Jump to content

Magic: The Gathering Commander: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Avienby (talk | contribs)
Fixed some stuff
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Avienby (talk | contribs)
About the CFP
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 36: Line 36:


On September 23, 2024, the CRC announced that four cards were being added to the banlist for the Commander format which sparked immediate backlash from the community.<ref name=":9">{{Cite web |last=Dohm-Sanchez |first=Jeffrey |date=September 23, 2024 |title=Commander Rules Committee Receives Backlash from 'Magic: The Gathering' Fans |url=https://icv2.com/articles/news/view/57858/commander-rules-committee-receives-backlash-magic-the-gathering-fans |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=[[ICv2]] |language=en |archive-date=September 27, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240927123751/https://icv2.com/articles/news/view/57858/commander-rules-committee-receives-backlash-magic-the-gathering-fans |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":10">{{Cite web |last=Golovchuk |first=Stan |date=September 26, 2024 |title=How Magic’s most popular format imploded |url=https://www.polygon.com/mtg-magic-the-gathering/456895/commander-ban-2024-jeweled-lotus-mana-crypt-dockside-extortionist-nadu |access-date=September 26, 2024 |website=[[Polygon (website)|Polygon]] |language=en-US |archive-date=September 26, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240926191350/https://www.polygon.com/mtg-magic-the-gathering/456895/commander-ban-2024-jeweled-lotus-mana-crypt-dockside-extortionist-nadu |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":11">{{Cite web |last=Carter |first=Chase |date=September 30, 2024 |title=Finance bros and harassment force MTG’s biggest player-owned format into corporate hands |url=https://www.rascal.news/finance-bros-and-harassment-force-mtgs-biggest-player-owned-format-into-corporate-hands/ |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=Rascal News |language=en}}</ref> James Whitbrook of ''[[Gizmodo]]'' characterized the community response as "heated" due to the [[Aftermarket (merchandise)|aftermarket]] value of the banned cards and their "popularity in competitive play", however, "things took a turn for the worse" when the reaction started to target members of the CRC individually.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Whitbrook |first=James |date=September 30, 2024 |title=Wizards Takes Over Magic's Commander Format After Card Bans, Death Threats |url=https://gizmodo.com/magic-commander-rules-committee-wizards-bans-harassment-2000505296 |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=Gizmodo |language=en-US}}</ref> Josh Lee Kwai, a member of the Commander Advisory Group (CAG) which supported the CRC, resigned following the banlist announcement.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dohm-Sanchez |first=Jeffrey |date=September 26, 2024 |title=Popular 'Magic: The Gathering' Commander Advisory Group Community Leader Resigns |url=https://icv2.com/articles/news/view/57885/popular-magic-the-gathering-commander-advisory-group-community-leader-resigns |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=[[ICv2]] |language=en |archive-date=September 27, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240927132922/https://icv2.com/articles/news/view/57885/popular-magic-the-gathering-commander-advisory-group-community-leader-resigns |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":10" /> On September 30, 2024, the CRC officially gave "management of the Commander format to the game design team of Wizards of the Coast".<ref name=":2" /> Wizards of the Coast stated that "the task of managing Commander has far outgrown the scope and safety of being attached to any five people".<ref name=":2" /> The CRC explained that the level of vitriol in the ban backlash, which included death threats,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bassil |first=Matt |date=September 30, 2024 |title=Wizards takes over Commander after MTG fans threaten Rules Committee |url=https://www.wargamer.com/magic-the-gathering/mtg-wizards-of-the-coast-takes-over-commander-rules-committee |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=[[Wargamer (website)|Wargamer]] |language=en-US}}</ref> made it "impossible" for the CRC "to continue operating as an independent entity".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Coleman |first=Jack |date=September 30, 2024 |title=Magic: The Gathering's Commander Format Will Now Be Controlled By Wizards Of The Coast |url=https://www.thegamer.com/magic-the-gathering-commander-now-controlled-by-wizards-of-the-coast/ |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=TheGamer |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Hall |first=Charlie |date=September 30, 2024 |title=Magic: The Gathering fans push volunteers out with alleged threats of violence |url=https://www.polygon.com/mtg-magic-the-gathering/458184/commander-rules-committee-steps-down |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=Polygon |language=en-US |archive-date=September 30, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240930193141/https://www.polygon.com/mtg-magic-the-gathering/458184/commander-rules-committee-steps-down |url-status=live }}</ref> Chase Carter of ''Rascal'' commented that this move is a "great and necessary solution" due to the level of harassment the CRC received, however, he was concerned about the long term health of the format with Wizards of the Coast presiding "as Commander's creator and arbitrator" which many felt "threatens the spirit of the format. If the company's weird bracket system suggestion is any indication of their stewardship, these first months could prove especially rough".<ref name=":11" /> Ash Parrish of ''[[The Verge]]'' similarly noted concerns that since Wizards of the Coast now controls the banlist, "there's nothing preventing it from continuing to print powerful, format-degrading cards in service of increased sales".<ref name=":12">{{Cite web |last=Parrish |first=Ash |date=October 3, 2024 |title=How four expensive cards imploded Magic: The Gathering’s most popular format |url=https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/3/24260527/magic-the-gathering-commander-rules-committee-ban |access-date=October 3, 2024 |website=[[The Verge]] |language=en}}</ref>
On September 23, 2024, the CRC announced that four cards were being added to the banlist for the Commander format which sparked immediate backlash from the community.<ref name=":9">{{Cite web |last=Dohm-Sanchez |first=Jeffrey |date=September 23, 2024 |title=Commander Rules Committee Receives Backlash from 'Magic: The Gathering' Fans |url=https://icv2.com/articles/news/view/57858/commander-rules-committee-receives-backlash-magic-the-gathering-fans |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=[[ICv2]] |language=en |archive-date=September 27, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240927123751/https://icv2.com/articles/news/view/57858/commander-rules-committee-receives-backlash-magic-the-gathering-fans |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":10">{{Cite web |last=Golovchuk |first=Stan |date=September 26, 2024 |title=How Magic’s most popular format imploded |url=https://www.polygon.com/mtg-magic-the-gathering/456895/commander-ban-2024-jeweled-lotus-mana-crypt-dockside-extortionist-nadu |access-date=September 26, 2024 |website=[[Polygon (website)|Polygon]] |language=en-US |archive-date=September 26, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240926191350/https://www.polygon.com/mtg-magic-the-gathering/456895/commander-ban-2024-jeweled-lotus-mana-crypt-dockside-extortionist-nadu |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":11">{{Cite web |last=Carter |first=Chase |date=September 30, 2024 |title=Finance bros and harassment force MTG’s biggest player-owned format into corporate hands |url=https://www.rascal.news/finance-bros-and-harassment-force-mtgs-biggest-player-owned-format-into-corporate-hands/ |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=Rascal News |language=en}}</ref> James Whitbrook of ''[[Gizmodo]]'' characterized the community response as "heated" due to the [[Aftermarket (merchandise)|aftermarket]] value of the banned cards and their "popularity in competitive play", however, "things took a turn for the worse" when the reaction started to target members of the CRC individually.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Whitbrook |first=James |date=September 30, 2024 |title=Wizards Takes Over Magic's Commander Format After Card Bans, Death Threats |url=https://gizmodo.com/magic-commander-rules-committee-wizards-bans-harassment-2000505296 |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=Gizmodo |language=en-US}}</ref> Josh Lee Kwai, a member of the Commander Advisory Group (CAG) which supported the CRC, resigned following the banlist announcement.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dohm-Sanchez |first=Jeffrey |date=September 26, 2024 |title=Popular 'Magic: The Gathering' Commander Advisory Group Community Leader Resigns |url=https://icv2.com/articles/news/view/57885/popular-magic-the-gathering-commander-advisory-group-community-leader-resigns |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=[[ICv2]] |language=en |archive-date=September 27, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240927132922/https://icv2.com/articles/news/view/57885/popular-magic-the-gathering-commander-advisory-group-community-leader-resigns |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":10" /> On September 30, 2024, the CRC officially gave "management of the Commander format to the game design team of Wizards of the Coast".<ref name=":2" /> Wizards of the Coast stated that "the task of managing Commander has far outgrown the scope and safety of being attached to any five people".<ref name=":2" /> The CRC explained that the level of vitriol in the ban backlash, which included death threats,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bassil |first=Matt |date=September 30, 2024 |title=Wizards takes over Commander after MTG fans threaten Rules Committee |url=https://www.wargamer.com/magic-the-gathering/mtg-wizards-of-the-coast-takes-over-commander-rules-committee |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=[[Wargamer (website)|Wargamer]] |language=en-US}}</ref> made it "impossible" for the CRC "to continue operating as an independent entity".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Coleman |first=Jack |date=September 30, 2024 |title=Magic: The Gathering's Commander Format Will Now Be Controlled By Wizards Of The Coast |url=https://www.thegamer.com/magic-the-gathering-commander-now-controlled-by-wizards-of-the-coast/ |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=TheGamer |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Hall |first=Charlie |date=September 30, 2024 |title=Magic: The Gathering fans push volunteers out with alleged threats of violence |url=https://www.polygon.com/mtg-magic-the-gathering/458184/commander-rules-committee-steps-down |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=Polygon |language=en-US |archive-date=September 30, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240930193141/https://www.polygon.com/mtg-magic-the-gathering/458184/commander-rules-committee-steps-down |url-status=live }}</ref> Chase Carter of ''Rascal'' commented that this move is a "great and necessary solution" due to the level of harassment the CRC received, however, he was concerned about the long term health of the format with Wizards of the Coast presiding "as Commander's creator and arbitrator" which many felt "threatens the spirit of the format. If the company's weird bracket system suggestion is any indication of their stewardship, these first months could prove especially rough".<ref name=":11" /> Ash Parrish of ''[[The Verge]]'' similarly noted concerns that since Wizards of the Coast now controls the banlist, "there's nothing preventing it from continuing to print powerful, format-degrading cards in service of increased sales".<ref name=":12">{{Cite web |last=Parrish |first=Ash |date=October 3, 2024 |title=How four expensive cards imploded Magic: The Gathering’s most popular format |url=https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/3/24260527/magic-the-gathering-commander-rules-committee-ban |access-date=October 3, 2024 |website=[[The Verge]] |language=en}}</ref>

In response to criticism about how Wizards might handle Commander, they have created their own replacement for the CRC, the Commander Format Panel (CFP). The CFP is a rotating group of 17 notable Magic players and content creators that will fill the place of the CRC.<ref name=":13" /> In a lengthy blog post by principal designer Gavin Verhey, he said “Ultimately, myself and other designers at Wizards are going to make the final calls [on Commander going forward],” “but I do expect that most of the time majority opinion on the panel will win out.”<ref>{{Cite web |title=Introducing the Commander Format Panel |url=https://magic.wizards.com/en/news/announcements/introducing-the-commander-format-panel |access-date=2024-10-28 |website=MAGIC: THE GATHERING |language=en-US}}</ref>


===Oathbreaker===
===Oathbreaker===
Line 71: Line 73:
Jeffrey Dohm-Sanchez of ''[[ICv2]]'' stated that the response was "overwhelming negative"<ref name=":9" /> and included petitions to reverse the banlist decision and fire the CRC.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dohm-Sanchez |first=Jeffrey |date=September 25, 2024 |title='Magic: The Gathering' Fans Launch Petition to Fire Commander Rules Committee |url=https://icv2.com/articles/news/view/57874/magic-the-gathering-fans-launch-petition-fire-commander-rules-committee |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=[[ICv2]] |language=en}}</ref> Golovchuk explained that many consumers "were viscerally upset over the cost of these cards prior to the" banlist announcement but following the ban, players who had "spent hundreds of dollars to enhance their decks" could no longer use these cards which left them "feeling stuck [[holding the bag]]".<ref name=":10" /> Ash Parrish of ''[[The Verge]]'' viewed the "heart of the issue" as the "tension between the spirit of Commander as a casual format and the commercial interests of both Wizards of the Coast and a subcommunity of players".<ref name=":12" /> Parrish highlighted that for this subcommunity, "''Magic'' cards aren't so much a game to play with friends as they are an investment vehicle".<ref name=":12" /> Chase Carter of ''Rascal'' reported that many players largely "rejoiced" as the ban supported "the overall health of the format" but a "loud minority" who were financially motivated "voiced their upset towards" both the CRC and the CAG.<ref name=":11" /> Carter thought "ultimately, the past week has proven that ''MTG''<nowiki/>'s ability to be enjoyed as a game is severely hobbled by the supposed need to prop up its secondary market".<ref name=":11" />
Jeffrey Dohm-Sanchez of ''[[ICv2]]'' stated that the response was "overwhelming negative"<ref name=":9" /> and included petitions to reverse the banlist decision and fire the CRC.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dohm-Sanchez |first=Jeffrey |date=September 25, 2024 |title='Magic: The Gathering' Fans Launch Petition to Fire Commander Rules Committee |url=https://icv2.com/articles/news/view/57874/magic-the-gathering-fans-launch-petition-fire-commander-rules-committee |access-date=September 30, 2024 |website=[[ICv2]] |language=en}}</ref> Golovchuk explained that many consumers "were viscerally upset over the cost of these cards prior to the" banlist announcement but following the ban, players who had "spent hundreds of dollars to enhance their decks" could no longer use these cards which left them "feeling stuck [[holding the bag]]".<ref name=":10" /> Ash Parrish of ''[[The Verge]]'' viewed the "heart of the issue" as the "tension between the spirit of Commander as a casual format and the commercial interests of both Wizards of the Coast and a subcommunity of players".<ref name=":12" /> Parrish highlighted that for this subcommunity, "''Magic'' cards aren't so much a game to play with friends as they are an investment vehicle".<ref name=":12" /> Chase Carter of ''Rascal'' reported that many players largely "rejoiced" as the ban supported "the overall health of the format" but a "loud minority" who were financially motivated "voiced their upset towards" both the CRC and the CAG.<ref name=":11" /> Carter thought "ultimately, the past week has proven that ''MTG''<nowiki/>'s ability to be enjoyed as a game is severely hobbled by the supposed need to prop up its secondary market".<ref name=":11" />


This ban led to members of the Commander Rules Committee being harassed and sent death threats by people critical of the announcement, which led to the dissolution of the CRC a few days later. Commander was then handed over to [[Wizards of the Coast]],<ref>{{Cite web |last=Whitbrook |first=James |date=2024-09-30 |title=Wizards Takes Over Magic's Commander Format After Card Bans, Death Threats |url=https://gizmodo.com/magic-commander-rules-committee-wizards-bans-harassment-2000505296 |access-date=2024-10-28 |website=Gizmodo |language=en-US}}</ref> who are currently working on power level changes and forming a new committee. This new committee, the Commander Format Panel (CFP), is a rotating set of seventeen notable Magic players and content creators who will fill the role of the former CRC. CFP members are being compensated for their contributions.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hall |first=Charlie |date=2024-10-22 |title=Magic: The Gathering publisher names new panel to oversee troubled Commander format |url=https://www.polygon.com/mtg-magic-the-gathering/468627/mtg-new-commander-format-panel-rules-committee |access-date=2024-10-28 |website=Polygon |language=en-US}}</ref>
This ban led to members of the Commander Rules Committee being harassed and sent death threats by people critical of the announcement, which led to the dissolution of the CRC a few days later. Commander was then handed over to [[Wizards of the Coast]],<ref>{{Cite web |last=Whitbrook |first=James |date=2024-09-30 |title=Wizards Takes Over Magic's Commander Format After Card Bans, Death Threats |url=https://gizmodo.com/magic-commander-rules-committee-wizards-bans-harassment-2000505296 |access-date=2024-10-28 |website=Gizmodo |language=en-US}}</ref> who are currently working on power level changes and forming a new committee. This new committee, the Commander Format Panel (CFP), is a rotating set of seventeen notable Magic players and content creators who will fill the role of the former CRC. CFP members are being compensated for their contributions.<ref name=":13">{{Cite web |last=Hall |first=Charlie |date=2024-10-22 |title=Magic: The Gathering publisher names new panel to oversee troubled Commander format |url=https://www.polygon.com/mtg-magic-the-gathering/468627/mtg-new-commander-format-panel-rules-committee |access-date=2024-10-28 |website=Polygon |language=en-US}}</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 22:28, 28 October 2024

Commander
ReleasedJune 17, 2011
SizeFive 100-card decks, including 51 new cards
DesignersKen Nagle (Lead), Mark Gottlieb, Scott Larabee, Ryan Miller, Mark Purvis
DevelopersMark Globus (Lead), Peter Knudson, Erik Lauer, Ryan Miller, Lee Sharpe
Development codeBedlam[1]

Commander is a series of supplemental Magic: the Gathering card game products. Its mechanics are derived from a fan-created format known as "Elder Dragon Highlander (EDH)".[2]

The Commander format has each player provide a 100-card deck, using cards from any printed sets excluding those that are banned, with the requirement that each card outside basic lands to be unique, in contrast to normal Magic decks that allow up to four copies of a card from the game's current base and expansion sets; the Commander format serves as a casual alternative to normal competitive play which is often dominated by those that can afford to purchase powerful cards and decks. [citation needed]

The official Commander format was initially "the only sanctioned format maintained by an outside entity" other than Wizards of the Coast.[3][4] While the Commander format had been overseen by a volunteer group of players since its inception, the group voluntarily turned over management of the format to Wizards of the Coast in September 2024 following player controversy over certain card bans.[5]

History

Elder Dragon Highlander

The original fan-created format, Elder Dragon Highlander (EDH), was developed by Adam Staley in the late 1990s and became a staple of his local play groups in Alaska.[6] Staley's original name was "a tribute to the line 'there can be only one' spoken repeatedly in the 1986 film Highlander" evoking the idea of a battle royale[7] and that there could only be one of a given type of card in a player's deck. The first part of the name referenced the Elder Dragons in the Magic storyline.[6] However, Polygon highlighted that there is some contention on the creative origins of the format as The Duelist also published a multiplayer format called "Elder Legend Dragon Wars" in July 1996 which was shared with the magazine by reader Jesus M. Lopez who claimed he had designed this format.[6] When asked by Polygon, Staley said "I do not remember reading that article. Some things are similar to my version and some are very different".[6]

Sheldon Menery, who was first introduced to EDH in 2002, while stationed at Elmendorf Air Force Base, then developed the format further culminating in his 2004 article[6][8] outlining the format on the Magic fan site Star City Games which "spread the word about it beyond his circle of judges for the first time".[6] This format differed in several ways such as an expanded deck size and a larger health total.[6][7] Scott Larabee, the Wizards of the Coast’s Pro Tour manager, played the format for the first time in 2005 with one of Menery's decks at a tournament. In the following year, Menery along with other Pro Tour judges, Gavin Duggan and Duncan McGregor, created a rules committee with an official website.[6]

Commander

Larabee went on to advocate for the format within Wizards of the Coast which led to the commercial launch of the format in 2011.[6] The EDH name was changed due to intellectual property concerns. Since 2011, Wizards of the Coast has released a product line containing preconstructed Commander decks.[6][9] However, the format was initially maintained by the Commander Rules Committee (CRC) which was run independently of Wizards of the Coast.[3][4] In 2020, Wizards of the Coast released metrics from stores in its Wizards Play Network (WPN) on the total number of participates in Magic events (referred to as Tickets). Per the industry trade ICv2:

...the number of unique players attending Commander events per week at WPN stores went from 9,000 in 2018 to 28,000 in 2020. In February 2020, all stores that ran events were averaging 1846 Tickets per year. However, stores that ran Commander events averaged about 2111 Tickets per year which is a 12.6% increase over the stores not running Commander. [...] Commander is clearly a growing format and is driving [organized play] numbers upward [...]. On a final note, for stores that carry singles, Reserved List Commander cards have been on a tear lately. [...] The market price sits at around $600.00 which represents more than a 45% increase in value in only about nine months"[10]

During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, Wizards of the Coast partnered on a webcam version of Magic: The Gathering playable online called SpellTable, which allows remote play of the Commander format.[11][12] In 2021, Dot eSports highlighted that "Commander has become one of the biggest formats in Magic over the past five years, even leading to Wizards of the Coast dubbing 2020 as 'The Year of Commander.' The format is a boon for novice and experienced deckbuilders to craft thematic decks centered around Magic’s over 1,200 Legendary creatures".[13]

On September 23, 2024, the CRC announced that four cards were being added to the banlist for the Commander format which sparked immediate backlash from the community.[14][15][16] James Whitbrook of Gizmodo characterized the community response as "heated" due to the aftermarket value of the banned cards and their "popularity in competitive play", however, "things took a turn for the worse" when the reaction started to target members of the CRC individually.[17] Josh Lee Kwai, a member of the Commander Advisory Group (CAG) which supported the CRC, resigned following the banlist announcement.[18][15] On September 30, 2024, the CRC officially gave "management of the Commander format to the game design team of Wizards of the Coast".[5] Wizards of the Coast stated that "the task of managing Commander has far outgrown the scope and safety of being attached to any five people".[5] The CRC explained that the level of vitriol in the ban backlash, which included death threats,[19] made it "impossible" for the CRC "to continue operating as an independent entity".[20][21] Chase Carter of Rascal commented that this move is a "great and necessary solution" due to the level of harassment the CRC received, however, he was concerned about the long term health of the format with Wizards of the Coast presiding "as Commander's creator and arbitrator" which many felt "threatens the spirit of the format. If the company's weird bracket system suggestion is any indication of their stewardship, these first months could prove especially rough".[16] Ash Parrish of The Verge similarly noted concerns that since Wizards of the Coast now controls the banlist, "there's nothing preventing it from continuing to print powerful, format-degrading cards in service of increased sales".[22]

In response to criticism about how Wizards might handle Commander, they have created their own replacement for the CRC, the Commander Format Panel (CFP). The CFP is a rotating group of 17 notable Magic players and content creators that will fill the place of the CRC.[23] In a lengthy blog post by principal designer Gavin Verhey, he said “Ultimately, myself and other designers at Wizards are going to make the final calls [on Commander going forward],” “but I do expect that most of the time majority opinion on the panel will win out.”[24]

Oathbreaker

In March 2023, Wizards of the Coast officially launched the Oathbreaker format, which originated as a fan-created variation of Commander. It was created by the Weirdcards Charitable Club, a Minnesota-based gaming group, "around 2017"[25] before becoming an officially supported format.[26][27]

The Oathbreaker format features an instant or sorcery "Signature Spell", and decks have only 60 cards.[25]

Gameplay

A game of Commander in progress

Commander is a format where players construct 100-card decks, with each card (except basic lands) appearing no more than once. The format is primarily played with four players, each with their own deck. Players also choose a legendary creature or Planeswalker to be their "Commander" or "General" (a Planeswalker must be designated as allowed to be used as a Commander), which begins the game in the "Command Zone", from where it can cast directly to the battlefield. If a commander leaves the battlefield, it goes back to the Command Zone and can be cast again for a higher mana cost. Each player's deck is based and built around their Commander's colors.[28]

In addition to the same losing conditions that exist in a normal game of Magic, each player starts the game with 40 life points instead of 20, and a player may lose if they are dealt 21 or more total points of combat damage from a single Commander throughout the game.[29][3] The format "supports two to six players, sometimes more".[3]

Commander also has its own "banned list" of cards, separate from any other format[30] which was controlled by the Commander Rules Committee. This committee also maintained the rules for the format.[3][4][31] A list of the recommended banned cards in the format can also be found on the Wizards of the Coast official website.[32]

Variants

  • Competitive EDH, also known as CEDH is distinct form of EDH, with the same rules as EDH. Competitive EDH has the same rules and banlist as Commander but it differs in that it has no restrictions on its own strategies, forgoing the typical social contracts in favor of pursuing the most optimal strategies to win.[33]
  • Duel Commander, also known as French Commander, got its origins from Magic judge Kevin Desprez, who brought the initial idea of EDH to France from the USA, before it spread across Europe and later globally. The game is played by two combatants, each starting with 20 life points, obeys the same rules as a regular Magic game, and has one commander (or commanders with Partner ability) plus 99 (or 98 with Partners) cards in the starting library. The mulligan system is the same as for sanctioned formats, and the deck construction rules follow the same color identity rule as the multiplayer version does. It also has its own ban list and is meant to be more competitive than traditional Commander.[34][35][31]
  • Magic Online 1v1 Commander is Wizards of the Coast's variant of Commander for Magic: The Gathering Online.[36] The format utilizes a ban list created by Wizards that differs from that of the Rules Committee.
  • Brawl is Wizards of the Coast's Commander variant for its online platforms and launched in 2018. Brawl utilizes all cards on Arena outside of its own banlist. It has a deck size of 100 cards, and allows for the commander to be any legendary creature or any planeswalker. Brawl was originally "Historic Brawl", while Standard Brawl held the Brawl moniker. Standard Brawl utilizes all cards that are currently legal in Standard and has a rotation schedule similar to that of Standard. While similar to traditional Commander, Standard Brawl deck size is limited to 60 cards and each player starts with 30 life.[37][38] The format is commonly played as a sanctioned event on Magic: The Gathering Online and on MTG Arena. It was a highly requested addition to MTG Arena[39][40][41] but the "variant never took off on paper".[42] The physical format was not well-received by the players due to a "shortage of preconstructed decks" and the resale price of individual cards.[43]
  • Pauper Commander is a variant in which each card in the deck must be Pauper legal (had to be printed or released online at one point with a Common rarity) and the Commander must be any creature (legendary or not) that was printed or released online at least one time at Uncommon rarity. On this variation, commander damage is 16 to 18 and starting life is 30 points.[44][45]
  • Oathbreaker is an official variant which launched in 2023. This format is free-for-all multiplayer with three to five players who each start with 20 life; the winner is the last standing player.[26][27] Each player builds a 58-card singleton deck[25] along with selecting an "Oathbreaker (a planeswalker card) and a Signature Spell (an instant or sorcery) that matches the color identity of the Oathbreaker" to go with the deck.[27] "The Oathbreaker and the Signature Spell start in the command zone at the beginning of each game, and can be cast during the game at their normal costs, plus an additional two mana for each time they have been cast. Both of these cards return to the command zone if they would go to the graveyard".[27]

Reception

Charlie Hall, for Polygon, commented in 2020 that "many Magic players see creating a Commander deck as the ultimate expression of a player’s skill, and of their ability to use their personal collection of cards to its fullest. The Commander format embodies the game’s reputation for competition, but also for storytelling".[6] Jason Coles, for Dicebreaker, wrote that Commander is "possibly the most popular format in all of Magic: The Gathering [...]. It’s a fun format that generally features groups of up to four players duking it out and trying to keep each other in check".[46] Jan Švelch, in the academic journal Analog Game Studies, wrote that "the popular Commander format has been receiving yearly expansions since 2011 when the first official Commander pre-constructed decks were released. Many of these emergent formats address the more controversial aspects of the official and sanctioned Magic formats [...]. The interactions between players and developers often follow the logic of cultural convergence with popular community formats receiving official expansions. Creation of such community formats and their consequent commercialization by publishers can also be seen as a manifestation of fan labor in which fans create value which is later capitalized on by the official producers".[4]

In 2013, Steve Heisler, for The A.V. Club, wrote that "EDH is dorky and fun. [...] But ironically, EDH is in danger of transforming into the same kind of serious, streamlined structure that its original creators wanted to avoid". Heisler was concerned that Wizards of the Coast's expansion into the casual Magic scene would recreate issues of the competitive format such as players only using the most optimal deck; additionally, he commented that the preconstructed decks add a new metagame to the format. Heisler highlighted "now there are cards created just for Commander that are inarguably better than their counterparts, and their inclusion in the pre-made decks implies you really should think about picking them up. [...] But if you’re not going to use these optimal cards, you’d better get ready to play against them. [...] The metagame of Commander has largely been dictated by the collector marketplace, which itself is largely dictated by a card’s demand in non-Commander settings". Heisler stated that Wizards of the Coast began to add cards to Commander decks that are more useful in the Legacy format leading to collectors buying the preconstructed decks for a single card which then led to the price of the Commander decks increasing. Heisler wrote, "by feeding Commander product into the collector-driven sludge pot, and by emphasizing the inclusion of cards that are absolutely better than others, Wizards and the Magic collector community threaten to make this format just like all the others".[47]

In 2021, Xavier Johnson, for Dot eSports, highlighted that deck building thrives in Commander's more casual format. Johnson wrote, "Commander is a casual Constructed format that emphasizes the importance of individual playgroups setting expectations rather than adherence to a strict set of rules and a win-at-all-costs mentality. This underlying philosophy influences how players craft their Commander decks, since many players view deckbuilding as a form of self expression or a way to make use of their collections. [...] A quirk of Commander deckbuilding is the social contract and the format’s focus on a fun, communal experience rather than wins and losses. This leads to certain cards being generally shunned by many playgroups". Since there is so much variety between playgroups and the focus is on the social experience, there isn't the same adherence to the metagame as there is in other formats such as Standard and Modern; optimized cards might not be used in a local playgroup because these cards are "frustrating to play against".[13]

Banlist and Dissolution of the CRC

Stan Golovchuk of Polygon reported that "players, game designers, Magic content creators, and – in an unusual move – even some of the game's artists took to social media to share their frustrations" following the September 2024 banlist announcement.[15] This announcement involved four cards (Dockside Extortionist, Jeweled Lotus, Mana Crypt, and Nadu, Winged Wisdom) being banned from the EDH format, without prior notice for most of said cards.

Jeffrey Dohm-Sanchez of ICv2 stated that the response was "overwhelming negative"[14] and included petitions to reverse the banlist decision and fire the CRC.[48] Golovchuk explained that many consumers "were viscerally upset over the cost of these cards prior to the" banlist announcement but following the ban, players who had "spent hundreds of dollars to enhance their decks" could no longer use these cards which left them "feeling stuck holding the bag".[15] Ash Parrish of The Verge viewed the "heart of the issue" as the "tension between the spirit of Commander as a casual format and the commercial interests of both Wizards of the Coast and a subcommunity of players".[22] Parrish highlighted that for this subcommunity, "Magic cards aren't so much a game to play with friends as they are an investment vehicle".[22] Chase Carter of Rascal reported that many players largely "rejoiced" as the ban supported "the overall health of the format" but a "loud minority" who were financially motivated "voiced their upset towards" both the CRC and the CAG.[16] Carter thought "ultimately, the past week has proven that MTG's ability to be enjoyed as a game is severely hobbled by the supposed need to prop up its secondary market".[16]

This ban led to members of the Commander Rules Committee being harassed and sent death threats by people critical of the announcement, which led to the dissolution of the CRC a few days later. Commander was then handed over to Wizards of the Coast,[49] who are currently working on power level changes and forming a new committee. This new committee, the Commander Format Panel (CFP), is a rotating set of seventeen notable Magic players and content creators who will fill the role of the former CRC. CFP members are being compensated for their contributions.[23]

References

  1. ^ Shawn Main (May 20, 2014). "Conspiring a Conspiracy". Wizards of the Coast. Archived from the original on May 24, 2014. Retrieved May 20, 2014.
  2. ^ "EDH is now Commander". TCGplayer.com. December 2, 2010. Archived from the original on September 30, 2011. Retrieved June 21, 2011.
  3. ^ a b c d e McWhertor, Michael (September 13, 2021). "Magic: The Gathering's most popular Commander has been banned". Polygon. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  4. ^ a b c d Švelch, Jan (2016). "Platform Studies, Computational Essentialism, and Magic: The Gathering". Analog Game Studies. 3 (3). ISSN 2643-7112. Archived from the original on 2021-09-15. Retrieved 2021-09-15.
  5. ^ a b c "On the Future of Commander" (Press release). Wizards of the Coast. September 30, 2024. Archived from the original on September 30, 2024. Retrieved September 30, 2024.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Hall, Charlie (May 28, 2020). "Commander: The definitive history of Magic's most popular format". Polygon. Archived from the original on September 13, 2021. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  7. ^ a b "A fan-made format has changed the way 'Magic: the Gathering' sets are developed". NME. September 12, 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-09-14. Retrieved 2021-09-14.
  8. ^ "A Dual History | Article by Devon Rule". www.coolstuffinc.com. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  9. ^ "Magic's Commander Anthology Asks a Steep Price". pastemagazine.com. July 19, 2017. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  10. ^ "Wizards of the Coast Reveals That 'Magic: The Gathering's' Commander Audience Has Tripled Between 2018 and 2020". ICv2. September 15, 2020. Archived from the original on September 16, 2021. Retrieved September 16, 2021.
  11. ^ "SpellTable Joins Wizards of the Coast". Hipsters of the Coast. August 17, 2020. Archived from the original on November 20, 2021. Retrieved November 20, 2021.
  12. ^ "MTG Commander during the pandemic: Interview with Wizards". Gamepur. October 28, 2021. Archived from the original on November 20, 2021. Retrieved November 20, 2021.
  13. ^ a b Johnson, Xavier (July 30, 2021). "Deckbuilding thrives in Magic: The Gathering's casual format Commander". Dot Esports. Archived from the original on September 14, 2021. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  14. ^ a b Dohm-Sanchez, Jeffrey (September 23, 2024). "Commander Rules Committee Receives Backlash from 'Magic: The Gathering' Fans". ICv2. Archived from the original on September 27, 2024. Retrieved September 30, 2024.
  15. ^ a b c d Golovchuk, Stan (September 26, 2024). "How Magic's most popular format imploded". Polygon. Archived from the original on September 26, 2024. Retrieved September 26, 2024.
  16. ^ a b c d Carter, Chase (September 30, 2024). "Finance bros and harassment force MTG's biggest player-owned format into corporate hands". Rascal News. Retrieved September 30, 2024.
  17. ^ Whitbrook, James (September 30, 2024). "Wizards Takes Over Magic's Commander Format After Card Bans, Death Threats". Gizmodo. Retrieved September 30, 2024.
  18. ^ Dohm-Sanchez, Jeffrey (September 26, 2024). "Popular 'Magic: The Gathering' Commander Advisory Group Community Leader Resigns". ICv2. Archived from the original on September 27, 2024. Retrieved September 30, 2024.
  19. ^ Bassil, Matt (September 30, 2024). "Wizards takes over Commander after MTG fans threaten Rules Committee". Wargamer. Retrieved September 30, 2024.
  20. ^ Coleman, Jack (September 30, 2024). "Magic: The Gathering's Commander Format Will Now Be Controlled By Wizards Of The Coast". TheGamer. Retrieved September 30, 2024.
  21. ^ Hall, Charlie (September 30, 2024). "Magic: The Gathering fans push volunteers out with alleged threats of violence". Polygon. Archived from the original on September 30, 2024. Retrieved September 30, 2024.
  22. ^ a b c Parrish, Ash (October 3, 2024). "How four expensive cards imploded Magic: The Gathering's most popular format". The Verge. Retrieved October 3, 2024.
  23. ^ a b Hall, Charlie (2024-10-22). "Magic: The Gathering publisher names new panel to oversee troubled Commander format". Polygon. Retrieved 2024-10-28.
  24. ^ "Introducing the Commander Format Panel". MAGIC: THE GATHERING. Retrieved 2024-10-28.
  25. ^ a b c "MTG declares fanmade Oathbreaker an official Magic format". Wargamer. March 16, 2023. Archived from the original on March 17, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
  26. ^ a b Hall, Charlie (March 16, 2023). "Magic: The Gathering officially recognizes a new multiplayer format, Oathbreaker". Polygon. Archived from the original on March 16, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
  27. ^ a b c d "Wizards of the Coast Announces 'Magic: The Gathering' Oathbreaker Format". ICv2. March 16, 2023. Archived from the original on March 17, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
  28. ^ Parlock, Joe (November 16, 2021). "Magic The Gathering: Everything You Need To Know About The Commander Format". The Gamer. Archived from the original on September 20, 2022. Retrieved September 17, 2022.
  29. ^ "Magic: The Gathering Commander Rules". Wizards of the Coast. Archived from the original on August 27, 2008. Retrieved June 21, 2011.,
  30. ^ "Deck Construction Rules". MTGCommander.com. Archived from the original on February 5, 2016. Retrieved June 21, 2011.
  31. ^ a b "The Fifth Element (of Commander)". MAGIC: THE GATHERING. December 25, 2014. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  32. ^ "Commander format". Wizards of the Coast. Archived from the original on October 10, 2008.
  33. ^ Liu, Calvin (2023). "Gathering Understanding: Subcultures, Hierarchies, and Norms". In Jones, Shelly (ed.). Beyond the Deck: Critical Essays on Magic: The Gathering and Its Influence. Studies in Gaming. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers. pp. 175–176. ISBN 978-1-4766-8316-4.
  34. ^ "A Commander Genius in France | Article by Steve Horton". www.coolstuffinc.com. Archived from the original on September 14, 2021. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  35. ^ "WHAT IS COMMANDER ? – Duel Commander". Archived from the original on September 14, 2021. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  36. ^ "Exploring 1v1 Commander". Star City Games. May 29, 2017. Archived from the original on September 14, 2021. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  37. ^ "Wizards Announces Brawl, a New Commander Format with 60 Standard Cards". Hipsters of the Coast. March 22, 2018. Archived from the original on September 14, 2021. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  38. ^ "Join the Brawl". MAGIC: THE GATHERING. March 22, 2018. Archived from the original on September 14, 2021. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  39. ^ "Brawl is Magic: The Gathering — Arena's best mode. Make it permanent". VentureBeat. October 31, 2019. Archived from the original on September 14, 2021. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  40. ^ Forster, Danny (June 23, 2020). "Brawl becomes permanent mode in MTG Arena, Brawlers' Guildhall removed". Dot Esports. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  41. ^ "New Magic: The Gathering Arena format is close to Commander". Dicebreaker. July 30, 2021. Archived from the original on September 14, 2021. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  42. ^ MacGregor, Collin (July 22, 2019). "Two New Brawl Cards Revealed for Magic The Gathering". Heavy.com. Archived from the original on October 1, 2024. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  43. ^ Forster, Danny (October 29, 2019). "Magic: The Gathering Brawl failures may kill the format". Dot Esports. Archived from the original on September 14, 2021. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  44. ^ "Let's Talk Pauper Commander". Star City Games. August 23, 2016. Archived from the original on September 14, 2021. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  45. ^ "Five Fun Formats You've (Probably) Never Heard Of". MAGIC: THE GATHERING. December 9, 2014. Archived from the original on September 14, 2021. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  46. ^ "Magic: The Gathering's most popular formats explained". Dicebreaker. January 14, 2020. Archived from the original on September 14, 2021. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  47. ^ "Why Magic: The Gathering struggles to stay relevant to casual players". The A.V. Club. December 5, 2013. Archived from the original on October 1, 2024. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  48. ^ Dohm-Sanchez, Jeffrey (September 25, 2024). "'Magic: The Gathering' Fans Launch Petition to Fire Commander Rules Committee". ICv2. Retrieved September 30, 2024.
  49. ^ Whitbrook, James (2024-09-30). "Wizards Takes Over Magic's Commander Format After Card Bans, Death Threats". Gizmodo. Retrieved 2024-10-28.