History of SpaceX: Difference between revisions
m Fixing broken anchor: Reminder of an inactive anchor: launch of Iridium satellites |
m Disambiguate Grasshopper (rocket) to SpaceX Grasshopper using popups |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Musk's personal ventures and founding == |
== Musk's personal ventures and founding == |
||
After being ousted as the CEO of [[PayPal]] in late 2000, [[Elon Musk]] started to gain an interest in [[space exploration]] ventures. This spark of interest, according to Musk, came when he is being asked by his friend entrepreneur [[Adeo Ressi]] about his plan for the future after PayPal. Musk looked up at [[NASA]]'s website and was surprised that NASA did not have any concrete plan for a [[human mission to Mars]].<ref name=":1">{{Cite book |last=Berger |first=Eric |title=Liftoff: Elon Musk and the Desperate Early Days That Launched SpaceX |date=March 2, 2021 |publisher=[[HarperCollins]] |isbn=978-0-06-297997-1 |edition= |location=New York, NY |author-link=Eric Berger (meteorologist)}}</ref>{{Rp|pages=9–10}} He then began to attend space conferences and provided funding for private space projects, which include [[The Planetary Society]]'s [[solar sail]] and the [[Ansari X Prize]] crewed spaceflight competition.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=10}} Musk also pledged US$100,000 to the [[Mars Society]] and was invited to be in its board of directors.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |date=2001-09-25 |title=MarsNow 1.9 Profile: Elon Musk, Life to Mars Foundation |url=https://spaceref.com/status-report/marsnow-19-profile-elon-musk-life-to-mars-foundation/ |access-date=2023-05-18 |website=SpaceRef |language=en-US}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite news |last=Vance |first=Ashlee |author-link=Ashlee Vance |date=May 14, 2015 |title=Elon Musk's Space Dream Almost Killed Tesla |work=Bloomberg.com |url=http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-elon-musk-spacex/ |access-date=2023-05-18 |archive-date=2015-05-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150516202413/http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-elon-musk-spacex/ |url-status=live }}</ref> As early as August 2001, in contemporary sources, Musk has publicly expressed his support for [[Space and survival|making humans an interplanetary species]] at the Mars Society's annual convention.<ref name=":4">{{Cite web |last=Cowing |first=Keith |date=2001-08-30 |title=Millionaires and billionaires: the secret to sending humans to Mars? |url=https://spaceref.com/uncategorized/millionaires-and-billionaires-the-secret-to-sending-humans-to-mars/ |access-date=2023-05-18 |website=SpaceRef |language=en-US |quote=}}</ref> The same month, Musk |
After being ousted as the CEO of [[PayPal]] in late 2000, [[Elon Musk]] started to gain an interest in [[space exploration]] ventures. This spark of interest, according to Musk, came when he is being asked by his friend entrepreneur [[Adeo Ressi]] about his plan for the future after PayPal. Musk looked up at [[NASA]]'s website and was surprised that NASA did not have any concrete plan for a [[human mission to Mars]].<ref name=":1">{{Cite book |last=Berger |first=Eric |title=Liftoff: Elon Musk and the Desperate Early Days That Launched SpaceX |date=March 2, 2021 |publisher=[[HarperCollins]] |isbn=978-0-06-297997-1 |edition= |location=New York, NY |author-link=Eric Berger (meteorologist)}}</ref>{{Rp|pages=9–10}} He then began to attend space conferences and provided funding for private space projects, which include [[The Planetary Society]]'s [[solar sail]] and the [[Ansari X Prize]] crewed spaceflight competition.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=10}} Musk also pledged US$100,000 to the [[Mars Society]] and was invited to be in its board of directors.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |date=2001-09-25 |title=MarsNow 1.9 Profile: Elon Musk, Life to Mars Foundation |url=https://spaceref.com/status-report/marsnow-19-profile-elon-musk-life-to-mars-foundation/ |access-date=2023-05-18 |website=SpaceRef |language=en-US}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite news |last=Vance |first=Ashlee |author-link=Ashlee Vance |date=May 14, 2015 |title=Elon Musk's Space Dream Almost Killed Tesla |work=Bloomberg.com |url=http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-elon-musk-spacex/ |access-date=2023-05-18 |archive-date=2015-05-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150516202413/http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-elon-musk-spacex/ |url-status=live }}</ref> As early as August 2001, in contemporary sources, Musk has publicly expressed his support for [[Space and survival|making humans an interplanetary species]] at the Mars Society's annual convention.<ref name=":4">{{Cite web |last=Cowing |first=Keith |date=2001-08-30 |title=Millionaires and billionaires: the secret to sending humans to Mars? |url=https://spaceref.com/uncategorized/millionaires-and-billionaires-the-secret-to-sending-humans-to-mars/ |access-date=2023-05-18 |website=SpaceRef |language=en-US |quote=}}</ref> The same month, Musk resigned from his position at Mars Society.<ref name=":2" /> |
||
According to [[Robert Zubrin]], Mars Society's founder, he provided Musk contact to aerospace engineer [[Jim Cantrell]] as a technical adviser for the society's [[Mars Gravity Biosatellite]] project.<ref name=":132">{{Cite book |last=Zubrin |first=Robert |title=The Case for Space: How the Revolution in Spaceflight Opens Up a Future of Limitless Possibility |date=14 May 2019 |publisher=[[Prometheus Books]] |isbn=978-1-63388-534-9 |location=Amherst, New York |oclc=1053572666 |author-link=Robert Zubrin}}</ref>{{Rp|pages=30–31}} From there, Musk, Cantrell, along with a few other engineers worked on Mars Oasis, a project that aimed to grow a plant in Martian soil as a publicity stunt for garnering interest to Mars missions.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=10}} Mars Oasis project is independent from the Mars Society.<ref name=":4" /> Musk and his team travelled twice to Russia, once in October 2001 and another in February 2002 with [[Michael D. Griffin]], to obtain a refurbished [[intercontinental ballistic missile]] to launch Mars Oasis. Both attempts failed – the missiles were outrageously priced by the [[ISC Kosmotras]] at $8 million per missile when queried,<ref name=":3" /> and the team was concerned that the price would go up even higher after the deal had been finalized.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=10}} Reportedly, this is because Musk and his team were not regarded highly by the Russians.<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=10}} |
According to [[Robert Zubrin]], Mars Society's founder, he provided Musk contact to aerospace engineer [[Jim Cantrell]] as a technical adviser for the society's [[Mars Gravity Biosatellite]] project.<ref name=":132">{{Cite book |last=Zubrin |first=Robert |title=The Case for Space: How the Revolution in Spaceflight Opens Up a Future of Limitless Possibility |date=14 May 2019 |publisher=[[Prometheus Books]] |isbn=978-1-63388-534-9 |location=Amherst, New York |oclc=1053572666 |author-link=Robert Zubrin}}</ref>{{Rp|pages=30–31}} From there, Musk, Cantrell, along with a few other engineers worked on Mars Oasis, a project that aimed to grow a plant in Martian soil as a publicity stunt for garnering interest to Mars missions.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=10}} Mars Oasis project is independent from the Mars Society.<ref name=":4" /> Musk and his team travelled twice to Russia, once in October 2001 and another in February 2002 with [[Michael D. Griffin]], to obtain a refurbished [[intercontinental ballistic missile]] to launch Mars Oasis. Both attempts failed – the missiles were outrageously priced by the [[ISC Kosmotras]] at $8 million per missile when queried,<ref name=":3" /> and the team was concerned that the price would go up even higher after the deal had been finalized.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=10}} Reportedly, this is because Musk and his team were not regarded highly by the Russians.<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=10}} |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Falcon 1 == |
== Falcon 1 == |
||
{{Main|Falcon 1}} |
{{Main|Falcon 1}} |
||
[[File:SpaceX falcon in warehouse.jpg|thumb|Construction of the Falcon 1]] |
[[File:SpaceX falcon in warehouse.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Construction of the Falcon 1]] |
||
Musk assumed the role of Chief Engineer, after having offered the title to Griffin who did not join SpaceX. Mueller was in charge of developing [[rocket engine]]s, propellant tanks and plumbing; Thompson was in charge of making the rocket's body and couplings. [[Hans Koenigsmann]], who was recommended by Thompson and had met Musk a few months earlier, joined SpaceX and was in charge of making the rocket's [[avionics]] (electronic systems).<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=13–15}} In August 2002, [[Gwynne Shotwell]] was hired as the head of sales for the company.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=16–17}} |
Musk assumed the role of Chief Engineer, after having offered the title to Griffin who did not join SpaceX. Mueller was in charge of developing [[rocket engine]]s, propellant tanks and plumbing; Thompson was in charge of making the rocket's body and couplings. [[Hans Koenigsmann]], who was recommended by Thompson and had met Musk a few months earlier, joined SpaceX and was in charge of making the rocket's [[avionics]] (electronic systems).<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=13–15}} In August 2002, [[Gwynne Shotwell]] was hired as the head of sales for the company.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=16–17}} |
||
At first, SpaceX's employees would meet at hotels in airports, but later the company headquartered at a building in 1310 East Grand Avenue, [[El Segundo, California]]. The building was {{Cvt|3000|ft2|m2}} |
At first, SpaceX's employees would meet at hotels in airports, but later the company headquartered at a building in 1310 East Grand Avenue, [[El Segundo, California]]. The building was {{Cvt|3000|ft2|m2}}, which at the time housed only a few [[cubicle]]s and fewer than a dozen employees.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=14–15}} The company at the time was under a [[flat hierarchy]], so employees (including Musk) could freely switch roles and do other person's tasks if needed. Musk personally interviewed the first three thousand employees, most were college graduates (because they do not have family attachments), and pushed them to work long hours at their highest effort.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=15, 19–20, 25}} |
||
SpaceX's first rocket was named Falcon 1 by Musk, taking inspiration from the ''[[Millennium Falcon]]'' from [[Star Wars]], and also because the rocket would have only one booster engine. Falcon 1 was designed with a core tenet of low launch cost; according to contemporary sources the rocket has an advertised price of $6 million per launch.<ref name=":0" /> This is the reason |
SpaceX's first rocket was named Falcon 1 by Musk, taking inspiration from the ''[[Millennium Falcon]]'' from [[Star Wars]], and also because the rocket would have only one booster engine. Falcon 1 was designed with a core tenet of low launch cost; according to contemporary sources the rocket has an advertised price of $6 million per launch.<ref name=":0" /> This is the reason SpaceX implemented tight [[vertical integration]] for manufacturing rocket parts.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=13–15}} Unlike most aerospace companies at the time, the Falcon 1 was developed in an [[Iterative and incremental development|iterative and incremental process]] instead of the [[waterfall process]].<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=23–25}} Musk was being extremely optimistic about the launch schedule; he wanted to launch Falcon 1 by the end of 2003, but late December 2005 would be when the rocket was first ready for flight.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=26}} A mockup for the rocket was first officially unveiled to the public and the government at the [[National Mall]], Washington, D.C. on 8 December 2003.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Foust |first=Jeff |date=December 8, 2003 |title=The Space Review: The Falcon and the showman (page 1) |url=https://www.thespacereview.com/article/70/1 |access-date=2023-05-21 |website=The Space Review |archive-date=2023-05-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230521142852/https://www.thespacereview.com/article/70/1 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
=== Merlin and Kestrel engine === |
=== Merlin and Kestrel engine === |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| image2 = SpaceX Kestrel engine2.gif |
| image2 = SpaceX Kestrel engine2.gif |
||
| footer = [[Computer-aided design|CAD]] models of Falcon 1 engines |
| footer = [[Computer-aided design|CAD]] models of Falcon 1 engines |
||
| total_width = |
| total_width = 270 |
||
| caption1 = Merlin |
| caption1 = Merlin |
||
| caption2 = Kestrel |
| caption2 = Kestrel |
||
}} |
}} |
||
The Falcon 1's first stage needed a rocket engine that produces about {{Cvt|70000|lbf||order=flip}} of [[thrust]] and |
The Falcon 1's first stage needed a rocket engine that produces about {{Cvt|70000|lbf||order=flip}} of [[thrust]] and used a [[kerosene]]–[[liquid oxygen]] propellant combination. However, because Mueller had little experience at building a [[turbopump]] for the engine, he initially outsourced the turbopump from NASA's [[Fastrac (rocket engine)|Fastrac engine]]. The one- or two-year long procurement process was too long for SpaceX, so the company contracted the manufacturer directly (named Barber-Nichols) to build Fastrac's turbopump. Later, a Barber-Nichols employee suggested that the engine should be named for a type of [[falcon]] bird, because the rocket itself is named 'Falcon 1'. Mueller called the first stage engine "[[Merlin (bird)|Merlin]]" after a medium-sized falcon and the second stage engine "[[Kestrel]]" after the small falcon.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=37–38}} |
||
SpaceX also needed a test site for the Merlin and Kestrel engines. In 2002, the company rented a space at the [[Mojave Air and Space Port]] to test the turbopumps, but soon SpaceX ran into issues with the testing facility: one time, black sooty clouds from the turbopump enveloped the [[air traffic control]] tower. A bigger and more lax testing facility was needed, especially because the Mojave Spaceport only allows testing of engines that have less than one-half the thrust of the Merlin engine. SpaceX finally |
SpaceX also needed a test site for the Merlin and Kestrel engines. In 2002, the company rented a space at the [[Mojave Air and Space Port]] to test the turbopumps, but soon SpaceX ran into issues with the testing facility: one time, black sooty clouds from the turbopump enveloped the [[air traffic control]] tower. A bigger and more lax testing facility was needed, especially because the Mojave Spaceport only allows testing of engines that have less than one-half the thrust of the Merlin engine. SpaceX finally chose a testing site at [[McGregor, Texas]] that was previously owned by the bankrupted [[Beal Aerospace]]. To save time, employees from the California headquarters would fly there on Musk's [[private jet]].<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=40, 44–46}} At 9:50 P.M., 11 March 2003, the Merlin engine completed its first ever full firing with a duration of about half a second,<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=27–28}} achieving a thrust of {{Cvt|60000|lbf||order=flip}} and 93% combustion efficiency.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2003-03-19 |title=SpaceX Performs First Rocket Engine Firing |url=https://spaceref.com/press-release/spacex-performs-first-rocket-engine-firing/ |access-date=2023-05-21 |website=SpaceRef |language=en-US}}</ref> |
||
=== Launch site preparations === |
=== Launch site preparations === |
||
[[File:Omelek Island.jpg|thumb| |
[[File:Omelek Island.jpg|thumb|upright=1.4|[[Omelek Island]], around 2005]] |
||
Initially, SpaceX planned to launch the Falcon 1 at [[Vandenberg Space Force Base|Vandenberg Air Force Base]] due to its close proximity to the company's headquarters. The [[Vandenberg Space Launch Complex 3]] was licensed to the company in early 2004, and SpaceX employees began the construction of supporting facilities around the launch complex. By early 2005, the first Falcon 1 arrived to the launch site via a [[flatbed truck]].<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=51-53}} In the first week of May 2005, SpaceX tried to perform its first static fire attempt, but after many aborts and recycling due to software |
Initially, SpaceX planned to launch the Falcon 1 at [[Vandenberg Space Force Base|Vandenberg Air Force Base]] due to its close proximity to the company's headquarters. The [[Vandenberg Space Launch Complex 3]] was licensed to the company in early 2004, and SpaceX employees began the construction of supporting facilities around the launch complex. By early 2005, the first Falcon 1 arrived to the launch site via a [[flatbed truck]].<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=51-53}} In the first week of May 2005, SpaceX tried to perform its first static fire attempt, but after many aborts and recycling due to software bugs and bad instruments, its liquid oxygen supply ran out and the test was cancelled for the day. The second static fire attempt a few weeks later, was also cancelled for the same reason, but the third static fire attempt on 27 May was a success.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=58–60}} |
||
However, since early 2003, when the [[Malaysia|Malaysian]] government contacted SpaceX for launching [[RazakSAT]] into a [[near-equatorial orbit]], SpaceX knew that Vandenberg was not an ideal launch site. To get to that orbit from California, the rocket needs to go east and into the continental United States, which is not allowed for safety. The then-current version of the Falcon 1 also |
However, since early 2003, when the [[Malaysia|Malaysian]] government contacted SpaceX for launching [[RazakSAT]] into a [[near-equatorial orbit]], SpaceX knew that Vandenberg was not an ideal launch site. To get to that orbit from California, the rocket needs to go east and into the continental United States, which is not allowed for safety. The then-current version of the Falcon 1 also needed to borrow velocity from the Earth's rotation to launch RazakSAT, meaning that a suitable launch site would be near the [[equator]]. So, after the deal was signed for $7 million, SpaceX selected [[Omelek Island]], [[Kwajalein Atoll]] as the place for launching the satellite.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=53–55,58}} Plans for launching Falcon 1 at Vandenburg were foiled when the Air Force kept delaying giving clearance for SpaceX's launch, citing the impending [[Titan IV]] launch of a [[reconnaissance satellite]]. SpaceX had to abandon $7 million worth of equipment at Vandenberg.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=61-62,66-67}} |
||
It was reasoned that waiting till the Titan IV launch or suing the Air Force would not be ideal for the company. In retrospect, Musk commented: "Technically, we weren't kicked out of Vandenberg, we were just put on ice. The Air Force never said no, but they never said yes. This went on for six months. The resources were draining out of the company. Effectively, it was just like being starved."<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=66|pages=}} |
It was reasoned that waiting till the Titan IV launch or suing the Air Force would not be ideal for the company. In retrospect, Musk commented: "Technically, we weren't kicked out of Vandenberg, we were just put on ice. The Air Force never said no, but they never said yes. This went on for six months. The resources were draining out of the company. Effectively, it was just like being starved."<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=66|pages=}} |
||
So, in June 2005, construction of the Omelek launch site begin. Aside from a small concrete bunker, everything else was brought in from mainland or built from scratch: concrete launch pad, rocket hangar, [[Electric generator|electric generators]], communications, etc. By September, most of the launch site was finished and more than {{Cvt|30|t|lb|abbr=}} of equipment were shipped by sea or air. The first stage of Falcon 1 came in September and the second stage came a month later; they were assembled and carried to the launch site using a wheeled [[Strongback (girder)|strongback]], rolling on top of pieces of plywood. One day before the first attempted Falcon 1 launch, due to frustration and intense pressure, the employees on Omelek went [[Strike action|on strike]]; this was quickly resolved by a [[Airdrop|supply drop]] of chicken wings and cigarettes.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=71-77}} |
So, in June 2005, construction of the Omelek launch site begin. Aside from a small concrete bunker, everything else was brought in from the mainland or built from scratch: concrete launch pad, rocket hangar, [[Electric generator|electric generators]], communications, etc. By September, most of the launch site was finished and more than {{Cvt|30|t|lb|abbr=}} of equipment were shipped by sea or air. The first stage of Falcon 1 came in September and the second stage came a month later; they were assembled and carried to the launch site using a wheeled [[Strongback (girder)|strongback]], rolling on top of pieces of plywood. One day before the first attempted Falcon 1 launch, due to frustration and intense pressure, the employees on Omelek went [[Strike action|on strike]]; this was quickly resolved by a [[Airdrop|supply drop]] of chicken wings and cigarettes.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=71-77}} |
||
=== First, second and third failed launches === |
=== First, second and third failed launches === |
||
[[File:Falcon 1 Prelaunch (67235805).jpg|thumb|Prelaunch preparation of the Falcon 1, on 26 November 2005]] |
[[File:Falcon 1 Prelaunch (67235805).jpg|thumb|Prelaunch preparation of the Falcon 1, on 26 November 2005]] |
||
Originally, [[TacSat-1]] was going to be the payload for the maiden Falcon 1 launch,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2004-08-16 |title=Falcon rocket rides slow road toward flight |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5725500 |access-date=2023-05-21 |website=NBC News |language=en |archive-date=2023-05-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230521142852/https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5725500 |url-status= |
Originally, [[TacSat-1]] was going to be the payload for the maiden Falcon 1 launch,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2004-08-16 |title=Falcon rocket rides slow road toward flight |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5725500 |access-date=2023-05-21 |website=NBC News |language=en |archive-date=2023-05-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230521142852/https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5725500 |url-status=dead }}</ref> but eventually the [[FalconSAT-2]] satellite from the [[United States Air Force Academy]] was chosen instead.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2006-03-24 |title=SpaceX rocket lost; was fuel leak to blame? |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna11997932 |access-date=2023-05-21 |website=NBC News |language=en |archive-date=2023-05-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230521142852/https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna11997932 |url-status=dead }}</ref> The static fire test before the launch on 26 November 2005<!-- Berger incorrectly said that the launch prep was on 27 November --> was postponed due to a helium and oxygen leak by a faulty valve, and the attempted launch on 20 December was also cancelled due to the bad weather. Thompson, who was supervising the launch, found that the Falcon 1 first stage had buckled and was mere seconds away from a violent [[Implosion (mechanical process)|implosion]]. This was again caused by a faulty valve that did not open during propellant detanking.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Falcon 1 maiden flight delayed again |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8487-falcon-1-maiden-flight-delayed-again/ |access-date=2023-05-21 |website=New Scientist |language=en-US |archive-date=2023-05-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230521142852/https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8487-falcon-1-maiden-flight-delayed-again/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=77-79}} |
||
The following year, a new first stage was shipped to Omelek. After the rocket was assembled, on February 6, the second stage's avionics [[Short circuit|short circuited]] and almost lead to the launch's months-long delay, if not for the quickly obtained [[capacitor]] from the mainland.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=82-84}} The maiden launch of Falcon 1 happened on 24 March 2006 at 22:30 UTC,<ref>{{Cite news |date=2006-03-24 |title=SpaceX rocket fails first flight |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4698736.stm |access-date=2023-05-21 |archive-date=2015-01-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150114042636/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4698736.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> which a fire damaged the rocket's pressurization system and cause the Merlin engine to flame off at T+29 seconds.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Malik |first=Tariq |date=2006-03-26 |title=Fuel Leak and Fire Led to Falcon 1 Rocket Failure, SpaceX Says |url=https://www.space.com/2200-fuel-leak-fire-led-falcon-1-rocket-failure-spacex.html |access-date=2023-05-21 |website=Space.com |language=en |archive-date=2023-05-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230521142853/https://www.space.com/2200-fuel-leak-fire-led-falcon-1-rocket-failure-spacex.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The next morning, SpaceX employees and civilians from the atoll cleaned up the rocket's debris and eventually found FalconSAT-2 lying inside a machine shop.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=89-90}} |
The following year, a new first stage was shipped to Omelek. After the rocket was assembled, on February 6, the second stage's avionics [[Short circuit|short circuited]] and almost lead to the launch's months-long delay, if not for the quickly obtained [[capacitor]] from the mainland.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=82-84}} The maiden launch of Falcon 1 happened on 24 March 2006 at 22:30 UTC,<ref>{{Cite news |date=2006-03-24 |title=SpaceX rocket fails first flight |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4698736.stm |access-date=2023-05-21 |archive-date=2015-01-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150114042636/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4698736.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> at which a fire damaged the rocket's pressurization system and cause the Merlin engine to flame off at T+29 seconds.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Malik |first=Tariq |date=2006-03-26 |title=Fuel Leak and Fire Led to Falcon 1 Rocket Failure, SpaceX Says |url=https://www.space.com/2200-fuel-leak-fire-led-falcon-1-rocket-failure-spacex.html |access-date=2023-05-21 |website=Space.com |language=en |archive-date=2023-05-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230521142853/https://www.space.com/2200-fuel-leak-fire-led-falcon-1-rocket-failure-spacex.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The next morning, SpaceX employees and civilians from the atoll cleaned up the rocket's debris and eventually found FalconSAT-2 lying inside a machine shop.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=89-90}} |
||
=== Fourth and fifth launches === |
|||
==Overview== |
==Overview== |
||
On August 4, 2008, SpaceX accepted a further $20 million investment from [[Founders Fund]].<ref>{{cite press release |first=Emily |last=Shanklin |publisher=SpaceX |url=http://spacex.com/press.php?page=47 |title=SpaceX receives $20 million investment from Founder's Fund |date=2008-08-04 |access-date=2008-08-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111104140811/http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=47 |url-status=dead |archive-date=2011-11-04 }}</ref> In early 2012, approximately two-thirds of the company was owned by its founder<ref>{{cite news|work=forbes.com|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/calebmelby/2012/03/12/how-elon-musk-became-a-billionaire-twice-over/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120313030030/http://www.forbes.com/sites/calebmelby/2012/03/12/how-elon-musk-became-a-billionaire-twice-over/|url-status=dead|archive-date=March 13, 2012|title=How Elon Musk Became A Billionaire Twice Over |date= 12 March 2012|first=Caleb|last=Melby}}</ref> and his 70 million shares were then estimated to be worth $875 million on [[Private equity|private markets]],<ref>{{cite web| publisher=businessweek.com |url=http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-10/elon-musk-anticipates-third-ipo-in-three-years-with-spacex.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120213021523/http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-10/elon-musk-anticipates-third-ipo-in-three-years-with-spacex.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=February 13, 2012|title=Elon Musk Anticipates Third IPO in Three Years With SpaceX |date=2012-02-10}}</ref> which roughly valued SpaceX at $1.3 billion as of February 2012.<ref>{{cite web |title=Elon Musk on Why SpaceX Has the Right Stuff to Win the Space Race |url=https://www.cnbc.com/ |
On August 4, 2008, SpaceX accepted a further $20 million investment from [[Founders Fund]].<ref>{{cite press release |first=Emily |last=Shanklin |publisher=SpaceX |url=http://spacex.com/press.php?page=47 |title=SpaceX receives $20 million investment from Founder's Fund |date=2008-08-04 |access-date=2008-08-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111104140811/http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=47 |url-status=dead |archive-date=2011-11-04 }}</ref> In early 2012, approximately two-thirds of the company was owned by its founder<ref>{{cite news|work=forbes.com|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/calebmelby/2012/03/12/how-elon-musk-became-a-billionaire-twice-over/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120313030030/http://www.forbes.com/sites/calebmelby/2012/03/12/how-elon-musk-became-a-billionaire-twice-over/|url-status=dead|archive-date=March 13, 2012|title=How Elon Musk Became A Billionaire Twice Over |date= 12 March 2012|first=Caleb|last=Melby}}</ref> and his 70 million shares were then estimated to be worth $875 million on [[Private equity|private markets]],<ref>{{cite web| publisher=businessweek.com |url=http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-10/elon-musk-anticipates-third-ipo-in-three-years-with-spacex.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120213021523/http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-10/elon-musk-anticipates-third-ipo-in-three-years-with-spacex.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=February 13, 2012|title=Elon Musk Anticipates Third IPO in Three Years With SpaceX |date=2012-02-10}}</ref> which roughly valued SpaceX at $1.3 billion as of February 2012.<ref>{{cite web |title=Elon Musk on Why SpaceX Has the Right Stuff to Win the Space Race |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2012/04/27/elon-musk-on-why-spacex-has-the-right-stuff-to-win-the-space-race.html |publisher=[[CNBC]] |date=27 Apr 2012 |access-date=9 September 2017 |archive-date=16 December 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161216213440/http://www.cnbc.com/id/47207833 |url-status=live }}</ref> After the [[Dragon C2+|COTS 2+]] flight in May 2012, the company private equity valuation nearly doubled to $2.4 billion.<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Privco|title={{Sic|hide=y|Privately|-}}held SpaceX Worth Nearly $2.4 Billion or $20/Share, Double Its Pre-Mission Secondary Market Value Following Historic Success at the International Space Station|url=http://www.privco.com/privately-held-spacex-worth-nearly-5-billion-or-20-share-double-its-pre-mission-secondary-market-pricing-following-historic-success-at-the-international-space-station|date=June 7, 2012|access-date=March 2, 2017|archive-date=August 6, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170806214559/http://www.privco.com/privately-held-spacex-worth-nearly-5-billion-or-20-share-double-its-pre-mission-secondary-market-pricing-following-historic-success-at-the-international-space-station|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|publisher=[[VentureBeat]]|url=https://venturebeat.com/2012/06/07/privco-spacexs-worth-skyrockets-to-4-8-billion-after-successful-mission/|title=SpaceX's worth skyrockets to $4.8B after successful mission|date=2012-06-10|access-date=2017-08-31|archive-date=2016-03-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306125528/http://venturebeat.com/2012/06/07/privco-spacexs-worth-skyrockets-to-4-8-billion-after-successful-mission/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
On 16 June 2009 SpaceX announced the opening of its Astronaut Safety and Mission Assurance Department. It hired former [[NASA]] astronaut [[Ken Bowersox]] to oversee the department as a vice president of the company.<ref>{{cite press release|title=Former astronaut Bowersox joins SpaceX as Vice President of Astronaut Safety and Mission Assurance|date=2009-06-16|publisher=SpaceX|url=http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=20090618|access-date=2009-07-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120118115539/http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=20090618|archive-date=2012-01-18|url-status=dead}}</ref> However, it has since been reported that the former astronaut subsequently left SpaceX in late 2011. No reason was given and no replacement in that position |
On 16 June 2009, SpaceX announced the opening of its Astronaut Safety and Mission Assurance Department. It hired former [[NASA]] astronaut [[Ken Bowersox]] to oversee the department as a vice president of the company.<ref>{{cite press release|title=Former astronaut Bowersox joins SpaceX as Vice President of Astronaut Safety and Mission Assurance|date=2009-06-16|publisher=SpaceX|url=http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=20090618|access-date=2009-07-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120118115539/http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=20090618|archive-date=2012-01-18|url-status=dead}}</ref> However, it has since been reported that the former astronaut subsequently left SpaceX in late 2011. No reason was given and no replacement in that position was announced.<ref name=Bowersox>{{Cite news|first=Dan|last=Leone|title=SpaceX Safety VP Quit Late Last Year|url=http://www.spacenews.com/venture_space/120118-spacex-safety-quit.html|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130202235754/http://www.spacenews.com/venture_space/120118-spacex-safety-quit.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=February 2, 2013|date=2012-01-18|access-date=2012-10-24}}</ref> |
||
In 2012 SpaceX advertised a launch price of $57 million on Falcon 9, while Arianespace was advertising a launch price of $137 million per launch.<ref name=Sharma>{{cite web|url=http://www.investopedia.com/news/how-spacex-reinvented-rocket-launch-industry/|title=How SpaceX Reinvented the Rocket Launch Industry|first=Rakesh|last=Sharma|date=February 26, 2017|access-date=March 2, 2017|archive-date=March 28, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230328113613/https://www.investopedia.com/news/how-spacex-reinvented-rocket-launch-industry/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
In 2012, SpaceX advertised a launch price of $57 million on Falcon 9, while Arianespace was advertising a launch price of $137 million per launch.<ref name=Sharma>{{cite web|url=http://www.investopedia.com/news/how-spacex-reinvented-rocket-launch-industry/|title=How SpaceX Reinvented the Rocket Launch Industry|first=Rakesh|last=Sharma|date=February 26, 2017|access-date=March 2, 2017|archive-date=March 28, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230328113613/https://www.investopedia.com/news/how-spacex-reinvented-rocket-launch-industry/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
In 2012 an [[initial public offering]] (IPO) was perceived as possible by the end of 2013,<ref>{{cite news|publisher=[[Bloomberg L.P.|Bloomberg]]|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-09/musk-sees-good-chance-of-spacex-stock-offering-by-next-year.html|title=Elon Musk Anticipates Third IPO in Three Years With SpaceX|date=2012-02-11|access-date=2017-03-07}}</ref> but then Musk stated in June 2013 that he planned to hold off any potential IPO until after the "[[Mars Colonial Transporter]] is flying regularly",<ref name="forbes20130606">{{cite news |last=Schaefer |first=Steve |title=SpaceX IPO Cleared For Launch? Elon Musk Says Hold Your Horses |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveschaefer/2013/06/06/with-tesla-and-solarcity-soaring-elon-musk-talks-down-spacex-ipo-plans/ |access-date=2013-06-10 |newspaper=Forbes |date=2013-06-06 |archive-date=2023-11-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231128153220/https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveschaefer/2013/06/06/with-tesla-and-solarcity-soaring-elon-musk-talks-down-spacex-ipo-plans/?sh=5aaf6eef59ad |url-status=live }}</ref> and this was reiterated in 2015 indicating that it would be many years before SpaceX would become a publicly traded company,<ref name=sn20150119>{{cite news | |
In 2012, an [[initial public offering]] (IPO) was perceived as possible by the end of 2013,<ref>{{cite news|publisher=[[Bloomberg L.P.|Bloomberg]]|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-09/musk-sees-good-chance-of-spacex-stock-offering-by-next-year.html|title=Elon Musk Anticipates Third IPO in Three Years With SpaceX|date=2012-02-11|access-date=2017-03-07}}</ref> but then Musk stated in June 2013 that he planned to hold off any potential IPO until after the "[[Mars Colonial Transporter]] is flying regularly",<ref name="forbes20130606">{{cite news |last=Schaefer |first=Steve |title=SpaceX IPO Cleared For Launch? Elon Musk Says Hold Your Horses |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveschaefer/2013/06/06/with-tesla-and-solarcity-soaring-elon-musk-talks-down-spacex-ipo-plans/ |access-date=2013-06-10 |newspaper=Forbes |date=2013-06-06 |archive-date=2023-11-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231128153220/https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveschaefer/2013/06/06/with-tesla-and-solarcity-soaring-elon-musk-talks-down-spacex-ipo-plans/?sh=5aaf6eef59ad |url-status=live }}</ref> and this was reiterated in 2015 indicating that it would be many years before SpaceX would become a publicly traded company,<ref name="sn20150119">{{cite news |author=de Selding |first=Peter B. |date=19 January 2015 |title=SpaceX To Build 4,000 Broadband Satellites in Seattle |url=http://spacenews.com/spacex-opening-seattle-plant-to-build-4000-broadband-satellites/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20150119210849/http://spacenews.com/spacex-opening-seattle-plant-to-build-4000-broadband-satellites/ |archive-date=19 January 2015 |access-date=2 March 2017 |publisher=SpaceNews.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=Woodyard |first=Chris |date=9 June 2015 |title=Elon Musk: SpaceX goes public when Mars flights begin |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2015/06/09/elon-musk-mars-spacex/28768361/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170223230305/http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2015/06/09/elon-musk-mars-spacex/28768361/ |archive-date=23 February 2017 |access-date=29 August 2017 |work=USA TODAY}}</ref> where Musk stated that "I just don't want [SpaceX] to be controlled by some [[private equity firm]] that would milk it for near-term revenue."<ref>{{cite web |author=Andersen |first=Ross |date=September 30, 2014 |title=Elon Musk puts his case for a multi-planet civilisat... |url=http://aeon.co/magazine/technology/the-elon-musk-interview-on-mars/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150612073942/http://aeon.co/magazine/technology/the-elon-musk-interview-on-mars/ |archive-date=June 12, 2015 |access-date=March 2, 2017 |work=Aeon}}</ref> The Mars Colonial Transporter project later evolved into the [[Interplanetary Transport System]],<ref name="Berger 2016"/> then the [[Big Falcon Rocket]],<ref name="Musk address at 68th International Astronautical Congress"/> and finally the [[SpaceX Starship]],<ref name="Boyle 2018"/> whose full stack was [[SpaceX Starship orbital test flight|first tested]] in 2023.<ref name="Davenport 2023">{{cite news | last=Davenport | first=Christian | title=Unmanned Starship explodes over gulf after liftoff | newspaper=Washington Post | date=April 20, 2023 | url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/04/20/starship-spacex-test-launch/ | access-date=April 22, 2023 | archive-date=April 20, 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230420153340/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/04/20/starship-spacex-test-launch/ | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Amos 2023"/><ref name="Amos 2021"/><ref name="SpaceX Starship test official site">{{cite web| title=SpaceX Starship first test flight official site| website=SpaceX| url=https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=starship-flight-test| date=April 22, 2023| access-date=April 22, 2023| archive-date=April 19, 2023| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230419182009/https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=starship-flight-test| url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
[[File:Falcon 9 Flight 20 OG2 first stage post-landing (23273082823) cropped.jpg|thumb|Falcon 9 rocket's first stage on the landing pad after the first successful vertical landing of an orbital rocket stage.]] |
[[File:Falcon 9 Flight 20 OG2 first stage post-landing (23273082823) cropped.jpg|thumb|Falcon 9 rocket's first stage on the landing pad after the first successful vertical landing of an orbital rocket stage.]] |
||
[[File:CRS-8 (26239020092).jpg|thumb|Falcon 9 first stage on an ASDS barge after the first successful landing at sea.]] |
[[File:CRS-8 (26239020092).jpg|thumb|Falcon 9 first stage on an ASDS barge after the first successful landing at sea.]] |
||
The company has grown rapidly since it was founded, growing from 160 employees in November 2005 to more than 500 by July 2008, to over 1,100 in 2010,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/497/1|title=Big plans for SpaceX|first=Jeff|last=Foust|date=2005-11-14|publisher=The Space Review|access-date=2017-03-02|archive-date=2005-11-24|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051124153155/http://www.thespacereview.com/article/497/1|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="MU">{{cite press release|date=2008-07-10|url=http://www.californiaspaceauthority.org/html/government_pages/pr080714-1.html|title=Diane Murphy joins SpaceX as Vice President of Marketing and Communications|publisher=SpaceX|url-status = dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100713163321/http://www.californiaspaceauthority.org/html/government_pages/pr080714-1.html|archive-date=2010-07-13}}</ref> 1,800 in early 2012,<ref name="sx20120521">{{cite news | first=W. | last=Hennigan | title=SpaceX Again Ready to Blast off After Last-second Launch Abort | url=http://www.spacex.com/company.php | publisher=MSNBC | date=2012-05-21 | access-date=2012-05-22 | archive-date=2013-04-25 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130425020246/http://www.spacex.com/company.php | url-status=dead }}</ref> |
The company has grown rapidly since it was founded, growing from 160 employees in November 2005 to more than 500 by July 2008, to over 1,100 in 2010,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/497/1|title=Big plans for SpaceX|first=Jeff|last=Foust|date=2005-11-14|publisher=The Space Review|access-date=2017-03-02|archive-date=2005-11-24|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051124153155/http://www.thespacereview.com/article/497/1|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="MU">{{cite press release|date=2008-07-10|url=http://www.californiaspaceauthority.org/html/government_pages/pr080714-1.html|title=Diane Murphy joins SpaceX as Vice President of Marketing and Communications|publisher=SpaceX|url-status = dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100713163321/http://www.californiaspaceauthority.org/html/government_pages/pr080714-1.html|archive-date=2010-07-13}}</ref> 1,800 in early 2012,<ref name="sx20120521">{{cite news | first=W. | last=Hennigan | title=SpaceX Again Ready to Blast off After Last-second Launch Abort | url=http://www.spacex.com/company.php | publisher=MSNBC | date=2012-05-21 | access-date=2012-05-22 | archive-date=2013-04-25 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130425020246/http://www.spacex.com/company.php | url-status=dead }}</ref> and 3,000 by early 2013.<ref name="nasa20130225">{{cite web |title=CRS-2 Press Kit |url=http://www.spacex.com/downloads/crs2-press-kit.pdf |publisher=NASA |date=25 February 2013 |access-date=25 February 2013 |url-status = dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130304132339/http://www.spacex.com/downloads/crs2-press-kit.pdf |archive-date=4 March 2013 }}</ref> The company had grown to 3,800 employees and contractors by October 2013,<ref name="pa20131016">{{cite news |last=Messier |first=Doug |title=ISPCS Morning Session: Gwynne Shotwell of SpaceX |url=http://www.parabolicarc.com/2013/10/16/ispcs-morning-session-gwynne-shotwell-spacex/ |date=16 October 2013 |access-date=7 December 2013 |quote=Gwynne Shotwell says that SpaceX is now up to about 3,800 employees, counting contractors working for the company. ... 600 more people to hire in next couple months. Finding good software people the hardest skills to fill. |archive-date=21 October 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131021205910/http://www.parabolicarc.com/2013/10/16/ispcs-morning-session-gwynne-shotwell-spacex/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> and had "nearly 5,000" in late 2015<ref name=st20151107>[http://www.seattletimes.com/business/spacexs-redmond-effort-very-speculative/ SpaceX's Redmond effort ‘very speculative’ ] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170216164420/http://www.seattletimes.com/business/spacexs-redmond-effort-very-speculative/ |date=2017-02-16 }} November 7, 2015, accessed 2016-02-04</ref> and February 2016.<ref name=shotwell20160203>{{cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cT7_iySwP8%3Ft%3D9000 |title=Gwynne Shotwell comments at Commercial Space Transportation Conference |publisher=Commercial Spaceflight |first=Gwynne |last=Shotwell |time=2:43:15–3:10:05 |date=3 February 2016 |access-date=4 February 2016 |archive-date=30 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200530094402/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cT7_iySwP8 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
and 3,000 by early 2013.<ref name="nasa20130225">{{cite web |title=CRS-2 Press Kit |url=http://www.spacex.com/downloads/crs2-press-kit.pdf |publisher=NASA |date=25 February 2013 |access-date=25 February 2013 |url-status = dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130304132339/http://www.spacex.com/downloads/crs2-press-kit.pdf |archive-date=4 March 2013 }}</ref> The company had grown to 3,800 employees and contractors by October 2013,<ref name="pa20131016">{{cite news |last=Messier |first=Doug |title=ISPCS Morning Session: Gwynne Shotwell of SpaceX |url=http://www.parabolicarc.com/2013/10/16/ispcs-morning-session-gwynne-shotwell-spacex/ |date=16 October 2013 |access-date=7 December 2013 |quote=Gwynne Shotwell says that SpaceX is now up to about 3,800 employees, counting contractors working for the company. ... 600 more people to hire in next couple months. Finding good software people the hardest skills to fill. |archive-date=21 October 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131021205910/http://www.parabolicarc.com/2013/10/16/ispcs-morning-session-gwynne-shotwell-spacex/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> and had "nearly 5,000" in late 2015<ref name=st20151107>[http://www.seattletimes.com/business/spacexs-redmond-effort-very-speculative/ SpaceX's Redmond effort ‘very speculative’ ] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170216164420/http://www.seattletimes.com/business/spacexs-redmond-effort-very-speculative/ |date=2017-02-16 }} November 7, 2015, accessed 2016-02-04</ref> and February 2016.<ref name=shotwell20160203>{{cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cT7_iySwP8%3Ft%3D9000 |title=Gwynne Shotwell comments at Commercial Space Transportation Conference |publisher=Commercial Spaceflight |first=Gwynne |last=Shotwell |time=2:43:15–3:10:05 |date=3 February 2016 |access-date=4 February 2016 |archive-date=30 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200530094402/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cT7_iySwP8 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
After the setback of |
After the setback of a [[Cape Canaveral Space Launch Complex 40#Accidents and incidents|launchpad explosion]], SpaceX got back to flying on 14 January 2017, with its [[List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches (2010–2019)#F9-029|launch of Iridium satellites]].<ref name="plarson">{{cite web |last=Larson |first=P. |date=September 1, 2016 |title=Anomaly Updates |url=http://www.spacex.com/news/2016/09/01/anomaly-updates |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170216160231/http://www.spacex.com/news/2016/09/01/anomaly-updates |archive-date=February 16, 2017 |access-date=March 2, 2017}}</ref> On February 19, 2017, a Falcon 9 carrying [[SpaceX CRS-10|CRS-10]] conducted the first launch from Kennedy Space Center's [[Launch Complex 39]]A.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/news/spacex-launches-falcon-9-from-historic-nasa-pad/|title=SpaceX launches Falcon 9 from historic NASA pad|access-date=2017-02-21|language=en|archive-date=2023-02-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230205153001/https://www.cbsnews.com/news/spacex-launches-falcon-9-from-historic-nasa-pad/|url-status=live}}</ref> The first stage of the launch was planned for the end of February 2017, was to be the recovered and refurbished one from April 8, 2016.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYFcpgX-afU%3Ft%3D54|title=Tesla Time News 20|date=2017-01-24|publisher=Now You Know|access-date=2017-03-02|archive-date=2023-02-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230205153004/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYFcpgX-afU%3Ft%3D54|url-status=live}}</ref>{{update after|2018|3|31}} |
||
On May 23, 2019, SpaceX |
On May 23, 2019, SpaceX deployed the first 60 of around 12,000 satellites in its planned [[Starlink]] satellite system<ref>{{Citation |
||
| last = Roulette |
| last = Roulette |
||
| first = Joey |
| first = Joey |
||
Line 82: | Line 79: | ||
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20201117160230/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-space-exploration-spacex/spacex-launches-first-satellites-for-musks-starlink-internet-service-idUSKCN1SU07Y |
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20201117160230/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-space-exploration-spacex/spacex-launches-first-satellites-for-musks-starlink-internet-service-idUSKCN1SU07Y |
||
| url-status = live |
| url-status = live |
||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> – which it aimed to use to provide low latency network communications via a large constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO).<ref>{{cite news |last1=Grush |first1=Loren |title=SpaceX is about to launch two of its space Internet satellites — the first of nearly 12,000 |url=https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/15/17016208/spacex-falcon-9-launch-starlink-microsat-2a-2b-paz-watch-live |access-date=16 February 2018 |work=The Verge |date=15 February 2018 |archive-date=16 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190616184857/https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/15/17016208/spacex-falcon-9-launch-starlink-microsat-2a-2b-paz-watch-live |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
On May 30, 2020, SpaceX |
On May 30, 2020, SpaceX launched two NASA astronauts ([[Douglas Hurley]] and [[Robert Behnken]]) into orbit on a [[Crew Dragon]] spacecraft during [[SpaceX Demo-2]], making SpaceX the first private company to send astronauts to the [[International Space Station]] (ISS) and marking the first crewed launch from American soil in 9 years.<ref name="NYT-20200530">{{cite news |last=Chang |first=Kenneth |title=SpaceX Lifts NASA Astronauts to Orbit, Launching New Era of Spaceflight - The trip to the space station was the first from American soil since 2011 when the space shuttles were retired. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/30/science/spacex-nasa-astronauts.html |date=May 30, 2020 |work=[[the New York Times]] |access-date=May 31, 2020 |archive-date=August 10, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200810172446/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/30/science/spacex-nasa-astronauts.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="CNN-20200530">{{cite news |last=Wattles |first=Jackie |title=SpaceX Falcon 9 launches two NASA astronauts into the space CNN news |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/30/tech/spacex-nasa-launch-astronauts-scn/index.html |date=May 30, 2020 |work=[[CNN News]] |access-date=May 31, 2020 |archive-date=May 31, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200531001954/https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/30/tech/spacex-nasa-launch-astronauts-scn/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The mission launched from [[Launch Complex 39A]] of the Kennedy Space Center in Florida.<ref>{{Cite web|title=SpaceX-NASA Dragon Demo-2 launch: All your questions answered|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-why-crew-dragon-demo-2-mission-nasa-spacex-is-important-and-how-it-will-take-place-6434723/|website=indianexpress.com|date=2 June 2020|language=en-US|access-date=2020-06-02|archive-date=2020-06-03|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200603035924/https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-why-crew-dragon-demo-2-mission-nasa-spacex-is-important-and-how-it-will-take-place-6434723/|url-status=live}}</ref> SpaceX Demo-2 successfully docked with the [[ISS]] on May 31, 2020<ref>{{Cite web|title=Crew Dragon docks with ISS|url=https://spacenews.com/crew-dragon-docks-with-iss-2/|website=spacenews.com|date=31 May 2020|language=en-US|access-date=2020-06-02}}</ref> and returned the astronauts safely on Aug 2, 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|title=SpaceX splashdown smoothly delivers NASA astronauts back to Earth|url=https://www.cnet.com/news/spacex-splashdown-smoothly-delivers-nasa-astronauts-back-to-earth/|website=cnet.com|language=en-US|access-date=2020-06-02}}</ref> |
||
==Goals== |
==Goals== |
||
[[File:KSC-20190624-PH_KLS01_0056.jpg|thumb|The third Falcon Heavy awaiting launch at Kennedy Space Center, June 2019]] |
[[File:KSC-20190624-PH_KLS01_0056.jpg|thumb|The third Falcon Heavy awaiting launch at Kennedy Space Center, June 2019]] |
||
Musk has stated that one of his goals is to improve the cost and reliability of access to [[outer space|space]], ultimately by a factor of ten.<ref>{{cite web|title=Space Exploration Technologies Corporation – press|url=http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=20100616|work=spacex.com|publisher=SpaceX|access-date=15 Dec 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130623215759/http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=20100616|archive-date=23 June 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref> In 2004 the company plans called for "development of a heavy lift product and even a super-heavy, if there is customer demand", with each size increase resulting in a significant decrease in cost per pound to orbit. Musk said: "I believe $500 per pound ($1,100/kg) or less is very achievable."<ref>{{cite web|publisher=SpaceX|url=http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=10|title=Elon Musk — Senate Testimony, 5 May 2004|date=2004-05-04|access-date=2008-08-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080830032226/http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=10|archive-date=30 August 2008|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
Musk has stated that one of his goals is to improve the cost and reliability of access to [[outer space|space]], ultimately by a factor of ten.<ref>{{cite web|title=Space Exploration Technologies Corporation – press|url=http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=20100616|work=spacex.com|publisher=SpaceX|access-date=15 Dec 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130623215759/http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=20100616|archive-date=23 June 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref> In 2004, the company plans called for "development of a heavy lift product and even a super-heavy, if there is customer demand", with each size increase resulting in a significant decrease in cost per pound to orbit. Musk said: "I believe $500 per pound ($1,100/kg) or less is very achievable."<ref>{{cite web|publisher=SpaceX|url=http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=10|title=Elon Musk — Senate Testimony, 5 May 2004|date=2004-05-04|access-date=2008-08-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080830032226/http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=10|archive-date=30 August 2008|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
A major goal of SpaceX has been to develop a [[SpaceX reusable launch system development program|rapidly reusable launch system]]. {{as of|2013|03}}, including a test program of the low-altitude, low-speed [[ |
A major goal of SpaceX has been to develop a [[SpaceX reusable launch system development program|rapidly reusable launch system]]. {{as of|2013|03}}, including a test program of the low-altitude, low-speed [[SpaceX Grasshopper|Grasshopper]] [[VTVL|vertical takeoff, vertical landing]] (VTVL) technology demonstrator rocket,<ref name=satspot20110926>{{cite news |last=Mohney |first=Doug |title=SpaceX Plans to Test Reusable Suborbital VTVL Rocket in Texas |url=http://satellite.tmcnet.com/topics/satellite/articles/222324-spacex-plans-test-reusable-suborbital-vtvl-rocket-texas.htm |access-date=2011-11-23 |newspaper=Satellite Spotlight |date=2011-09-26 |archive-date=2016-08-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160804024136/http://satellite.tmcnet.com/topics/satellite/articles/222324-spacex-plans-test-reusable-suborbital-vtvl-rocket-texas.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=sfn20120709>{{cite news |title=Reusable rocket prototype almost ready for first liftoff |url=http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1207/10grasshopper/ |access-date=2012-07-13 |newspaper=Spaceflight Now |date=2012-07-09 |quote=SpaceX has constructed a half-acre concrete launch facility in McGregor, and the Grasshopper rocket is already standing on the pad, outfitted with four insect-like silver landing legs. |archive-date=2013-05-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130521132738/http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1207/10grasshopper/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=msnbc20110927>{{cite news |last=Klotz |first=Irene |title=A rocket that lifts off — and lands — on launch pad |url=http://satellite.tmcnet.com/topics/satellite/articles/222324-spacex-plans-test-reusable-suborbital-vtvl-rocket-texas.htm |access-date=2011-11-23 |newspaper=MSNBC |date=2011-09-27 |archive-date=2016-08-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160804024136/http://satellite.tmcnet.com/topics/satellite/articles/222324-spacex-plans-test-reusable-suborbital-vtvl-rocket-texas.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> and a high-altitude, high-speed [[Falcon 9]] post-mission booster return test campaign where—beginning in mid-2013, with the sixth overall flight of Falcon 9—every [[first stage (rocketry)|first stage]] will be instrumented and equipped as a controlled descent test vehicle to accomplish [[Flight test|propulsive-return over-water tests]].<ref name=nsw20130328>{{cite news |last=Lindsey |first=Clark |title=SpaceX moving quickly towards fly-back first stage |url=http://www.newspacewatch.com/articles/spacex-moving-quickly-towards-fly-back-first-stage.html |access-date=2013-03-29 |newspaper=NewSpace Watch |date=2013-03-28 |url-access=subscription |archive-date=2013-04-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130416030256/http://www.newspacewatch.com/articles/spacex-moving-quickly-towards-fly-back-first-stage.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> SpaceX COO [[Gwynne Shotwell]] said at the Singapore Satellite Industry Forum in summer 2013 "If we get this [reusable technology] right, and we're trying very hard to get this right, we're looking at launches to be in the {{USD|5 to 7 million}} range, which would really change things dramatically."<ref name=ps20140114>{{cite news |last=Messier |first=Doug |title=Shotwell: Reusable Falcon 9 Would Cost $5 to $7 Million Per Launch |url=http://www.parabolicarc.com/2014/01/14/shotwell/ |access-date=2014-01-15 |newspaper=Parabolic Arc |date=2014-01-14 |archive-date=2017-02-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170216044345/http://www.parabolicarc.com/2014/01/14/shotwell/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> |
||
Musk stated in a 2011 interview that he hopes to send humans to Mars' surface within 10–20 years.<ref name="Musk Interview 20110422">{{cite news|title=Elon Musk: I'll Put a Man on Mars in 10 Years |url=http://www.marketwatch.com/video/asset/elon-musk-ill-put-a-man-on-mars-in-10-years-2011-04-22/CCF1FC62-BB0D-4561-938C-DF0DEFAD15BA#!CCF1FC62-BB0D-4561-938C-DF0DEFAD15BA |newspaper=Market Watch |date=2011-04-22 |publisher=The Wall Street Journal |location=New York |access-date=2011-12-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110902234053/http://www.marketwatch.com/video/asset/elon-musk-ill-put-a-man-on-mars-in-10-years-2011-04-22/CCF1FC62-BB0D-4561-938C-DF0DEFAD15BA |url-status = live|archive-date=2011-09-02 }}</ref> In 2010, Musk's calculations convinced him that the colonization of Mars was possible.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/news/elon-musk-on-mars-its-a-fixer-upper-of-a-planet/|title=Elon Musk on Mars: "It's a fixer-upper of a planet"|website=[[CBS News]]|date=September 21, 2012|access-date=March 2, 2017|archive-date=February 18, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170218203837/http://www.cbsnews.com/news/elon-musk-on-mars-its-a-fixer-upper-of-a-planet/|url-status=live}}</ref> In June 2013, Musk used the descriptor [[Mars Colonial Transporter]] to refer to the [[private capital|privately funded]] [[New product development|development project]] to design and build a spaceflight system of [[rocket engine]]s, [[launch vehicle]]s and [[space capsule]]s to [[space transport|transport]] [[human spaceflight|humans]] to Mars and return to [[Earth]].<ref name=forbes20130606/> In March 2014, COO [[Gwynne Shotwell]] said that once the Falcon Heavy and Dragon 2 crew version are flying, the focus for the company engineering team will be on developing the technology to support the transport infrastructure necessary for Mars missions.<ref name=tss20140321>{{cite AV media|people=Gwynne Shotwell |date=2014-03-21 |title=Broadcast 2212: Special Edition, interview with Gwynne Shotwell |medium=audio file |url=http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/2212-BWB-2014-03-21.mp3 |access-date=2014-03-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140322013556/http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/2212-BWB-2014-03-21.mp3 |archive-date=2014-03-22 |format=mp3 |time=41:20–42 |publisher=The Space Show |id=2212 |url-status = dead}}</ref> The project evolved into the [[Interplanetary Transport System]],<ref name="Berger 2016">{{cite web | last=Berger | first=Eric | title=Elon Musk scales up his ambitions, considering going "well beyond" Mars | website=Ars Technica | date=September 18, 2016 | url=https://arstechnica.com/science/2016/09/spacexs-interplanetary-transport-system-will-go-well-beyond-mars/ | access-date=April 22, 2023 | archive-date=September 20, 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160920000810/http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/09/spacexs-interplanetary-transport-system-will-go-well-beyond-mars/ | url-status=live }}</ref> then the [[Big Falcon Rocket]],<ref name="Musk address at 68th International Astronautical Congress">{{cite web | title=Making Life Multiplanetary | website=YouTube | url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdUX3ypDVwI | access-date=April 22, 2023 | archive-date=August 19, 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210819035735/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdUX3ypDVwI | url-status=live }}</ref> and finally the [[SpaceX Starship]].<ref name="Boyle 2018">{{cite web | last=Boyle | first=Alan | title=Goodbye, BFR … hello, Starship: Elon Musk gives a classic name to his Mars spaceship | website=GeekWire | date=November 20, 2018 | url=https://www.geekwire.com/2018/goodbye-bfr-hello-starship-elon-musk-gives-classic-name-mars-spaceship/ | access-date=April 22, 2023 | archive-date=November 22, 2018 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181122215524/https://www.geekwire.com/2018/goodbye-bfr-hello-starship-elon-musk-gives-classic-name-mars-spaceship/ | url-status=live }}</ref> |
Musk stated in a 2011 interview, that he hopes to send humans to Mars' surface within 10–20 years.<ref name="Musk Interview 20110422">{{cite news|title=Elon Musk: I'll Put a Man on Mars in 10 Years |url=http://www.marketwatch.com/video/asset/elon-musk-ill-put-a-man-on-mars-in-10-years-2011-04-22/CCF1FC62-BB0D-4561-938C-DF0DEFAD15BA#!CCF1FC62-BB0D-4561-938C-DF0DEFAD15BA |newspaper=Market Watch |date=2011-04-22 |publisher=The Wall Street Journal |location=New York |access-date=2011-12-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110902234053/http://www.marketwatch.com/video/asset/elon-musk-ill-put-a-man-on-mars-in-10-years-2011-04-22/CCF1FC62-BB0D-4561-938C-DF0DEFAD15BA |url-status = live|archive-date=2011-09-02 }}</ref> In 2010, Musk's calculations convinced him that the colonization of Mars was possible.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/news/elon-musk-on-mars-its-a-fixer-upper-of-a-planet/|title=Elon Musk on Mars: "It's a fixer-upper of a planet"|website=[[CBS News]]|date=September 21, 2012|access-date=March 2, 2017|archive-date=February 18, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170218203837/http://www.cbsnews.com/news/elon-musk-on-mars-its-a-fixer-upper-of-a-planet/|url-status=live}}</ref> In June 2013, Musk used the descriptor [[Mars Colonial Transporter]] to refer to the [[private capital|privately funded]] [[New product development|development project]] to design and build a spaceflight system of [[rocket engine]]s, [[launch vehicle]]s and [[space capsule]]s to [[space transport|transport]] [[human spaceflight|humans]] to Mars and return to [[Earth]].<ref name=forbes20130606/> In March 2014, COO [[Gwynne Shotwell]] said that once the Falcon Heavy and Dragon 2 crew version are flying, the focus for the company engineering team will be on developing the technology to support the transport infrastructure necessary for Mars missions.<ref name=tss20140321>{{cite AV media|people=Gwynne Shotwell |date=2014-03-21 |title=Broadcast 2212: Special Edition, interview with Gwynne Shotwell |medium=audio file |url=http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/2212-BWB-2014-03-21.mp3 |access-date=2014-03-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140322013556/http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/2212-BWB-2014-03-21.mp3 |archive-date=2014-03-22 |format=mp3 |time=41:20–42 |publisher=The Space Show |id=2212 |url-status = dead}}</ref> The project evolved into the [[Interplanetary Transport System]],<ref name="Berger 2016">{{cite web | last=Berger | first=Eric | title=Elon Musk scales up his ambitions, considering going "well beyond" Mars | website=Ars Technica | date=September 18, 2016 | url=https://arstechnica.com/science/2016/09/spacexs-interplanetary-transport-system-will-go-well-beyond-mars/ | access-date=April 22, 2023 | archive-date=September 20, 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160920000810/http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/09/spacexs-interplanetary-transport-system-will-go-well-beyond-mars/ | url-status=live }}</ref> then the [[Big Falcon Rocket]],<ref name="Musk address at 68th International Astronautical Congress">{{cite web | title=Making Life Multiplanetary | website=YouTube | url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdUX3ypDVwI | access-date=April 22, 2023 | archive-date=August 19, 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210819035735/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdUX3ypDVwI | url-status=live }}</ref> and finally the [[SpaceX Starship]].<ref name="Boyle 2018">{{cite web | last=Boyle | first=Alan | title=Goodbye, BFR … hello, Starship: Elon Musk gives a classic name to his Mars spaceship | website=GeekWire | date=November 20, 2018 | url=https://www.geekwire.com/2018/goodbye-bfr-hello-starship-elon-musk-gives-classic-name-mars-spaceship/ | access-date=April 22, 2023 | archive-date=November 22, 2018 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181122215524/https://www.geekwire.com/2018/goodbye-bfr-hello-starship-elon-musk-gives-classic-name-mars-spaceship/ | url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
In August 2020, SpaceX indicated it was looking to build a resort in South Texas with the intent to turn "Boca Chica into a '21st century Spaceport{{'}}".<ref>{{cite news |url=https://techcrunch.com/2020/08/10/spacex-reveals-plans-for-a-texas-spaceport-resort-in-new-job-ad/ |title=SpaceX reveals plans for a Texas spaceport resort in new job ad |work=TechCrunch |date=10 August 2020 |access-date=11 August 2020 |archive-date=11 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200811071827/https://techcrunch.com/2020/08/10/spacex-reveals-plans-for-a-texas-spaceport-resort-in-new-job-ad/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>[https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-spaceport-resort-developer-texas-rocket-factory-job-opening/ SpaceX is hiring a Spaceport resort developer for its Texas rocket factory] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230509142826/https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-spaceport-resort-developer-texas-rocket-factory-job-opening/ |date=2023-05-09 }}, Teslarati, 11 August 2020.</ref> |
In August 2020, SpaceX indicated it was looking to build a resort in South Texas with the intent to turn "Boca Chica into a '21st century Spaceport{{'}}".<ref>{{cite news |url=https://techcrunch.com/2020/08/10/spacex-reveals-plans-for-a-texas-spaceport-resort-in-new-job-ad/ |title=SpaceX reveals plans for a Texas spaceport resort in new job ad |work=TechCrunch |date=10 August 2020 |access-date=11 August 2020 |archive-date=11 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200811071827/https://techcrunch.com/2020/08/10/spacex-reveals-plans-for-a-texas-spaceport-resort-in-new-job-ad/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>[https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-spaceport-resort-developer-texas-rocket-factory-job-opening/ SpaceX is hiring a Spaceport resort developer for its Texas rocket factory] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230509142826/https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-spaceport-resort-developer-texas-rocket-factory-job-opening/ |date=2023-05-09 }}, Teslarati, 11 August 2020.</ref> |
||
Line 99: | Line 96: | ||
== Achievements == |
== Achievements == |
||
Major achievements of SpaceX include:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.yaabot.com/8479/rise-rise-spacex/ |
Major achievements of SpaceX include:<ref>{{cite web |author=Hussain |first=Mir Juned |date=12 November 2014 |title=The Rise and Rise of SpaceX |url=http://www.yaabot.com/8479/rise-rise-spacex/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170130032130/http://www.yaabot.com/8479/rise-rise-spacex/ |archive-date=30 January 2017 |access-date=2 March 2017 |work=Yaabot}}</ref> |
||
* The first privately funded, liquid-fueled rocket (Falcon 1) to reach orbit (28 September 2008) |
* The first privately funded, liquid-fueled rocket (Falcon 1) to reach orbit (28 September 2008) |
||
* The first privately funded company to successfully launch (by Falcon 9), orbit and recover a spacecraft (Dragon) (9 December 2010) |
* The first privately funded company to successfully launch (by Falcon 9), orbit and recover a spacecraft (Dragon) (9 December 2010) |
||
Line 116: | Line 113: | ||
On March 1, 2013, a [[SpaceX Dragon|Dragon spacecraft]] in [[orbit]] developed problems with its thrusters. Due to blocked fuel valves, the craft was unable to properly control itself. SpaceX engineers were able to remotely clear the blockages. Because of this, it arrived at the [[International Space Station]] one day later than expected. Since spacecraft like the Dragon were classified as [[munitions]], and considered weapons under [[International Traffic in Arms Regulations|arms regulations]] until November 2014, SpaceX Mission controllers were unable to release more information to the public.<ref>"Spacex Gagged By Arms Rule." ''New Scientist'' 217.2907 (2013): 4–5. ''Academic Search Complete''. Web. 4 Nov. 2015.</ref> |
On March 1, 2013, a [[SpaceX Dragon|Dragon spacecraft]] in [[orbit]] developed problems with its thrusters. Due to blocked fuel valves, the craft was unable to properly control itself. SpaceX engineers were able to remotely clear the blockages. Because of this, it arrived at the [[International Space Station]] one day later than expected. Since spacecraft like the Dragon were classified as [[munitions]], and considered weapons under [[International Traffic in Arms Regulations|arms regulations]] until November 2014, SpaceX Mission controllers were unable to release more information to the public.<ref>"Spacex Gagged By Arms Rule." ''New Scientist'' 217.2907 (2013): 4–5. ''Academic Search Complete''. Web. 4 Nov. 2015.</ref> |
||
On June 28, 2015 [[SpaceX CRS-7|CRS-7]] launched a [[Falcon 9]] carrying an unmanned [[SpaceX Dragon|Dragon]] capsule intended to take supplies to the International Space Station. 2 minutes and 19 seconds into the flight a cloud of vapor was seen by the tracking camera forming outside the craft. A few seconds afterward there was a loss of pressure in the [[helium]] tank, after which they exploded, causing a complete failure of the mission.<ref>"CRS-7 Investigation Update". SpaceX. 20 July 2015. Retrieved 11 November 2015.</ref> The [[software]] was not programmed to deploy the parachute for the [[SpaceX Dragon|Dragon]] capsule after a launch mishap, therefore the Dragon broke upon impact.<ref name="Stephen Clark for spaceflightnow.com">{{Cite web|url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2015/07/20/support-strut-probable-cause-of-falcon-9-failure/ |
On June 28, 2015 [[SpaceX CRS-7|CRS-7]] launched a [[Falcon 9]] carrying an unmanned [[SpaceX Dragon|Dragon]] capsule intended to take supplies to the International Space Station. 2 minutes and 19 seconds into the flight a cloud of vapor was seen by the tracking camera forming outside the craft. A few seconds afterward there was a loss of pressure in the [[helium]] tank, after which they exploded, causing a complete failure of the mission.<ref>"CRS-7 Investigation Update". SpaceX. 20 July 2015. Retrieved 11 November 2015.</ref> The [[software]] was not programmed to deploy the parachute for the [[SpaceX Dragon|Dragon]] capsule after a launch mishap, therefore the Dragon broke upon impact.<ref name="Stephen Clark for spaceflightnow.com">{{Cite web |author=Clark |first=Stephen |date=July 20, 2015 |title=Support strut probable cause of Falcon 9 failure |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2015/07/20/support-strut-probable-cause-of-falcon-9-failure/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170217222505/http://spaceflightnow.com/2015/07/20/support-strut-probable-cause-of-falcon-9-failure/ |archive-date=February 17, 2017 |access-date=April 14, 2016 |website=spaceflightnow.com}}</ref> The problem was discovered to be a failed 2 ft (61 cm) steel strut, purchased from a supplier, on a helium [[pressure vessel]], which broke due to the force of acceleration. This caused a breach and allowed helium to escape causing the loss of the spacecraft, which exploded.<ref>{{cite news |author=Masunaga |first=Samantha |last2=Petersen |first2=Melody |date=September 2, 2016 |title=SpaceX rocket exploded. Establishing the cause involved analyzing a large amount of data |url=http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-spacex-investigation-20160902-snap-story.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170219040426/http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-spacex-investigation-20160902-snap-story.html |archive-date=19 February 2017 |access-date=1 March 2017 |newspaper=LA Times}}</ref> The software issue was also fixed; in addition, an analysis of the entire program was carried out in order to ensure proper abort mechanisms are in place for future rockets and their payload.<ref>Nasr, Reem. "Musk: This Is What Caused the SpaceX Launch Failure."'' CNBC''. Consumer News and Business Channel, 20 July 2015. Web. Retrieved 4 November 2015.</ref> SpaceX President [[Gwynne Shotwell]] stated that in terms of the differences between the six previous successful [[Falcon 9]] [[Commercial Resupply Services|Commercial Resupply]] Launches, "there's nothing that stands out as being different for any particular flight." Though the craft was set to bring a resupply of food and water to the [[International Space Station|ISS]], the crew members had enough supplies to last another 4 months before another resupply, which would end up being the Russian Progress 60P vehicle.<ref>Calandrelli, Emily. "Understanding The Aftermath Of SpaceX's Failed Falcon Launch." ''TechCrunch''. 29 June 2015. Web. 4 Nov. 2015.</ref> Student science experiments, as well as a [[International Docking Adapter|docking adapter]] and other miscellaneous cargo, were lost due to the [[SpaceX CRS-7|CRS-7]] failure as well.<ref>''SpaceX CRS-7''. Orlando: NASA, June 2015. PDF.</ref> |
||
On September 1, 2016, a Falcon 9 Full Thrust launch vehicle exploded during a propellant fill operation for a standard pre-launch [[Wet dress rehearsal|static fire test]] at [[Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Space Launch Complex 40|Cape Canaveral Launch Complex 40]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/771395212304277504|title=SpaceX on Twitter: Update on this morning's anomaly|website=twitter.com|access-date=2016-09-01|archive-date=2017-01-31|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170131062926/https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/771395212304277504|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://techcrunch.com/timeline/the-top-15-events-that-happened-in-space-in-2016/slide/10/|title=The top 15 events that happened in space in 2016|date=16 December 2016|publisher=TechCrunch|access-date=2016-12-16|vauthors=Calandrelli E, Escher A|archive-date=2016-12-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161220172657/https://techcrunch.com/timeline/the-top-15-events-that-happened-in-space-in-2016/slide/10/|url-status=dead}}</ref> There were no reported injuries, as the area was cleared for the test. However the payload, the [[Spacecom]] [[AMOS-6]] communications satellite valued at $200 million, was destroyed.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/space/go-for-launch/os-spacex-spacecom-answers-20160906-story.html |title=SpaceX customer vows to rebuild satellite in explosion aftermath |date=September 6, 2016 |author=Marco Santana |publisher=Orlando Sentinel |access-date=1 March 2017 |archive-date=16 February 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170216160435/http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/space/go-for-launch/os-spacex-spacecom-answers-20160906-story.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Spacecom claims its contract, since the launch failed, allows it to choose to receive $50 million or a future flight at no cost.<ref>{{cite news|title=Spacecom to claim AMOS 6 compensation from IAI|url=http://www.globes.co.il/en/article-spacecom-to-claim-compensation-for-amos-6-from-iai-1001149933|first=Nitzan|last=Cohen|date=September 4, 2016|publisher=[[Globes (newspaper)|Globes]]|access-date=March 2, 2017|archive-date=September 5, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160905130757/http://www.globes.co.il/en/article-spacecom-to-claim-compensation-for-amos-6-from-iai-1001149933|url-status=live}}</ref> Musk described the event as the "most difficult and complex failure" |
On September 1, 2016, a Falcon 9 Full Thrust launch vehicle exploded during a propellant fill operation for a standard pre-launch [[Wet dress rehearsal|static fire test]] at [[Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Space Launch Complex 40|Cape Canaveral Launch Complex 40]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/771395212304277504|title=SpaceX on Twitter: Update on this morning's anomaly|website=twitter.com|access-date=2016-09-01|archive-date=2017-01-31|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170131062926/https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/771395212304277504|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://techcrunch.com/timeline/the-top-15-events-that-happened-in-space-in-2016/slide/10/|title=The top 15 events that happened in space in 2016|date=16 December 2016|publisher=TechCrunch|access-date=2016-12-16|vauthors=Calandrelli E, Escher A|archive-date=2016-12-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161220172657/https://techcrunch.com/timeline/the-top-15-events-that-happened-in-space-in-2016/slide/10/|url-status=dead}}</ref> There were no reported injuries, as the area was cleared for the test. However the payload, the [[Spacecom]] [[AMOS-6]] communications satellite valued at $200 million, was destroyed.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/space/go-for-launch/os-spacex-spacecom-answers-20160906-story.html |title=SpaceX customer vows to rebuild satellite in explosion aftermath |date=September 6, 2016 |author=Marco Santana |publisher=Orlando Sentinel |access-date=1 March 2017 |archive-date=16 February 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170216160435/http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/space/go-for-launch/os-spacex-spacecom-answers-20160906-story.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Spacecom claims its contract, since the launch failed, allows it to choose to receive $50 million or a future flight at no cost.<ref>{{cite news|title=Spacecom to claim AMOS 6 compensation from IAI|url=http://www.globes.co.il/en/article-spacecom-to-claim-compensation-for-amos-6-from-iai-1001149933|first=Nitzan|last=Cohen|date=September 4, 2016|publisher=[[Globes (newspaper)|Globes]]|access-date=March 2, 2017|archive-date=September 5, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160905130757/http://www.globes.co.il/en/article-spacecom-to-claim-compensation-for-amos-6-from-iai-1001149933|url-status=live}}</ref> Musk described the event as the "most difficult and complex failure" in SpaceX's 14-year history; SpaceX reviewed nearly 3,000 channels of telemetry and video data covering a period of 35–55 milliseconds for the postmortem.<ref>{{cite news |author=Masunaga |first=Samantha |date=September 9, 2016 |title=Elon Musk: Launch pad explosion is 'most difficult and complex' failure in SpaceX's 14 years |url=http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-spacex-investigation-20160909-snap-story.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170216212623/http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-spacex-investigation-20160909-snap-story.html |archive-date=16 February 2017 |access-date=1 March 2017 |newspaper=LA Times}}</ref> In late September, SpaceX stated that interim results suggested that a major breach of the cryogenic helium system of the second stage rocket had occurred.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://techcrunch.com/2016/09/23/spacex-investigation-suggests-helium-breach-caused-its-falcon-9-explosion/|title=SpaceX investigation suggests helium breach caused its Falcon 9 explosion|last=Etherington|first=Darrell|website=TechCrunch|date=23 September 2016|access-date=2016-09-26|archive-date=2016-09-26|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160926194820/https://techcrunch.com/2016/09/23/spacex-investigation-suggests-helium-breach-caused-its-falcon-9-explosion/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-23/spacex-says-it-will-return-to-rocket-flight-as-early-as-november|title=SpaceX Sees Clue to Rocket Blast in Super-Chilled Helium Breach|last=Hull|first=Dana|date=2016-09-23|newspaper=Bloomberg.com|access-date=2016-09-26|archive-date=2016-09-26|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160926075250/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-23/spacex-says-it-will-return-to-rocket-flight-as-early-as-november|url-status=live}}</ref> In November 2016, Musk reported the explosion was caused by the liquid oxygen used as the oxidizer turning so cold that it became a solid, and it may have breached the helium pressure vessels which are immersed in liquid oxygen. The vessels are [[Composite overwrapped pressure vessel|overwrapped with a carbon composite material]]. The solid oxygen, under pressure, could have ignited with the carbon material causing the explosion.<ref name=verge-sept-explod-cause>[https://www.theverge.com/2016/11/5/13533900/elon-musk-spacex-falcon-9-failure-cause-solved Elon Musk says SpaceX finally knows what caused the latest rocket failure] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170219013804/http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/5/13533900/elon-musk-spacex-falcon-9-failure-cause-solved |date=2017-02-19 }} The Verge, November 7, 2016</ref> SpaceX concluded its investigation on 2 January 2017, then restarted its business of launching rockets in January 2017.<ref name="plarson"/> |
||
On April 20, 2023, the [[SpaceX Starship orbital test flight]] ended in failure, and the rocket's flight termination system was activated four minutes into the flight.<ref name="SpaceX Starship test official site"/><ref name="Davenport 2023"/> |
On April 20, 2023, the [[SpaceX Starship orbital test flight]] ended in failure, and the rocket's flight termination system was activated four minutes into the flight.<ref name="SpaceX Starship test official site"/><ref name="Davenport 2023"/> |
||
Line 126: | Line 123: | ||
==Funding== |
==Funding== |
||
SpaceX is privately funded.<ref name=st20130301/> SpaceX developed its first launch vehicle—[[Falcon 1]]—and three [[rocket engine]]s—[[Merlin (rocket engine)|Merlin]], [[Kestrel (rocket engine)|Kestrel]], and [[Draco (rocket engine)|Draco]]—completely with [[private capital]]. SpaceX contracted with the [[Federal government of the United States|US government]] for a portion of the development funding for the [[Falcon 9]] launch vehicle, which uses a modified version of the [[Merlin 1C|Merlin rocket engine]].<ref name="st20130301">{{cite news |last=Engel|first=Max |title=Launch Market on Cusp of Change |url=http://www.satellitetoday.com/via/satellitegetspersonal/Launch-Market-on-Cusp-of-Change_40648.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130218050904/http://www.satellitetoday.com/via/satellitegetspersonal/Launch-Market-on-Cusp-of-Change_40648.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=2013-02-18 |access-date=2013-02-15 |newspaper=Satellite Today |date=2013-03-01<!-- this is the PUBLICATION date of the newsstand issue; it came online on the internet by 15 Feb, but its stated date is 1 March 2013 --> |quote=SpaceX is not the first private company to try to break through the commercial space launch market. The company, however, appears to be the real thing. Privately funded, it had a vehicle before it got money from NASA, and while NASA's space station resupply funds are a tremendous boost, SpaceX would have existed without it. }}</ref> SpaceX |
SpaceX is privately funded.<ref name=st20130301/> SpaceX developed its first launch vehicle—[[Falcon 1]]—and three [[rocket engine]]s—[[Merlin (rocket engine)|Merlin]], [[Kestrel (rocket engine)|Kestrel]], and [[Draco (rocket engine)|Draco]]—completely with [[private capital]]. SpaceX contracted with the [[Federal government of the United States|US government]] for a portion of the development funding for the [[Falcon 9]] launch vehicle, which uses a modified version of the [[Merlin 1C|Merlin rocket engine]].<ref name="st20130301">{{cite news |last=Engel|first=Max |title=Launch Market on Cusp of Change |url=http://www.satellitetoday.com/via/satellitegetspersonal/Launch-Market-on-Cusp-of-Change_40648.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130218050904/http://www.satellitetoday.com/via/satellitegetspersonal/Launch-Market-on-Cusp-of-Change_40648.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=2013-02-18 |access-date=2013-02-15 |newspaper=Satellite Today |date=2013-03-01<!-- this is the PUBLICATION date of the newsstand issue; it came online on the internet by 15 Feb, but its stated date is 1 March 2013 --> |quote=SpaceX is not the first private company to try to break through the commercial space launch market. The company, however, appears to be the real thing. Privately funded, it had a vehicle before it got money from NASA, and while NASA's space station resupply funds are a tremendous boost, SpaceX would have existed without it. }}</ref> SpaceX developed the [[Falcon Heavy]] launch vehicle,<ref name="tsr20140310">{{cite journal |last=Boozer |first=R. D. |date=2014-03-10 |title=Rocket reusability: a driver of economic growth |url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2466/1 |url-status=live |journal=The Space Review |volume=2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150406202450/http://thespacereview.com/article/2466/1 |archive-date=2015-04-06 |access-date=2014-03-25}}</ref> the [[Raptor (rocket engine family)|Raptor methane-fueled rocket engine]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=47400|title=SpaceX Prepared Testimony by Jeffrey Thornburg|website=spaceref.com|date=26 June 2015|access-date=2 March 2017|archive-date=19 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230319120440/https://spaceref.com/status-report/spacex-prepared-testimony-by-jeffrey-thornburg/|url-status=dead}}</ref> and a set of [[SpaceX reusable launch system development program|reusable launch vehicle technologies]] with private capital.<ref name="AtlanticCouncil20140604">{{cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYocHwhfFDc |title=Discussion with Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO, SpaceX |publisher=Atlantic Council |first=Gwynne |last=Shotwell |time=22:35–26:20 |date=June 4, 2014 |access-date=June 9, 2014 |quote=''This technology element [reusable launch vehicle technology] all this innovation is being done by SpaceX alone, no one is paying us to do it. The government is very interested in the data we are collecting on this test series. ... This is the kind of thing that entrepreneurial investment and new entrants/innovators can do for an industry: fund their own improvements, both in the quality of their programs and the quality of their hardware, and the speed and cadence of their operations.'' |archive-date=January 25, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170125082949/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYocHwhfFDc |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
{{as of|2012|05}}, SpaceX had operated on total funding of approximately $1 billion in its first ten years of operation. Of this, private equity provided about $200M, with Musk investing approximately $100M and other investors having put in about $100M ([[Founders Fund]], [[Draper Fisher Jurvetson]], ...).<ref>{{cite web|title=SpaceX overview on secondmarket |publisher=[[SecondMarket]] |url=https://www.secondmarket.com/company/spacex |archive-url=https://archive.today/20121217191301/https://www.secondmarket.com/company/spacex |url-status = dead|archive-date=2012-12-17 }}</ref> The remainder has come from progress payments on long-term launch contracts and development contracts. {{as of|2012|04}}, NASA had put in about $ |
{{as of|2012|05}}, SpaceX had operated on total funding of approximately $1 billion in its first ten years of operation. Of this, private equity provided about $200M, with Musk investing approximately $100M and other investors having put in about $100M ([[Founders Fund]], [[Draper Fisher Jurvetson]], ...).<ref>{{cite web|title=SpaceX overview on secondmarket |publisher=[[SecondMarket]] |url=https://www.secondmarket.com/company/spacex |archive-url=https://archive.today/20121217191301/https://www.secondmarket.com/company/spacex |url-status = dead|archive-date=2012-12-17 }}</ref> The remainder has come from progress payments on long-term launch contracts and development contracts. {{as of|2012|04}}, NASA had put in about $400–500 million of this amount, with most of that as progress payments on launch contracts.<ref name=cnbc20120427/> By May 2012, SpaceX had contracts for 40 launch missions, and each of those contracts provide down payments at contract signing, plus many are paying progress payments as launch vehicle components are built in advance of mission launch, driven in part by United States accounting rules for [[Revenue recognition#Long-term contracts|recognizing long-term revenue]].<ref name=cnbc20120427>{{cite news |last=Watts |first=Jane |title=Elon Musk on Why SpaceX Has the Right Stuff to Win the Space Race |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2012/04/27/elon-musk-on-why-spacex-has-the-right-stuff-to-win-the-space-race.html |access-date=2012-05-03 |newspaper=CNBC |date=2012-04-27 |archive-date=2016-12-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161216213440/http://www.cnbc.com/id/47207833 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
In August 2012, SpaceX signed a large development contract with NASA to design and develop a crew-carrying [[space capsule]] for the "[[CCiCap|next generation of U.S. human spaceflight capabilities]]", in order to re-enable the launch of astronauts from U.S. soil by 2017. Two other companies, Boeing and [[Sierra Nevada Corporation]], received similar development contracts. Advances made by all three companies under Space Act Agreements through NASA's Commercial Crew Integrated Capability ([[CCiCap]]) initiative are intended to ultimately lead to the availability of commercial human spaceflight services for both government and commercial customers. As part of this agreement, SpaceX was awarded a contract worth up to $440 million for contract deliverables between 2012 and May 2014.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Hennigan |first1=W.J. |title=Boeing, SpaceX big winners in NASA competition for new spacecraft |url=http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-nasa-crew-funding-20120802,0,7335499.story | |
In August 2012, SpaceX signed a large development contract with NASA to design and develop a crew-carrying [[space capsule]] for the "[[CCiCap|next generation of U.S. human spaceflight capabilities]]", in order to re-enable the launch of astronauts from U.S. soil by 2017. Two other companies, Boeing and [[Sierra Nevada Corporation]], received similar development contracts. Advances made by all three companies under Space Act Agreements through NASA's Commercial Crew Integrated Capability ([[CCiCap]]) initiative are intended to ultimately lead to the availability of commercial human spaceflight services for both government and commercial customers. As part of this agreement, SpaceX was awarded a contract worth up to $440 million for contract deliverables between 2012 and May 2014.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Hennigan |first1=W. J. |date=3 August 2012 |title=Boeing, SpaceX big winners in NASA competition for new spacecraft |url=http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-nasa-crew-funding-20120802,0,7335499.story |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121102140640/http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-nasa-crew-funding-20120802%2C0%2C7335499.story |archive-date=2 November 2012 |access-date=12 June 2015 |work=Los Angeles Times}}</ref><ref name=nasa20120803>{{cite web |title=NASA Announces Next Steps In Effort To Launch Americans From U.S. Soil |url=http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/aug/HQ_12-263_CCiCAP_Awards.html |work=Press Release |publisher=NASA |date=2012-08-03 |access-date=2012-08-05 |archive-date=2016-03-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305002812/http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/aug/HQ_12-263_CCiCAP_Awards.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> |
||
At the end of 2012 SpaceX had over 40 launches on its manifest, representing about $4 billion in contract revenue. Many of those contracts were already making progress payments to SpaceX, with both commercial and [[Federal government of the United States|government]] (NASA/DOD) customers.<ref name=sx20121231>{{cite web |title=Company overview: Advancing the future |url=http://www.spacex.com/company.php |work=company website |publisher=SpaceX |access-date=2012-12-31 |archive-date=2013-04-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130425020246/http://www.spacex.com/company.php |url-status=dead }}</ref>{{as of|2013|12}}, SpaceX |
At the end of 2012, SpaceX had over 40 launches on its manifest, representing about $4 billion in contract revenue. Many of those contracts were already making progress payments to SpaceX, with both commercial and [[Federal government of the United States|government]] (NASA/DOD) customers.<ref name=sx20121231>{{cite web |title=Company overview: Advancing the future |url=http://www.spacex.com/company.php |work=company website |publisher=SpaceX |access-date=2012-12-31 |archive-date=2013-04-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130425020246/http://www.spacex.com/company.php |url-status=dead }}</ref>{{as of|2013|12}}, SpaceX had a total of 50 future launches under contract, two-thirds of them were for commercial customers.<ref name=usat20131204>{{cite news |last=Dean |first=James |title=SpaceX makes its point with Falcon 9 launch |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2013/12/04/spacex-launch-successful/3866655/ |access-date=2013-12-07 |newspaper=USA Today |date=2013-12-04 |archive-date=2017-07-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170711121951/https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2013/12/04/spacex-launch-successful/3866655/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="sfn-20131203">{{cite news |author=Clark |first=Stephen |date=3 December 2013 |title=Falcon 9 rocket launches first commercial telecom payload |url=http://spaceflightnow.com/falcon9/007/131203launch/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161114201728/http://spaceflightnow.com/falcon9/007/131203launch/ |archive-date=14 November 2016 |access-date=4 December 2013 |publisher=Spaceflight Now}}</ref> In late 2013, space industry media began to comment on the phenomenon that SpaceX [[competition (economics)|prices are undercutting]] the major competitors in the commercial [[commsat]] launch market—the [[Ariane 5]] and [[Proton-M]]<ref name="sfn-20131124">{{cite news |author=Clark |first=Stephen |date=24 November 2013 |title=Sizing up America's place in the global launch industry |url=http://spaceflightnow.com/falcon9/007/131124commercial/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203224447/http://spaceflightnow.com/falcon9/007/131124commercial/ |archive-date=3 December 2013 |access-date=25 November 2013 |publisher=Spaceflight Now}}</ref>—at which time SpaceX had at least 10 further geostationary orbit flights on its books.<ref name=sfn-20131203/> |
||
In January 2015 SpaceX raised $1 billion in funding from [[Google]] and [[Fidelity Investments|Fidelity]], in exchange for 8.333% of the company, establishing the company valuation at approximately $12 billion. Google and Fidelity joined the then current investorship group of Draper Fisher Jurvetson, Founders Fund, Valor Equity Partners and Capricorn.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://newsdaily.com/2015/01/spacex-raises-1-billion-in-funding-from-google-fidelity/ |title=SpaceX raises $1 billion in funding from Google, Fidelity |agency=Reuters |date=20 January 2015 |publisher=NewsDaily |url-status = dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150121094554/http://newsdaily.com/2015/01/spacex-raises-1-billion-in-funding-from-google-fidelity/ |archive-date=21 January 2015 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | |
In January 2015, SpaceX raised $1 billion in funding from [[Google]] and [[Fidelity Investments|Fidelity]] Investments, in exchange for 8.333% of the company, establishing the company valuation at approximately $12 billion. Google and Fidelity joined the then current investorship group of Draper Fisher Jurvetson, Founders Fund, Valor Equity Partners and Capricorn.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://newsdaily.com/2015/01/spacex-raises-1-billion-in-funding-from-google-fidelity/ |title=SpaceX raises $1 billion in funding from Google, Fidelity |agency=Reuters |date=20 January 2015 |publisher=NewsDaily |url-status = dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150121094554/http://newsdaily.com/2015/01/spacex-raises-1-billion-in-funding-from-google-fidelity/ |archive-date=21 January 2015 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |author=Berger |first=Brian |date=20 January 2015 |title=SpaceX Confirms Google Investment |url=http://spacenews.com/spacex-confirms-google-investment/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230220155735/https://spacenews.com/spacex-confirms-google-investment/ |archive-date=20 February 2023 |access-date=2 March 2017 |publisher=SpaceNews.com}}</ref> Although the investment was thought to be related to SpaceX's launch of a [[SpaceX Starlink|Starlink constellation]] effort,<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Google_aboard_as_Musks_SpaceX_gets_1_bn_in_funding_999.html |title= Google aboard as Musk's SpaceX gets $1 bn in funding |author= AFP |publisher= SpaceDaily |date= 20 January 2015 |access-date= 2 March 2017 |archive-date= 21 March 2015 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150321022350/http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Google_aboard_as_Musks_SpaceX_gets_1_bn_in_funding_999.html |url-status= live }}</ref> [[Gwynne Shotwell]] said in March 2015 that the investment was not specifically for the global internet project.<ref name=mb20170317>{{cite news |last1=Koebler |first1=Jason |title=SpaceX: No One Laughs Anymore When We Talk About Colonizing Mars |url=http://motherboard.vice.com/read/spacex-no-one-laughs-anymore-when-we-talk-about-colonizing-mars |access-date=20 March 2015 |work=Motherboard |date=2015-03-17 |archive-date=2015-03-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150320010741/http://motherboard.vice.com/read/spacex-no-one-laughs-anymore-when-we-talk-about-colonizing-mars |url-status=live }}</ref> Google had been searching for a satellite internet partner since the split with [[O3b Networks]] and [[OneWeb]].<ref>{{cite news |author=Geuss |first=Megan |date=19 January 2015 |title=Google might pour money into SpaceX, really wants satellite Internet |url=https://arstechnica.com/business/2015/01/google-might-pour-money-into-spacex-really-wants-satellite-internet/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170630152600/https://arstechnica.com/business/2015/01/google-might-pour-money-into-spacex-really-wants-satellite-internet/ |archive-date=30 June 2017 |access-date=14 June 2017 |publisher=Ars Technica}}</ref> |
||
In 2020, Abu Dhabi-based IHC or International Holding Group bought 94% stakes in a private equity fund namely, Falcon CI IV LP, which had invested in SpaceX. Following the purchase of stakes, SpaceX completed $850 million worth of equity funding round, taking the total value of the company to nearly $74 billion in March 2021.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.arabianbusiness.com/banking-finance/459385-spacex-completes-funding-round-of-850m|title=SpaceX, backed by Abu Dhabi-based IHC, completes funding round of $850m|access-date=2 March 2021|website=Arabian Business|archive-date=24 June 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210624203025/https://www.arabianbusiness.com/banking-finance/459385-spacex-completes-funding-round-of-850m|url-status=live}}</ref> On the other hand, the stock price of IHC also surged |
In 2020, Abu Dhabi-based IHC or International Holding Group bought 94% stakes in a private equity fund namely, Falcon CI IV LP, which had invested in SpaceX. Following the purchase of stakes, SpaceX completed $850 million worth of equity funding round, taking the total value of the company to nearly $74 billion in March 2021.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.arabianbusiness.com/banking-finance/459385-spacex-completes-funding-round-of-850m|title=SpaceX, backed by Abu Dhabi-based IHC, completes funding round of $850m|access-date=2 March 2021|website=Arabian Business|archive-date=24 June 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210624203025/https://www.arabianbusiness.com/banking-finance/459385-spacex-completes-funding-round-of-850m|url-status=live}}</ref> On the other hand, the stock price of IHC also surged 75%, as of April 2021.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/spacex-investor-international-holdings-stock-price-gain-abu-dhabi-2021-4-1030285915|title=A secretive SpaceX investor has scored a 75% stock gain in the past 3 weeks|access-date=8 April 2021|website=Business Insider|archive-date=2023-02-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230205153002/https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/spacex-investor-international-holdings-stock-price-gain-abu-dhabi-2021-4-1030285915|url-status=live}}</ref> IHC is led by [[Tahnoun bin Zayed Al Nahyan (national security advisor)|Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed]] al-Nahyan as the President of the company, who also heads IHC's shareholder, Royal Group. Sheikh Tahnoon, who is the National Security Adviser of UAE also heads several other Abu Dhabi-based ventures including the International Golden Group,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gsn-online.com/article/international-golden-group-scoops-contracts-its-home-market|title=International Golden Group scoops contracts in its home market|access-date=4 March 2021|website=GSN|archive-date=28 June 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210628175951/https://www.gsn-online.com/article/international-golden-group-scoops-contracts-its-home-market|url-status=live}}</ref> which has ties to the Libyan and Yemeni civil war.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://paxforpeace.nl/media/download/pax-report-under-the-radar--arms-trade.pdf|title=Under the radar|access-date=11 September 2017|website=Pax for Peace|archive-date=5 February 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230205153008/https://paxforpeace.nl/media/download/pax-report-under-the-radar--arms-trade.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.intelligenceonline.com/international-dealmaking/2020/10/07/international-golden-group-key-emirati-supporter-of-haftar,109612017-gra|title=International Golden Group key Emirati supporter of Haftar|access-date=7 October 2020|website=Intelligence Online|date=7 October 2020|archive-date=27 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230327225841/https://www.intelligenceonline.com/international-dealmaking/2020/10/07/international-golden-group-key-emirati-supporter-of-haftar,109612017-gra|url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
* [[SpaceX Starship design process]] |
* [[SpaceX Starship design process]] |
Revision as of 00:25, 13 November 2024
This article needs to be updated.(April 2023) |
This is a corporate history of SpaceX, an American aerospace manufacturer and space transport services company founded by Elon Musk.
Musk's personal ventures and founding
After being ousted as the CEO of PayPal in late 2000, Elon Musk started to gain an interest in space exploration ventures. This spark of interest, according to Musk, came when he is being asked by his friend entrepreneur Adeo Ressi about his plan for the future after PayPal. Musk looked up at NASA's website and was surprised that NASA did not have any concrete plan for a human mission to Mars.[1]: 9–10 He then began to attend space conferences and provided funding for private space projects, which include The Planetary Society's solar sail and the Ansari X Prize crewed spaceflight competition.[1]: 10 Musk also pledged US$100,000 to the Mars Society and was invited to be in its board of directors.[2][3] As early as August 2001, in contemporary sources, Musk has publicly expressed his support for making humans an interplanetary species at the Mars Society's annual convention.[4] The same month, Musk resigned from his position at Mars Society.[2]
According to Robert Zubrin, Mars Society's founder, he provided Musk contact to aerospace engineer Jim Cantrell as a technical adviser for the society's Mars Gravity Biosatellite project.[5]: 30–31 From there, Musk, Cantrell, along with a few other engineers worked on Mars Oasis, a project that aimed to grow a plant in Martian soil as a publicity stunt for garnering interest to Mars missions.[2][1]: 10 Mars Oasis project is independent from the Mars Society.[4] Musk and his team travelled twice to Russia, once in October 2001 and another in February 2002 with Michael D. Griffin, to obtain a refurbished intercontinental ballistic missile to launch Mars Oasis. Both attempts failed – the missiles were outrageously priced by the ISC Kosmotras at $8 million per missile when queried,[3] and the team was concerned that the price would go up even higher after the deal had been finalized.[1]: 10 Reportedly, this is because Musk and his team were not regarded highly by the Russians.[3][1]: 10
After the second failed attempt to procure a missile, the Mars Oasis plan was abandoned and Musk pondered the feasibility of building a rocket himself. As he learned more about the United States space industry, in retrospect, Musk realized that the Mars Oasis mission would more likely lead to an unsustainable Mars program, similar to how the Apollo program operated. According to Musk, the crucial component for a sustainable Mars program is a low launch cost.[1]: 11–12
In early 2002, with that realization, Musk met with aerospace engineers at a hotel in Los Angeles International Airport to discuss founding a space launch company, with reportedly some having scoffed at the idea. In April, from that group he invited five that could join the company as early employees: Michael Griffin, Jim Cantrell, John Garvey, Tom Mueller, and Chris Thompson. Griffin, Cantrell and Garvey declined the invitation, while Mueller and Thompson became the company's first and second employee respectively. Musk provided half of his $180 million from PayPal stocks to the newly founded company securing both employees with two-years' worth of salary. The company was named "Space Exploration Technologies Corporation", originally with "S.E.T." as a shortened name, but it was quickly changed to be "SpaceX".[1]: 12–14 According to filings, SpaceX was incorporated on 14 March 2002,[6] but according to various sources SpaceX's de facto founding date might instead be 6 May[1] or around June.[3][7]
Falcon 1
Musk assumed the role of Chief Engineer, after having offered the title to Griffin who did not join SpaceX. Mueller was in charge of developing rocket engines, propellant tanks and plumbing; Thompson was in charge of making the rocket's body and couplings. Hans Koenigsmann, who was recommended by Thompson and had met Musk a few months earlier, joined SpaceX and was in charge of making the rocket's avionics (electronic systems).[1]: 13–15 In August 2002, Gwynne Shotwell was hired as the head of sales for the company.[1]: 16–17
At first, SpaceX's employees would meet at hotels in airports, but later the company headquartered at a building in 1310 East Grand Avenue, El Segundo, California. The building was 3,000 sq ft (280 m2), which at the time housed only a few cubicles and fewer than a dozen employees.[1]: 14–15 The company at the time was under a flat hierarchy, so employees (including Musk) could freely switch roles and do other person's tasks if needed. Musk personally interviewed the first three thousand employees, most were college graduates (because they do not have family attachments), and pushed them to work long hours at their highest effort.[1]: 15, 19–20, 25
SpaceX's first rocket was named Falcon 1 by Musk, taking inspiration from the Millennium Falcon from Star Wars, and also because the rocket would have only one booster engine. Falcon 1 was designed with a core tenet of low launch cost; according to contemporary sources the rocket has an advertised price of $6 million per launch.[8] This is the reason SpaceX implemented tight vertical integration for manufacturing rocket parts.[1]: 13–15 Unlike most aerospace companies at the time, the Falcon 1 was developed in an iterative and incremental process instead of the waterfall process.[1]: 23–25 Musk was being extremely optimistic about the launch schedule; he wanted to launch Falcon 1 by the end of 2003, but late December 2005 would be when the rocket was first ready for flight.[1]: 26 A mockup for the rocket was first officially unveiled to the public and the government at the National Mall, Washington, D.C. on 8 December 2003.[9]
Merlin and Kestrel engine
The Falcon 1's first stage needed a rocket engine that produces about 310,000 N (70,000 lbf) of thrust and used a kerosene–liquid oxygen propellant combination. However, because Mueller had little experience at building a turbopump for the engine, he initially outsourced the turbopump from NASA's Fastrac engine. The one- or two-year long procurement process was too long for SpaceX, so the company contracted the manufacturer directly (named Barber-Nichols) to build Fastrac's turbopump. Later, a Barber-Nichols employee suggested that the engine should be named for a type of falcon bird, because the rocket itself is named 'Falcon 1'. Mueller called the first stage engine "Merlin" after a medium-sized falcon and the second stage engine "Kestrel" after the small falcon.[1]: 37–38
SpaceX also needed a test site for the Merlin and Kestrel engines. In 2002, the company rented a space at the Mojave Air and Space Port to test the turbopumps, but soon SpaceX ran into issues with the testing facility: one time, black sooty clouds from the turbopump enveloped the air traffic control tower. A bigger and more lax testing facility was needed, especially because the Mojave Spaceport only allows testing of engines that have less than one-half the thrust of the Merlin engine. SpaceX finally chose a testing site at McGregor, Texas that was previously owned by the bankrupted Beal Aerospace. To save time, employees from the California headquarters would fly there on Musk's private jet.[1]: 40, 44–46 At 9:50 P.M., 11 March 2003, the Merlin engine completed its first ever full firing with a duration of about half a second,[1]: 27–28 achieving a thrust of 270,000 N (60,000 lbf) and 93% combustion efficiency.[8]
Launch site preparations
Initially, SpaceX planned to launch the Falcon 1 at Vandenberg Air Force Base due to its close proximity to the company's headquarters. The Vandenberg Space Launch Complex 3 was licensed to the company in early 2004, and SpaceX employees began the construction of supporting facilities around the launch complex. By early 2005, the first Falcon 1 arrived to the launch site via a flatbed truck.[1]: 51–53 In the first week of May 2005, SpaceX tried to perform its first static fire attempt, but after many aborts and recycling due to software bugs and bad instruments, its liquid oxygen supply ran out and the test was cancelled for the day. The second static fire attempt a few weeks later, was also cancelled for the same reason, but the third static fire attempt on 27 May was a success.[1]: 58–60
However, since early 2003, when the Malaysian government contacted SpaceX for launching RazakSAT into a near-equatorial orbit, SpaceX knew that Vandenberg was not an ideal launch site. To get to that orbit from California, the rocket needs to go east and into the continental United States, which is not allowed for safety. The then-current version of the Falcon 1 also needed to borrow velocity from the Earth's rotation to launch RazakSAT, meaning that a suitable launch site would be near the equator. So, after the deal was signed for $7 million, SpaceX selected Omelek Island, Kwajalein Atoll as the place for launching the satellite.[1]: 53–55, 58 Plans for launching Falcon 1 at Vandenburg were foiled when the Air Force kept delaying giving clearance for SpaceX's launch, citing the impending Titan IV launch of a reconnaissance satellite. SpaceX had to abandon $7 million worth of equipment at Vandenberg.[1]: 61–62, 66–67
It was reasoned that waiting till the Titan IV launch or suing the Air Force would not be ideal for the company. In retrospect, Musk commented: "Technically, we weren't kicked out of Vandenberg, we were just put on ice. The Air Force never said no, but they never said yes. This went on for six months. The resources were draining out of the company. Effectively, it was just like being starved."[1]: 66
So, in June 2005, construction of the Omelek launch site begin. Aside from a small concrete bunker, everything else was brought in from the mainland or built from scratch: concrete launch pad, rocket hangar, electric generators, communications, etc. By September, most of the launch site was finished and more than 30 t (66,000 lb) of equipment were shipped by sea or air. The first stage of Falcon 1 came in September and the second stage came a month later; they were assembled and carried to the launch site using a wheeled strongback, rolling on top of pieces of plywood. One day before the first attempted Falcon 1 launch, due to frustration and intense pressure, the employees on Omelek went on strike; this was quickly resolved by a supply drop of chicken wings and cigarettes.[1]: 71–77
First, second and third failed launches
Originally, TacSat-1 was going to be the payload for the maiden Falcon 1 launch,[10] but eventually the FalconSAT-2 satellite from the United States Air Force Academy was chosen instead.[11] The static fire test before the launch on 26 November 2005 was postponed due to a helium and oxygen leak by a faulty valve, and the attempted launch on 20 December was also cancelled due to the bad weather. Thompson, who was supervising the launch, found that the Falcon 1 first stage had buckled and was mere seconds away from a violent implosion. This was again caused by a faulty valve that did not open during propellant detanking.[12][1]: 77–79
The following year, a new first stage was shipped to Omelek. After the rocket was assembled, on February 6, the second stage's avionics short circuited and almost lead to the launch's months-long delay, if not for the quickly obtained capacitor from the mainland.[1]: 82–84 The maiden launch of Falcon 1 happened on 24 March 2006 at 22:30 UTC,[13] at which a fire damaged the rocket's pressurization system and cause the Merlin engine to flame off at T+29 seconds.[14] The next morning, SpaceX employees and civilians from the atoll cleaned up the rocket's debris and eventually found FalconSAT-2 lying inside a machine shop.[1]: 89–90
Overview
On August 4, 2008, SpaceX accepted a further $20 million investment from Founders Fund.[15] In early 2012, approximately two-thirds of the company was owned by its founder[16] and his 70 million shares were then estimated to be worth $875 million on private markets,[17] which roughly valued SpaceX at $1.3 billion as of February 2012.[18] After the COTS 2+ flight in May 2012, the company private equity valuation nearly doubled to $2.4 billion.[19][20]
On 16 June 2009, SpaceX announced the opening of its Astronaut Safety and Mission Assurance Department. It hired former NASA astronaut Ken Bowersox to oversee the department as a vice president of the company.[21] However, it has since been reported that the former astronaut subsequently left SpaceX in late 2011. No reason was given and no replacement in that position was announced.[22]
In 2012, SpaceX advertised a launch price of $57 million on Falcon 9, while Arianespace was advertising a launch price of $137 million per launch.[23]
In 2012, an initial public offering (IPO) was perceived as possible by the end of 2013,[24] but then Musk stated in June 2013 that he planned to hold off any potential IPO until after the "Mars Colonial Transporter is flying regularly",[25] and this was reiterated in 2015 indicating that it would be many years before SpaceX would become a publicly traded company,[26][27] where Musk stated that "I just don't want [SpaceX] to be controlled by some private equity firm that would milk it for near-term revenue."[28] The Mars Colonial Transporter project later evolved into the Interplanetary Transport System,[29] then the Big Falcon Rocket,[30] and finally the SpaceX Starship,[31] whose full stack was first tested in 2023.[32][33][34][35]
The company has grown rapidly since it was founded, growing from 160 employees in November 2005 to more than 500 by July 2008, to over 1,100 in 2010,[36][37] 1,800 in early 2012,[38] and 3,000 by early 2013.[39] The company had grown to 3,800 employees and contractors by October 2013,[40] and had "nearly 5,000" in late 2015[41] and February 2016.[42]
After the setback of a launchpad explosion, SpaceX got back to flying on 14 January 2017, with its launch of Iridium satellites.[43] On February 19, 2017, a Falcon 9 carrying CRS-10 conducted the first launch from Kennedy Space Center's Launch Complex 39A.[44] The first stage of the launch was planned for the end of February 2017, was to be the recovered and refurbished one from April 8, 2016.[45][needs update]
On May 23, 2019, SpaceX deployed the first 60 of around 12,000 satellites in its planned Starlink satellite system[46] – which it aimed to use to provide low latency network communications via a large constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO).[47]
On May 30, 2020, SpaceX launched two NASA astronauts (Douglas Hurley and Robert Behnken) into orbit on a Crew Dragon spacecraft during SpaceX Demo-2, making SpaceX the first private company to send astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS) and marking the first crewed launch from American soil in 9 years.[48][49] The mission launched from Launch Complex 39A of the Kennedy Space Center in Florida.[50] SpaceX Demo-2 successfully docked with the ISS on May 31, 2020[51] and returned the astronauts safely on Aug 2, 2020.[52]
Goals
Musk has stated that one of his goals is to improve the cost and reliability of access to space, ultimately by a factor of ten.[53] In 2004, the company plans called for "development of a heavy lift product and even a super-heavy, if there is customer demand", with each size increase resulting in a significant decrease in cost per pound to orbit. Musk said: "I believe $500 per pound ($1,100/kg) or less is very achievable."[54]
A major goal of SpaceX has been to develop a rapidly reusable launch system. As of March 2013[update], including a test program of the low-altitude, low-speed Grasshopper vertical takeoff, vertical landing (VTVL) technology demonstrator rocket,[55][56][57] and a high-altitude, high-speed Falcon 9 post-mission booster return test campaign where—beginning in mid-2013, with the sixth overall flight of Falcon 9—every first stage will be instrumented and equipped as a controlled descent test vehicle to accomplish propulsive-return over-water tests.[58] SpaceX COO Gwynne Shotwell said at the Singapore Satellite Industry Forum in summer 2013 "If we get this [reusable technology] right, and we're trying very hard to get this right, we're looking at launches to be in the US$5 to 7 million range, which would really change things dramatically."[59]
Musk stated in a 2011 interview, that he hopes to send humans to Mars' surface within 10–20 years.[60] In 2010, Musk's calculations convinced him that the colonization of Mars was possible.[61] In June 2013, Musk used the descriptor Mars Colonial Transporter to refer to the privately funded development project to design and build a spaceflight system of rocket engines, launch vehicles and space capsules to transport humans to Mars and return to Earth.[25] In March 2014, COO Gwynne Shotwell said that once the Falcon Heavy and Dragon 2 crew version are flying, the focus for the company engineering team will be on developing the technology to support the transport infrastructure necessary for Mars missions.[62] The project evolved into the Interplanetary Transport System,[29] then the Big Falcon Rocket,[30] and finally the SpaceX Starship.[31]
In August 2020, SpaceX indicated it was looking to build a resort in South Texas with the intent to turn "Boca Chica into a '21st century Spaceport'".[63][64]
Achievements
Major achievements of SpaceX include:[65]
- The first privately funded, liquid-fueled rocket (Falcon 1) to reach orbit (28 September 2008)
- The first privately funded company to successfully launch (by Falcon 9), orbit and recover a spacecraft (Dragon) (9 December 2010)
- The first private company to send a spacecraft (Dragon) to the International Space Station (25 May 2012)
- The first private company to send a satellite into geosynchronous orbit (SES-8, 3 December 2013)
- The first private company to send a probe beyond Earth orbit (Deep Space Climate Observatory, 11 February 2015)
- The first landing of a first stage orbital capable rocket (Falcon 9, Flight 20) (22 December 2015 1:39 UTC)[66]
- The first water landing of a first stage orbital capable rocket (Falcon 9) (8 April 2016 20:53 UTC)
- The development of the most powerful operational rocket as of 2020 (Falcon Heavy, first flight 6 February 2018)
- The first private company to send humans into orbit (Crew Dragon Demo-2, 30 May 2020)[67][68][69][70]
- Most orbital launches of a single rocket model without failure (120 Falcon 9 launches, 21 April 2022)[71]
- The tallest, most powerful rocket to ever launch (Starship first test flight, 20 April 2023)[33][34][35][32]
Setbacks
This section is missing information about lower demand from customers in 2019.(August 2019) |
On March 1, 2013, a Dragon spacecraft in orbit developed problems with its thrusters. Due to blocked fuel valves, the craft was unable to properly control itself. SpaceX engineers were able to remotely clear the blockages. Because of this, it arrived at the International Space Station one day later than expected. Since spacecraft like the Dragon were classified as munitions, and considered weapons under arms regulations until November 2014, SpaceX Mission controllers were unable to release more information to the public.[72]
On June 28, 2015 CRS-7 launched a Falcon 9 carrying an unmanned Dragon capsule intended to take supplies to the International Space Station. 2 minutes and 19 seconds into the flight a cloud of vapor was seen by the tracking camera forming outside the craft. A few seconds afterward there was a loss of pressure in the helium tank, after which they exploded, causing a complete failure of the mission.[73] The software was not programmed to deploy the parachute for the Dragon capsule after a launch mishap, therefore the Dragon broke upon impact.[74] The problem was discovered to be a failed 2 ft (61 cm) steel strut, purchased from a supplier, on a helium pressure vessel, which broke due to the force of acceleration. This caused a breach and allowed helium to escape causing the loss of the spacecraft, which exploded.[75] The software issue was also fixed; in addition, an analysis of the entire program was carried out in order to ensure proper abort mechanisms are in place for future rockets and their payload.[76] SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell stated that in terms of the differences between the six previous successful Falcon 9 Commercial Resupply Launches, "there's nothing that stands out as being different for any particular flight." Though the craft was set to bring a resupply of food and water to the ISS, the crew members had enough supplies to last another 4 months before another resupply, which would end up being the Russian Progress 60P vehicle.[77] Student science experiments, as well as a docking adapter and other miscellaneous cargo, were lost due to the CRS-7 failure as well.[78]
On September 1, 2016, a Falcon 9 Full Thrust launch vehicle exploded during a propellant fill operation for a standard pre-launch static fire test at Cape Canaveral Launch Complex 40.[79][80] There were no reported injuries, as the area was cleared for the test. However the payload, the Spacecom AMOS-6 communications satellite valued at $200 million, was destroyed.[81] Spacecom claims its contract, since the launch failed, allows it to choose to receive $50 million or a future flight at no cost.[82] Musk described the event as the "most difficult and complex failure" in SpaceX's 14-year history; SpaceX reviewed nearly 3,000 channels of telemetry and video data covering a period of 35–55 milliseconds for the postmortem.[83] In late September, SpaceX stated that interim results suggested that a major breach of the cryogenic helium system of the second stage rocket had occurred.[84][85] In November 2016, Musk reported the explosion was caused by the liquid oxygen used as the oxidizer turning so cold that it became a solid, and it may have breached the helium pressure vessels which are immersed in liquid oxygen. The vessels are overwrapped with a carbon composite material. The solid oxygen, under pressure, could have ignited with the carbon material causing the explosion.[86] SpaceX concluded its investigation on 2 January 2017, then restarted its business of launching rockets in January 2017.[43]
On April 20, 2023, the SpaceX Starship orbital test flight ended in failure, and the rocket's flight termination system was activated four minutes into the flight.[35][32]
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Funding
SpaceX is privately funded.[87] SpaceX developed its first launch vehicle—Falcon 1—and three rocket engines—Merlin, Kestrel, and Draco—completely with private capital. SpaceX contracted with the US government for a portion of the development funding for the Falcon 9 launch vehicle, which uses a modified version of the Merlin rocket engine.[87] SpaceX developed the Falcon Heavy launch vehicle,[88] the Raptor methane-fueled rocket engine,[89] and a set of reusable launch vehicle technologies with private capital.[90]
As of May 2012[update], SpaceX had operated on total funding of approximately $1 billion in its first ten years of operation. Of this, private equity provided about $200M, with Musk investing approximately $100M and other investors having put in about $100M (Founders Fund, Draper Fisher Jurvetson, ...).[91] The remainder has come from progress payments on long-term launch contracts and development contracts. As of April 2012[update], NASA had put in about $400–500 million of this amount, with most of that as progress payments on launch contracts.[92] By May 2012, SpaceX had contracts for 40 launch missions, and each of those contracts provide down payments at contract signing, plus many are paying progress payments as launch vehicle components are built in advance of mission launch, driven in part by United States accounting rules for recognizing long-term revenue.[92]
In August 2012, SpaceX signed a large development contract with NASA to design and develop a crew-carrying space capsule for the "next generation of U.S. human spaceflight capabilities", in order to re-enable the launch of astronauts from U.S. soil by 2017. Two other companies, Boeing and Sierra Nevada Corporation, received similar development contracts. Advances made by all three companies under Space Act Agreements through NASA's Commercial Crew Integrated Capability (CCiCap) initiative are intended to ultimately lead to the availability of commercial human spaceflight services for both government and commercial customers. As part of this agreement, SpaceX was awarded a contract worth up to $440 million for contract deliverables between 2012 and May 2014.[93][94]
At the end of 2012, SpaceX had over 40 launches on its manifest, representing about $4 billion in contract revenue. Many of those contracts were already making progress payments to SpaceX, with both commercial and government (NASA/DOD) customers.[95]As of December 2013[update], SpaceX had a total of 50 future launches under contract, two-thirds of them were for commercial customers.[96][97] In late 2013, space industry media began to comment on the phenomenon that SpaceX prices are undercutting the major competitors in the commercial commsat launch market—the Ariane 5 and Proton-M[98]—at which time SpaceX had at least 10 further geostationary orbit flights on its books.[97]
In January 2015, SpaceX raised $1 billion in funding from Google and Fidelity Investments, in exchange for 8.333% of the company, establishing the company valuation at approximately $12 billion. Google and Fidelity joined the then current investorship group of Draper Fisher Jurvetson, Founders Fund, Valor Equity Partners and Capricorn.[99][100] Although the investment was thought to be related to SpaceX's launch of a Starlink constellation effort,[101] Gwynne Shotwell said in March 2015 that the investment was not specifically for the global internet project.[102] Google had been searching for a satellite internet partner since the split with O3b Networks and OneWeb.[103]
In 2020, Abu Dhabi-based IHC or International Holding Group bought 94% stakes in a private equity fund namely, Falcon CI IV LP, which had invested in SpaceX. Following the purchase of stakes, SpaceX completed $850 million worth of equity funding round, taking the total value of the company to nearly $74 billion in March 2021.[104] On the other hand, the stock price of IHC also surged 75%, as of April 2021.[105] IHC is led by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed al-Nahyan as the President of the company, who also heads IHC's shareholder, Royal Group. Sheikh Tahnoon, who is the National Security Adviser of UAE also heads several other Abu Dhabi-based ventures including the International Golden Group,[106] which has ties to the Libyan and Yemeni civil war.[107][108]
See also
References
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa Berger, Eric (March 2, 2021). Liftoff: Elon Musk and the Desperate Early Days That Launched SpaceX. New York, NY: HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-297997-1.
- ^ a b c "MarsNow 1.9 Profile: Elon Musk, Life to Mars Foundation". SpaceRef. 2001-09-25. Retrieved 2023-05-18.
- ^ a b c d Vance, Ashlee (May 14, 2015). "Elon Musk's Space Dream Almost Killed Tesla". Bloomberg.com. Archived from the original on 2015-05-16. Retrieved 2023-05-18.
- ^ a b Cowing, Keith (2001-08-30). "Millionaires and billionaires: the secret to sending humans to Mars?". SpaceRef. Retrieved 2023-05-18.
- ^ Zubrin, Robert (14 May 2019). The Case for Space: How the Revolution in Spaceflight Opens Up a Future of Limitless Possibility. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-63388-534-9. OCLC 1053572666.
- ^ "Delaware Business Search (File # 3500808 – Space Exploration Technologies Corp)". Delaware Department of State: Division of Corporations. Archived from the original on 20 September 2016. Retrieved 1 February 2022.
- ^ Friedman, Josh (2003-04-22). "Entrepreneur Tries His Midas Touch in Space". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2022-10-29. Retrieved 2023-05-18.
- ^ a b "SpaceX Performs First Rocket Engine Firing". SpaceRef. 2003-03-19. Retrieved 2023-05-21.
- ^ Foust, Jeff (December 8, 2003). "The Space Review: The Falcon and the showman (page 1)". The Space Review. Archived from the original on 2023-05-21. Retrieved 2023-05-21.
- ^ "Falcon rocket rides slow road toward flight". NBC News. 2004-08-16. Archived from the original on 2023-05-21. Retrieved 2023-05-21.
- ^ "SpaceX rocket lost; was fuel leak to blame?". NBC News. 2006-03-24. Archived from the original on 2023-05-21. Retrieved 2023-05-21.
- ^ "Falcon 1 maiden flight delayed again". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 2023-05-21. Retrieved 2023-05-21.
- ^ "SpaceX rocket fails first flight". BBC News. 2006-03-24. Archived from the original on 2015-01-14. Retrieved 2023-05-21.
- ^ Malik, Tariq (2006-03-26). "Fuel Leak and Fire Led to Falcon 1 Rocket Failure, SpaceX Says". Space.com. Archived from the original on 2023-05-21. Retrieved 2023-05-21.
- ^ Shanklin, Emily (2008-08-04). "SpaceX receives $20 million investment from Founder's Fund" (Press release). SpaceX. Archived from the original on 2011-11-04. Retrieved 2008-08-10.
- ^ Melby, Caleb (12 March 2012). "How Elon Musk Became A Billionaire Twice Over". forbes.com. Archived from the original on March 13, 2012.
- ^ "Elon Musk Anticipates Third IPO in Three Years With SpaceX". businessweek.com. 2012-02-10. Archived from the original on February 13, 2012.
- ^ "Elon Musk on Why SpaceX Has the Right Stuff to Win the Space Race". CNBC. 27 Apr 2012. Archived from the original on 16 December 2016. Retrieved 9 September 2017.
- ^ "Privately-held SpaceX Worth Nearly $2.4 Billion or $20/Share, Double Its Pre-Mission Secondary Market Value Following Historic Success at the International Space Station". Privco. June 7, 2012. Archived from the original on August 6, 2017. Retrieved March 2, 2017.
- ^ "SpaceX's worth skyrockets to $4.8B after successful mission". VentureBeat. 2012-06-10. Archived from the original on 2016-03-06. Retrieved 2017-08-31.
- ^ "Former astronaut Bowersox joins SpaceX as Vice President of Astronaut Safety and Mission Assurance" (Press release). SpaceX. 2009-06-16. Archived from the original on 2012-01-18. Retrieved 2009-07-27.
- ^ Leone, Dan (2012-01-18). "SpaceX Safety VP Quit Late Last Year". Archived from the original on February 2, 2013. Retrieved 2012-10-24.
- ^ Sharma, Rakesh (February 26, 2017). "How SpaceX Reinvented the Rocket Launch Industry". Archived from the original on March 28, 2023. Retrieved March 2, 2017.
- ^ "Elon Musk Anticipates Third IPO in Three Years With SpaceX". Bloomberg. 2012-02-11. Retrieved 2017-03-07.
- ^ a b Schaefer, Steve (2013-06-06). "SpaceX IPO Cleared For Launch? Elon Musk Says Hold Your Horses". Forbes. Archived from the original on 2023-11-28. Retrieved 2013-06-10.
- ^ de Selding, Peter B. (19 January 2015). "SpaceX To Build 4,000 Broadband Satellites in Seattle". SpaceNews.com. Archived from the original on 19 January 2015. Retrieved 2 March 2017.
- ^ Woodyard, Chris (9 June 2015). "Elon Musk: SpaceX goes public when Mars flights begin". USA TODAY. Archived from the original on 23 February 2017. Retrieved 29 August 2017.
- ^ Andersen, Ross (September 30, 2014). "Elon Musk puts his case for a multi-planet civilisat..." Aeon. Archived from the original on June 12, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2017.
- ^ a b Berger, Eric (September 18, 2016). "Elon Musk scales up his ambitions, considering going "well beyond" Mars". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on September 20, 2016. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
- ^ a b "Making Life Multiplanetary". YouTube. Archived from the original on August 19, 2021. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
- ^ a b Boyle, Alan (November 20, 2018). "Goodbye, BFR … hello, Starship: Elon Musk gives a classic name to his Mars spaceship". GeekWire. Archived from the original on November 22, 2018. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
- ^ a b c Davenport, Christian (April 20, 2023). "Unmanned Starship explodes over gulf after liftoff". Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
- ^ a b Amos, Jonathan (April 20, 2023). "SpaceX Starship: Elon Musk promises second launch within months". BBC News. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
- ^ a b Amos, Jonathan (August 6, 2021). "Biggest ever rocket is assembled briefly in Texas". BBC News. Archived from the original on August 11, 2021. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
- ^ a b c "SpaceX Starship first test flight official site". SpaceX. April 22, 2023. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
- ^ Foust, Jeff (2005-11-14). "Big plans for SpaceX". The Space Review. Archived from the original on 2005-11-24. Retrieved 2017-03-02.
- ^ "Diane Murphy joins SpaceX as Vice President of Marketing and Communications" (Press release). SpaceX. 2008-07-10. Archived from the original on 2010-07-13.
- ^ Hennigan, W. (2012-05-21). "SpaceX Again Ready to Blast off After Last-second Launch Abort". MSNBC. Archived from the original on 2013-04-25. Retrieved 2012-05-22.
- ^ "CRS-2 Press Kit" (PDF). NASA. 25 February 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2013. Retrieved 25 February 2013.
- ^ Messier, Doug (16 October 2013). "ISPCS Morning Session: Gwynne Shotwell of SpaceX". Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 7 December 2013.
Gwynne Shotwell says that SpaceX is now up to about 3,800 employees, counting contractors working for the company. ... 600 more people to hire in next couple months. Finding good software people the hardest skills to fill.
- ^ SpaceX's Redmond effort ‘very speculative’ Archived 2017-02-16 at the Wayback Machine November 7, 2015, accessed 2016-02-04
- ^ Shotwell, Gwynne (3 February 2016). Gwynne Shotwell comments at Commercial Space Transportation Conference. Commercial Spaceflight. Event occurs at 2:43:15–3:10:05. Archived from the original on 30 May 2020. Retrieved 4 February 2016.
- ^ a b Larson, P. (September 1, 2016). "Anomaly Updates". Archived from the original on February 16, 2017. Retrieved March 2, 2017.
- ^ "SpaceX launches Falcon 9 from historic NASA pad". Archived from the original on 2023-02-05. Retrieved 2017-02-21.
- ^ "Tesla Time News 20". Now You Know. 2017-01-24. Archived from the original on 2023-02-05. Retrieved 2017-03-02.
- ^ Roulette, Joey (23 May 2019), "First satellites for Musk's Starlink internet venture launched into orbit", Reuters, archived from the original on 17 November 2020, retrieved 24 May 2019
- ^ Grush, Loren (15 February 2018). "SpaceX is about to launch two of its space Internet satellites — the first of nearly 12,000". The Verge. Archived from the original on 16 June 2019. Retrieved 16 February 2018.
- ^ Chang, Kenneth (May 30, 2020). "SpaceX Lifts NASA Astronauts to Orbit, Launching New Era of Spaceflight - The trip to the space station was the first from American soil since 2011 when the space shuttles were retired". the New York Times. Archived from the original on August 10, 2020. Retrieved May 31, 2020.
- ^ Wattles, Jackie (May 30, 2020). "SpaceX Falcon 9 launches two NASA astronauts into the space CNN news". CNN News. Archived from the original on May 31, 2020. Retrieved May 31, 2020.
- ^ "SpaceX-NASA Dragon Demo-2 launch: All your questions answered". indianexpress.com. 2 June 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-06-03. Retrieved 2020-06-02.
- ^ "Crew Dragon docks with ISS". spacenews.com. 31 May 2020. Retrieved 2020-06-02.
- ^ "SpaceX splashdown smoothly delivers NASA astronauts back to Earth". cnet.com. Retrieved 2020-06-02.
- ^ "Space Exploration Technologies Corporation – press". spacex.com. SpaceX. Archived from the original on 23 June 2013. Retrieved 15 Dec 2012.
- ^ "Elon Musk — Senate Testimony, 5 May 2004". SpaceX. 2004-05-04. Archived from the original on 30 August 2008. Retrieved 2008-08-10.
- ^ Mohney, Doug (2011-09-26). "SpaceX Plans to Test Reusable Suborbital VTVL Rocket in Texas". Satellite Spotlight. Archived from the original on 2016-08-04. Retrieved 2011-11-23.
- ^ "Reusable rocket prototype almost ready for first liftoff". Spaceflight Now. 2012-07-09. Archived from the original on 2013-05-21. Retrieved 2012-07-13.
SpaceX has constructed a half-acre concrete launch facility in McGregor, and the Grasshopper rocket is already standing on the pad, outfitted with four insect-like silver landing legs.
- ^ Klotz, Irene (2011-09-27). "A rocket that lifts off — and lands — on launch pad". MSNBC. Archived from the original on 2016-08-04. Retrieved 2011-11-23.
- ^ Lindsey, Clark (2013-03-28). "SpaceX moving quickly towards fly-back first stage". NewSpace Watch. Archived from the original on 2013-04-16. Retrieved 2013-03-29.
- ^ Messier, Doug (2014-01-14). "Shotwell: Reusable Falcon 9 Would Cost $5 to $7 Million Per Launch". Parabolic Arc. Archived from the original on 2017-02-16. Retrieved 2014-01-15.
- ^ "Elon Musk: I'll Put a Man on Mars in 10 Years". Market Watch. New York: The Wall Street Journal. 2011-04-22. Archived from the original on 2011-09-02. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- ^ "Elon Musk on Mars: "It's a fixer-upper of a planet"". CBS News. September 21, 2012. Archived from the original on February 18, 2017. Retrieved March 2, 2017.
- ^ Gwynne Shotwell (2014-03-21). Broadcast 2212: Special Edition, interview with Gwynne Shotwell (audio file). The Space Show. Event occurs at 41:20–42. 2212. Archived from the original (mp3) on 2014-03-22. Retrieved 2014-03-22.
- ^ "SpaceX reveals plans for a Texas spaceport resort in new job ad". TechCrunch. 10 August 2020. Archived from the original on 11 August 2020. Retrieved 11 August 2020.
- ^ SpaceX is hiring a Spaceport resort developer for its Texas rocket factory Archived 2023-05-09 at the Wayback Machine, Teslarati, 11 August 2020.
- ^ Hussain, Mir Juned (12 November 2014). "The Rise and Rise of SpaceX". Yaabot. Archived from the original on 30 January 2017. Retrieved 2 March 2017.
- ^ "Twitter: SpaceX successfully deployed 11 satellites into Low Earth orbit and landed back on ground for the first time in history". 22 December 2015. Archived from the original on 20 September 2020. Retrieved 22 December 2015.
- ^ "Crew Dragon SpX-DM2". Spacefacts. Archived from the original on 3 July 2020. Retrieved 22 April 2023.
- ^ Wattles, Jackie (27 May 2020). "Next attempt: Saturday at 3:22 pm EDT". CNN. Archived from the original on 27 May 2020. Retrieved 22 April 2023.
- ^ "Upcoming Missions". SpaceX Now. Archived from the original on 26 April 2020. Retrieved 22 April 2023.
- ^ "SpaceX Launches". The New York Times. 30 May 2020. Archived from the original on 30 May 2020. Retrieved 30 May 2020.
- ^ "Most consecutive successful orbital launches by a rocket model". Guinness World Records. 21 April 2022. Archived from the original on 22 April 2022. Retrieved 22 April 2022.
- ^ "Spacex Gagged By Arms Rule." New Scientist 217.2907 (2013): 4–5. Academic Search Complete. Web. 4 Nov. 2015.
- ^ "CRS-7 Investigation Update". SpaceX. 20 July 2015. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
- ^ Clark, Stephen (July 20, 2015). "Support strut probable cause of Falcon 9 failure". spaceflightnow.com. Archived from the original on February 17, 2017. Retrieved April 14, 2016.
- ^ Masunaga, Samantha; Petersen, Melody (September 2, 2016). "SpaceX rocket exploded. Establishing the cause involved analyzing a large amount of data". LA Times. Archived from the original on 19 February 2017. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
- ^ Nasr, Reem. "Musk: This Is What Caused the SpaceX Launch Failure." CNBC. Consumer News and Business Channel, 20 July 2015. Web. Retrieved 4 November 2015.
- ^ Calandrelli, Emily. "Understanding The Aftermath Of SpaceX's Failed Falcon Launch." TechCrunch. 29 June 2015. Web. 4 Nov. 2015.
- ^ SpaceX CRS-7. Orlando: NASA, June 2015. PDF.
- ^ "SpaceX on Twitter: Update on this morning's anomaly". twitter.com. Archived from the original on 2017-01-31. Retrieved 2016-09-01.
- ^ Calandrelli E, Escher A (16 December 2016). "The top 15 events that happened in space in 2016". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2016-12-20. Retrieved 2016-12-16.
- ^ Marco Santana (September 6, 2016). "SpaceX customer vows to rebuild satellite in explosion aftermath". Orlando Sentinel. Archived from the original on 16 February 2017. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
- ^ Cohen, Nitzan (September 4, 2016). "Spacecom to claim AMOS 6 compensation from IAI". Globes. Archived from the original on September 5, 2016. Retrieved March 2, 2017.
- ^ Masunaga, Samantha (September 9, 2016). "Elon Musk: Launch pad explosion is 'most difficult and complex' failure in SpaceX's 14 years". LA Times. Archived from the original on 16 February 2017. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
- ^ Etherington, Darrell (23 September 2016). "SpaceX investigation suggests helium breach caused its Falcon 9 explosion". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2016-09-26. Retrieved 2016-09-26.
- ^ Hull, Dana (2016-09-23). "SpaceX Sees Clue to Rocket Blast in Super-Chilled Helium Breach". Bloomberg.com. Archived from the original on 2016-09-26. Retrieved 2016-09-26.
- ^ Elon Musk says SpaceX finally knows what caused the latest rocket failure Archived 2017-02-19 at the Wayback Machine The Verge, November 7, 2016
- ^ a b Engel, Max (2013-03-01). "Launch Market on Cusp of Change". Satellite Today. Archived from the original on 2013-02-18. Retrieved 2013-02-15.
SpaceX is not the first private company to try to break through the commercial space launch market. The company, however, appears to be the real thing. Privately funded, it had a vehicle before it got money from NASA, and while NASA's space station resupply funds are a tremendous boost, SpaceX would have existed without it.
- ^ Boozer, R. D. (2014-03-10). "Rocket reusability: a driver of economic growth". The Space Review. 2014. Archived from the original on 2015-04-06. Retrieved 2014-03-25.
- ^ "SpaceX Prepared Testimony by Jeffrey Thornburg". spaceref.com. 26 June 2015. Archived from the original on 19 March 2023. Retrieved 2 March 2017.
- ^ Shotwell, Gwynne (June 4, 2014). Discussion with Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO, SpaceX. Atlantic Council. Event occurs at 22:35–26:20. Archived from the original on January 25, 2017. Retrieved June 9, 2014.
This technology element [reusable launch vehicle technology] all this innovation is being done by SpaceX alone, no one is paying us to do it. The government is very interested in the data we are collecting on this test series. ... This is the kind of thing that entrepreneurial investment and new entrants/innovators can do for an industry: fund their own improvements, both in the quality of their programs and the quality of their hardware, and the speed and cadence of their operations.
- ^ "SpaceX overview on secondmarket". SecondMarket. Archived from the original on 2012-12-17.
- ^ a b Watts, Jane (2012-04-27). "Elon Musk on Why SpaceX Has the Right Stuff to Win the Space Race". CNBC. Archived from the original on 2016-12-16. Retrieved 2012-05-03.
- ^ Hennigan, W. J. (3 August 2012). "Boeing, SpaceX big winners in NASA competition for new spacecraft". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2 November 2012. Retrieved 12 June 2015.
- ^ "NASA Announces Next Steps In Effort To Launch Americans From U.S. Soil". Press Release. NASA. 2012-08-03. Archived from the original on 2016-03-05. Retrieved 2012-08-05.
- ^ "Company overview: Advancing the future". company website. SpaceX. Archived from the original on 2013-04-25. Retrieved 2012-12-31.
- ^ Dean, James (2013-12-04). "SpaceX makes its point with Falcon 9 launch". USA Today. Archived from the original on 2017-07-11. Retrieved 2013-12-07.
- ^ a b Clark, Stephen (3 December 2013). "Falcon 9 rocket launches first commercial telecom payload". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on 14 November 2016. Retrieved 4 December 2013.
- ^ Clark, Stephen (24 November 2013). "Sizing up America's place in the global launch industry". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 25 November 2013.
- ^ "SpaceX raises $1 billion in funding from Google, Fidelity". NewsDaily. Reuters. 20 January 2015. Archived from the original on 21 January 2015.
- ^ Berger, Brian (20 January 2015). "SpaceX Confirms Google Investment". SpaceNews.com. Archived from the original on 20 February 2023. Retrieved 2 March 2017.
- ^ AFP (20 January 2015). "Google aboard as Musk's SpaceX gets $1 bn in funding". SpaceDaily. Archived from the original on 21 March 2015. Retrieved 2 March 2017.
- ^ Koebler, Jason (2015-03-17). "SpaceX: No One Laughs Anymore When We Talk About Colonizing Mars". Motherboard. Archived from the original on 2015-03-20. Retrieved 20 March 2015.
- ^ Geuss, Megan (19 January 2015). "Google might pour money into SpaceX, really wants satellite Internet". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 30 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- ^ "SpaceX, backed by Abu Dhabi-based IHC, completes funding round of $850m". Arabian Business. Archived from the original on 24 June 2021. Retrieved 2 March 2021.
- ^ "A secretive SpaceX investor has scored a 75% stock gain in the past 3 weeks". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 2023-02-05. Retrieved 8 April 2021.
- ^ "International Golden Group scoops contracts in its home market". GSN. Archived from the original on 28 June 2021. Retrieved 4 March 2021.
- ^ "Under the radar" (PDF). Pax for Peace. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 February 2023. Retrieved 11 September 2017.
- ^ "International Golden Group key Emirati supporter of Haftar". Intelligence Online. 7 October 2020. Archived from the original on 27 March 2023. Retrieved 7 October 2020.