Jump to content

Lotus throne: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Add pp-protect template
Monkbot (talk | contribs)
m Task 20: replace {lang-??} templates with {langx|??} ‹See Tfd› (Replaced 1);
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{pp-protect|small=yes}}
{{short description|Stylized lotus flower used as the seat or base for a figure in Asian art}}
{{short description|Stylized lotus flower used as the seat or base for a figure in Asian art}}
[[File:Monkey gives honey to Buddha Shakyamuni, India, Bihar, probably Kurkihar, Pala dynasty, c. 1000 AD, black stone - Östasiatiska museet, Stockholm - DSC09270.JPG|thumb|The three Buddha figures here each have a lotus throne. [[Pala Empire|Pala dynasty]], Eastern India, c. 1000.]]
[[File:Monkey gives honey to Buddha Shakyamuni, India, Bihar, probably Kurkihar, Pala dynasty, c. 1000 AD, black stone - Östasiatiska museet, Stockholm - DSC09270.JPG|300px|thumb|The three Buddha figures here each have a lotus throne. [[Pala Empire|Pala dynasty]], Eastern India, c. 1000.]]
In Asian art a '''lotus throne''', sometimes '''lotus platform''', is a stylized lotus flower used as the seat or base for a figure. It is the normal [[pedestal]] for divine figures in [[Buddhist art]] and [[Hindu art]], and often seen in [[Jain art]].<ref>Pal, 39</ref> Originating in [[Indian art]], it followed [[Indian religions]] to [[East Asia]] in particular.
The '''lotus throne''', sometimes called '''lotus platform''', is a stylized lotus flower used as the seat or base for a figure in art associated with [[Indian religions]]. It is the normal [[pedestal]] for divine figures in [[Buddhist art]] and [[Hindu art]], and often seen in [[Jain art]].<ref>Pal, 39</ref> Originating in [[Indian art]], it followed [[Indian religions]] to [[East Asia]] in particular.
[[File:HanaNoHasu7.jpg|thumb|Flower of ''[[nelumbo nucifera]]'', the [[Indian lotus]]; its colour range is from white to red]]


The precise form varies, but is intended to represent the opening flower of ''[[Nelumbo nucifera]]'', the [[Indian lotus]]; in some Buddhist legends the baby [[Buddha]] emerged from a lotus flower. The Indian lotus is an aquatic plant similar to a [[Nymphaeaceae|water lily]], though not actually any close relation. Among other unusual characteristics, ''nelumbo nucifera'' has particular properties of repelling water, known as the [[lotus effect]] or [[ultrahydrophobicity]]. Among other symbolic meanings, it rises above the water environment it lives in, and is not contaminated by it, so providing a model for Buddhists.<ref>Pal, 39–42; Coomaraswamy, 21; Krishan & Tadikonda, 65; Rodrigues</ref> According to the [[Pali Canon]], the Buddha himself began this often-repeated metaphor, in the [[Aṅguttara Nikāya]], saying that the lotus flower raises from the muddy water unstained, as he raises from this world, free from the defilements taught in the [[sutra]].<ref>Pal, 39–40; Coomaraswamy, 21; the texts are: AN 10.81, "Bāhuna suttaṃ"; AN 4.36, "Doṇa suttaṃ".</ref>
The precise form varies, but is intended to represent the opening flower of ''[[Nelumbo nucifera]]'', the [[Indian lotus]]. In the traditional biographies lotus flowers sprung up at [[the Buddha]]'s first seven steps, and in some Buddhist legends the baby [[Padmasambhava]] emerged from a lotus flower. The Indian lotus is an aquatic plant similar to a [[Nymphaeaceae|water lily]], though not actually any close relation. It has a large, round, and flat [[Receptacle (botany)|seed head]] in the centre of the flower, with initially small openings above each of the relatively small number of seeds. Among other unusual characteristics, ''nelumbo nucifera'' has particular properties of repelling water, known as the [[lotus effect]] or [[ultrahydrophobicity]]. Among other symbolic meanings, it rises above the water environment it lives in, and is not contaminated by it, so providing a model for Buddhists.<ref>Pal, 39–42; Coomaraswamy, 21; Krishan & Tadikonda, 65; Rodrigues</ref> According to the [[Pali Canon]], the Buddha himself began this often-repeated metaphor, in the [[Aṅguttara Nikāya]], saying that the lotus flower raises from the muddy water unstained, as he raises from this world, free from the defilements taught in the [[sutra]].<ref>Pal, 39–40; Coomaraswamy, 21; the texts are: AN 10.81, "Bāhuna suttaṃ"; AN 4.36, "Doṇa suttaṃ".</ref>


In [[Sanscrit]] the throne is called either a ''[[padmāsana]]'' ({{lang-sa|पद्मासन}}, {{IPA-sa|pɐdmaːsɐnɐ|}}, ''[[asana]]'' is the name for a seated position), which is also the name for the [[Lotus position]] in meditation and [[yoga]], or ''padmapitha'',<ref>Jansen, 18</ref> ''padma'' meaning lotus and ''pitha'' a base or plinth.<ref>Pal, 45</ref>
In [[Sanskrit]] the throne is called either a ''[[padmāsana]]'' ({{langx|sa|पद्मासन}}, {{IPA|sa|pɐdmaːsɐnɐ|}}, ''[[asana|āsana]]'' is the name for a seated position), which is also the name for the [[Lotus position]] in meditation and [[yoga]], or ''padmapitha'',<ref>Jansen, 18</ref> ''padma'' meaning lotus and ''pitha'' a base or plinth.<ref>Pal, 45</ref>


==History==
==History==
The earliest of the [[Veda]]s, the ''[[Rigveda]]'', describes the other gods watching the birth of [[Agni]], the god of fire, seated on lotus flowers; also the birth of [[Vasishtha]].<ref>Coomaraswamy, 18–19; Pal, 40</ref> In Hindu myth, the major deity [[Brahma]] emerged from a lotus growing from the navel of [[Vishnu]].<ref>Pal, 40</ref>
The earliest of the [[Veda]]s, the ''[[Rigveda]]'', describes the other gods watching the birth of [[Agni]], the god of fire, seated on lotus flowers; also the birth of [[Vasishtha]].<ref>Coomaraswamy, 18–19; Pal, 40</ref> In Hindu myth, the major deity [[Brahma]] emerged from a lotus growing from the navel of [[Vishnu]].<ref>Pal, 40</ref>
[[File:The Hindu Goddess Parvati LACMA M.77.82 (3 of 12).jpg|thumb|Double-thrones under [[Parvati]], 11th century]]
[[File:HanaNoHasu7.jpg|thumb|Flower of ''[[nelumbo nucifera]]'', the [[Indian lotus]]; its colour range is from white to red]]

In art the form is first seen as a base for rare early images of [[Laxmi]] from the 2nd century BCE; many or most of these may have a Buddhist context.<ref>Coomaraswamy, 22; Krishan & Tadikonda, 78, note 89</ref> However it first becomes common with seated [[Buddha]] figures in the [[Greco-Buddhist art]] of [[Gandhara]] around the late 2nd or the 3rd century CE.<ref>Moore & Klein, 149; Krishan & Tadikonda, 65</ref> It may have reached the [[Deccan]] as early as the end of the 2nd century.<ref>Pal, 41; Walser, 80–87</ref> At some point, probably around 200, and before his death in about 250, the Buddhist thinker [[Nagarjuna]] exhorted an unknown Buddhist monarch, very probably in the Deccan, to:
In art the form is first seen as a base for rare early images of [[Laxmi]] from the 2nd century BCE; many or most of these may have a Buddhist context.<ref>Coomaraswamy, 22; Krishan & Tadikonda, 78, note 89</ref> However it first becomes common with seated [[Buddha]] figures in the [[Greco-Buddhist art]] of [[Gandhara]] around the late 2nd or the 3rd century CE.<ref>Moore & Klein, 149; Krishan & Tadikonda, 65</ref> It may have reached the [[Deccan]] as early as the end of the 2nd century.<ref>Pal, 41; Walser, 80–87</ref> At some point, probably around 200, and before his death in about 250, the Buddhist thinker [[Nagarjuna]] exhorted an unknown Buddhist monarch, very probably in the Deccan, to:
<blockquote>... Please construct from all precious substances
<blockquote>... Please construct from all precious substances
Line 19: Line 19:
– suggesting this [[iconography]] was current by then. It is not clear from the language whether sculptures or paintings, or both, were meant.<ref>Walser, 81–83</ref>
– suggesting this [[iconography]] was current by then. It is not clear from the language whether sculptures or paintings, or both, were meant.<ref>Walser, 81–83</ref>


In early Buddhist art it may be intended to specifically depict the second of [[the Twin Miracle]]s in the legend of the Buddha's life. In some accounts of this, when engaged in a contest with sorcerers, the Buddha multiplied himself into other bodies, which sat or stood on lotus flowers.<ref>Krishan & Tadikonda, 67</ref> It became used for other Buddhist figures, and adopted for other Hindu deities than [[Laxmi]].
In early Buddhist art it may be intended to specifically depict the second of [[the Twin Miracle]]s in the legend of the Buddha's life. In some accounts of this, when engaged in a contest with sorcerers, the Buddha multiplied himself into other bodies, which sat or stood on lotus flowers.<ref>Krishan & Tadikonda, 67</ref> It became used for other Buddhist figures, and adopted for other Hindu deities than [[Laxmi|Lakshmi]].


==Form==
==Form==
The throne in art evolved to be rather distant from the actual plant. In historic sculpture there is very often a clear dividing line about halfway up; this type is called a "double-lotus" (''vishvapadma'') pedestal or throne.<ref>Lerner & Kossak, Nos. 68, 84, 88, 89, 92, 94, 97, 101 (for ''vishvapadma''), 110, 111, 113 etc.</ref> Most often petal shapes both rise and fall from the dividing line, but sometimes the upper part of the throne represents the prominent flat-topped seed head as a base for the figure, perhaps with circles for the holes holding the seeds, as in maturing lotus heads.<ref>Lerner & Kossak, Nos. 133, 139, 140; Hāṇḍā, Omacanda, ''Gaddi Land in Chamba: Its History, Art & Culture : New Light on the Early Wooden Temples'', 78–79, 2005, Indus Publishing, {{ISBN|8173871744}}, 9788173871740, [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=2EaFNQ7Zfl8C&pg=PA78 google books]</ref> The [[bingdi lotus]] is a particular strain with two back-to-back flowers on each stem, but it is not clear if this influenced the form in art. In [[East Asia]]n paintings, and also modern Hindu paintings, the lotus throne is often depicted more realistically in terms of its shape (though obviously not its size).
The throne in art evolved to be rather distant from the actual plant. In historic sculpture there is very often a clear dividing line about halfway up; this type is called a "double-lotus" (''vishvapadma'') pedestal or throne.<ref>Lerner & Kossak, Nos. 68, 84, 88, 89, 92, 94, 97, 101 (for ''vishvapadma''), 110, 111, 113 etc.</ref> Most often petal shapes both rise and fall from the dividing line, but sometimes the upper part of the throne represents the prominent flat-topped seed head as a base for the figure, perhaps with circles for the holes holding the seeds, as in maturing lotus heads.<ref>Lerner & Kossak, Nos. 133, 139, 140; Hāṇḍā, Omacanda, ''Gaddi Land in Chamba: Its History, Art & Culture : New Light on the Early Wooden Temples'', 78–79, 2005, Indus Publishing, {{ISBN|8173871744}}, 9788173871740, [https://books.google.com/books?id=2EaFNQ7Zfl8C&pg=PA78 google books]</ref>
The [[bingdi lotus]] is a particular strain with two back-to-back flowers on each stem, but it is not clear if this influenced the form in art. In [[East Asia]]n paintings, and also modern Hindu paintings, the lotus throne is often depicted more realistically in terms of its shape (not its size).


<gallery widths="200px" heights="200px">
<gallery widths="200px" heights="200px">
Line 29: Line 31:
File:Dinar of Chandragupta II LACMA M.77.55.20 (2 of 3) (cropped).jpg|Gold dinar coin of [[Chandragupta II]], reigned c. 375–c. 415 CE
File:Dinar of Chandragupta II LACMA M.77.55.20 (2 of 3) (cropped).jpg|Gold dinar coin of [[Chandragupta II]], reigned c. 375–c. 415 CE
File:Shiva as the Lord of Dance LACMA.jpg|Restrained double-lotus throne typical of [[Chola bronzes]], when they have them at all. Shiva [[Nataraja]], 10th century.
File:Shiva as the Lord of Dance LACMA.jpg|Restrained double-lotus throne typical of [[Chola bronzes]], when they have them at all. Shiva [[Nataraja]], 10th century.
File:The Hindu Goddess Parvati LACMA M.77.82 (3 of 12).jpg|Double-thrones under [[Parvati]], 11th century
File:Juntei Kannon.jpg|[[Guanyin]], 12th-century Japan
File:Juntei Kannon.jpg|[[Guanyin]], 12th-century Japan
File:Tibet, mahakala sotto l'aspetto di ye-shes mgon-po, xii sec.JPG|Apart from the three figures, the pendent foot of this 12th-century Tibetan [[Mahakala]] has its own throne
File:Tibet, mahakala sotto l'aspetto di ye-shes mgon-po, xii sec.JPG|Apart from the three figures, the pendent foot of this 12th-century Tibetan [[Mahakala]] has its own throne
Line 41: Line 42:
==Representing the whole plant==
==Representing the whole plant==
[[File:059 Queen Maya lustrated by Elephants (33364982300).jpg|thumb|The Buddha's mother, [[Maya (mother of the Buddha)|Queen Maya]], lustrated by elephants. [[Sanchi]], Stupa 3 gateway, probably 1st century CE]]
[[File:059 Queen Maya lustrated by Elephants (33364982300).jpg|thumb|The Buddha's mother, [[Maya (mother of the Buddha)|Queen Maya]], lustrated by elephants. [[Sanchi]], Stupa 3 gateway, probably 1st century CE]]
The vast majority of lotus thrones just depict an isolated flower, or a group of flowers under different figures. But some images depict more of the plant. A famous relief of [[Gaja-Laxmi]] in Cave 16 at [[Ellora Caves|Ellora]] shows a pond of lotus leaves and budding flowers as a vertical panel below the throne.<ref>Michell, 362</ref>
The vast majority of lotus thrones just depict an isolated flower or a group of flowers under different figures. But some images depict more of the plant. A famous relief of [[Gaja-Laxmi]] in Cave 16 at [[Ellora Caves|Ellora]] shows a pond of lotus leaves and budding flowers as a vertical panel below the throne.<ref>Michell, 362</ref>
[[File:Burma - Seated Buddha - 2011.149 - Cleveland Museum of Art (cropped).tif|thumb|Burmese wood and [[lacquer]] Buddha, 11th century]]
[[File:Burma - Seated Buddha - 2011.149 - Cleveland Museum of Art (cropped).tif|thumb|Burmese wood and [[lacquer]] Buddha, 11th century]]


Line 54: Line 55:
{{commons category}}
{{commons category}}
*[[Ananda Coomaraswamy|Coomaraswamy, Ananda]], ''Elements of Buddhist Iconography'', Harvard University Press, 1935, [https://archive.org/details/in.gov.ignca.13957/page/n31 online text]
*[[Ananda Coomaraswamy|Coomaraswamy, Ananda]], ''Elements of Buddhist Iconography'', Harvard University Press, 1935, [https://archive.org/details/in.gov.ignca.13957/page/n31 online text]
*Jansen, Eva Rudy, ''The Book of Hindu Imagery: The Gods and their Symbols'', 1993, Binkey Kok Publications, {{ISBN|9074597076}}, 9789074597074, [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=1iASyoae8cMC&pg=PA18 google books]
*Jansen, Eva Rudy, ''The Book of Hindu Imagery: The Gods and their Symbols'', 1993, Binkey Kok Publications, {{ISBN|9074597076}}, 9789074597074, [https://books.google.com/books?id=1iASyoae8cMC&pg=PA18 google books]
*Krishan, Yuvrajmm, Tadikonda, Kalpana K., ''The Buddha Image: Its Origin and Development'', 1996, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, {{ISBN|8121505658}}, 9788121505659, [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=kDyJh--iaL0C&pg=PA65 google books]
*Krishan, Yuvrajmm, Tadikonda, Kalpana K., ''The Buddha Image: Its Origin and Development'', 1996, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, {{ISBN|8121505658}}, 9788121505659, [https://books.google.com/books?id=kDyJh--iaL0C&pg=PA65 google books]
*Lerner, Martin and Kossak, Steven, ''The Lotus Transcendent: Indian and Southeast Asian Art from the Samuel Eilenberg Collection'', 1991, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, N.Y.), {{ISBN|0870996134}}, 9780870996139, [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KVoKd9vDSxsC&pg=PA185 google books]
*Lerner, Martin and Kossak, Steven, ''The Lotus Transcendent: Indian and Southeast Asian Art from the Samuel Eilenberg Collection'', 1991, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, N.Y.), {{ISBN|0870996134}}, 9780870996139, [https://books.google.com/books?id=KVoKd9vDSxsC&pg=PA185 google books]
*Michell, George (1990), ''The Penguin Guide to the Monuments of India, Volume 1: Buddhist, Jain, Hindu'', 1990, Penguin Books, {{ISBN|0140081445}}
*Michell, George (1990), ''The Penguin Guide to the Monuments of India, Volume 1: Buddhist, Jain, Hindu'', 1990, Penguin Books, {{ISBN|0140081445}}
*Moore, Albert C., Klein, Charlotte, ''Iconography of Religions: An Introduction'', 1977, Chris Robertson, {{ISBN|0800604881}}, 9780800604882, [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=chWcZcYcyeQC&pg=PA149 google books]
*Moore, Albert C., Klein, Charlotte, ''Iconography of Religions: An Introduction'', 1977, Chris Robertson, {{ISBN|0800604881}}, 9780800604882, [https://books.google.com/books?id=chWcZcYcyeQC&pg=PA149 google books]
*Pal, Pratapaditya, ''Indian Sculpture: Circa 500 B.C.-A.D. 700'', Volume 1 of ''Indian Sculpture: A Catalogue of the Los Angeles County Museum of Art Collection'', 1986, Los Angeles County Museum of Art/University of California Press, {{ISBN|0520059913}}, 9780520059917, [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=clUmKaWRFTkC&pg=PA41 google books]
*Pal, Pratapaditya, ''Indian Sculpture: Circa 500 B.C.-A.D. 700'', Volume 1 of ''Indian Sculpture: A Catalogue of the Los Angeles County Museum of Art Collection'', 1986, Los Angeles County Museum of Art/University of California Press, {{ISBN|0520059913}}, 9780520059917, [https://books.google.com/books?id=clUmKaWRFTkC&pg=PA41 google books]
*Rodrigues, H, [http://www.mahavidya.ca/2016/04/22/the-sacred-lotus-symbol/ "The Sacred Lotus Symbol"], ''Mahavidya'', 2016
*Rodrigues, H, [http://www.mahavidya.ca/2016/04/22/the-sacred-lotus-symbol/ "The Sacred Lotus Symbol"], ''Mahavidya'', 2016
*Walser, Joseph, ''Nagarjuna in Context: Mahayana Buddhism and Early Indian Culture'', 2005, Columbia University Press, {{ISBN|0231506236}}, 9780231506236, [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=PUmrdqQ8Vz8C&pg=PA80 google books]
*Walser, Joseph, ''Nagarjuna in Context: Mahayana Buddhism and Early Indian Culture'', 2005, Columbia University Press, {{ISBN|0231506236}}, 9780231506236, [https://books.google.com/books?id=PUmrdqQ8Vz8C&pg=PA80 google books]




Line 68: Line 69:
[[Category:Indian art]]
[[Category:Indian art]]
[[Category:Jain iconography]]
[[Category:Jain iconography]]
[[Category:Plants in art]]
[[Category:Flowers in religion]]

Latest revision as of 15:03, 6 November 2024

The three Buddha figures here each have a lotus throne. Pala dynasty, Eastern India, c. 1000.

The lotus throne, sometimes called lotus platform, is a stylized lotus flower used as the seat or base for a figure in art associated with Indian religions. It is the normal pedestal for divine figures in Buddhist art and Hindu art, and often seen in Jain art.[1] Originating in Indian art, it followed Indian religions to East Asia in particular.

Flower of nelumbo nucifera, the Indian lotus; its colour range is from white to red

The precise form varies, but is intended to represent the opening flower of Nelumbo nucifera, the Indian lotus. In the traditional biographies lotus flowers sprung up at the Buddha's first seven steps, and in some Buddhist legends the baby Padmasambhava emerged from a lotus flower. The Indian lotus is an aquatic plant similar to a water lily, though not actually any close relation. It has a large, round, and flat seed head in the centre of the flower, with initially small openings above each of the relatively small number of seeds. Among other unusual characteristics, nelumbo nucifera has particular properties of repelling water, known as the lotus effect or ultrahydrophobicity. Among other symbolic meanings, it rises above the water environment it lives in, and is not contaminated by it, so providing a model for Buddhists.[2] According to the Pali Canon, the Buddha himself began this often-repeated metaphor, in the Aṅguttara Nikāya, saying that the lotus flower raises from the muddy water unstained, as he raises from this world, free from the defilements taught in the sutra.[3]

In Sanskrit the throne is called either a padmāsana (Sanskrit: पद्मासन, [pɐdmaːsɐnɐ], āsana is the name for a seated position), which is also the name for the Lotus position in meditation and yoga, or padmapitha,[4] padma meaning lotus and pitha a base or plinth.[5]

History

[edit]

The earliest of the Vedas, the Rigveda, describes the other gods watching the birth of Agni, the god of fire, seated on lotus flowers; also the birth of Vasishtha.[6] In Hindu myth, the major deity Brahma emerged from a lotus growing from the navel of Vishnu.[7]

Double-thrones under Parvati, 11th century

In art the form is first seen as a base for rare early images of Laxmi from the 2nd century BCE; many or most of these may have a Buddhist context.[8] However it first becomes common with seated Buddha figures in the Greco-Buddhist art of Gandhara around the late 2nd or the 3rd century CE.[9] It may have reached the Deccan as early as the end of the 2nd century.[10] At some point, probably around 200, and before his death in about 250, the Buddhist thinker Nagarjuna exhorted an unknown Buddhist monarch, very probably in the Deccan, to:

... Please construct from all precious substances

Images of Buddha with fine proportions

Well designed and sitting on lotuses ...[11]

– suggesting this iconography was current by then. It is not clear from the language whether sculptures or paintings, or both, were meant.[12]

In early Buddhist art it may be intended to specifically depict the second of the Twin Miracles in the legend of the Buddha's life. In some accounts of this, when engaged in a contest with sorcerers, the Buddha multiplied himself into other bodies, which sat or stood on lotus flowers.[13] It became used for other Buddhist figures, and adopted for other Hindu deities than Lakshmi.

Form

[edit]

The throne in art evolved to be rather distant from the actual plant. In historic sculpture there is very often a clear dividing line about halfway up; this type is called a "double-lotus" (vishvapadma) pedestal or throne.[14] Most often petal shapes both rise and fall from the dividing line, but sometimes the upper part of the throne represents the prominent flat-topped seed head as a base for the figure, perhaps with circles for the holes holding the seeds, as in maturing lotus heads.[15]

The bingdi lotus is a particular strain with two back-to-back flowers on each stem, but it is not clear if this influenced the form in art. In East Asian paintings, and also modern Hindu paintings, the lotus throne is often depicted more realistically in terms of its shape (not its size).

Representing the whole plant

[edit]
The Buddha's mother, Queen Maya, lustrated by elephants. Sanchi, Stupa 3 gateway, probably 1st century CE

The vast majority of lotus thrones just depict an isolated flower or a group of flowers under different figures. But some images depict more of the plant. A famous relief of Gaja-Laxmi in Cave 16 at Ellora shows a pond of lotus leaves and budding flowers as a vertical panel below the throne.[17]

Burmese wood and lacquer Buddha, 11th century

Other compositions show stalks, buds and flowers reaching up beside a main figure.[18] These may terminate in a flower held by the main figure,[19] especially if it is Avalokitesvara or from the 5th or 6th century Vishnu, (both also having the epithet Padmapani, "lotus holder"),[20] or in another lotus throne behind the hand, if it is outstretched in a mudra. Alternatively, stalks may climb up to support lotus thrones underneath minor, smaller, figures, as in the early terracotta plaque illustrated above, where stalks rise at the side to support the elephants lustrating Gaja-Laxmi. This is seen in the 1st century BCE terracotta plaque illustrated above.[21] The Sanchi stone relief illustrated here shows a similar composition with Queen Maya, mother of the Buddha. Above or below the water, the stems may be supported by small naga figures.[22]

The lotus plant in lotus thrones is often imagined as growing out of the cosmic ocean, and a few images represent the plant below the water level, with a stem also representing the world axis.[23]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Pal, 39
  2. ^ Pal, 39–42; Coomaraswamy, 21; Krishan & Tadikonda, 65; Rodrigues
  3. ^ Pal, 39–40; Coomaraswamy, 21; the texts are: AN 10.81, "Bāhuna suttaṃ"; AN 4.36, "Doṇa suttaṃ".
  4. ^ Jansen, 18
  5. ^ Pal, 45
  6. ^ Coomaraswamy, 18–19; Pal, 40
  7. ^ Pal, 40
  8. ^ Coomaraswamy, 22; Krishan & Tadikonda, 78, note 89
  9. ^ Moore & Klein, 149; Krishan & Tadikonda, 65
  10. ^ Pal, 41; Walser, 80–87
  11. ^ Walser, 80, 86–87 for the date
  12. ^ Walser, 81–83
  13. ^ Krishan & Tadikonda, 67
  14. ^ Lerner & Kossak, Nos. 68, 84, 88, 89, 92, 94, 97, 101 (for vishvapadma), 110, 111, 113 etc.
  15. ^ Lerner & Kossak, Nos. 133, 139, 140; Hāṇḍā, Omacanda, Gaddi Land in Chamba: Its History, Art & Culture : New Light on the Early Wooden Temples, 78–79, 2005, Indus Publishing, ISBN 8173871744, 9788173871740, google books
  16. ^ Pal, 40
  17. ^ Michell, 362
  18. ^ Lerner & Kossak, Nos. 116, 117, 119
  19. ^ Pal, 39
  20. ^ Pal, 41
  21. ^ Pal, 40
  22. ^ Coomaraswamy, 53
  23. ^ Coomaraswamy, 20, 53–55

References

[edit]
  • Coomaraswamy, Ananda, Elements of Buddhist Iconography, Harvard University Press, 1935, online text
  • Jansen, Eva Rudy, The Book of Hindu Imagery: The Gods and their Symbols, 1993, Binkey Kok Publications, ISBN 9074597076, 9789074597074, google books
  • Krishan, Yuvrajmm, Tadikonda, Kalpana K., The Buddha Image: Its Origin and Development, 1996, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, ISBN 8121505658, 9788121505659, google books
  • Lerner, Martin and Kossak, Steven, The Lotus Transcendent: Indian and Southeast Asian Art from the Samuel Eilenberg Collection, 1991, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, N.Y.), ISBN 0870996134, 9780870996139, google books
  • Michell, George (1990), The Penguin Guide to the Monuments of India, Volume 1: Buddhist, Jain, Hindu, 1990, Penguin Books, ISBN 0140081445
  • Moore, Albert C., Klein, Charlotte, Iconography of Religions: An Introduction, 1977, Chris Robertson, ISBN 0800604881, 9780800604882, google books
  • Pal, Pratapaditya, Indian Sculpture: Circa 500 B.C.-A.D. 700, Volume 1 of Indian Sculpture: A Catalogue of the Los Angeles County Museum of Art Collection, 1986, Los Angeles County Museum of Art/University of California Press, ISBN 0520059913, 9780520059917, google books
  • Rodrigues, H, "The Sacred Lotus Symbol", Mahavidya, 2016
  • Walser, Joseph, Nagarjuna in Context: Mahayana Buddhism and Early Indian Culture, 2005, Columbia University Press, ISBN 0231506236, 9780231506236, google books