TV Review|work=The Times|date=16 December 2003|access-date=6 September 2020}} {{subscription required}}</ref> Of the supposed plot presumed to originate with the drug companies as a means to discredit Wakefield,<!-- Lawson: "without any explanation of whether it's the drug companies or the NHS or the CIA that is being fingered for intimidation". --> [[Ben Goldacre]] wrote in ''[[The Guardian]]'' of its utter implausibility as the patent on the MMR vaccine had lapsed, it was now generic and no longer highly profitable.<ref name="Gdn20031211" /> |
||
Goldacre wrote that while the film was "moving and convincing" as a drama, it was factually inaccurate: "The only things that the writers of ''Hear the Silence'' get wrong, to be fair, are the science and the story."<ref name="Gdn20031211" /> In addition, [[David Aaronovitch]] wrote that while the film begins by saying that it is a "dramatised account of the work of Dr Andrew Wakefield and his colleagues at the Royal Free Hospital in the late 1990s," the statement is not accurate. Aaronovitch commented: "Wakefield's own history is distorted, as are the opinions of his colleagues. No scientist is permitted to put a contrary case to that of the hero, though the vast majority of them believe he is wrong".<ref name=Travesty/> |
Goldacre wrote that while the film was "moving and convincing" as a drama, it was factually inaccurate: "The only things that the writers of ''Hear the Silence'' get wrong, to be fair, are the science and the story."<ref name="Gdn20031211" /> In addition, [[David Aaronovitch]] wrote that while the film begins by saying that it is a "dramatised account of the work of Dr Andrew Wakefield and his colleagues at the Royal Free Hospital in the late 1990s," the statement is not accurate. Aaronovitch commented: "Wakefield's own history is distorted, as are the opinions of his colleagues. No scientist is permitted to put a contrary case to that of the hero, though the vast majority of them believe he is wrong".<ref name=Travesty/> Many years later, after Wakefield's paper had been discredited Aaronovitch described the drama as being "a piece of the purest propaganda".<ref name="Times20200904" /> |
||
An open letter from 11 leading British doctors working in [[paediatrics]] condemned the film, calling it "distorted" and "entirely unbalanced."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3314719.stm | title=Medics slam 'distorted' MMR drama | work=[[BBC News]] | date=15 December 2003 | accessdate=1 May 2014}}</ref> One of the letter's signatories, [[Great Ormond Street Hospital]] |
An open letter from 11 leading British doctors working in [[paediatrics]] condemned the film, calling it "distorted" and "entirely unbalanced."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3314719.stm | title=Medics slam 'distorted' MMR drama | work=[[BBC News]] | date=15 December 2003 | accessdate=1 May 2014}}</ref> One of the letter's signatories, [[Great Ormond Street Hospital]] paediatrician David Elliman, also called the film "overly sentimental" and "potentially dangerous".<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1449322/TV-drama-on-MMR-could-cost-lives.html | title=TV drama on MMR 'could cost lives' | work=The Daily Telegraph | date=13 December 2003 | access-date=3 May 2014 |last=Martin|first=Nicole}}</ref> |
||
==Aftermath== |
==Aftermath== |
||
The discussion programme about the MMR-autism link following the film was a requirement of the broadcasting |
The discussion programme about the MMR-autism link following the film was a requirement of the <!-- the Independent Television Commission -->broadcasting regulator's impartiality rules.<ref name="Gdn20031203">{{cite news|last1=Wells|first1=Matt|last2=Boseley|first2=Sarah|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/dec/03/broadcasting.channel5|title=Calls to axe TV drama on MMR|work=The Guardian|date=3 December 2003|access-date=6 September 2020}}</ref> Multiple doctors opposing Wakefield were invited to participate, but boycotted it on the grounds that they considered the film misleading.<ref>{{cite news|last=Boseley|first=Sarah|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/dec/04/broadcasting.sciencenews|title=Boycott of Five's MMR drama|work=The Guardian|date=4 December 2003|access-date=6 September 2020}}</ref> One of these doctors (David Salisbury, director of the British National Immunization Program) justified his decision to do so by saying that if he and his public health colleagues had appeared as the broadcasters had requested, "We felt we'd be giving respectability to a program that was not respectable."<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41450-2004Jul10_3.html | title=Charismatic Doctor at Vortex of Vaccine Dispute | newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] | date=11 July 2004 | access-date=6 September 2020 |last=Frankel|first=Glenn | pages=3}}</ref> David Henderson in ''The Times'' thought the eventual discussion was "unreasonably weighted in Wakefield’s favour" and "no antidote to the two hours of emotional blackmail that preceded it".<ref name="Times20031220" /> One of the participants in the programme, Anjana Ahuja, felt those questioning his research were in the minority and she regretted the decision of those doctors who had declined to appear.<ref>{{cite news|last=Ahuja|first=Anjana|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/a-missed-chance-to-jab-the-mmr-doctor-where-it-hurts-0rf2gk2qxkx|title=A missed chance to jab the MMR doctor where it hurts|work=The Times|date=15 December 2003|access-date=6 September 2020}} {{subscription required}}</ref> Ahuja described the discussion, hosted by [[Kirsty Young]], as being "ill-tempered".<ref name="Times20031213" /><ref name="Gdn20031203" /> |
||
In 2008, responding to the criticism she had received at the time of the broadcast, Stevenson commented in a ''[[Daily Telegraph]]'' interview: "Perhaps it was naive of me to think you could put out a film like that" and "I thought it was generating an interesting debate and that it gave a voice to those who needed a voice - parents who were told they didn't know anything."<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/features/3635674/Juliet-Stevenson-I-would-love-a-completely-different-life.html | title=Juliet Stevenson: 'I would love a completely different life?' | work=[[The Daily Telegraph]] | date=18 February 2008 | access-date=6 September 2020}}</ref> |
In 2008, responding to the criticism she had received at the time of the broadcast, Stevenson commented in a ''[[Daily Telegraph]]'' interview: "Perhaps it was naive of me to think you could put out a film like that" and "I thought it was generating an interesting debate and that it gave a voice to those who needed a voice - parents who were told they didn't know anything."<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/features/3635674/Juliet-Stevenson-I-would-love-a-completely-different-life.html | title=Juliet Stevenson: 'I would love a completely different life?' | work=[[The Daily Telegraph]] | date=18 February 2008 | access-date=6 September 2020}}</ref> |
||
Line 59: | Line 106: | ||
[[Category:2003 television films]] |
[[Category:2003 television films]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:2003 films]] |
||
[[Category:Channel 5 (British TV channel) television dramas]] |
|||
[[Category:Anti-vaccination media]] |
[[Category:Anti-vaccination media]] |
||
[[Category:British television films]] |
[[Category:British television films]] |
||
[[Category:British films]] |
|||
[[Category:Films directed by Tim Fywell]] |
[[Category:Films directed by Tim Fywell]] |
||
[[Category:MMR vaccine and autism]] |
[[Category:MMR vaccine and autism]] |
Latest revision as of 23:49, 14 September 2024
Hear the Silence | |
---|---|
Written by | Timothy Prager |
Directed by | Tim Fywell |
Starring | Hugh Bonneville Juliet Stevenson |
Country of origin | United Kingdom |
Production | |
Cinematography | Ivan Strasburg |
Running time | 90 minutes |
Budget | £1 million |
Original release | |
Network | Five |
Release | 15 December 2003 |
Hear the Silence is a 2003 semi-fictional TV drama based around the discredited idea of a potential link between the MMR vaccine and autism.[1] By then, a contentious issue, the supposed connection originated in a paper by Andrew Wakefield published in 1998.[2] The film debuted on 15 December 2003 at 9 pm on the British network Five. Produced on a budget of £1 million, it stars Hugh Bonneville as Wakefield and Juliet Stevenson as Christine Shields, a fictional mother who discovers the possible MMR-autism link when her son is diagnosed as autistic.[3]
Synopsis
[edit]Christine Shields (Stevenson), who works in a senior capacity for a bank, begins informing a series of doctors that her son appeared to develop autism soon after he received the MMR vaccine, but she receives no sympathy from them, her boss, or even her husband. However, this all changes when she meets Wakefield (Bonneville), who shares her opinion of the MMR vaccine causing her son's autism. Shields is highly relieved at finding someone who believes her.[4][5]
At the press conference at which Wakefield announces his research findings, mysterious figures are shown already plotting.[4] Fictional government officials want to achieve Wakefield's "demise", which they intend to bring about by portraying his research as flawed. Although never demonstrated as being based on fact, the film depicts Wakefield being targeted by the government: his phone is tapped and his files are stolen.[6]
Cast
[edit](in credits order)
- Juliet Stevenson as Christine Shields
- Jamie Martin as Nicky Shields
- Stefan Mervyn as Max Shields (1 year old)
- Luke Mervyn as Max Shields (1 year old)
- Andrew Woodall as Martin Shields
- Hugh Bonneville as Andrew Wakefield
- Adie Allen as Dr. Carmel Wakefield
- Emma Pike as Emma
- Helen Kirkpatrick as Christine's secretary
- Todd Boyce as Simonson
- Emma Handy as Ann
- Felicity Montagu as Mary Watt
- Louis Doré as Philip Watt
- David Mallinson as Dr. Philip Ash
- Kish Sharma as ENT doctor
- Adrian Rawlins as Dr. Tony Danielson
- Paul Curran as Paediatrician
- Rosalind Bailey as Paediatric psychiatrist
- Simon Markey as Educational psychologist
- Diana Marchment as Woman shopper
- Harvey Virdi as Dr. Ash's receptionist
- Jan Harvey as Dr. Mead
- Richard Durden as Dr. Austen Parker
- Thomas Hunt as Max Shields (2 years old)
- Oliver Hunt as Max Shields (2 years old)
- Maurice Gleeson as Dr. Collier
- Rebecca Charles as Mother #1
- Caroline O'Neill as Anna Hoskins
- Denise Black as Valerie Park
- Denise Stephenson as Red-Headed woman
- Victoria Williams as Tessa Jowell
- Peter Halliday as Sir Kenneth Calman
- Gabrielle Jourdan as Sarah
- Emma Cleasby as Lisa - ABA
- Jack Le Breton as Jamie Park
- David Blair as Clean cut young man
- Hugh Walters as Dean Dr. Richard Stein
- Finlay Robertson as Journalist
- Fred Pearson as Dr. Terence Roberts
- Belle Mary Hithersay as Mother #2
- Paul Antony-Barber as Trust director
- Olivia Darnley as Wakefield's babysitter
- Simon Wilson as Worried father
- Sarah Woodward as Headmistress
- Jason Morell as Dr. Lyndon Gardner
- Cate Fowler as Headteacher
Reception
[edit]Hear the Silence, according to unofficial overnight figures, attracted 1.2 million viewers on its first screening with a 6 per cent audience share; Channel Five's films debuting at 9 pm often gained audiences of more than 2 million viewers at the time.[7] Mark Lawson in The Guardian wrote that Tim Fywell's direction "ensures that the piece, from its shivery beginnings onwards, has a flu-like hold on the viewer" and is "a fine piece of drama".[8] The Times science writer Anjana Ahuja believed there were reasons to praise the drama as it contained a "powerful portrayal of autism, parental frustration and marital strains", despite its serious flaws.[4] It was "deceitful, unbalanced and irresponsible", according to Mark Henderson in The Times, but also "slick, gripping and professional" and Juliet Stevenson gave an "outstanding" performance.[9]
Otherwise the film was received negatively, with critics arguing that it portrayed the purported MMR-autism link in a mistakenly sympathetic light as scientific evidence supporting the connection was lacking. It was said to idealize Wakefield and vilify the physicians who dismissed the vaccine-autism link by depicting them as "blatant caricatures" (British Medical Journal).[5][8] Jon Joseph in The Times wrote "there are definitely no shades of grey" with Wakefield's assertions treated as if they are "a law of nature, like gravity".[10] Of the supposed plot presumed to originate with the drug companies as a means to discredit Wakefield, Ben Goldacre wrote in The Guardian of its utter implausibility as the patent on the MMR vaccine had lapsed, it was now generic and no longer highly profitable.[2]
Goldacre wrote that while the film was "moving and convincing" as a drama, it was factually inaccurate: "The only things that the writers of Hear the Silence get wrong, to be fair, are the science and the story."[2] In addition, David Aaronovitch wrote that while the film begins by saying that it is a "dramatised account of the work of Dr Andrew Wakefield and his colleagues at the Royal Free Hospital in the late 1990s," the statement is not accurate. Aaronovitch commented: "Wakefield's own history is distorted, as are the opinions of his colleagues. No scientist is permitted to put a contrary case to that of the hero, though the vast majority of them believe he is wrong".[6] Many years later, after Wakefield's paper had been discredited Aaronovitch described the drama as being "a piece of the purest propaganda".[1]
An open letter from 11 leading British doctors working in paediatrics condemned the film, calling it "distorted" and "entirely unbalanced."[11] One of the letter's signatories, Great Ormond Street Hospital paediatrician David Elliman, also called the film "overly sentimental" and "potentially dangerous".[12]
Aftermath
[edit]The discussion programme about the MMR-autism link following the film was a requirement of the broadcasting regulator's impartiality rules.[13] Multiple doctors opposing Wakefield were invited to participate, but boycotted it on the grounds that they considered the film misleading.[14] One of these doctors (David Salisbury, director of the British National Immunization Program) justified his decision to do so by saying that if he and his public health colleagues had appeared as the broadcasters had requested, "We felt we'd be giving respectability to a program that was not respectable."[15] David Henderson in The Times thought the eventual discussion was "unreasonably weighted in Wakefield’s favour" and "no antidote to the two hours of emotional blackmail that preceded it".[9] One of the participants in the programme, Anjana Ahuja, felt those questioning his research were in the minority and she regretted the decision of those doctors who had declined to appear.[16] Ahuja described the discussion, hosted by Kirsty Young, as being "ill-tempered".[4][13]
In 2008, responding to the criticism she had received at the time of the broadcast, Stevenson commented in a Daily Telegraph interview: "Perhaps it was naive of me to think you could put out a film like that" and "I thought it was generating an interesting debate and that it gave a voice to those who needed a voice - parents who were told they didn't know anything."[17]
References
[edit]- ^ a b Aaronovitch, David (4 September 2020). "The Doctor Who Fooled the World by Brian Deer review — the father of anti-vaxxer lies". The Times. Retrieved 13 September 2020. (subscription required)
- ^ a b c Goldacre, Ben (11 December 2003). "Never mind the facts". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 September 2020.
- ^ Wells, Matt (23 May 2003). "Five plans autism drama". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 April 2014.
- ^ a b c d Ahuja, Anjana (13 December 2003). "Suffer little children?". The Times. Retrieved 6 September 2020. (subscription required)
- ^ a b Elliman, David (December 2003). "Hear the Silence". BMJ. 327 (7428): 1411. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7428.1411-a. PMC 293044.
- ^ a b Aaronovitch, David (14 December 2003). "A travesty of truth". The Observer. Retrieved 1 May 2014.
- ^ Deans, Jason (16 December 2003). "MMR row fails to stir audiences". The Guardian. Retrieved 7 May 2014.
- ^ a b Lawson, Mark (8 December 2003). "Saint Mum, Saint Doctor and the evil MMR". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 September 2020.
- ^ a b Henderson, Mark (20 December 2003). "Junk medicine: TV coverage of MMR". The Times. Retrieved 6 September 2020. (subscription required)
- ^ Joseph, Jon (16 December 2003). "TV Review". The Times. Retrieved 6 September 2020. (subscription required)
- ^ "Medics slam 'distorted' MMR drama". BBC News. 15 December 2003. Retrieved 1 May 2014.
- ^ Martin, Nicole (13 December 2003). "TV drama on MMR 'could cost lives'". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 3 May 2014.
- ^ a b Wells, Matt; Boseley, Sarah (3 December 2003). "Calls to axe TV drama on MMR". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 September 2020.
- ^ Boseley, Sarah (4 December 2003). "Boycott of Five's MMR drama". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 September 2020.
- ^ Frankel, Glenn (11 July 2004). "Charismatic Doctor at Vortex of Vaccine Dispute". The Washington Post. p. 3. Retrieved 6 September 2020.
- ^ Ahuja, Anjana (15 December 2003). "A missed chance to jab the MMR doctor where it hurts". The Times. Retrieved 6 September 2020. (subscription required)
- ^ "Juliet Stevenson: 'I would love a completely different life?'". The Daily Telegraph. 18 February 2008. Retrieved 6 September 2020.