User talk:Edward321

Hello Edward321! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Ageo020 03:31, 4 September 2006 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Pirtek

Why did you remove the info i put on the Chris Alajajian page, I placed all is race resualts from 2006, and 2007 and you deleted them, Why? I put it back to the way it was. But why did you do it

Revert of catchphrase information by loplop100

Why are you removing all of my additions? What have you got about against catchphrases? For most of these people, catchphases are pretty much all they're known for.

Kaito-Kid

hummmm...maybe you are right about Kira's background stuff...but the Allegiance, Rank/Position and Family informations ware all official. Kaito-kid 00:11, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Kaito-Kid

way did you Revert my last edits In the Kira Yamato,Athrun Zala, Lacus Clyne and Cagalli Yula Athha pages pages? Those were confirmed informations. Kaito-kid 23:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

My response

The reason why I changed that back is because the Ethnic origin is not for which government they were born into but rather their cultural background of which country they are based off of. Besides if you take a look at Kiras page you can see his background as Japanese. Anyway after looking at your message I can suggest if you want to talk about it with other users and see if it is reliable iformation then I would suggest looking into the talk page at WikiProject Mobile Operation System and posting a message. -Adv193 04:09, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

24.118.153.134

Okay, good to know. You should probably collect some examples (with diffs) so you'll have evidence to show admins who get involved. The edits are subtle and it's hard for an outsider to determine who is right. Let me know if you have any questions. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

There you go. You should probably make a user space page with all that (like User:Edward321/Evidence) so you can refer to it - and update it - whenever you need to. —Wknight94 (talk) 12:13, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Hm, someone else is having trouble with this guy? Do you think we can finally get him banned? I've seen warnings galore on his talk page, but no action taken. Zaku^Talk 22:32, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Still, reverting so much is getting really tedious... he's very persistent. I tried reporting him two days ago... seems no action was taken. Zaku^Talk 22:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Rejoice, justice have finally prevail when the troll got his hands on a few dozens of real life page that got easier to read references and got himself a band of 7 days. MythSearcher^talk 13:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunoichi

Why did you feel the need to delete several of my comments there? --UsaSatsui 18:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

• No worries. Mistakes happen. Thanks for clearing it up.  :) --UsaSatsui 03:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Afd Accident

No worries man. I've seen weirder things happen to me when working in the edit window. No need for my warning if it was an accident and changes have been reverted. Don't forget to add back in your vote, if you didn't already. No need to stay away over an innocent mistake.  ;-) /Blaxthos 03:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Gundam Seed Infoboxes

Did you notice recently that Gundam Seed Character Infoboxes have been modified and that it will no longer display the love interests which I can understand if someone were to take them off. But anyway think it is time to remove them from the character pages since they no longer have any use. -Adv193 03:02, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi there, wanted to thank you for reverting my user page for me after the vandalism. I appreciated it. :) ~ (The Rebel At) ~ 22:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism?

How is adding more information vandalism?--Tempest115 02:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Apology accepted. I do see your point about the criticism being unsourced though I thought I removed that part. I also must agree with you about the abundant use of stock footage. It got annoying after a few episodes.--Tempest115 00:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

RE: NoobJ

Sorry I haven't written back sooner ([1]) - I am not currently active at Wikipedia. However, it's good to know there are people keeping an eye on it in my absence! Keep up the good work. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 14:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Matthew Joseph Harrington

Thanks for the note. As you say, not worth doing anything; it's well on the road to deletion (unless everyone in the AFD is a closet Mason). Tearlach 10:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Jew Crew

Actually, I was just as within my rights to remove the hangon tag. There is no way in hell that article will be kept, and so I removed hangon under Wikipedia:Ignore all rules policy. All the hangon tag is doing is delaying the inevitable and wasting an admins time by making them to have wait to and check back to see if a valid reason for inclusion is provided. DarkSaber2k 14:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: List of Gundam Seed characters

No problem. The article cleanup took me a lot longer to complete than I thought it would. And thanks for expressing your support for the cleanup. --Silver Edge 18:43, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Saving Private Ryan

You recently reverted one of my edits, claiming I deleted information rathr then moving it (Saving Private Ryan). Please re read my summary as well as the edit history. The information in question was moved to and incorporated into the Historical Background section over a series of 3 edits. I'm putting it back that way - if you've a problem with the changed let's discuss it on the article's talk page.--Lepeu1999 11:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Ah! I see, cut-and-paste error on my part, thank you. Next time possibly more info in the edit summary or a note on the discussion page might be a better solution then a whole-scale revision.--Lepeu1999 13:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Drip

hi, please see WP:MOSDAB - no piping in disambig pages, no external links in disambig pages, one bluelink per line - also remember to use edit summaries when reverting. 82.3.64.139 13:31, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Siobhan Bennett

Hi. Unfortunately, I don't think Siobhan Bennett meets speedy criteia, as notability is asserted. Thus, I think it has to go to AfD. William Pietri 05:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Nevermind! Problem solved. Thanks for being bold. William Pietri 05:38, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Hamilton Central School

Hi, it is not permitted to revert a removed Prod. If concerned then take the article to WP:AFD. TerriersFan 23:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

The Jewish Encyclopedia etc.

The copyright on The Jewish Encyclopedia expired long ago, and WP:STALK is forbidden by policy. Jayjg ^(talk) 05:25, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

According to the website, the encyclopedia is in the public domain. If it was published in the US before 1923, it becomes public domain; this was last published in 1906. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 06:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Please review John Henry Browne article and remove speedy deletion tag

You recently added a speedy deletion tag to John Henry Browne. I'm sure it did not meet the speedy deletion criteria to begin with, and after some minor edits on my part it certainly does not now -- more than that, it's completely appropriate and notable. I explain my rational in depth on the talk page. If you disagree, would you please change the speedy deletion to a request for consensus or some other appropriate method under Wikipedia guidelines and policy? Thanks. Wikidemo 04:21, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Image

Why did you remove that image? Is it a copyvio? I am not a denier, but a Revisionist. jdm/^talk/_contribs 03:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Not to be rude, but I don't understand. It depicts what revisionism is. jdm/^talk/_contribs 03:57, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

I am also not here to edit war. I just didn't understand why an image that has to do with the article would be offensive. This place isn't WP:CENSORED! anyway, hope you like it here. jdm/^talk/_contribs 04:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Article

Please don't change until the person who I am working on this with can review notes. I left "History of Sicily" unchanged, but changed this one, so we can compare notes. I am sorry if I offended you, I truly am, but that was in the past and I apologize. But this means alot to me and when it is done, it will be done right, please give me a chance to work on this before you delete it, I am trying really hard, and I do apologize again, thank you(Scipio3000 00:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC))

As noted here, I have asked several times who this person is, so I could maybe have a chat with him or her... Regretfully, no answer so far. El_C 00:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Robert E. Murray and Disambiguation

Why did you remove the link I added on the Robert Murray disambiguation page (to American mine owner Robert E. Murray)? You indicated it was a redlink, but I finished the article this morning. An oversight, perhaps? Scartol 21:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

No worries. I figured it was an oversight. Thanks for your response tho!

Scipio3000

As you know, this user is finding it difficult to deal with people. I am working with him in an effort to help him improve. I have warned him about deleting material from the discussion pages of the articles on which he works, however, when it comes to his discussion page he can delete from it according to our guidelines (see here section 4.1. Of course it is generally best not to and one should archive. I have no idea why he posted on the archive of a user page but he was warned.

I will encourage him to be more civil. Please make every effort to avoid issues with him as it is unproductive and wastes your time when I'm sure you have editing you want to do. Thanks! --JodyB _{yak, yak, yak} 10:11, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

You might like to know that Scipio3000 has just reported you on an archive of WP:AN/I, I'm not quite sure why. He presumably should have warned you beforehand. He has also been blanking sections on another user's talk pages. --Mathsci 00:34, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

He has been warned in very stern language again. There was no substance to the report so I wouldn't worry about it. --JodyB _{yak, yak, yak} 01:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Why

Why are you so against me? Every time I do something, you either undo it, revise it or tell on me. I am tired of your vendetta against me...Is it ever going to end? Can we not settle this like men? I apologized to you, which takes a real man to do...so why do you continue to want to tell on me? We are not in preschool, I hope we can resolve are differences. BTW you accuse me of alot, but I was going to totally restructure that whole page, no one gave me a chance it was WIP, and then I have been blocked 75% of the time. The context that was in is incorrect. It belonged in an earlier period which in my opinion needed a complete overhaul. Please let me know if you are willing to discuss this further with me and solve this matter as men and not as children. Thank you(Scipio3000 16:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC))

PLEASE STOP!!!!

What is your problem??? Me, thescilianist and the sicilianmandolin all dedided on these changes who are you to change this...WHAT ISS YOUR PROBLEM??? I AM TIRED OF YOU and yopur tamperingof my work...It took me along time to do this. I am contacting the Italian defamation league...Who are you to tamper with =what 3 Sicilian ancestors decided on?? I am tired of your double standards btw...Yeah thats righht I am. Because that flag with Lincoln on the confederate flag is offensive!!! Now don't make any changes until you contact me!!!!(Scipio3000 14:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC))