Talk:Gesias Cavalcante

Untitled

The articles of Gesias Calvancante and Shinya Aoki are disgustingly biased in favour of Aoki. These POV articles need to be fixed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.188.60 (talk) 09:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Go ahead and fix them then. --David from Downunder (talk) 19:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Who are you kidding? A friend of mine already tried fixing them and I saw what you did. You misinterpreted everything he wrote or just plain put words in his mouth, then you ran around gathering info from random (unreliable) sources to support any claim but his and now the article is full of lies and complete nonsense, all the while you claim it is all perfect due to following wikipedia policies. Then I guess wikipedia policies allows lies then. No one has time to fix any article with people like you around who are willing to spend hours looking up any shady sources just to support your point of view. Thanks to guys like you, wikipedia can never be a reliable source for information. 99.237.188.60 (talk) 05:03, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

What exactly do you think is wrong in this article? From what i gather everything is correct and non-biased: the referee stopped the fight because he though something illegal was done, the doctor announced Aoki was unable to continue and it was ruled a NC... How is that nothing but unbiased facts? Even if the elbows didn't hit Aokis neck, the fight was stopped because the referee THOUGH it did, so that's what is written in the article. I don't think you can write anything else without it being speculation..aktsu (talk) 05:24, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

See it for yourself and you tell me what's wrong. 99.237.188.60 (talk) 05:30, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

I've watched the replay many times and from what I saw can't say the elbows CLEARLY didn't hit Aoki's neck as many of them were sliding up after first hitting his shoulder, and at least the last elbow looked to me like it hit the back of the neck as Aoki was going down... Anyway, as you wrote (in the edit that was reverted) there were alot of discussion back and forth and the decision for a NC was indeed controversial and I think that should be mentioned.. aktsu (talk) 05:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Isn't the name of the article wrong? Is it Calvancante or Cavalcante? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.109.43.195 (talk) 17:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gesias Cavalcante. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090114034641/http://www.mmaweekly.com:80/absolutenm/templates/dailynews.asp?articleid=5901 to http://www.mmaweekly.com/absolutenm/templates/dailynews.asp?articleid=5901

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:42, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gesias Cavalcante. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711044903/http://mmajunkie.com:80/news/24296/gesias-cavalcante-vs-lyle-beerbohm-slated-for-strikeforce-fedor-vs-henderson.mma to http://mmajunkie.com/news/24296/gesias-cavalcante-vs-lyle-beerbohm-slated-for-strikeforce-fedor-vs-henderson.mma
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130826115245/http://www.muaythaiauthority.com:80/2013/08/glory-signs-hesdy-gerges-ben-edwards.html to http://www.muaythaiauthority.com/2013/08/glory-signs-hesdy-gerges-ben-edwards.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 11 January 2017 (UTC)