User talk:70.177.90.39: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:31, 30 May 2005

Hello, I'm [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]]. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]]. Thanks!

Flatulence

Unless you've got a good source, I'm inclined to dismiss your suggestion about using superglue in flatulence as trolling. Similar experiments have led to serious injury. JFW | T@lk 14:15, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions do display a certain obsession with the anatomy and physiology of the pelvic floor.

I'm starting to doubt your sanity. You must have understood by now that nobody is appreciating your edits. If you insist on citing "medical views" in the flatulence article, will you please back this up? JFW | T@lk 02:31, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Unless you've got a good source, I'm inclined to dismiss your suggestion about using [[superglue]] in [[flatulence]] as trolling. Similar experiments have led to serious injury. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 14:15, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
+:[[Special:Contributions/70.177.90.39|Your contributions]] do display a certain obsession with the anatomy and physiology of the pelvic floor.
+:I'm starting to doubt your sanity. You must have understood by now that nobody is appreciating your edits. If you insist on citing "medical views" in the [[flatulence]] article, will you please back this up? [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 02:31, 30 May 2005 (UTC)